Tag Archives: ZDNet.com

We’ve Been Hacked

Not scared of losing your data to a corporate thief? You should be Bob McNeal sits down in a cubicle in his Alexandria, Va., office with his morning coffee. He turns on his computer and flips open his notebook to check out the specifics of today’s assignment. He clicks a couple of buttons on the screen and runs his usual scripted program, entering in a few numbers from those that are scribbled in his notebook. He types in some commands, following routine instructions from his database of tools. Then he patiently waits for the computer to process his programs and answer his questions — questions that could be worth thousands of dollars to his client. Two hours later, McNeal has completed his assignment. He has broken into the computer network of MBA Management Inc., located some 20 miles away in Fairfax, and verified that he can access every computer and every database in the company. And, McNeal tells his boss, he can read the user ID and password of every single employee. Is that enough, he asks, or should he continue? That’s hacking. Sorry to make it seem so banal. But it doesn’t take some wild-eyed rocket scientist with a supercomputer and nothing better to do but type ingenious code into the wee hours of the morning to perform it. Most of what hackers do is disarmingly simple. Often they use readily available vulnerability-seeking software programs, which some experts call “point, click, and attack tools.” And most of the time hackers are pretty successful — especially when they target small companies, which typically don’t spend either the time or the resources they need to protect themselves. The simplest tricks can do tremendous damage. (Witness the “I Love You” bug that was sent earlier this year in an E-mail attachment.) Most small companies that are hooked up to the Internet do what James Mugnolo, president of MBA Management, did: assume that their Internet service provider will furnish a secure connection. It took McNeal just one morning to reveal how faulty an assumption that was. Fortunately for MBA Management, a $5-million executive-search business, Bob McNeal works for the good guys: Para-Protect Services Inc., an E-commerce and network-security company. Mugnolo, who recently moved his company to Chantilly, Va., hired Para-Protect in October 1998 to find the holes in his company’s network and recommend ways to stitch them up. McNeal stopped his penetration test into the MBA Management network after those first two hours. Normally, such a job can take two days. “We stopped when we found we could get into everything,” says Chuck Downs, Para-Protect’s vice-president and director of operations. “There was no sense in beating that horse to death.” Close call: James Mugnolo’s company received a nasty virus that read, “Enclosed is my résumé.” Mugnolo had decided to test his company’s security and to spend some money upgrading it after a former employee was suspected of stealing customer data. Like most employers who have such suspicions, Mugnolo doesn’t like to discuss the details. Still, he clearly felt betrayed, and worse, the incident scared him. In its database the company keeps information on more than 50,000 workers throughout North America, as well as on an equal number of companies that are looking for employees. “Their whole business is that database,” says Downs. Though Mugnolo didn’t hire “white hat” hackers until the company had lost data, other small-business owners are rushing to secure their networks before disaster strikes. In some cases the critical or private nature of the company’s data pushes them to it; in other cases companies see security as a differentiator for their product or service. But many have just plain seen the writing on the wall — or more precisely, in the newspaper headlines, which have blared a stream of reports on security breaches. Though well-publicized stories about computer viruses have lately brought security into the public consciousness, it’s often other threats that are more dangerous to a company’s profits and reputation. Those can include attacks that shut down Web servers, for instance, or that replace Web sites with obscene or insulting graphics. Hackers can also get in and rummage through a company’s files. Sometimes data just disappear — consider the case earlier this year at the U.S. State Department, where Madeleine Albright ordered a crackdown after a classified laptop vanished, and at Los Alamos National Laboratory, where two hard drives containing classified nuclear-weapons data were missing for more than a month. Those sorts of events — from the annoying to the frightening — are often what it takes to make an entrepreneur recognize the need for computer security, says Terry Gudaitis of information-protection consultant Global Integrity Corp., based in Reston, Va. After all, you don’t want your company to be the next one in the headlines. Certainly, Mugnolo doesn’t. And he has thus far been successful. In March, Para -Protect Services ran an unscheduled penetration test of MBA Management’s systems, and this time the company passed with flying colors. Since it adopted its new security measures, “we haven’t had a single instance of systems penetration,” says David Denne, MBA Management’s vice-president of marketing. That has left the company free to concentrate on growth: this year’s second quarter was its best ever, and the business grew from 35 employees to almost 60 in the first six months of the year. In perhaps its closest call, the company escaped damage from a virus that was seemingly designed for a headhunting company: code disguised as a E-mail attachment on a résumé. That message, signed “Janet Simons,” read: “Attached is my résumé with a list of references contained within. Please feel free to call or E-mail me if you have any further questions regarding my experience. I am looking forward to hearing from you.” The attachment, however, carried a virus that could have methodically erased every single drive on MBA Management’s network. Needless to say, that particular virus could have been disastrous for the company, where résumés flow in regularly through the E-mail system. “It probably shut down several of our competitors,” says Denne. “Our system immediately scrubbed anything that came in through the firewall, flagged it, and kept it on a server outside the firewall.” Like Mugnolo, Denne believes that MBA Management has gained a competitive edge through its stepped-up security. “I find it comforting, and therefore I think my clients find it comforting,” Denne says. Hire a Hacker At Para-Protect Services, Chuck Downs was surprised but not shocked that McNeal was able to break into MBA Management’s systems in just two hours. Doing what Mugnolo did — relying on his ISP to configure his connection to the Net — meant by definition that it was an open connection, Downs says. But if Downs wasn’t appalled, Mugnolo certainly was. His business’s competitive edge — the reason companies go to him rather than to other headhunters — is his deep compilation of information on thousands of potential employees. Included in that data is sensitive information on job openings, including postings that haven’t been made public — perhaps because an employee doesn’t yet know that he or she is on the way out. Companies can unwittingly reveal a lot about their strategic plans, for example, by listing the specific skills required for various jobs. “The last thing in the world the client wants is for that information to get back to his staff or to a competitor,” says Denne. In particular, a company that’s developing a new product doesn’t want anyone to know the nature of its work. “A breach in a program could spell the end of the whole market for their idea,” Denne adds. Still, it’s not surprising that few people spend a lot of time worrying about Internet security. As the user looks out onto the superhighway of the Web, it’s easy to see it as a one-way street. But in fact, when you open a Web page or do virtually anything on the Internet, you send a request to the faraway computer on which that Web page is stored, and that computer sends you back information, which is opened by your browser or other software. That means your computer — and, in a company setting, the server — must be constantly open and able to receive data feeds from the outside. That openness is exactly where vulnerability lies. For a fee of about $10,000, Para-Protect restricted the openness of MBA Management’s systems in two ways. First, the company installed a simple firewall from Prism Servers Inc., in Allison Park, Pa., at a cost of less than $3,000. The firewall was configured according to a simple rule, Downs says: “Anything coming from the Internet that is not requested from the inside is denied.” It does that by using a Unix filter to distinguish between information — like a Web page — that is coming in at a user’s request and any unknown traffic that arrives unbidden. When someone inside the network requests something from outside the firewall, the firewall issues a tag number with the request. If incoming data packets don’t contain a matching tag, the firewall won’t let them in. There are two big exceptions. One is E-mail, which arrives unrequested. Downs put MBA Management’s E-mail system onto a separate server, which redirects incoming mail and scans it for viruses before users can access it. The other exception is the company’s own Web site, which anyone from the outside should be able to access. MBA Management disconnected the site from its corporate network and arranged to have it hosted off-site. Second, Downs made sure that each computer went on the internal network, which is invisible to outsiders. In a normal office network with Internet access, each workstation has a unique Internet Protocol (IP) address. It was those addresses that McNeal was able to identify and attack in the penetration test. Downs changed each workstation’s IP address to a nonroutable address — meaning that outsiders can only see the address of the firewall. The result: nobody from outside can discover the IP address of an internal computer and use it as a port into the network — a common hacking procedure. Downs says that the firewall’s logs reveal that hackers have frequently scanned MBA Management’s system looking for ports since Downs put the firewall in place. Although $3,000 is low-end for a commercial firewall, Downs says, it’s all that a small company needs. “The only thing you limit is the number of people you can service,” he says, since the small firewall has limited bandwidth capacity. The Prism product, he says, can easily handle 200 users. That should cover the short-term needs of MBA Management, which plans to double its number of networked users within a year. As the company has grown, it has periodically added servers behind the main firewall and is now running six of them. Now that Downs feels the company is secure from outside intruders, the next move is to provide greater internal security for the databases. Currently, MBA Management uses a proprietary database running on NT servers. It is about to split the database into several parts using software called Adapt, which will allow the company to use the operating system’s security-administration features to carefully control who can have access to different levels of data. Since installing the firewall, Para-Protect has conducted monthly tests as part of a routine security checkup. That is not to say that MBA Management’s security is 100% foolproof. But the company has put a pretty solid defense in place — solid enough to send hackers on to easier targets. And that’s a big part of what Internet security is about: making sure yours is not the easiest lock to pick. Virtual Privacy You could say that a kindergarten play cost entrepreneur Dana Dodds $120,000 a year, and you wouldn’t be that far off. One afternoon in 1996, Dodds, CEO of San Diego auto insurer Reliant General Insurance Services Inc., left work to watch his daughter perform in a school play. He was immediately struck by guilt. “I had a customer-service rep whose daughter was in that class, too, but she couldn’t be there, and it bugged me,” Dodds says. A virtual private network lets Dana Dodds’s employees work from home without sacrificing security. Soon, about 15 of Reliant General’s employees were working from home, with no time clock — just quotas for the number of applications they processed and standards for the quality of the work they did. Back then, the workers connected to the corporate network directly through a dial-in 800 number. The phone bills for those lines ran about $120,000 a year. Reliant General is a fast-growth company — it’s made the Inc. 500 twice, as #341 in 1998 and #417 in 1999. And Dodds is all for using the newest technology to keep his company growing at a rapid pace. So in 1997 he hired information-services director Cary White to help him do just that. When White, 32, joined the company, he took one look at the exorbitant phone bill and told Dodds that the company could eliminate most of it by letting the telecommuters connect over the Internet. Dodds liked the idea but knew there had to be a catch. “He’s a very sharp guy when it comes to technology,” White says with a laugh. “Almost too smart for his own good.” The catch, White responded, lay in the open nature of the Internet. Essentially, the Internet is a very large collection of routers that are wired to one another. When you send a packet of data into cyberspace, it wanders, asking at each router, “Have you seen this IP address?” If the answer is no, the packet moves on to the next router. However, nobody should trust that every router on the Internet will simply shoo data packets along. Hackers can put tools, called “sniffers,” on those routers and use them to peek inside every packet of data that comes along. If a packet’s contents or destination seems juicy enough, the sniffers can read everything inside. An extra layer of worry exists for Dodds and his colleagues working in California’s auto industry: 11 years ago actress Rebecca Schaeffer was murdered by a stalker who obtained her address from the state Department of Motor Vehicles. (Since then, California has tightened its DMV privacy laws.) Not surprisingly, Dodds is passionate about the need to protect his customers. “Information for us is a trust, and we can’t give it away, and we can’t let anybody get it,” he says. “We’re talking about where they live, what cars they drive, where they work, the children that drive in the household, their driving records, their claims history — it’s very similar to credit information. It’s very private.” For White, simply using the wide-open Internet was out. So he called in a local consultant, Paradise Technology, which built a virtual private network. At the time, VPNs were a fresh concept, and few companies of any size had tried them out. The VPN creates a tunnel of sorts between the Reliant General network and telecommuters’ computers, shielding its content from the view of the myriad routers along the way. Axent Technologies’ PowerVPN was one of the first of its kind on the market, so Paradise chose it for Reliant General. In addition, Reliant General purchased Axent’s Defender product to authenticate users on its dial-up lines. The system works this way: Telecommuters like Reliant policy underwriter Mike Lemieux connect to the Internet through a cable modem or a dial-up ISP. Lemieux, who works full-time from his home in El Cajon, Calif., clicks on an icon to start his session with Reliant General. Lemieux’s request then passes through several stages. First, the firewall lets it through only if it is a request for a VPN session on the Axent machine. Anyone — even an authorized user like Lemieux — who tries to bypass that machine and connect directly to the corporate server will be blocked by the firewall. Approved requests for VPN sessions make it to the next stage: authentication by the Defender hardware. Lemieux enters his user ID and, just as he would at an ATM machine, types in a personal identification number. But in addition, using that PIN and secret data stored on Lemieux’s hard drive, the system creates a onetime password that allows him to access it. This two-level authentication means that someone would have to know Lemieux’s password and use his computer in order to impersonate him and gain access to the corporate server. When Defender gives the go-ahead to Lemieux’s session, the PowerVPN establishes a secure tunnel that keeps all transmissions out of harm’s way. In addition, it encrypts the contents. Once the secure connection is established, Lemieux logs in to the corporate server — using yet another password — and begins working on applications just as if he were on the network in the office. So far the system has worked so well that Reliant General uses the VPN not just for its own telecommuters but also for approved outsiders, like insurance-claims reps. Installing the system for about 25 telecommuters cost Reliant General about $20,000. Given a yearly savings of $100,000 on the phone bill, “it was pretty clear-cut, pretty much a slam-dunk decision,” says chief financial officer Greg Goodrich. Instant reassurance: Joseph Rosmann guarantees that the children’s records are shielded from harm. According to Dodds, the phone-bill savings haven’t been the only gain. He says telecommuters’ productivity has increased sharply — a phenomenon supported by a new poll conducted by the International Telework Association & Council, which found that nearly half of the telecommuters surveyed felt they were more productive working at home, while less than 10% thought they were less productive. According to Dodds, underwriters who used to process about 70 applications a day in the office are now doing at least 100 a day working at home. And giving a staffer time off to attend a school play no longer costs the company a small fortune. Bedside Manner If you think that storing kids’ immunization records doesn’t sound like a business bonanza, then you haven’t been talking with Joseph Rosmann. Rosmann’s soft-spoken manner belies his passion about his Internet start-up, HealthRadius. The company — Rosmann’s obsession since he launched it in 1996 — will soon make many millions of dollars from its Web-based repository of children’s vaccination records, he explains in measured tones. Doctors, he says, have free access to the records. Public-health agencies pay a fee to access the records of children in their area. Health plans pay $1 a child for basic data and as much as $4 a child for more complete records. Individuals, through their employers or insurers, can access their own children’s records for a family subscription fee of $15 a year. Eventually, every time a doctor’s office wants to check on a new patient’s history or a parent wants to sign up a kid for summer camp, money will flow into HealthRadius. What companies like Healtheon/WebMD Corp. have become for the Web-based administrative side of health care, Rosmann’s company will be for the patient-records side of it, he says. Rosmann, 56, who formerly worked as a health-care consultant, has had to make his pitch many, many times, to venture capitalists, state health officials, doctors, and health-care administrators. Though they may expect the caricature of an Internet-start-up entrepreneur with plans as big as the sky — a young, brash, fast-talking braggadocio — what they get instead is the calm assurance of Joe Rosmann, with his mellifluous voice that never rises or rushes. Like a family doctor explaining your test results, he provides instant reassurance with his smile and bearing. Reassurance is an important element of Rosmann’s plan. To make it work, he must collect and distribute the type of information that everyone agrees should be held in utmost privacy: medical records. Without strict assurance of the data’s security, Rosmann says, his company could never meet the requirements of health-care privacy laws — newly tightened in the wake of consumer outrage over privacy violations. And just as important, without that security, Rosmann could never sell anyone on the idea. And these days it’s a Herculean task to ensure that Web-based transactions are private and secure. Still, for cost, speed, and simplicity, Rosmann wants to do it all — including data collection and access — over the Web. His approach seems to be working. HealthRadius, based in Bellevue, Wash., will expand its immunization-records service to four new states this fall and expects to have more than half a million physicians involved within two years. Although the company took in just $100,000 in revenues last year, venture capitalists value the company at about $20 million. Rosmann expects revenues of close to $5 million this year. Four years ago, when Rosmann launched HealthRadius, doctors and health-care administrators were just beginning to eye the potential of the Internet. Washington state health officials brought Rosmann in to study how to salvage a failed medical-records-exchange initiative, the Community Health Information Network. Their request, he says, was straightforward: “Get something simple started to prove that you can safely exchange medical-health records and automate the transactions between doctors, health plans, and hospitals.” Out of that effort came two companies: Rosmann’s and a payment-exchange provider called Pointshare. Rosmann’s response to the state’s request was to break into the potentially enormous health-care-records field through the single entry point of children’s immunization data. That category is a good testing ground for the broader health-records field, he believes. For one thing, parents must frequently provide immunization records to new schools, new summer camps, and new doctors. A child typically has seen three doctors and had 23 immunizations by age six, according to HealthRadius’s research. Who wouldn’t want to make managing and exchanging all that data easier? Rosmann believed it was a market waiting to be served. One of Rosmann’s key early contacts was information-law specialist John R. Christiansen of the Seattle office of law firm Stoel Rives LLP. Christiansen began consulting for HealthRadius in the fall of 1996. “There is no standard-setting organization out there” for electronic medical records, Christiansen says. “You can’t just go out there and say, ‘What are the steps I need to take?” He advised Rosmann to draft his contracts with clients in a way that holds HealthRadius to an unusually high level of liability for the privacy and security of the data it collects. Only by doing so could Rosmann hope to reassure the doctors, health insurers, and parents who were HealthRadius’s targeted customers. If you’re going to put your business on the line like that, you’d better make sure you can live up to your promises. So the first person Rosmann brought on board was not a health-care adviser, but information-security veteran Gene Shook, now vice-president of the company’s operations and development. Rosmann and Shook, working together in their quiet offices on the outskirts of Seattle, laid out a long list of steps they would take to keep medical data both secure and private. First, they needed to be able to verify the identity of any client trying to access their records over the Web. Then they had to encrypt the data sent to and from HealthRadius servers so that only people holding the keys to unscramble it could read it. In addition, since participating doctors’ offices would submit information directly to the HealthRadius database when they performed immunizations, the company had to guarantee an even greater level of security for those transactions. Different employees at doctors’ offices — even those using the same computer — would need to have varying levels of access; for instance, some workers would be able to read but not edit patient records. The first employee Rosmann brought on board was Gene Shook, who took charge of security. Shook will soon install a VPN, which will offer a high degree of security. In the meantime, he turned to the encryption built into standard versions of Netscape Navigator and Microsoft Internet Explorer (called Secure Socket Layer encryption) and other Microsoft tools. For authentication, Shook currently uses the access-control system built into the Microsoft Windows NT operating system as well as the company’s own custom-developed access-control system. To ensure that changes that are made to HealthRadius’s database are verifiable and legally valid, Shook decided to use a method that should soon become more widespread: digital signatures that use public key interchange (PKI). Those digital signatures, provided through an authorized third party, verify two parties to each another, like a secret handshake. Washington state has recently authorized a Utah company called Digital Signature Trust to act as the licensed certificate authority for supplying digital PKI signatures. Anyone in the state can sign up with Digital Signature Trust and receive the hardware or software to generate digital IDs. Two parties that are both using those digital IDs — for instance, HealthRadius and a physician’s office — can be certain that the information that was sent exactly matches what the other party receives. In Washington, such electronic documents can now legally take the place of paper. Shook is hoping that other states adopt compatible systems; if they don’t, HealthRadius may have to install a vast and confusing array of different digital-signature systems. (Without a common standard, Shook fears that HealthRadius may have to establish its own PKI service for its customers. That not only would be more costly and difficult — HealthRadius would have to license and distribute software to everyone who is authorized to access its data over the Web — but also would open HealthRadius up to liability for its digital-signature system.) So far HealthRadius has spent about $1 million on technology, including security. By the time it rolls out nationally during the next year or two, Rosmann expects he will have spent $2 million to $3 million on technology. But perhaps most important, the company has already subjected itself to an intensive security audit (in the spring of 1998) and will undergo another one early next year. It also requires periodic audits of the 50 clinics and hospitals that supply it with medical-records data, and a randomly selected 5% of clients’ sites will be audited each year. In such a review, an independent outside party rigorously examines the procedures and technology that a company is using to handle its data. In HealthRadius’s case, the auditors were interested in seeing whether the company could live up to the security standards of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. That legislation established ground rules for medical-records privacy — always a delicate subject and one made even more so in the Internet age. (DrKoop.com got into hot water recently when its advertising partner, DoubleClick, sold lists that included members’ health information. HealthRadius’s contract with its clients bars it from selling its information.) The audit, which takes about three weeks to complete, includes interviews and a systematic review of the technology itself. That may seem like a lot of effort to secure something as relatively uncontroversial as immunization records. But a market test in 1998 confirmed that the HealthRadius service had no chance of acceptance if people felt even a slight concern that someone could access its demographic information on the more than 2 million people in its system. “We needed to act as a bank — you have direct access and no one else has access,” says Shook. In addition, managing immunization records is just HealthRadius’s initial foray into the arena of electronic-medical-records exchange. In the not too distant future, Rosmann plans to start databases that will contain patients’ disease histories and other medical matters. At that point, he wants an unblemished security track record. The company’s biggest vote of confidence so far has come in black and white: a letter from the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), an independent nonprofit organization that evaluates the quality of managed-care organizations. The letter, dated January 1999, stated that NCQA considered HealthRadius’s registry of immunization records an allowable source of data for its own system, which is used almost universally by health plans. “NCQA gave its blessing because we had provided the privacy,” says Rosmann. “As soon as that letter was issued, about every health plan became a customer.” That’s not to say Rosmann is satisfied. “We still have a little sensitivity around the subject of security,” he says, still in that calm, careful voice. In fact, he has Shook shopping for three more security items. One, HackerShield from BindView Development, scans for known intrusion methods, similar to the way antivirus software checks for familiar computer viruses. A second, IPsec, is a computer-security standard that keeps unwanted data traffic from bothering a company’s servers. One benefit of that would be protection against denial-of-service attacks that can overload and disable a server. (Remember that disastrous day for Amazon.com and eBay last February?) The third product Rosmann and Shook want, WebTrends, monitors and analyzes firewall logs for unusual activity. That will help Shook manage the company’s defenses more actively and will also help the company prosecute any hackers who try to break in. Because catching a hacker would make the kind of headlines that Rosmann would like to be in. David S. Bernstein is a freelance writer in Watertown, Mass. What Are You Afraid Of? So what’s the worst that can happen? There are several types of hacker attacks, all of which have occurred in recent months. Denial of service. Much like protesters’ barring the entrance to a physical store, hackers can shut down your E-business by making sure no customers can get through to your site. Typically, they bombard the site with data traffic, rendering the Web server useless. That is the type of attack that brought down ZDNet, E*Trade, CNN.com, eBay, Buy.com, Amazon.com, and Yahoo, each for about three to five hours, all during a period of several days in February. Electronic theft. This scenario is just like a physical robbery: the hacker breaks into your system, finds something he wants, and downloads it to his own computer. In most cases you may retain your copy of the data, but now someone else has it as well. Is that so bad? Ask the folks at CD Universe, an Internet music retailer based in Wallingford, Conn. Last December someone describing himself as a 19-ye

Prepare Your Site for Going Global

For many companies, localization is an afterthought. Whenever I inquire of people in the information technology and/or e-commerce industries whether they are planning to localize their Web sites, I am told, “We are concentrating on the English version first.” This kind of thinking often turns out to be costly for future expansion into international markets, because the initial design of the back end and front end of your Web site will determine future localization costs. If you don’t do some planning before you build your Web site, reengineering it later to accommodate localization needs will be needlessly expensive. Whether you plan an international Web site outright or just “concentrate on the English version first,” your base Web site most likely is going to be the foundation for all future language versions. Below are three pointers for planning your Web site. They will save you money when the time comes to localize your site. Up-Front Market ResearchDefine the issues and develop the strategies necessary to meet your business objectives and match your vision. Up-front market research will lower the cost of localization by identifying issues that will affect marketing across the globe. Pay particular attention to Web site features that customers in your target market(s) will directly interact with, such as page layout, graphics, site navigation, etc. One useful approach to attaining market insight is to review your competitors’ sites. Once you know how far they have progressed beyond “English only,” move on to reviewing some of the major multilingual Web sites (those of Microsoft, MSNBC, CNET, ZDNet, and Symantec). Note if and how their page layouts and graphics differ from one language site to another. See how they bring each language site version in line with the base site. Finally, decide where in the localization spectrum you want your Web site to be. (Will you localize your shopping cart only or translate every page of your site?) Keep this in mind when designing your Web site. Site DesignNow that you have an idea as to what you would or would not want a localized version of your Web site to include, you need to keep in mind that your site’s design has to accommodate the need for both universality and cultural specificity. Most companies’ localized Web sites link off a main home page and have a design and layout that complement the base site. Companies do this because they want their localized sites to have an integrated look and feel, rather than appearing to be disconnected Web sites lumped together at one address. Consequently, attaining a balance between universality and cultural specificity while maintaining the crucial elements needed for company branding should be one of the overall goals when designing your Web site. Remember: Think long term rather than short term. Thinking in terms of “English only” ? or, for that matter, French or Arabic only ? prevents you from seeing the larger picture. My advice is to begin by developing a simple design without cultural details specific to any target country. Then let it be the foundation for your other localized sites. Here are some points to keep in mind when thinking of a design for your base Web site: Keep the layout simple and avoid cultural icons such as an American flag or a Russian sickle. Try to avoid adding elements that would give the site the “flavor” of the target country. Keep the page layouts and color choices similar throughout all the pages of your base site. This way, you can use your base site as a template for your localized versions, thus saving money. Keep in mind that if you can review color and graphic issues before you build your site, you will reduce costs considerably when you localize. Choose visual elements that can work across cultures. Once you localize, these elements can help further integrate all your foreign-language sites together. So it’s important that they remain consistent across all your sites and that you make your initial choices carefully. If you need to choose different images or formats for localized versions, they should still be representative of your base site. Do not lose sight of the purpose of your Web site. It should serve as a tool that communicates the benefits of your products or services to a customer, with the goal of provoking an action, such as a purchase. Site TestingThoroughly test your site to make sure that it can handle different character sets, localization of scripts, etc. This will ensure that your internationalization efforts were successful, and that your Web site can handle localization when your business is ready to go global. With the growing number of non-English-speaking users logging on to the Internet, more and more companies are focusing on internationalizing their Web sites to reduce the amount of time and effort it takes to expand into foreign markets ? and so should you. Copyright © 1995-2000 Pinnacle WebWorkz Inc. All rights reserved. Do notduplicate or redistribute in any form.

Nailing It

They needed it overnight. They wanted the best. In the race to build the first online hardware store, Peter Hunt and Rich Takata put their company in the hands of outright strangers The Company Name: CornerHardware.com Inc. Founded: Incorporated May 1999; Web site launched early 2000 Location: San Francisco Cofounders: Chairman and CEO Richard Takata; president and chief operating officer Peter A. Hunt Employees: 35 full-timers Mission: Creating an online home-improvement store, magazine, and community for do-it-yourselfers URL: www.cornerhardware.com The Developer Name: Xuma Founded: 1998 Location: San Francisco; with offices in New York, Los Angeles, and Las Vegas Cofounders: CEO Joe Cha; chief technology officer Jamie Lerner Employees: 250 Mission: Producing built-to-order Web sites for E-businesses URL: www.xuma.com In December 1998, Peter Hunt set out to tackle what should have been a simple, joyous task: building a tree house for his four-year-old son for Christmas. Hunt couldn’t wait to start the project. It wasn’t just that he welcomed the diversion from his high-powered job as an investment banker. It was more that, ever since he’d been a kid, Hunt had loved working with his hands: making model trains and airplanes, building furniture, fixing things around the house. As an adult he’d dreamed of buying a corner hardware store in some rural New England town, the kind of place with a bell over the door and shelves lined with hinges and screws and doorknobs, where he’d spend his days happily helping customers pick out the right paintbrush or handsaw. But with two kids and a top job at Montgomery Securities in San Francisco, the lanky, thoughtful Hunt didn’t even have time to stop into a local hardware shop, let alone wander through a giant home-improvement warehouse. He assumed he’d save time by buying everything he needed for the tree house — instructions, lumber, materials, and tools — online. So he went to the Web and looked for hardware sites. And looked. And looked. He found nothing except a loose network of like-minded tree-house enthusiasts, many similarly frustrated by their own fruitless online searches for supplies and information. From that experience, Peter Hunt, banker, suddenly figured out how to finally become Peter Hunt, hardware guy. Hunt’s thinking went like this: What if there were lots of little communities out there — tree-house builders and woodworkers and plumbers and fixer-uppers and even contractors — all hungry for online hardware and home-improvement advice? And what if somebody could provide it for them in one friendly, convenient location, sort of a virtual corner hardware store? In early 1999, Hunt, then 35, took a week off to write a business plan for just such a company. But he knew something was missing. He needed a business partner — a veteran hardware retailer, a real insider. When he asked around, he kept hearing the same name: Rich Takata. Richard T. Takata, then of Seattle, had been in the hardware business for 24 years. Takata, who’d most recently been president and CEO of Eagle Hardware & Garden Inc., had remained with the 41-store chain after North Carolina­based Lowe’s Cos. had bought it for $1.4 billion. (In fact, Hunt’s firm had handled the sale.) Although reserved and soft-spoken, Takata, then 49, was hardly averse to risk; in his spare time he occasionally drove race cars. A lifelong do-it-yourselfer, Takata also knew his industry and its customers. Over the years he’d waited on thousands of people, even during store visits when he was the company’s CEO. And like Hunt, whose own company had been acquired by North Carolina­based NationsBank, Takata was ready for a change. Xuma’s founders named their Web-development company after an ancient Chinese battle cry. In April 1999, at the urging of a mutual friend, Hunt and Takata met for dinner to talk about launching a big home-improvement E-commerce site. They discovered they had much in common. Both were quietly intense, articulate, committed. Both were customer-service evangelists, true believers in keeping promises and building long, loyal relationships. Both believed passionately in the Internet’s potential for business. And both had high — some might say almost impossible — standards for themselves, their companies, and those who worked for or with them. Of the two, Takata was more tactical and analytical, a manager with a keen recall of industry statistics and an almost instinctive understanding of business trends. Hunt, very much the money guy and deal maker, was also more sentimental. (He documents CornerHardware.com’s growth in a scrapbook filled with mementos like copies of the company’s incorporation papers and of its early bank deposits, and Polaroid photos of each newly hired employee.) From the start, the two men agreed they wanted to do more than lead the Web in sales of drill bits and deck stain. They wanted to re-create the old-fashioned corner hardware store of Hunt’s dreams and Takata’s experience: a place with well-stocked shelves, knowledgeable clerks, lots of how-to information, and most of all, a friendly, collegial, yes-you-can-do-it-yourself atmosphere. It would, of course, be called CornerHardware.com. They knew it was a big idea with hefty potential; pulling in even a small fraction of the $400-billion-a-year home-improvement business would yield a fortune. They were amazed that nobody had launched the kind of venture they envisioned, and they knew that before long somebody else certainly would. What they wanted to do — build a full-service online hardware store and community — would cost at least $2.5 million. Takata and Hunt knew they needed to move fast — and they did. Within three weeks of their first meeting, both men had quit their jobs; put up $250,000 each of their own money; raised about $500,000 more from angel investors, family, friends, and colleagues; and incorporated their business. But for all the partners knew they needed to do, there was still plenty they needed to learn. Chief among the lessons: just how tough it would be to build a big Web business in a matter of months — and how much tougher it would get when circumstances forced them to launch the site weeks earlier than planned. They didn’t know for sure whether a no-name newcomer like CornerHardware.com could compete with new and upcoming E-commerce arms from brick-and-mortar brands like Sears (which was already selling parts, tools, and appliances online), Home Depot (which plans to launch a full E-commerce site this summer), and Ace Hardware (which would begin selling merchandise online at OurHouse.com late in 1999). In addition, dot-com start-ups were also racing to market. Major projects included HomeWarehouse.com, then under development in nearby San Mateo, Calif., and Amazon.com‘s new tools and hardware store, which would also launch by year’s end. And it was entirely likely that some of those in the race would end up as roadkill. When it came to CornerHardware.com’s technology, Hunt and Takata knew they weren’t looking just for a speedy job. Sure, there was no time to waste — they wanted a beta site before year’s end, a quiet launch by March 2000, and a public launch shortly after that. But building their Web site would also be a big, complex, cutting-edge project. They needed transaction processing capability and complete descriptions and images of some 37,000 products, everything from penny nails to power saws to Phillips-head screwdrivers. They would shoot to double their inventory, which is distributed from a warehouse in Kansas, within their first six months online. True to their customer-service mission, Hunt and Takata also wanted, from day one, to offer how-to articles, visitor message boards, animated step-by-step project instructions, a massive glossary of hardware terms, a superb search engine, and live customer service, online and in real time. That last capability would become, in fact, the real cornerstone, so to speak, of CornerHardware.com. Using interactive windows, customers would be able to chat with service reps in real time — asking questions about products or about a bill, for instance. That kind of service, which the company would contract out to dedicated staffers at Boston-based eSupportNow, would be what Hunt and Takata believed would ultimately distinguish their company not just from other online hardware stores but from their brick-and-mortar brethren as well. As Takata pointed out later, there weren’t many home-improvement stores that were open 24 hours a day. Although Hunt and Takata knew what they wanted their site to do, they didn’t know much about the nuts and bolts required to make it happen. They needed professional help. And they needed it fast. The high-speed, high-stakes scenario isn’t unique to CornerHardware.com — or even to the online home-improvement industry. Today almost any new business-to-consumer Internet company must fight for a foothold in an already crowded market. (Witness the proliferation of online pet stores, drugstores, vitamin stores, and toy stores.) Being first online remains a competitive advantage. But there’s no point in being first without doing it well. As consumers on the Internet grow more sophisticated they’re less willing to tolerate sites that are slow, unreliable, boring, or tough to navigate. And they absolutely won’t return to sites that haven’t provided stellar customer service. E-commerce sites have grown increasingly complex in reaction to the industry’s ever higher standards and well-publicized successes and failures. In many cases, like CornerHardware.com’s, a business simply can’t hire its own team to build a site — even if it could find the right people, it probably couldn’t afford to pay them or retain them. So, like CornerHardware.com, the company opts to stake the future of its business on outside developers — people the company doesn’t know, people who must translate the entrepreneur’s dreams and plans into equipment and software and code. Xuma’s approach bridges the gap between standard and optional E-commerce components. As Takata and Hunt were setting up shop in rented space in San Francisco’s financial district, Joe Cha was building his own business just a few blocks away. About a year earlier Cha had been working at his third consulting job. A friend reintroduced him to Jamie Lerner, a consultant Cha had known slightly when both had worked at Andersen Consulting several years earlier. Like Hunt and Takata, Cha and Lerner found themselves thinking along the same lines. They wanted to try something new, and they didn’t want to create just another San Francisco Web-development company. Instead their thinking went like this: What if you could apply the same approach to building a Web site that Dell Computer applies to building a computer? What if you could create big, complex, flexible, reliable, customized E-commerce systems in record time simply by not reinventing the wheel for every single project? So Cha and Lerner founded Xuma. (The name, pronounced “zoo-ma,” is an ancient Chinese battle cry that the partners found perfect to describe their army of engineers charging into the E-commerce wars.) They adapted the Dell model: just as Dell combines standard and optional components to rapidly create computers, Xuma combines its standard and optional E-commerce components to quickly build Web sites. In the venture’s first year, the quiet, charming Cha (so charismatic that he was among 10 bachelors featured in a Women.com feature on “The Men of Silicon Valley”) sold Xuma’s services to customers ranging from health-and-beauty-products retailer More.com to home-furnishings site GoodHome.com. By its second anniversary, in April 2000, Xuma had launched more than 70 Web-based businesses nationwide and employed 250 people in four offices. But back in mid-1999, Xuma hadn’t yet tackled anything on the multimillion-dollar scale of CornerHardware.com. By the summer of 1999, Takata, CornerHardware.com’s CEO, and Hunt, its chief operating officer, had raised about $6 million in funding: close to $1 million from their own pockets and from family, friends, and angels; and the balance from the first round of venture funding. (A second round early in 2000 would yield an additional $21 million.) And the founders had begun building a staff. Their first hire: vice-president of engineering Steve Finer, who faced the daunting job of actually overseeing the Web site’s construction. (See “Chronicles from the Pit,” below.) Finer, then 33, was an enthusiastic, outspoken technologist who, in a previous life, had managed nightclubs in Boston. He knew something about risk: he’d cofounded an Internet start-up that later collapsed and eventually filed for bankruptcy. And he knew something about working hard; he was always either at the office or connected to it by beeper, cell phone, or computer. (Shortly before the CornerHardware.com launch, when Finer was working 12 to 15 hours a day, he came home one night to find that his lonely dog, Cassius, had disemboweled a sofa cushion.) After joining CornerHardware.com in August 1999, Finer faced his first and toughest task: getting his new bosses “to understand that you don’t build anything — whether it’s a car or a Web site — overnight.” Especially not something as complex as CornerHardware.com. And in Internet terms, what Hunt and Takata wanted was pretty close to overnight. So Finer immediately ruled out doing the job in-house. Given the tight market for top technology staffers, especially in San Francisco, he knew he couldn’t build the talented team he needed to even approach that timetable. Instead, at his recommendation, CornerHardware.com looked outside, holding what Cha describes as a “bake-off” for potential developers late in the summer of 1999. Xuma wasn’t the oldest or the biggest or the best-known contestant. But Hunt, Takata, and Finer liked what Xuma had cooked up. The decisive factor: speed. Cha, Xuma’s CEO, and Lerner, its chairman and chief technology officer, then both 29, promised to do the job faster than anybody else — within six months. They also promised to build systems and databases that would “scale,” or grow quickly without having to be replaced. That’s what CornerHardware.com needed — and that’s why Xuma walked away with a contract worth between $750,000 and $1 million. (Takata says the balance of CornerHardware.com’s launch budget went for interface design, software licensing, equipment, product photography, and related costs.) By Xuma’s standards today — less than a year later — the CornerHardware.com contract is a relatively small one. But at the time it was a huge coup, providing, if all went well, a link in the chain leading to bigger jobs. So Cha took the kind of risk that he would later say no developer should ever take: he went ahead without any built-in contingency plan — no plan B — in case of crisis. True to its own business model, Xuma would build the CornerHardware.com site using many preexisting components — a standard credit-card-processing system, for instance. Still, the Xuma team, headed by senior project manager Phil Lew, then 26, knew that building such a complex E-commerce site wouldn’t be easy. Xuma anticipated it would spend five to six months, beginning in October 1999, building, testing, debugging, and launching the site. The schedule, though ambitious, seemed entirely possible. That is, as long as nothing went wrong. Although CornerHardware.com and Xuma were both new, fast-growing San Francisco­based start-ups, their cultures were entirely different. Sure, they both hired the best they could find: CornerHardware.com’s hiring coups included a Home Depot senior vice-president, a top producer from CNet, and several home-improvement authors and writers, while Xuma lured dozens of “rock-star engineers” away from other Web developers. But theirs were very different workplaces. At CornerHardware.com, a middle-aged artist or writer in a flannel shirt and jeans might sit in meetings with a college-age kid with a nose ring. It was rare for anybody to spend the whole night at work (with the possible exception of Finer, who worked around the clock in the countdown to the launch). In general, it was quiet, especially since most employees worked one or two days at home. (There wasn’t enough office space for everyone to be there at the same time.) In contrast to that relative calm, at Xuma nobody had a private office. Engineers racing to meet project deadlines spent days in the big war room known as “the pit,” living on trucked-in pizza or Thai food, working elbow to elbow at food-littered tables lined with computers. It was a noisy, messy, overwhelmingly youthful atmosphere. For Lew, it was exhausting, but it was also fun. His team bonded in a way that can come only from eating three meals a day together, working side by side until after midnight, then car-pooling home through unusually silent streets. And that bonding meant that together they felt they could do anything, Lew says. They would need to. In late fall, when Lew’s team was already spending most of its time in the pit simply trying to hit the original March launch date, something did go wrong. In mid-November, a CornerHardware.com competitor, HomeWarehouse.com, launched earlier than anybody had expected. About the same time, Amazon.com launched its home-improvement store, and Ace began putting OurHouse.com online. And funding was beginning to dry up for consumer dot-coms in favor of business-to-business ventures. Takata and Hunt decided they had no choice: they had to move the stealth launch from late March to January 15, and follow that with the public launch a few weeks later. They delivered the bad news to Finer, their liaison with Xuma. “They told me, ‘If we wait till March, we’re out of business,’ ” Finer recalls. “At that point I’m holding my stomach.” Finer reluctantly asked Xuma to shave close to six weeks off the initial launch date. Xuma agreed to try moving it up to January 15. “The trouble with being the vendor is that the customer is always right,” Cha says with a sigh. In this case, being right required heroics from Lew’s project team. “We had guys here that didn’t see their families, that were living here 24/7,” Cha says. (See Lew’s diary, below.) “We killed ourselves. But we got on-the-job training there. We learned.” What followed was a series of compromises made by both sides. Five days before the new launch date, the Xuma project team begged for an extension, saying they needed the extra testing time to make sure the site worked well. They asked for two more weeks. Takata and Hunt agreed to wait 10 more days. They knew they wouldn’t be doing themselves any favors by launching sooner if the site frustrated the very people they wanted to attract. Meanwhile, Lew was learning that both Hunt and Takata were demanding, detail-oriented, hands-on managers. “I used to say ‘Retail is detail,’ ” Takata says. “Now I say ‘E-tail is detail.’ ” Both Hunt and Takata closely tracked the site’s development, sometimes requesting changes that would take days of engineering time to complete. “Or they’d say, ‘We need 700 pages [of Web-site content before launch],’ ” Lew says. “We’d say, ‘We can do 200.’ “ Then there was the titanic tinkering on the day before the rescheduled launch. In the afternoon of January 24, Hunt decided the site needed another level of search hierarchy, or ways for customers to view products and information. While other team members frantically tested the site, one engineer spent six hours building in the new function, letting it go live around 8 p.m. After viewing the site that evening, Hunt changed his mind. Lew describes it this way: “Peter sees it. He doesn’t like it. I say, ‘It’s exactly what you guys asked for.’ He says, ‘I want it back like it was this morning.’ ” Lew asked Finer to intercede; Finer returned with this message from Hunt: “Sorry, but it has to happen. And you have to tell me when it’s done.” The same staffer spent the next three hours reversing his earlier work, finishing at about 1:30 a.m., just hours before the quiet launch. And yet Cha, ever the diplomat, doesn’t regard CornerHardware.com as particularly exacting. “All of our customers are very demanding,” he says. In fact, he adds, CornerHardware.com was a relatively easy client because, unlike many enthusiastic dot-com start-ups with ill-defined business plans, from the very beginning Hunt and Takata had clear ideas about what they wanted to accomplish. On January 25 at 3:30 a.m., Lew drove his entire team home from work, and, at 4:45 a.m., finally slept. CornerHardware.com had launched — without fanfare and without any major problems. It also launched without some of the things its founders had wanted. These were the trade-offs: CornerHardware.com had been photographing about 800 products a day, but even at that rate the company couldn’t shoot 37,000 products before the launch. Instead it posted a representative sampling from each category. (Says Hunt, “If you have 72 hammers on the site, do you really need pictures of all 72 from day one?”) It also launched with no way of issuing returns to customers’ credit-card bills. (Initially, refunds would be made by check.) And it launched with fewer products and less content than Hunt and Takata had wanted. But nothing crashed, and the products advertised were available, poised on the shelves in the Kansas City warehouse. Surprisingly, Takata rates the launch at about 95% of what he’d hoped for. “One of the lessons I have learned about the Internet space in general is that you can’t be a perfectionist,” he says. “The Internet is a game of weeks. If you can get your site up four weeks earlier and have a complete customer experience [even without some desired features], I’d say do it.” A month later the public launch went off without any major hitches. Since then, CornerHardware.com’s traffic has grown steadily, with Xuma continuing to run the site. Hunt and Takata won’t release figures except to say that they had more traffic in April than in the entire first quarter. As for the conversion rate — the percentage of people who actually buy something — “some days it’s 19% or 20%,” Hunt says. “And we have days where it’s 1%.” Meanwhile, the purchasing of big-ticket items has increased: in addition to batteries and lightbulbs, customers are buying bathroom vanities and power tools. These days the founders are still keeping an eye on the competition, especially that big orange company from Atlanta. “I’d be lying if I told you we don’t worry about Home Depot,” Hunt says. “But we don’t lose any sleep over it,” because, he says, he doesn’t believe the giant retailer will duplicate the CornerHardware.com business model or its real-time online customer service. As for that tree house, Hunt did build it much later. But he ended up creating it from a kit that he got from a brick-and-mortar retailer. Ironically, he got so busy starting up CornerHardware.com that he didn’t have time to build one from scratch. And in returning to that project, Hunt revisited one big lesson that he and Takata had discovered throughout the building of their business: it’s all about making compromises. Anne Stuart is a senior writer at Inc. Technology. Chronicles from the Pit Steve Finer, vice-president of engineering for CornerHardware.com, and Phil Lew, Xuma’s CornerHardware.com project team leader, each kept diaries for several weeks between the Web site’s “stealth launch,” in January, and its first major marketing pushes, in early March. Here are some excerpts: Steve Finer Thursday, February 17 At 3:45 a.m., we added another Sun Enterprise 4500 server with 16 CPUs. Serious horsepower! As I got off the elevator this morning my coworkers gave me a high five because the new server made the site so much faster. Wednesday, February 23 Two new applications went into alpha testing. One rotates products featured on the home page. The other is a media-tracking application [which tracks the effectiveness of promotional campaigns]. Unique visitors to the site have doubled since last week. Today the site was accessed from all over the world, including from Taiwan, Slovenia, Thailand, Malaysia, Israel, and Japan. Actually shaved for the first time in weeks. Wanted to be presentable for a taping we did today with Xuma and the Mark Bunting video crew [for a business video to be shown on United Airlines and TWA]. Thursday, February 24 Biggest challenge: preparing for the March marketing campaign [a newspaper and online ad campaign with coupons]. We need to be able to support the traffic. Friday, February 25 Added 6,000 new images. Finished quality-assurance process for media tracker and product-feature applications. Also [a New York Times] article gave us a nice boost in traffic and tripled the number of people who went to the customer-support line yesterday. Monday, February 28 We’re all really busy. The engineering team has a lot of projects that need to be completed, including the media tracker and the product-feature device. Tuesday, February 29 Public launch. It has been a difficult day. All departments are asking for additions to the site. It’s a challenge to satisfy all requests and prioritize them properly. Our lack of space [is a problem]. My job would be so much easier if we could hire people to supplement Xuma’s activities. Friday, March 3 We’re really focusing on driving traffic. We added a new disk drive to the development server and a new storage device to help manage all our images. We also added more than 40 new how-to articles. Don Johnson and Cheech Marin filmed their TV show, Nash Bridges, outside our office. We passed out CornerHardware.com hats to the crew, which they all wore during the filming. Saturday, March 4 Had one last meeting with Xuma and my staff to make sure we have the right staffing in place to support [Sunday's marketing campaign]. Monday, March 6 The marketing campaign went off without a hitch. We were able to support all the additional traffic. It blew my mind! Daily traffic today was more than double normal, and we had 10 times as many people buying products as we have on a typical day. Next week the campaign will branch out to a larger part of the country. Since everything today went so well, I’m not too worried. But it is still keeping me up at night. Phil Lew Thursday, February 24 Development seems to be going better than planned. [CornerHardware.com CIO Ken Hite] called me in the morning wanting to track an order number for an order where the money wasn’t captured. The problem was with the file from the third-party fulfillment house. Lesson learned: We need to build in more robust error checking. We cannot assume that the third-party fulfillment house will always give us the correct formatted file. The need to develop a robust process to keep the content and data fresh on the live site is giving me grief. [The process was so slow that when CornerHardware.com updated many items, it could take days for the updates to take effect.] We are working on another solution to load data but don’t know when that will be in place. The media-tracker application needs to be done by tomorrow (that is, in the hands of QA). Things are going great, but I’ve been down this road before. I need to keep the pressure on development to make sure that they follow through on our delivery dates. Friday, February 25 Had our first meeting with [new CornerHardware.com executive producer] Alice Hill. She had some fantastic ideas about the site direction. I look forward to working with her; she’s going to be able to streamline the decision-making process since we will not have to wait on [COO Peter Hunt and CEO Rich Takata] in the future for decisions about where the site is going to be heading. Sunday, February 27 What I’ll remember most about today: talking to Bill [Meehan, Xuma's lead engineer on the CornerHardware project] at midnight on a Sunday night about CornerHardware.com — again. We make this site go. Both of us take a lot of pride in that. We are both emotionally attached to this project and want CornerHardware.com to be the best it can be. That makes it easier to stay up late on Sunday nights to do things for CornerHardware.com. Monday, February 28 Everyone is very excited about the big day tomorrow [the official launch]. I think we have all done due diligence to get ready for this big day, but until the day comes you never know. Tuesday, February 29 Crazy, crazy day. In the afternoon, CornerHardware.com informed us that [there were] 40 additional content pages to be attached to a new front page. At 5 p.m., 6 p.m., 7 p.m., 8 p.m., this content had still not passed the QA check. The new front page will not be able to go up until tomorrow. Traffic was higher than usual. Two articles [about CornerHardware.com] came across my desk: one was from CNet and the other from ZDNet. Didn’t get much sleep, since we were at work until 5 a.m. Sunday, March 5 First thing I did when I woke up today was log on to the Internet via my DSL to check on the site [following that morning's newspaper coupon campaign]. I can see that the orders are already rolling in from Washington and Utah. By 10:30 a.m., we are already at 15 orders for the day. I called Steve Finer at home (I think I woke him up) and let him know the good news: people are hitting the site and buying things. Please e-mail your comments to editors@inc.com.

Top Sites for Tech Buying

CEO’s Start-Up Toolkit: Best of the Web A panel of entrepreneurs searches for the best spots to shop online Does anybody buy computers in person anymore? If you buy technology today, the odds are pretty good that you make some of the purchases online — or at least choose some items based on information you’ve found online. Your most important choice may therefore be not which product to buy but which site to start with. With our crew of entrepreneurs, we reviewed three of the top multivendor retailers, with an eye to their overall effectiveness as tech-buying sites for Inc. Technology readers. We didn’t evaluate the quality of the products sold there but rather considered whether the site would help readers make quick, productive work of buying computers, peripherals, and/or networking hardware (all from multiple manufacturers) for a small company. (Note, too, that for this trip we ignored the single-source, direct-market sites such as Dell.com and Gateway.com. But, of course, you may want to give those sites a try.) Another buying site not reviewed here but worth checking out is Zones.com, which features a unique set of business-to-business buying tools. But what good is an online technology source without unbiased online technology insight? To accompany our source reviews, we first looked at a selection of “product comparison” research sites, places that promise unbiased reviews, comparisons, specifications, and other data to help you make informed decisions when shopping online. Where to Do Your Research www.zdnet.com What it offers: Oodles of product information and articles; links to buying sites What it’s good for: Locating in-depth articles and analysis Don’t waste your time on: Expecting to navigate the site without getting a migraine; the layout is too busy. What our panel had to say: Our reviewers were un-wowed by ZDNet, although one panelist, the CEO of a consulting and publishing firm, found the site’s “Anti-Virus Guide” very valuable. He also appreciated how much content ZDNet offered from a single access point. Still, he wished the presentation had been better. He recommended an “at a glance” organizational model in which lists of products in a category or resulting from a search are shown with review data on a single page. www.cnet.com What it offers: Lots of good tech information and links to buying sites What it’s good for: Product reviews, articles, “Editors’ Choice” awards Don’t waste your time on: Clicking on the links to “premier sponsor” sellers, which muddy an otherwise unbiased presentation What our panel had to say: CNet.com is broad in the same way that ZDNet.com is, but it’s much better organized and easier on the eyes. The site features not only product information and comparisons but also articles, tech news, tech-job notices, how-to instructions, and even product auctions. In addition to doing broad product searches, visitors can display “Editors’ Choice” picks and lists of the most popular products in various categories. The site presents it all within a happy balance of good design and readability. The combination of product news, reviews, and access to technical products makes CNet an easy stop. Panelists liked CNet. One dubbed it “simple, concise, and focused,” and observed that “there are other comparison-shopping engines, but the combination of news, reviews, and shopping for technical products makes this an easy stop.” www.productopia.com What it offers: A friendly gateway to product information and links to buying sites What it’s good for: Training-wheels-easy tours of product categories Don’t waste your time on: Getting advanced techie-type info; the content is skewed to newbies. What our panel had to say: Productopia is exactly what it sounds like: a consumer-oriented, all-purpose repository of information on all types of products, including cars, appliances, clothing, and more. The pages that deal with computers are adequate though clearly skewed to novices. In the plus column, however, there are “user reviews” and discussion groups that may offer some firsthand insight into products you’re considering buying — although we could find very little information about the items we tried. Both Mac and PC products are available and offered as equivalent choices for the same tasks. For example, computers that were selected as “Style Picks” (apparently for how good they’ll look sitting on your desk) included an Apple iMac as well as PCs from Sony and Quantex. Despite the site’s consumerishness, panelists were impressed with Productopia, which got unanimously high marks for its search function, presentation, and navigability. www.techshopper.com What it offers: A handy way to research and buy from a single site What it’s good for: Research, but not purchasing Don’t waste your time on: Trying to locate customer service; panelists had trouble tracking down that link. What our panel had to say: The reviewers approved of TechShopper, although one wished that the site’s customer service had been made more apparent. Another panelist was surprised and impressed by the amount of Mac information that was available, though he conceded that the site was skewed to the PC market. “If you’re not sure what you want, then this site is great to clarify,” commented one reviewer. “But if you just want to click and buy, too much effort is required to get to the final step.” www.dealtime.com What it offers: One-site searches for a product’s price and availability on multiple other sites What it’s good for: Great searches Don’t waste your time on: Looking for consumer comments to back up your choices. You won’t find any. What our panel had to say: In addition to doling out product information on pet supplies and jewelry along with computer information, DealTime searches online stores, auctions, classifieds, and buying groups and delivers a list of places where shoppers can find what they want at the best price or terms. Great finds: DealTime.com searches for places you can shop for the lowest prices or the best terms. Panelists loved DealTime’s navigability and search function. One entrepreneur especially appreciated the site’s tracking feature, which automatically sends customers updates on products that they have flagged for tracking for up to two months. One panelist would have appreciated some pictures of the products in the initial search-response list. She also would like to have seen comments from other consumers to assist her in making her decision. www.mysimon.com What it offers: One-site convenience for searching for a product’s price and availability on multiple other sites What it’s good for: It’s friendly to very new shoppers. Don’t waste your time on: Navigation. It’s more difficult than it seems at first glance. And the “Simon” cartoon character is annoying. What our panel had to say: Like DealTime, mySimon searches online stores for products in order to help you find the best deals on the Web. The site’s name and personality derive from its mascot and spokesman, a cartoon character you might like only if you also like the Office Assistant character that offers help in Microsoft Office. Panelists drubbed mySimon. “This site is difficult to navigate, it’s nonintuitive, and it presents itself as unbiased when in fact — unless they are just bad at what they do — their search engine fails to find many products I know are available on numerous sites on the Web,” said one entrepreneur. “They have a great idea and an unbiased shopping search engine. However, they sell advertising and present some stores in a biased fashion, so they don’t do what they claim to do.” Another panelist liked mySimon only slightly better but also lamented the small range of products her searches turned up. Where to Buy www.beyond.com What it offers: Lots and lots of software What it’s good for: Software, handhelds, and business discounts available with registration Don’t waste your time on: Looking for desktops and notebooks. Plus, the Recommendation Guide is too simplistic to offer much expert guidance. What our panel had to say: Panelists liked Beyond’s “Top 10″ lists of the most popular products in a category and the links to Top Products by Top Publishers and Top Manufacturers, which provides fast access to the latest and greatest from Microsoft, Symantec, and other heavy hitters. One panelist called Beyond “unique, deep, and competitive.” Another panelist found Beyond of “limited use” because of its dearth of Mac hardware. Our panelists said that Beyond.com goes above and beyond in offering a broad selection of software. www.buycomp.com What it offers: A complete range of computer products, including hardware, software, and networking options What it’s good for: Product searches and special sales Don’t waste your time on: Expecting to find everything you need in one place — or a strong B2B personality What our panel had to say: This site packs all of the useful product-search tools, including keyword and shop-by-brand searches, and it appears to be a good place to check for special discounts and sales. Move quickly, though; sales may be offered on a very limited number of units, in some cases. Wait half an hour, and they might be out of stock. Though the site looks and feels like a substantial warehouse, it’s surprising how limited the selection is at times. And the site makes no real attempt to address the special needs of business buyers. Panelists thought BuyComp was OK but agreed that although “the notion is good, the entire process of business-to-business ordering, tracking, and promoting customer satisfaction is not yet quite there.” This same panelist wanted to find out more about such things as order turnaround time and support contracts. www.cdw.com What it offers: A complete range of computer products, including hardware, software, and networking options What it’s good for: Well-managed business accounts and good search and organizational tools Don’t waste your time on: Looking for product reviews. You’ll find only product specs, not opinions. What our panel had to say: This site appears to be well tailored to the business-technology buyer. From a “My Company” link on the home page, you can set up a customized “CDW@work” extranet for your company. (You can use the extranet to communicate product selections and standards to your purchasing team and also to set up and administer employee purchase programs and to access customized pricing.) Panelists rated CDW about average overall. One offered, “The site is good at delivering the basic information, but nothing special.” He felt that the corporate-account features were easy to set up and use but added little value. Listing product specifications without any accompanying reviews was also cited as a CDW downfall. Ned Snell is a freelance writer based in Arlington, Va. Research Sites Would our CEOs go back? What is the site good for? CEOs’ quick take TechShopper.com www.techshopper.com Occasionally, if they had a specific need Selection; accurate product information “I liked the layout: easy to use, simple, straightforward.” DealTime.com www.dealtime.com Occasionally, if they had a specific need Strong product information for research “For setting up or expanding an office, it would be very useful.” mySimon.com www.mysimon.com Occasionally, if they had a specific need Thoroughness “Not too much different from all the other shopping sites out there.” ZDNet.com www.zdnet.com Occasionally, if they had a specific need New-product announcements; free downloads “Too detailed; very similar to other sites; nothing special about it.” CNet.com www.cnet.com Once a week Usefulness of content; industry-specific information “It allowed me to get the information I needed.” Productopia.com www.productopia.com Once a week Outstanding consumer-goods section “It is a consumer service with limited business applications.” Buying Sites Would our CEOs go back? What is the site good for? CEOs’ quick take CDW.com www.cdw.com Occasionally, if they had a specific need Basic information “They deliver the basic information, but nothing special.” Beyond.com www.beyond.com Once a week Links to top publishers and manufacturers “Unique, deep, and competitive.” BuyComp.com www.buycomp.com Occasionally, if they had a specific need Product quality; accuracy of information “Good concepts, but fuzzy on such things as order turnaround time and support contracts.” Our Reviewers Al Acitelli, CEO, BestInService.com Credit Reporting Jay Graves, president and cofounder, DataMark Inc. Susan Howington, vice-president business development, Lee Hecht Harrison Linda Kellogg, founder and CEO, Start-Up Resources Inc. Beth Marcus, CEO, president and founder, Glow Dog Inc. Dan Maude, president and CEO, Beacon Application Services Corp. Marion McGovern, president, M Squared LLC Debbi Milner, CEO, Jade Systems Corp. James Morel, president, 1-800 Postcards Gerry Philpott, president and CEO, E-Poll.com Eric Schechter, president, GAME: Great American Marketing & Events Al Shariff, owner and president, GlobeTrends Inc. Srikanth Sundararajan, CEO and president, Pretzel Logic Software Inc. Vincent Trantolo, chief operating officer, Annotate.net LLC Maura White, founder and CEO, GoBabies.com Mark Zweig, president and CEO, Zweig White & Associates Inc. For more on the gear you really need to start and grow your small business, see our CEO’s Start-Up Toolkit. Please e-mail your comments to editors@inc.com.

Beauty and the Best

CEO’s Start-Up Toolkit: CEO Profile As she outfits her fast-growing “clicks and bricks” business, this CEO has one cardinal rule: Don’t waste my time Whether she’s buying or selling, whether it’s computers or cosmetics, Marla Malcolm loves brand names. In fact, it was Malcolm’s own frustrating quest to track down her favorite specialty skin-care line that prompted her to launch Bluemercury Inc., a retailer of high-end, hard-to-find beauty products. From July to December 1999, Malcolm and cofounder Barry Jon Beck bought and refurbished two cosmetic boutiques in Washington, D.C., created a mail-order catalog, and launched an online store. In the process Bluemercury’s staff has grown from 2 to 33; it will multiply again as the company opens more stores this year. Malcolm and Beck want to equip their expanding staff with every tool necessary to serve the company’s well-heeled customers. Well, every tool within reason. True, Bluemercury projects revenues of $8 million for this year. And according to its cofounders, the company is already profitable. But with equipment- and software-related expenses approaching $100,000 a year, the tools outlay could well be a torpedo aimed at Bluemercury’s financial health. Inc. Technology asked Malcolm to explain how she equipped her start-up from scratch. And just for fun, we asked her to whip up a money-is-no-object wish list. (See “The Gear She Skipped,” below.) We figured her experiences with outfitting a new, fast-growing company would generate useful lessons for start-ups of every stripe. When buying off-brand products, get two- or three-year warranties and unlimited phone support. Malcolm budgeted about $60,000 to equip her business during its first six months. She and Beck each had a notebook computer that would serve their needs, so that freed up the budget for other things. On her shopping list: desktop computers and laser printers for office staffers and salespeople at each store, an accounting computer, and fax machines for communicating with skin-care advisers and vendors. She also needed to purchase servers that would run the point-of-sale and information systems, manage the Web site, and store an Oracle customer database. Malcolm sums up her tech-buying philosophy succinctly: “We’re supercheap. If a product doesn’t affect the customer, we don’t care about it.” As with her skin-care regimen, she trusts brand names. She wants reliable, easy-to-use products. She expects fast delivery and instant response to complaints. And she doesn’t want to waste time, money, or energy along the way. “That stuff is secondary to our customers,” says Malcolm, gesturing toward the notebook computer and laser printer on her desk at Bluemercury’s headquarters, just off M Street in Washington’s upscale Georgetown neighborhood. The 30-year-old entrepreneur, whose tailored black pantsuit and neatly swept-back blonde hair mirror her quiet, brisk manner, believes that small technology purchases fall into the find-it-fast-and-forget-about-it category. She’d rather focus her energies on the things she considers critical for success: raising money, opening new stores, and choosing merchandise like the Acqua di Parma line of colognes and soaps and Nars cosmetics with names like Orgasm (inexplicably, a peach-toned blush). And she wants her employees to concentrate on serving customers, who spend an average of $400 a year on products like the Nars nail-polish quartet ($45) and the three-piece Shu Uemura cosmetic brush set ($110). Malcolm, whose father was an insurance agent in Oakland, Calif., knew since childhood that she, too, wanted to be her own boss. After receiving an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School, she became VP of strategy for a high-powered Washington, D.C., entrepreneur. But she yearned for her own opportunity. Conventional wisdom dictated launching an online business-to-business company, but no b-to-b ideas set her soul afire. She wanted something fun. She kept looking. Short-term gain, long-term pain: Bluemercury saved up front by buying printers for each store. The answer was staring her in the face. She’d long used, but suddenly had trouble finding, high-quality skin-care products from Dermalogica, of Torrance, Calif. Then she discovered Efx (pronounced effects), a two-store chain in Washington, D.C., that specialized in such elusive niche brands. Last year Malcolm and Beck spent less than $1 million of their own money to buy the stores and then raised more money from angel and seed-round investors to build complementary Web and catalog ventures. In October she moved Bluemercury — a name she created because it sounds “calm and strong and fast” — from her dining-room table to an office complex a few blocks from the company’s flagship store in Georgetown. She continued hiring people, buying products, and planning her expansion. Within six months the company was profitable, and Malcolm was closing the deal for her third store and negotiating deals for the fourth and fifth. During her technology shopping, Malcolm hired consultants only when the time came to choose servers — a decision too complex and expensive to make without expert advice. For everything else, she relied on her own research and input from Beck, the company’s chief operating officer. Malcolm depended most on the product reviews, lab tests, and rankings on CNet and ZDNet’s Computer Shopper site (www.computershopper.com). She cut through the deluge of information by defaulting to trusted brands like Hewlett-Packard, Dell, IBM, and Nokia. The next step: deciding where to buy and what to spend. Malcolm tried bargain hunting with the free online shopping robot mySimon but found that it returned too much information, most of it from unknown sources. In fact, her sole deviation from brand-name buying: the company’s Emachines PCs. At $499 each, including the monitor, the Emachines were “the cheapest little desktop computers available,” Malcolm says. Why break the big-name rule? Because, she says, Bluemercury employees use PCs primarily for doing E-mail, word processing, and spreadsheets, functions that don’t require best-of-breed machines. But sharing printers over a network will save a company money in the long run. Ironically, considering her company’s presence in the cutthroat Web cosmetics marketplace, Malcolm made no technology purchases online. Except for the Dell servers, which she ordered by phone, Malcolm has so far bought most of her gear at her neighborhood Staples. “You can look at the stuff and develop a relationship with the local store,” she says, adding that deliveries and returns have been fast and painless. The Bluemercury folks have fumbled a few times in their shopping. To save money and space, they initially picked an all-in-one machine — printer, fax, and copier. The machine was slow, unreliable, and produced unreadable faxes. Lesson learned: “No more multifunction machines,” Malcolm says. “We only buy machines that do the one thing that they’re designed to do.” Problem solved? Not yet. They goofed once again, applying Malcolm’s cheaper-is-better philosophy and buying a fax machine that cost less than $90. They saved about $60 by passing up a fax in the next-higher price tier, but they ultimately paid a steep price in frustration — the machine kept breaking down under the incoming fax load. Eventually, the company invested in heavy-duty workhorses from Hewlett-Packard — which was, of course, a name they knew. Anne Stuart is a senior writer at Inc. Technology. The Gear She Picked SERVERS: Malcolm chose machines from Dell because the build-to-order computer manufacturer offers unmatched customer service. Final Choice: Two Dell PowerEdge 1300 servers and one PowerEdge 2300 machine, approximately $5,000 each FAX MACHINES: Bluemercury currently has four heavy-duty fax machines, two at its headquarters and one in each store. Malcolm also uses the eFax.com online service to get faxes by E-mail while traveling. Final Choice: High-speed Hewlett-Packard 920s, $250 each; the eFax service is free DESKTOP COMPUTERS: Bluemercury employees aren’t power users; they need only a few basic functions, such as word processing, E-mail, and spreadsheets. Malcolm’s pick: #2 on CNet’s list of top-five inexpensive PCs. It provides those basic functions at a bargain price. Final Choice: Nine Emachines PCs, all 400 MHz with 32MB of RAM and 4.3GB hard drives, $499 each ACCOUNTING COMPUTER: For the company’s accounting tasks, Malcolm wanted a computer that would never crash and wouldn’t take up a lot of space. Her selection received high marks from CNet for its reliability and slim, space-saving design. Final Choice: Compaq Presario 3550 (500MHz, 64MB of RAM, and an 8GB hard drive), about $2,000 NOTEBOOK COMPUTERS: Malcolm and Beck each brought their own notebooks to the business. (Malcolm uses an IBM ThinkPad 600; Beck has a Dell Inspiron 7000.) They’re not in the market for new machines, but if they were, they would both upgrade to the 4.9-pound ThinkPad 600X, which at 650 MHz, 64MB of RAM, and with a 12GB hard drive, is much faster and more robust than Malcolm’s current machine and lighter than Beck’s 9-pound Dell model. Final Choice: IBM ThinkPad 600X, about $4,000 LASER PRINTERS: Bluemercury wanted black-and-white laser printers that would spit out at least eight pages a minute. The company bought one printer for each of the seven administrative employees and one for each store. (It went that route because initially it didn’t network its computers, although it plans to do so soon.) In a pinch, it can buy a snap-on accessory, also from HP, for low-volume scanning or copying. Final Choice: Hewlett-Packard LaserJet 1100, $399 each; accessory, $149 CELL PHONES: The office staff uses basic Nokia cell phones from AT&T Wireless Services. The phones weren’t the cheapest available, but Malcolm likes them because they allow staffers to get E-mail. Final Choice: Nokia 6160, about $200, plus monthly service fee and call charges The Gear She Skipped DIGITAL CAMERA: Bluemercury pays a professional photographer to produce images for its Web site. But if Malcolm were to succumb to temptation and buy a camera, she’d purchase the Kodak DC215, just to keep a digital camera handy. “It’s one of the cheapest, it’s Kodak, and it’s in the top-five ranking of bargain cameras on CNet.” Saved: about $299 SCANNER: Malcolm lusts for a flatbed scanner to use for promotional materials, but adds, sighing, that the expense seems like a luxury. And besides, Bluemercury already owns a cheaper scanner that she’s never used. Saved: about $300 For more on the gear you really need to start and grow your small business, see our CEO’s Start-Up Toolkit. Please e-mail your comments to editors@inc.com.

Research Off-the-Shelf Data Backup Solutions

You can purchase backup software, hardware, and media from online resellers, such as NECX Global Electronics Exchange and Outpost.com, as well as brick-and-mortar computer stores and, in some cases, directly from the vendor’s Web site. NECX even offers buying how-to guides that explain the technology and its features and uses. Evaluate Key Features Outlined below are the key features to look for in software for an off-the-shelf data backup solution: Support for all the devices (tape, DVD, CD, etc.) you use. A backup scheduling option that fits your needs. Automatic virus detection while backing up. An option to encrypt data before backing up. Disaster recovery features such as one-button recovery and the ability to rebuild system from scratch using backups. Understand the Issues to Consider in Selecting Off-the-Shelf Data Backup Solution Software Be aware that using data encryption and virus detection options may slow down backup so that it can’t be completed in one night if you have a slow connection speed. Research off-the-shelf data backup solution software costs. NovaStor’s NovaBackup and Backup Exec from Veritas (formerly Seagate’s Backup Exec) offer sophisticated features for a networked office. These products range from $50 to $2,000, depending on the complexity of your network (single desktop or multiple servers with RAID). PG Soft’s Tape-it ($59) offers a simple solution for tape drives only. For a list of Macintosh products, check out Apple’s Macintosh Products Guide. Research off-the-shelf data backup hardware features. Outlined below are the key features to look for in off-the-shelf data hardware. You can buy any of these types of backup hardware for either the PC or the Macintosh. Backup hardware can be internal (built into a computer) or external (portable). Because of the extra case needed to house an external drive, the external versions of CD, DVD, or tape drives generally run $100 more than internal versions. If your computers are on a network, you’ll be able to purchase a drive for the server and use it to back up all the computers on the network. If you want to purchase only one drive and use it to back up two or more computers that aren’t networked together, you’ll want to pay extra to get an external drive. However, not all external drives are easy to move from system to system. If this capability is important to you, look for a drive that’s designed to be easily portable. Understand the issues to consider in selecting off-the-shelf data backup solution hardware. Make sure your computer system meets the minimum requirements for the hardware you choose. Also make sure that the hardware is compatible with older hardware technologies. For example, DVD-RAMs should be able to read CD-ROMs, and a DAT-DDS-3 drive should be able to read and write DDS-1 and DDS-2 tapes. Research off-the-shelf data backup solution hardware costs. CD drives: If you’re going to buy a CD for creating backups and archives, your best is a CD-RW drive. CD-RW drives and media are more expensive than CD-R drives and media, but not by much. A CD-RW costs from $200 to $400, while a CD-R costs from $150 to $400. (The difference in price in each case depends on the speed of the drive and whether it uses the standard IDE-type electronic interface controller or the more expensive and faster SCSI-type electronic interface controller.) And although CD-RW media costs around $2 a disk, while CD-R media cost about $1 a disk, a CD-RW drive can also read and write using the cheaper CD-R media. If you’re planning to use a CD drive to regularly back up data, you’ll want the ability to rewrite new backups over old backups. You’ll save more than enough by not having to constantly purchase new CDs to pay for the rewritable capability. CD-R and CD-RW drive vendors include Hewlett-Packard, Iomega, Memorex, Plextor, Ricoh, and Yamaha Corp. of America. ZDNet’s CD-Rewritable Guide provides installation and troubleshooting help as well as links to vendors, prices, and product reviews. Computer Shopper reviewed CD-RWs in its November 1999 issue. DVD-RAMs cost from $260 to $600, with the higher-priced drives offering faster read/write and SCSI controllers. DVD-RAM media cost from $20 to $40 per disk. Creative Labs, Hi-Val, Panasonic, Pinnacle Micro, and Toshiba all offer DVD-RAMs. ZDNet’s DVD Guide provides installation and troubleshooting help as well as links to vendors, prices, and product reviews. Tape drives. You’ll need to clean your drive, so to save money, look for a drive that includes a cleaning tape or has a built-in, self-activated head cleaner. Tape drive prices vary according to the amount of storage offered, its speed, and whether it uses a SCSI or an IDE controller. Expect high-capacity, fast drives with SCSI controllers to cost the most. Travan drives cost from $200 to $600. DAT drives cost from $500 to $2,000. 8-mm drives cost from $1,000 to $2,500. DLT drives cost from $2,000 to $6,000. Tape prices are based on quality and capacity. Travan tapes cost from $20 to $40. DAT tapes cost from $5 to $50. 8-mm tapes cost from $4 to $60. DLT tapes cost from $30 to $90. Tape drive manufacturers include Exabyte, Hewlett-Packard, Quantum, Seagate Technology, and Sony. Copyright © 1995-2000 Pinnacle WebWorkz Inc. All rightsreserved. Do not duplicate or redistribute in any form.