Tag Archives: Westport

CRM: Software as a Customer Service

Every business needs some form of customer relationship management (CRM) system, argues Brian Donaghy, vice president of product strategy with Smart Online Inc., a provider of software-as-a-service (SaaS) applications for businesses in Durham, N.C. That’s true even if the system is an amalgamation of Post-It notes, spreadsheets, and the like. Of course, this is not always effective. That’s where software comes in. “A CRM application is a better way to manage so that you can be more organized and do more with less,” Donaghy says. An effective CRM application provides an organized, comprehensive view of a company’s customers and prospects, and employees’ interactions with them. Once a large-business luxury, CRM software packages have come down in price and scale as they have migrated to hosted applications or SaaS solutions, making CRM available to a growing number of small and mid-size businesses. Spending on SaaS will climb by 25 percent annually through 2010, according to a May 2007 report by Saugatuck Technology Inc., of Westport, Conn., “Three Waves of Change: SaaS Beyond the Tipping Point.” Hosted versus licensed CRM SaaS solutions for CRM usually require a lower upfront investment, as no software needs to be purchased and installed. Upgrades can be done over the Internet, rather than by loading disks onto each computer. And, employees can access the program with just an Internet connection. Gerry Czarnecki, chair and chief executive officer with The Deltennium Group, Inc., a consulting firm based in Boca Raton, Fla., tried out a half dozen different applications, checking how easy it was to enter and access data and create reports, before zeroing in an SaaS solution from Infusion Software, an on-demand CRM provider from Gilbert, Ariz. Czarnecki’s goals in implementing a CRM solution were to better manage relationships and leads, and automate the company’s marketing efforts. While the system has only been in place for several months, “I have no doubt that I’ll be able to do more with less,” Czarnecki says. “I can use my staff to focus on expanding.” While security often is mentioned as a concern with hosted solutions, most providers continually invest in updated security features, 24/7 monitoring, and multiple backups and redundancies. As a result, their security often trumps the protection a small business owner can afford. However, it’s not unheard of for the server hosting an application to go down. Until that server is back up, the data in the system is inaccessible, says Doc Pratt, president of Pratt Computing Technologies, Inc., of Knoxville, Tenn. And the costs of hosted solutions can add up. Some providers charge a set-up fee of several thousand dollars or more. Ongoing monthly fees can range from $20 to $150 per user. In addition, the provider may charge more for additional services, such as delivering a tape backup. SaaS also can be more difficult to customize. Licensed solutions typically start at several hundred dollars per user license, and go up from there. Some also charge a maintenance fee of about 20 percent of the initial cost. According to Ted Harding, general manager of Legrand Software, a San Franciso-based CRM provider, some of the benefits of licensed CRM include that the application runs on your computers, and data is stored in your file server. It’s also not off-site, and you’re not dependent on an Internet connection to access the programs. Interfacing the application to third-party applications tends to go faster and has fewer constraints. Finally, the user interface may be richer. Lisa and Michael Lujan, co-founders of Mentoring Minds LP, a Tyler, Texas-based provider of educational products to schools, opted for a licensed CRM product that to track and follow up on prospects and sales calls. In early 2006, the Lujans implemented a CRM solution from LeGrand. Now, they electronically tag different mailings. When an order arrives, the Lujans can easily match the order with the materials that were sent to that school or district. And, salespeople can enter information on the schools they’ve visited, enabling the Lujans to quickly see which visits are leading to sales. “We can track and see what was successful. Before, it was hit or miss,” Lisa Lujan says. Features to look for in CRM Whether hosted or licensed, these are some common features you’ll want to look for in a CRM solution for your business: Application Programming Interface (API): This allows the CRM solution to link with other systems, eliminating the need to enter information multiple times, says Clate Mask, president and chief executive officer with Infusion Software. Multiple contact information: Users should be able to organize and access information by a person’s name, as well as his or her company, says Harding. That makes it possible to view all the interactions that have occurred with a particular person, as well as with multiple individuals within a single company. Dashboards: The system should provide a summary view of the sales opportunities underway across a company’s customer base and the employees working on them. With this, promising opportunities are less likely to fall through the cracks, says Harding. Delegation: Employees should be able to use the system to electronically delegate tasks to their colleagues. Information entry and access: Employees also should be able to enter and access information from anywhere within the system, says Donaghy of SmartOnline. For example, if they’ve talked with a client on the phone, they should be able to enter details of the call under the person’s name. Once in the system, that information should be accessible through both the individual’s and the company’s name.

Time to Consolidate Your Data Center

our beautiful site

More and more small-and medium-sized businesses are thinking about consolidating their data centers, as a result of having grown haphazardly or through many mergers and acquisitions. According to a 2006 report by tech research firm IDC, 80 percent of U.S. IT organizations are consolidating and in 2009 global spending on IT consolidation should hit $25 billion. “Most of these things aren’t planned and then executives wonder how in the world they’ve grown to the number of servers they’ve got,” says Cal Braunstein, chairman and CEO of research at the Robert Frances Group, a Westport, Conn. IT consulting firm. “They need to add another application, and somehow before they know it, each of these applications are on different servers.” And, oftentimes those different servers can be in different rooms, on different floors, and even in different cities. M&A activity sparks consolidation One big driver of data center consolidation is the rash of mergers and acquisitions that leave the new entities with IT systems that are often incompatible, sometimes burdening even forward-looking companies with outdated systems from a company being acquired. “CIOs are telling their CEOs, ‘Could you please buy a company with the same IT platform and infrastructure?’” says James F. O’Grady, the director of technology value solution for Hewlett-Packard Financial Services. Why consolidate when it’s an expensive undertaking? Let’s start with those systems that are the product of mergers and acquisitions. All the little band-aid fixes to make these systems work together may be costing your company money — not to mention resources — that could be better spent elsewhere. Even without mergers, small and medium-sized businesses tend to be sitting on a lot of older servers being kept around in order to save money on costs of new equipment. However, since many of these machines have poor utilization rates, they aren’t necessarily the best use of money. Braunstein estimates various utilization rates of different systems as follows: mainframes (75-90 percent), Unix (10-20 percent although some achieve up to 60 percent), and Windows-Intel systems (5-12 percent). High maintenance and licensing fees On top of having all this old equipment around, there are high maintenance costs and licensing fees, not to mention the issues of power and cooling for all your machines. “Two years ago no one cared about power and cooling,” says Braunstein. But now that energy costs have skyrocketed, businesses are starting to be more aware. Costs for power and cooling could run 40 percent of your run rate for operational components for your data center. Consolidation can mean lower power output, says HP’s O’Grady. If you have five data centers all over the country and you really only need three, not only will consolidation save on power costs but will also save on labor costs. Those are big numbers that could be made smaller through consolidation. On average, says Braunstein, hardware costs tend to be 15 percent of overall costs. What it means to consolidate Consolidation can mean different things to different businesses. For some, it’s reducing the number of data location center locations and moving equipment to places that have lower operating costs, according a March 2007 report by HP, titled “Data center consolidation: Financing options address more than just cost.” Two spaces in midtown Manhattan dedicated to holding IT are more expensive to maintain, than say, combining them both into a new one in northern New Jersey. With telecommunications advances, it’s more feasible to locate the data centers away from your office. Another approach is to consolidate at the current site by putting in a converged voice-and-data network. Or you can save space by installing racks. With a vertical rack, instead of buying servers, you buy components that altogether look a little like an entertainment system. Blade servers work on the same concept as a rack but are even more condensed. A blade comes in a smaller box, so it slides in vertically. You can get a number of these going across a couple of rows, giving you a tremendous amount of capacity in a small space. And, then there’s the virtual approach. Companies can virtualize their servers by running many systems in a single box. Not only can that save space but it can also up performance; instead of running at about 10 percent utilization, it can be at least 40 percent. Paying for it No matter how you undertake it, consolidating your data center is going to cost money. According to HP, often you’ll have to keep the old data center running as you’re setting up your new one. Or, you can set up a temporary facility — using the same type of old equipment — as you’re taking apart the old center and setting up the new one. So, you could potentially have up to three data centers running at the same time before you get everything sorted out. Companies, like HP, and IBM, and to lesser extent, Sun, who are all in the data center consolidation business provide financing options, including leasing, short-term equipment rental, and help with the recovering of money from asset sales. They also work with the customer to apply some of the costs to covering the purchasing of new equipment. Another approach, says Braunstein, that may make sense, is putting the new data center inside one of your current spaces. “You could consolidate it piecemeal so you don’t have to go beyond the bounds of existing data center,” he says. “It takes longer this way, however, it’s a good approach because you get to see what works as you go along.”

Why You Need a UPS

It should be apparent to anyone who suffered through the blackout of 2003. And it should be apparent to any business impacted by the brownouts that are increasingly a fact of life during summer months, ice storms that knock out power lines in the winter, and other disasters, such as Hurricane Katrina. A power outage can wreak disaster on a business. It can shut a company down for days. It can zap your data. It can disappoint your customers. And, ultimately, it can run you out of business. That’s one reason that businesses need to invest in a device called “uninterruptible power supply” (UPS). This is an intermediary device between a power source and the machinery for which the power is being provided, typically a computer. That device can apply to anything from a battery to a generator. There are three kinds of UPSes — one that’s always on, the most common type, one that’s on standby, going on as soon as power is cut off, and one that’s really a hybrid of the two. A backup power supply Think of a UPS as a backup power supply, says Cal Braunstein, the chairman and CEO of the Robert Frances Group, a Westport, Conn. technology consultancy. That’s the advice he gives to small business owners who are considering UPS. “Some alarm clocks today have the ability for a battery to be plugged in so that when power is lost, your alarm clock continues keeping time,” Braunstein says. “A UPS is just a much bigger version of that for computers. This way if power dies, systems and disk drives don’t crash, which could cause real data corruption or file corruption problems.” On a basic level, the UPS is some energy that provides the user with a few extra minutes of power, in the case of an emergency, so that they can save what they were working on, print it out, and turn all the machines off.  More powerful ones, says Andrea Peiro, the CEO and founder of the Small Business Technology Institute, a non-profit organization that promotes technology usage by small business, can be used to actually continue working for several more hours while the user is waiting for the grid power to return. Tips for buying UPS When buying one or more UPS devices for your business, there are several factors to consider. “The primary factor that influences how many pieces of hardware can be supported by a single UPS and for how long is the capacity of their batteries,” says Peiro, noting that the capacity is measured in Volt-Amperes (VA). “The bigger the number, the better.” Costs for buying a UPS can range from less than one hundred dollars to a few thousand dollars. But in the long run whatever you pay will be small compared with what could happen if one’s data disappears. If cost is a concern, however, consider that today’s prices represent a decrease from where they used to be, and also that laptops usually do not need a UPS, since they can operate on their own internal battery in case of power failure. However, no matter what the price is, a UPS should be part of any small business office, says Peiro, who considers them a very important investment, especially when they are connected to the company’s networking equipment.  “UPSes are a critical element for the reliability of any computing environment, allowing for non-disruptive shut down of workstations, servers and peripherals.”

Should Some Computers Be Off the Network?

our beautiful site

Is there a magic bullet to make your business computers secure? “The most secure computer in the world is one that can’t be used by anybody,” says Paul Stamp, senior analyst at Forrester Research, of Cambridge, Mass. That’s a nice sentiment, but he admits that it’s not really practical these days, unless you are running a computer museum. More realistically, today’s small business owners should concern themselves with balancing the need for security with access. And, at every step of the way they have to make the risk tradeoff. Just by being on the Internet will invite attempts, says Toby Weir-Jones, the director of product management of BT Counterpane, of Mountain View, Calif., which provides managed security services. And attempts are the definition of risk. And that could be a cost. “If a machine doesn’t need to be online it should be,” Weir-Jones says. Networking depends on the PC’s function Whether you have a computer that should be kept off network, says Cal Braunstein, the chairman and CEO of the Robert Frances Group, a business technology consultancy in Westport, Conn., will also depend on the company and the type of function being performed. For example, you may have multiple networks at a company, rather than one. You may have a mini-network in research and development (R&D) and may not want any of those machines linked to the outside world in order to better protect your company secrets. Many R&D facilities, Braunstein says, have multiple PCs per user there. Some are for the R&D network or standalone boxes and others are linked to the rest of the company. “Not all of these machines should be linked together into a single network,” he says. “There needs to be someone who understands the security issues for the company who is looking at all these assets and deciding their networking rights.” Besides security, says Andrea Peiro, the CEO and founder of the Small Business Technology Institute, a non-profit devoted to encouraging technology adoption among small business, another reason to consider putting a machine off the network, is that if it “performs a very specialized task – such as direct e-mail marketing distribution – and may be faster if directly connected to non-shared Internet access.” Hidden costs of off-network computers Having a computer that is not attached to the network can protect sensitive data and provide one less avenue for malware, but it can also be an inconvenience. It’s a cost from a time perspective. It takes a lot longer to go over to another PC and burn the information onto a CD or put it on a USB drive than to e-mail it over the network or allow the computer user to download it from the Internet or an intranet. On the other hand, says Stamp, it takes a lot of time to wipe spyware off a PC, or worse. “In business, you have got to make the call,” he says. If keeping certain PCs off the network is too much of a hassle, Peiro suggests that a small company can configure its firewall and gateways differently and assign different levels of access to different users. “Sometimes a simple repositioning of the network firewall and the Internet gateway,” she says, “creating multiple sub-networks with different levels of access to resources, may elegantly address the concerns and maintain the benefits of the network for everybody.”

Bill’s Excellent Adventure

Many companies talk about getting close to the customer, but Microsoft pushed this idea to the extreme when it hired Nelle Steele to show up at 5 in the morning at the Milwaukee home of Tim Tucker. The owner of Air Engineering Inc., a supplier of industrial air compressor parts, is Microsoft’s model customer. Steele’s mission was to observe Tucker at close range, arriving as soon as he stepped out of the shower, then shadowing him until his workday ended at 10:30 p.m. Steele, a cultural anthropology Ph.D. student on leave from the University of Wisconsin, is one of five anthropologist-ethnographers (and the only one focused on entrepreneurs) that Microsoft hired full-time to conduct a field study. Called “Dawn to Dusk,” the study documents the work habits and thought processes of a species the software behemoth had never before tried to understand: owners and employees of small businesses. In tailing her quarry, Steele discovered, to her surprise, that small companies kept vital information in disconnected places — what she called “data silos” — from scribbled notes on scraps of paper to files on a PC that could be accessed by only one employee. This made it harrowing to try to answer basic questions like, “How did we do in the Northeast last quarter?” “I saw the pain that data silos caused day to day,” says Steele. Her work is part of Microsoft’s $2 billion research and development effort aimed at convincing these tribes of technological primitives to join the modern world. While most of that is earmarked to improve products, a lot of it is going to spreading the word. That’s in addition to two recent acquisitions — Great Plains and Navision business management software at another $2.4 billion — to enhance its offerings for small business. Even for Microsoft, with $50 billion in cash in the bank, that’s a major investment. Microsoft has started trying to care about these customers. Why us, you might ask, and why now? Partly it’s because “enterprise” customers, those that have more than 1,000 employees and 500 PCs, aren’t spending on tech the way they used to. So the industry’s top names, including IBM, Hewlett-Packard, and Dell, have started going after the littler fish. Even among this crowd, though, Microsoft’s push into small business is remarkably fervent and richly funded — and for a good reason: competition. There are two parts to the story that follows: the first is the challenge Microsoft faces and the criticism it has endured in the past. The second is what Microsoft is doing — with a degree of success — about both. Microsoft’s push into small business is remarkably fervent and richly funded — and for a good reason: competition. Today, 90% of small and midsize businesses run on the Microsoft platform, says Mika Krammer, an analyst at Gartner, a research firm. That’s a stranglehold on this enormous market of 8 million companies in the U.S. and 40 million worldwide. Globally, these companies pay almost as much for info tech — $400 billion a year — as America spends on defense. But despite its long history of dominance, Microsoft faces a looming threat from Linux and the insurgent open-source “free software” movement. Linux could do what the Justice Department couldn’t: end the era of Microsoft’s near monopoly and strip a sizable chunk of its sales and profits in the coming decade. Many industry analysts and media critics think that Linux is more secure and reliable than Windows, a prime target for hackers. Entrepreneurs have been paying close attention to the debate. Two of their biggest role models — Amazon and Google — now rely on Linux to run their websites. At a Yankee Group conference in San Francisco in March, small-business owners commiserated with one another about Microsoft’s disappointing customer support and their dislike of paying licensing and upgrade fees. They griped about how Microsoft’s new releases often seemed more like beta software — test versions with plenty of kinks — than reliable finished products, and they bemoaned the software’s vulnerability to viruses and the constant need for patches. With mighty IBM putting its clout behind Linux, some small businesses are starting to convert, often with impressive results. Satellite Records, a 35-employee music retailer in New York City, made the switch after IT director Steve Shapero found Microsoft’s software simply too high-maintenance. “It’s like American cars and Japanese cars,” says Shapero. “Do you want a Chevy Impala or a Honda Accord? It’s great that Detroit and Microsoft are finally making things that don’t suck, but we’d rather have the state of the art.” Shapero said that Microsoft server software would require a full-time person to keep it running, which the company didn’t want. “As an independent consultant I like to set up a Linux box, deploy it, and ideally never hear from my client again,” he says. Other customers were motivated by cost savings from not having licensing fees. Westport Rivers Winery, a 20-person family business in Westport, Mass., cut its annual tech budget by 60% with Linux, according to an IBM case study. Rob Meyer, Internet director for Anaconda Sports, a 200-person sporting goods distributor in Lake Katrine, N.Y., says it saves around $3,000 a year on licensing fees now. What’s more, small-business owners still feel a residue of fear from Microsoft’s long history of abusing power in its quest for total dominance. They remember how the company tried to hijack their websites in 2001 with SmartTags, an aborted Windows feature that would have turned many of their own words into links to Microsoft’s sites and advertisers’ without asking their consent. And they read about Microsoft’s vendetta against guitar-string maker Ernie Ball, based in San Luis Obispo, Calif. Four years ago, the founder’s son and CEO, Sterling Ball, was a victim of a “nail your boss” campaign by the Business Software Alliance, a trade group that Microsoft co-founded. BSA raided the operation and found that a few of its 80 computers had unpaid copies of Microsoft products. Ball said it was an accident, a case of unused programs left over on old PCs when they were passed from engineers to clerks. But he still had to pay $90,000 in fines and legal fees. Microsoft sent the news clips to other small companies as a threat. Since switching to Linux, Ball has saved more money than he lost in the contretemps. “The money that I’m not spending on new versions of Office and on fighting viruses is going into marketing and R&D,” he says. Now that it fully grasps the Linux threat, Microsoft isn’t being so heavy-handed with small businesses. Instead, the company is trying shrewdly to make its own claims of parity or superiority. Executives dispute Linux’s claims of better security and reliability and point out that “free software” isn’t actually free because you need to hire people to install, maintain, and customize it. (That’s how rivals, particularly IBM, are looking to profit.) Still, Linux is “a real threat, and we take it seriously,” says Darren Huston, the Microsoft vice president who leads U.S. initiatives for small and midsize businesses. The stakes are stunningly high — a $400 billion-a-year global market! — and this is going to be an epic battle waged over a long time. Krammer says that Microsoft will continue to dominate that market for several years because smaller customers are often slow to switch to new software and most buyers won’t really consider Linux until it becomes more mainstream. Besides, there aren’t yet many business programs based on Linux, and those that are available, such as Sun’s StarOffice, aren’t as good as Microsoft’s offerings. Microsoft remains vulnerable, however, because small-business owners resent being captive to such a powerful force and not having viable choices. A January Yankee Group survey of companies with fewer than 500 employees found that 43% of them are concerned about becoming overly reliant on Microsoft’s products and services; of those respondents, 72% were actively seeking alternative vendors. “Microsoft’s challenge,” says Krammer, “is to go from being a necessary evil to something that small businesses like to invest in.” Improvements are being made, but there is always room for more. In April Microsoft launched a revamped and much easier-to-use Web portal at www.microsoft.com/smallbusiness. Still, you might have to wait half an hour when calling customer service. Even more frustrating is how Microsoft keeps smaller customers at arm’s length by forcing them to work through intermediaries — local consultants who sell Microsoft’s software, set it up, show buyers how to use it, or write their own software to work with it. There are some 325,000 of these folks, who go by awkward acronyms and names such as “VARs” (value-added resellers), “ISVs” (independent software vendors), and “certified partners” (individuals who have passed training courses run by Microsoft). Small businesses hook up with these “partners” mainly through word of mouth, but if you’re an entrepreneur with little tech savvy, it’s hard to know whether your accountant’s sister-in-law or your lawyer’s fraternity brother is the best person to apply software to the challenges of your business. To help, Microsoft’s newly redesigned Web page has a “partner finder” to identify local consultants and their areas of training and expertise. The cottage industry of Microsoft’s partners is getting some big new players. Both HP and Dell are starting to hawk their consulting services to businesses with fewer than 500 employees. IBM is reaching out to entrepreneurs too, but rarely dips below the 500- to 1,000-employee range. While all three companies embrace Linux, they also promote Microsoft’s products as part of their overall packages for clients. Although finding the right partner and setting up a new software system can be stressful, there’s a compelling reason for sticking it out: Microsoft now offers many extremely useful products for small and midsize businesses. Microsoft divides this huge market into two parts: The 7.5 million “small” businesses with fewer than 50 employees, with no more than 25 PCs and with a maximum of $5 million in annual revenue. The 330,000 “midmarket” companies with fewer than 1,000 employees have up to 500 PCs and up to $500 million in revenue. The smallest businesses probably don’t have a PC network or even a professional info-tech employee. These start-ups can benefit from Small Business Center (formerly bCentral), a set of Web-based services hosted by Microsoft on its own computers. The pitch is that it’s like hiring Microsoft to be your info-tech department for a monthly or annual rental fee, usually after a 30-day free trial. First developed in 1999, the services — aimed at businesses with fewer than 25 employees — have quickly become popular, attracting more than 2 million users in the U.S., Microsoft says. One of them is Jack Marshall, president of Pastry Chef Central in Boca Raton, Fla. His small family business sells baking and pastry tools through pastrychef.com. “It’s supercheap,” Marshall says of Microsoft’s “shopping-cart” services, which cost only $249 a year (excluding credit card verification fees, which are billed by a third-party partner). “You can’t beat it.” And even though Microsoft can’t give the little guy all the powerful features of an Amazon, “they’re moving toward that,” he says. Marshall particularly likes the new “order status link” that sends e-mail purchase confirmations to customers with Web links so they can check on delivery without having to contact the company: “That’s been a fabulous timesaver for us.” Besides time, there’s the money: Microsoft says that the top 100 customers for Small Business Center’s e-commerce service averaged $43,000 in revenue last December. Small Business Center also offers ListBuilder, which enables companies to send mass e-mails to customers to let them know about sales or other news. Microsoft handles the mailing, then tracks who opened the messages and were inspired to visit the sender’s website. The cost: $29.95 a month or $299 a year. Microsoft surveyed 100 ListBuilder clients and found that businesses sent e-mails to an average of 30,000 customers, though some had amassed lists of more than 100,000 names. (Microsoft says it does not keep e-mail addresses for its own use.) One of Microsoft’s most useful hosted Web services is SharePoint, which allows colleagues to share information and collaborate with one another and their customers. SharePoint is sadly underused by small businesses, but it’s a smart idea. In a Microsoft case study, Jeff Williams, president and owner of Carolina’s Choice, a furniture manufacturer in Rocky Mount, N.C., says SharePoint allowed his company to make up-to-date sales information available 24 hours a day to a network of 700 furniture dealers (the cost: $19.95 introductory price, then $39.95 monthly). As fledgling companies grow, Microsoft wants to wean them from paying monthly rental fees to investing in licensed software installed on PCs (which is how Microsoft has always made most of its money). The staple of the desktop PC has long been Microsoft Office (Word, Excel, Outlook, and PowerPoint), which boasts 400 million users worldwide. “Everyone I hire out of college can use it,” says Eric Meslow, president of Timbercon, a 30-person, $4.5 million fiber optics manufacturer in Portland, Oreg. That gives Microsoft a big advantage over Linux, which often requires training. The latest twist: Last October, Microsoft introduced Office Small Business Edition 2003, which lists for $449, while earlier Office users can pay an upgrade price of $279. The prices are up to $50 higher than the standard version, but Microsoft throws in two compelling programs. First, Business Contact Manager consolidates all the information you have about a customer, a dramatic improvement over the haphazard data silos discovered by Nelle Steele that could spell lost leads or missed sales opportunities. The program can identify long-neglected sales accounts or alert you to what’s coming up in the pipeline in the next seven days. Timbercon’s Meslow says that before his salespeople had this “sales funnel” feature, it took them an hour a day to monitor their accounts. Now it takes “about two minutes,” he says. Meslow figures that saves a total of 20 hours a month for his typical salesperson, who generates an average of $150 to $200 an hour. Office’s other addition, Publisher, is a tool for creating websites, e-mail newsletters, and other marketing materials so you don’t have to hire professional design firms or printers. Timbercon saved $72,000 in the first year by designing portions of its website and product data sheets. “Publisher was one of the larger surprises of the new line for us,” Meslow says. “Five years ago you could tell if something was created in Publisher. Now it looks professionally done, and it’s relatively easy to use.” It’s also fast, he says. A project that once took three weeks for outside firms to design and print can be created in-house within a week. “Five years ago you could tell if something was created in Publisher. Now it looks professionally done.” Terry Szpak, VP of marketing and sales at Telesystems West, an 18-person, $2.5 million company in Bellevue, Wash., that sells and installs phone systems, estimates sales rose $5,000 to $10,000 a month thanks to Publisher. Over its first dozen years, Telesystems had put together a database of 5,000 customers, but employees were too busy to create or manage promotions to sell additional products. With Publisher they were able to turn out flyers and e-mails. “It’s hitting people who already trust us,” Szpak says. “Marketing to our existing customer base has been a boon.” Office and Business Center provide benefits to companies with multiple PCs hooked up only through the Internet or what’s known as the “sneaker net” — people simply walking around, a likely scenario for a start-up. But as the business grows, even greater opportunities can come from setting up a PC network with a separate machine dedicated as a server. About 7 million of America’s 8 million small businesses still don’t have a server, according to Microsoft. It charges $599 to license its Small Business Server software for five users, and Dell and HP both sell the hardware with this software already installed for under $1,000. (Customers can later expand by licensing up to 75 users before they have to switch to a more capable product.) The investment usually pays for itself quickly. A server makes it easier to back up data that might otherwise reside on isolated PCs. It lets employees look at each other’s calendars and contacts, hook up to the network remotely, and share software for business functions such as accounting and inventory. Having a server enables a company to host a SharePoint intranet, which is how the Fischer Group changed the way it did business. The 23-person, $10 million Orange, Calif., food manufacturer representative firm had relied on old-fashioned paper files for purchase orders, contracts, contact information, and memos. They were often misplaced. Worse, employees could only get to the files during business hours. “Our biggest problem was wasting time and money physically handling job documents,” says Gene Austin, the company’s general manager. “It was like putting $100 bills in a pile and setting them on fire.” Once Fischer digitized this material, finding information and responding to customers became easier and faster. Small Business Server also provides security for a company’s network, an area where many small businesses are turning to Linux, including Timbercon, which runs its firewall on an open-source software server. Even though Microsoft still relies on its partners, it’s trying much harder to make direct contact with its customers. The company now offers free seminars for small businesses in 160 cities, many of them far-flung rural outposts like Casper, Wyo. Cynthia Bates, Microsoft’s general manager for U.S. small business, says that everyone on her team has to spend one day a month working for a customer’s company to see what daily life is like. “We want to humanize Microsoft rather than be the company in the backroom,” says her boss, Darren Huston. Meanwhile, our intrepid cultural anthropologist Nelle Steele has begun a new two and a half year study called Small Business Better Together, which is applying technology to three small companies in the Seattle area. The owner of one of the three didn’t want customers to wind up with voice mail; he insisted that an employee take a message. But these employees relied on sticky notes applied to computers or chairs. When these fell off, the customer’s needs would go ignored. Microsoft responded by buying new hardware and donating software. Now, Steele reports, “people are taking messages for each other in Outlook.” The notes haven’t gone away entirely. Some things stick for a long time, and no amount of technology will change that. Sidebar: Microsoft a la carte Info-tech options for your small business Small Business Center (formerly bCentral) What It Is: Online services for hosting e-commerce websites, processing customers’ orders, developing sales leads, and launching e-mail marketing campaigns Pros And Cons: Microsoft rents many useful Web-based services on a monthly or annual basis, though the other options — especially eBay — are popular with small merchants and with customers. Alternatives: Amazon, eBay, Yahoo Office Small Business Edition 2003 What It Is: Tools for creating and editing documents, spreadsheets, presentations, and marketing materials; managing e-mail and calendars; and tracking contacts and leads Pros And Cons: Everyone’s already trained on Microsoft’s excellent suite, the global standard with 400 million users, but OpenOffice is a viable option — and it’s free. Alternatives: OpenOffice, Sun’s StarOffice Small Business Server What It Does: Runs and provides security for PC networks Pros And Cons: It’s a good product. But Microsoft charges $599 for five users, while open-source rivals like Apache are free — and critics say they offer lower maintenance costs and better security. Alternatives: Apache, EmergeCore IT-100, Novell’s Small Business Suite, Red Hat Linux Alan Deutschman is a writer living in San Francisco and Roanoke, Va.

Making the Switch

Bottom Line When a high-tech trend threatened the future of his business, Michael Edell radically reshaped his company. Two years later, he’s suffered record losses and lost legions of employees. But don’t stop him now How would you feel if one day people just stopped buying your most popular product? Software vendor Michael Edell got a taste of that feeling in October 1998. That’s when Edell began to notice a disturbing sales pattern. His company, jeTech Data Systems, based in Camarillo, Calif., created and sold labor-management software, which automates the administrative tasks — payroll, time tracking, and project planning — that come with managing a large workforce. At the time, Edell’s company was losing deals, but not to rival vendors. Instead, sales prospects were forgoing software products altogether, preferring punch clocks and paper — in Edell’s view, inefficiency — to the expense and hassle that came with buying and installing jeTech’s software. Never in 15 years had Edell, then 35, experienced such flat-out rejection. He knew something was up. “When you look at our markets, a solution like ours makes so much sense,” he says. “It had to come down to the fact that we were somehow doing the wrong thing.” Meanwhile, in another realm of the software universe, the application service provider (ASP) model for selling and distributing software was emerging. ASP software vendors act like high-tech landlords, providing their customers with software over the Internet for a fixed monthly fee. Customers usually access the software, which runs on the vendor’s servers or on those of a third-party provider, through their Web browsers. Besides giving customers more predictable costs, the ASP model spares them the headaches of buying servers, hiring IT staff, and enduring lengthy systems-integration ordeals. Edell pondered his lost deals and concluded that unless jeTech began offering Web-based software, the company might well be doomed. This past January, jeTech became eLabor.com, the first software vendor to offer an ASP model in the labor-management niche, according to industry sources. By then, of course, few software vendors didn’t have some sort of ASP plan. But back in 1998, ASPs were practically unheard of. These days, companies with an ASP approach are backed by venture capital and are officially hot. Research firms are also crowing about the ASP model. IDC, for one, believes the market for ASP software will balloon to $7.8 billion by 2004, compared with the $300 million it took in last year. But for all the noise surrounding the ASP trend, what’s rarely discussed is the dilemma small vendors like Edell face because of it. What happens when the product you’ve sold for years for millions of dollars suddenly has no prospective buyers, only renters? Obviously, your cash flow plummets — at least at first. Using an ASP system, some vendors reap the same revenues they would have received as traditional software vendors, but the money is paid out over time. Most actually make more in the long run by structuring their leases not for a given period but for as long as the customer uses the product. Either way, there’s a big cash crunch up front as the vendor adjusts from a diet of six-digit pie to monthly morsels. Software vendors also have to determine whether they should switch whole hog to an ASP model or continue to offer customers the choice of buying their product outright. Offering both options gets tricky. How, for instance, do you structure incentives for your salespeople so that they will push the “cheaper” ASP model? And how do you explain to customers who’ve recently installed your software that the very package they’ve just paid six digits for and that required months to get configured is now available at rental rates on the Web, with minimal customization required? Those were a few of the challenges Edell confronted as he transformed jeTech into eLabor.com. The issue was not whether jeTech would change, according to Edell. “It was how do you finance, deploy, and market that change?” he says. Michael Edell decided that unless jeTech began offering Web-based software, the company might be doomed. Edell lists financing first for a reason: adapting software to make it deployable on the Web is pricey because of the personnel (costly programmers and Web designers) and gear (the latest servers and network equipment) needed to do the job. Most industry observers agree that it’s nearly impossible for a small software vendor to switch to an ASP model without acquiring millions in outside funding, both to pay for the overhead and to provide operating capital until rental revenues ramp up enough to cover monthly costs. At best, switching to the rent-based model would mean two years of flattened sales. At worst, if leasing never caught on with the large businesses that typically use labor-management software, the move would drown jeTech in red ink. Both scenarios were tough for Edell to stomach. But Edell could at least feel confident that he had a key advantage when it came to seeking external financing: a track record as an experienced pre-Internet entrepreneur. Edell had built jeTech from barefoot beginnings in 1983 into a $14-million, 85-employee player. With customers like Corning and Hertz, tiny jeTech competed with national powers like $254-million Kronos and Simplex, which has revenues of more than $800 million. Edell consistently kept jeTech’s margins near 20%. During the company’s migration from DOS to Unix, in 1983, and throughout the early-1990s recession, jeTech stayed debt free, growing without outside funding. Edell doesn’t hesitate to invoke his status as an industry veteran, a profits-first type who needs a swig of Maalox when he hears about Web-based companies with free products and deep deficits. “I’m from the old school,” he says. Complementing Edell’s sturdy résumé is his decidedly sturdy appearance. With his full head of jet black hair, the energetic, six-foot-two Edell resembles not so much a grown-up techie as he does a seasoned corporate battler. “Customers don’t like to buy from rookies,” says Brad Jones, partner at Brentwood Venture Capital, which in November 1998 poured $7.5 million into jeTech. Edell met Jones through jeTech’s corporate attorney, Leib Orlanski, who’d already worked with the company for five years and had sat on jeTech’s board. He had seen the company grow nearly 600% since 1994. Orlanski’s firm had connections in the venture-capital community, and it was quick to make introductions for Edell (with an eye, no doubt, on doing the company’s IPO if everything worked out). Even with the Brentwood money — which jeTech burned through in 13 months — Edell found himself in need of a larger credit line. He inquired at his bank, but it was from the old school, too, and wouldn’t expand jeTech’s then $2-million line, which was based strictly on accounts receivable. Eventually, Edell landed a $6-million line at Silicon Valley Bank in December 1999, just as the $7.5 million from Brentwood ran dry. The line easily tided the company over until its next cash installment: $16 million from Lehman Brothers and Brentwood Venture Capital, which came in March. For such a heretofore penny-pinching soul as Edell, raising and spending money at that rate might have seemed foolhardy. But the dollars involved in turning jeTech into eLabor.com were comparable to what other companies have burned through in doing their entire ASP makeovers. Art Williams, a director and analyst with Giga Information Group in Cambridge, Mass., says that Edell’s figures are not only typical — they’re necessary. “You’re giving up your front-end revenues for an annuity stream,” he says. Williams estimates that it can take a company up to two years to recoup the front-end revenues it loses during the transition. But that hardly spells doom for small software vendors that don’t raise mountains of money, says Katherine Jones of the Aberdeen Group, in Palo Alto, Calif. Jones says some vendors take an outsourcing approach: rather than executing an ASP model by themselves, the vendors simply form a partnership with companies that already have an ASP infrastructure, such as Breakaway Solutions or NaviSite, to name two. Essentially, Breakaway and NaviSite license application software from vendors, host it on their own servers, and act as de facto value-added resellers (except in this case they’re actually renting, not selling). Edell, however, was intent on turning eLabor.com into a stand-alone ASP. He saw it as the company’s best chance to close the gap on competitor Kronos (which had yet to offer an ASP option). After all, the capital he raised could do more than just smooth over cash flow. It could also fund the staffing requirements for rapid growth, allowing the company to add salespeople, programmers, developers, and security gurus. So far, in fact, 85% of eLabor.com’s capital has gone toward hiring personnel. But the hiring hasn’t always gone as planned. The company has actually had two separate recruiting binges in the past two years. The first ramp-up — bringing the total number of employees to 180 by the end of 1999 — was followed by a “scale back” to 130 when Edell opted to outsource some support and implementation services he had previously planned to keep in-house. The retrenchment was also prompted by what might be termed “technocultural” issues, workplace tensions created by technology changes the company had to make as it switched course. Since 1997, jeTech’s programmers had written software mostly in Java code, with a Sun Microsystems-based architecture. Most members of one of the product-development teams saw no reason to change when the company converted its software from installed to Web-based. But a faction of that team believed — rightly, as it turned out — that jeTech’s software would run faster on Microsoft architecture. They also thought key parts of the system should be written not in Java but in the programming languages C++ and Visual Basic. When those workers persuaded Edell to scrap more than a year’s worth of Java coding — about $1 million in labor, Edell guesses — some of the Java programmers revolted and left the company. Other programmers had grown accustomed to an environment in which they sometimes spent more than a year developing products for which time-to-market rates weren’t crucial. Now the treadmill was accelerating. The structure of the product-development segment was changed, and the company’s development teams were whittled from 20 members to 5, yet the teams — faced with the same workload — were expected to produce faster. “We took 18 months of work and crunched it into 3 for a development cycle,” says Dave Mikelonis, vice-president of product development. Mikelonis says the company hardly misses the departed workers. “In my opinion, 20% of us were doing 80% of the work anyway,” he adds. Edell saw turning his company into an ASP as its best chance to close the gap on the competition. Edell estimates that he lost 50 employees, between the disgruntled Java programmers and workers who resigned or were fired for their inability to adjust to the faster pace. And like Mikelonis, Edell thinks the business is better for the exodus. “No one left that we didn’t want to leave. We lost 50 people, and production doubled,” he says. Whether the jettisoned workers share Edell’s view of their inefficiency is another matter. Edell refused to provide contact information for his ex-employees, saying: “I don’t think trying to find out why they were left behind is appropriate. I don’t want to rub that in anyone’s face.” Although the ASP ramp-up began nearly two years ago, the company didn’t change its name to eLabor.com until January, five months after it began pushing the ASP model. The belated switch symbolized Edell’s biggest regret to date and another cause of employee defections: poor communication with the rank and file. When the company was still known as jeTech, confusion reigned among the staff. The ASP offering seemed like just another new product from jeTech — not a complete change in corporate direction. Edell faults himself for not spelling things out more clearly. In hindsight he wishes he’d taken employees on a three-day “vision” retreat. Instead, he gave a PowerPoint presentation to his staff to outline the ASP plan. He thought his vision was clear, as did his fellow executives. But the rest of the staff members were baffled by this new ASP product called eLabor.com that, according to Edell, was going to change the world. “There was a lot of confusion,” says longtime salesman Dan Auge. When salespeople demonstrated an early version of jeTech’s ASP product in the field, they didn’t see what all the hype was about — and neither did some of their customers. That wasn’t surprising since the early version looked just like the installed jeTech product. It hardly seemed worthy of the fanfare Edell had sounded in its honor. “They saw some product getting released that looked just like our old product, and they’d ask, ‘What’s the difference?” says Edell. “They didn’t get it.” Even after numerous informational meetings, sales staff would return from the field wondering what, besides the cost, were the benefits of a Web-based product. “It was hard for me to fathom why a company wouldn’t buy the product the traditional way,” adds Auge. When the sales force finally did understand — and start to sell — the company’s ASP solution, another problem emerged: how could the company motivate its salespeople to sell a three-year contract instead of a flat-fee installation? The sales staff was selling both versions at the same time but had little rationale to push the rental model, since doing so would mean smaller up-front commissions. Edell and the sales staff ultimately agreed on a compensation system in which the company would pay full commissions during the first six months of an ASP rental contract. (At press time Edell said he was considering paying them over 90 days.) That way, salespeople wouldn’t have to wait three years to collect the commissions they previously would have received instantly on a sale. Though Edell takes the blame for the communications gaffe, he attributes his company’s bumps partly to its early entry into the ASP arena. In late 1998 there essentially was no ASP market, which placed a big burden on the company to explain the concept to both employees and customers. But the employees, it seems, finally do “get it,” and eLabor.com has sold 20 Web-based deployments so far. In addition, the company has yet to face any wrath from its legacy customers, who paid for on-site software installations before the company began offering its Web-based alternative. Edell doesn’t anticipate problems, mainly because he’s been upfront with customers about the switch, and because most of his customers seem to understand how rapidly technology changes. But not everyone thinks it’ll be easy for companies making the ASP switch to keep existing customers from feeling cheated. John Witchel, founder and CEO of San Francisco-based Red Gorilla, which offers Web-based time-tracking software, thinks established companies are at a decided disadvantage in rolling out an ASP model. “You have tons of customers who’ve spent millions on software. If you offer the exact same thing on the Internet for less, you’ll have an absolutely livid customer base thinking it got ripped off,” he says. Other vendors, however, agree with Edell that customers are numb to the pain of frequent high-tech spending and are therefore unlikely to become angry when they have to spend more on new technologies. “When customers make an investment to build a data center, hire IT staff, and buy servers, they know that after a few years they’ll need new stuff,” says Allie Rogers, CEO of $10-million Triple Point Technology, based in Westport, Conn. “Over time, customers expect more users or volume on their systems anyway, which always means new purchases. There’s no concept of making an investment and sitting on it.” Though Triple Point’s latest releases are deployable on the Web, Rogers says, customers are hardly champing at the bit for his company’s Web-based products. “I still consider Web-based software two years away from wide acceptance,” he says. Jim Kizielewicz, vice-president of marketing for Kronos, shares Rogers’s view that the ASP model will take some time to take off. Kronos launched its ASP offering in June. “We’ve had an ongoing dialogue with analysts, and the market appears to be extremely overhyped right now,” Kizielewicz says. “Plus we weren’t hearing about it from many of our customers.” The difference in opinion between Kizielewicz and Edell — two guys in the same market — illustrates the fallacy of generalizing about an industrywide trend like ASP deployment. Edell reacted to the model early for two reasons: he saw the technology’s potential impact on his customers; and he realized that in his position — as a small company competing with Kronos and Simplex — he might miss the chance to capitalize on a historical change in the way customers purchase and use software. Right now it’s difficult to judge whether eLabor.com is too early, right on time, or just plain wrong. What’s clear, though, is that Edell is no longer quite the same old-school guy. “Well, now I’m kind of an old-school, new-school guy,” he says. “New school when it comes to the model. Old school when it comes to making money.” Ilan Mochari is a reporter at Inc. Please e-mail your comments to editors@inc.com.