Tag Archives: Viagra

Tech Talk: Publisher Puts Kibosh on Spam

Hay House, a book publisher based in Carlsbad, Calif., was founded 24 years ago and has grown to become one of the largest self-help publishers in the world with 125 employees in the U.S. and locations in four different continents. The publishing house relies on e-mail for internal communication and for communicating with writers, often sending manuscripts back and forth. But employees were being deluged with spam – the company receives up to 10,000 spam messages per day – until information technology director Mike Fishell and his staff installed an e-mail security appliance. Elizabeth Wasserman: What are the plusses and minuses of using e-mail in your business? Mike Fishell: It’s much faster for moving information around. Whether it’s information for a book, fact-checking, public relations, or passing on quotes to be inserted into our books, we rely on our e-mail. We also have offices located in time zones that don’t match up. We have offices in the U.K., Australia, South Africa, and India, in addition to the U.S. So if it’s noon in London and someone e-mails us with something that has to be addressed that day, we can get back to them before they go home that night. We also may receive manuscripts via e-mail from our authors. Instead of sending a manuscript via FedEx, they can e-mail it to us directly. Wasserman: What are the security risks to a business posed by relying on e-mail? Do you get a lot of spam? Fishell: We get in the neighborhood of 10,000 spam messages a day. Wasserman: What did you do about that? Fishell: We were using software-based spam solutions in the past, but the spam problem was growing faster than our application could deal with it. I looked at appliances and Axway’s Mailgate was the first one I brought in-house for a trial. It worked so well that we couldn’t even think of taking it out of production. The trial unit we were sent was kept in production for three years. Wasserman: What does it do? How does it help you? Fishell: It helps us with spam by using a context-based algorithm. Some of our books may deal with health and we may have the word Viagra show up in a book, maybe with someone giving medical advice related to it. It’s not in the context of someone trying to sell it, because that wouldn’t be delivered to the mailbox. Our users receive an e-mail every day at 5 p.m. showing everything that was quarantined by the filter. They have an option to release it to themselves or ignore it. Wasserman: What have the results been? Fishell: On the inbound side, the time savings is money savings. I do a report once a year for the directors explaining the cost savings associated with it. I have calculated out in the thousands and thousands of dollars in terms of man hours for our people not having to delete spam. The cost savings worked out to about $54,000 a year in terms of man-hours we would have spent deleting spam. There are a lot of these e-mails being sent around maybe directing people to a website and it’s not enough of an e-mail to be caught as spam or a virus. But it directs them to a website that may have malicious intentions. We’re able to plug keywords into our filter and have it blocked in a matter of minutes instead of waiting for the virus companies to have something out there to block one. I don’t have to worry about anyone clicking on the link. It also allows me to set policies to prevent certain types of sensitive data from being e-mailed outside the office accidentally. Not only viruses, but personal information or confidential information, certain contracts we don’t want leaving the building, or proprietary material we don’t want leaving the building. In terms of time management, it’s nice having something in the business that doesn’t require babysitting. I take a look at the reports once a day. If I skip looking at the reports once a day, I’m not worried. The box gets restarted once or twice a year.  That and software updates a couple times a year and you can pretty much set it and forget it.

E-mail Archiving: A Solution to System Overload

our beautiful site

Even disregarding the spam and notes from friends, chances are you get too much e-mail at the office. Trying to save it all can be daunting, and for a small business this can add up to cost in both time and resources. And while it might be easy to delete those unwanted solicitations for Viagra, saving business legitimate communications isn’t just a good idea — it might even be required. “It depends on the policy of the company and the industry,” says Vivian Gopico-Tero, senior research analyst of compliance infrastructure at research firm IDC. She says that e-mail archiving has historically been used to address system storage space, and depending on company and federal rules, some individuals may have to save virtually all e-mail. Goouci-Tero says there are issues to consider, including those on the operational side in regards to management policies, as well as the legal compliance side. “These are not independent of each other.” Advantages of in-house and off-site e-mail storage Archiving of e-mail can help a business, should it find itself in hot water. “It’s certainly true that many businesses have to adhere to specific governmental regulations with regard to document retention, and this can include not just email but also instant messaging,” says Mitch Tulloch, of Microsoft Most Valuable Professional (MVP) and lead author of the Windows Vista Resource Kit from Microsoft Press. “With the recent amendments to the U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), businesses in non-regulatory situations however are realizing more and more the risk of not archiving their e-mail since legal discovery events typically extend to e-mail and other forms of messaging. The best approach may simply be to save everything except spam for a certain number of days. In most cases that seems sufficient for evidentiary purposes.” There are multiple methods for archiving of e-mail, including using an additional server to house the data. This could also include backing up to disk, and even after a certain amount of time to tape. In these cases a business would have to worry less about the theft or loss of any private or sensitive data by a third party. The other option would be to archive e-mail to a hosted service provider. “Hosted service may cost more in ‘hard dollars,’” says Tulloch. “But by outsourcing your archiving needs you’re actually freeing up your IT resources so you can focus on other more strategic initiatives.” He recommends Microsoft Exchange Hosted Archive as a hosted option, which can help generate extra cost savings in terms of bandwidth by pairing it with Exchange Hosted Filtering. The reasons is that since your e-mail stream is filtered for spam and viruses and only clean e-mail gets through to your business, while a copy of each message is sent to the hosted archive repository. Tulloch adds that the Microsoft Exchange Hosted Archive service also includes a permissions infrastructure that allows different users to have varying levels of access to the archived data. “That’s important for most businesses as you don’t want just anyone in your company to have access to your history.” Disadvantages of e-mail backup systems No system of e-mail archiving is perfect. And even when in place, there are always risks involved whether a business is backing up e-mail in-house or to an off-site provider. In the case of in-house e-mail archiving, Goouci-Tero says that issues such as system failure or just an old-fashioned tearing of tape can result in a lost e-mail. On-site e-mail storage could also require additional training and support, but this could still be done by a part-time or contracted IT manager. Outsourcing of the archiving will allow you to forego those expenses, but this brings up the issue of security. “Trust is a big issue of course, and different businesses will have different concerns around whether outsourcing is the way to go or not,” says Tulloch. What works best for archiving your e-mail Does hosting the archives on-site make sense, or can your small business look to outsource all of your digital communication? To help you decide, ask yourself the following questions. Is company or federal regulation required for the archiving of industry communication? What types and how much of e-mail communication should be backed up? Does this include e-mail from support staff, or just those with financial clients or others dealing with business arrangements? Do you have the support personal and space for an additional server? E-mail archival is only as good as the system. The key to its success is that people use it. If this isn’t regularly backed up and maintained, either in-house or off-site, then it’s just money wasted. For it to work, the system must be simple and reliable. “The threat of litigation is always hanging over businesses nowadays,” says Tulloch, “and it’s just not acceptable to say ‘Oops, sorry we don’t have that information’ when you get called upon to respond to a request for evidence in a trial or lawsuit.” SIDEBAR: E-Mail Archiving Products to Watch Fort Knox secure, Fortiva.com, provides on-demand e-mail archiving solutions. The GFI Mail Archive is an affordable management solution that requires little administrative effort to store, back-up and retrieve archived communications including mailbox quotas on Microsoft Exchange server. The Athena Archiver addresses corporate and federal compliance, as well as policy-based corporate governance needs.

Beware of Botnets and Other New Kinds of Spam

Businesses appear to be falling behind in the eternal war against spammers. Just when they manage to block one variety of unsolicited junk email to their office inboxes, another variety is developed. Until new technological advances come along, the best they can hope to do is use existing technology to stem the flow or outsource the work to companies that fight spam full time. In the last year, the amount of spam rose 250 percent over 2005 levels, according to security software firm SonicWall, in Sunnyvale, Calif. There are two main reasons for this surge: Image spam and botnets. Making it past spam filters Botnets, in which a virus takes over a PC and turns it into a spam-sending machine, have helped increase the overall amount of spam. The way it works is that perpetrators that want to take over other people’s computers for the purpose of sending spam first distribute viruses or worms to mostly Windows PCs. The code also contains a bot, or software robot, that automatically logs onto a server. Spammers access the server and order it to force the PC to send out spam to mail servers. While botnets are dangerous, some businesses try to block bots from being deployed through the use of intrusion prevention systems, either through a hosted service or at the network level. While effective against network-base infections, IPS offers little to defend against infections caused by employees willingly downloading bot infection payloads deceptively marketed as screen savers or browser toolbars. And once infected, these systems won’t stop bots from communication with botnets using standard http and https protocols. Image spam is also proving difficult to combat. Image spam has added to the amount of spam that makes it past spam filters employed by many businesses or Internet providers. Image spam was devised to foil filters looking for words like “Viagra” or “XXX.” When text is presented in a JPEG or PDF, such text-seeking filters are rendered useless. Image spam has been around for a while, but until 2004 or so most of it was filtered out by software that was looking for “signatures” — domains, common words or phrases, bulk recipients, etc. — that were common to emails sent en masse. The spammers came up with “snowflake spam,” in which every image is unique, although they look the same to the naked eye. Spammers quickly discovered the technique works: In 2005, only 3 percent of spam was imaged-based. In 2006, that figure rose to 30 percent, according to IronPort Sytems, a San Bruno, Calif., gateway security provider. Patrick Peterson, vice president of technology for IronPort Systems, says signature-based filters don’t work very well anymore. IronPort does do some image-based filtering, like looking for similar background colors, but the technique is far from foolproof and optical character analysis — the ability to recognize image-based text — is still way too ineffective. How to block the new flavors of spam Another way to address image spam is to simply block all images unless they are sent from an address that has been pre-selected by the recipient. The downside, of course, is that some legitimate emails will inevitably be lost in the shuffle. In addition to of filtering and blocking, many spam-fighters are focusing on “reputation analysis,” that is, assessing the validity of the recipient based on the incoming email address. Such reputation analysis finds out where the spam is coming from and then creates a blacklist. Analysts say while reputation analysis is the most effective ways to combat spam right now, it is far from a total solution. The other problem is that, like with image spam blocking, legitimate emails may be blacklisted. “These are small steps,” says Jeanniey Mullen, executive director of email marketing for Ogilvy, the New York ad agency. “I don’t think anyone has the answer yet.” Arabella Hallawell, research vice president for Gartner Research, of Stamford, Conn., recommends either getting an email appliance to limit a system’s exposure to spam and/or outsourcing -mail management to someone else. Not surprisingly, Peterson agrees with her. “The ante has really gone up,” he says. “In the old days, five to 10 really smart guys could put together a spam solution that’s pretty good. Now we’ve got 30-plus guys working on spam just to stay ahead of what the bad guys are doing.”

Things I Can’t Live Without: Michael Murdoch

CEO of AppRiver In the murky world of Internet security, Michael Murdoch’s company thwarts the spammers, phishers, and hackers. After working in the IT industry for 20 years, Murdoch co-founded AppRiver in 2002. These days, the $5 million company blocks spam and viruses for roughly 6,500 organizations. Murdoch has 42 employees in Gulf Breeze, Florida, and will hire more when he opens a London office next month. In 2004, AppRiver’s location made it vulnerable to a different threat. “Hurricane Ivan pounded us,” says Murdoch of the storm that ripped the roof off the company’s headquarters. Fortunately, Murdoch’s customers weren’t inundated with offers for Viagra and cheap mortgages because AppRiver’s servers are in other states. This hurricane season Murdoch is spreading goodwill by offering free services to Florida companies. If a hurricane knocks out a business’s servers, AppRiver will safeguard incoming e-mails until the systems are restored. “Sure, it’s philanthropic,” Murdoch says. “It’s also good business.” Attack monkey, $31 “The attack monkey is our company mascot. Every new employee gets filmed being killed by the attack monkey on his first day of work.” Reef flip-flops, $50 “Florida is casual, and you have to have a good pair of flip-flops. I’ve yet to find a more comfortable brand than Reef.” Collection of history books, $2,400 “I studied business in college, but history is my true passion. I like American history, particularly the Civil War and President Lincoln.” Sprint PPC-6700, $400 “This can do anything my desktop can do, anywhere–even on vacation in Costa Rica (when my wife’s not looking).” …and What I Covet A700 AdamJet, $2.3 million “I don’t fly, but I’d like to learn. I travel a lot for work, and the airports around here are so difficult these days. It would be nice if I could travel in my own plane.”

Technofile: Why Wi-Fi?

Unless you’ve been living under a rock for the past year or so, you’ve seen the term “Wi-Fi.” You’ve probably figured out that it’s shorthand for “wireless fidelity.” You may even know that it’s got something to do with accessing the Internet or a private network through the air instead of through cables. What you’re probably still wondering is: Why should I care? Because chances are that, within the next year or so, you’ll use Wi-Fi regularly at work, at home, or on the road. You may well depend on Wi-Fi as much as you do your cell phone, your laptop computer, or your personal digital assistant (PDA). In fact, all those devices increasingly come ready to work with Wi-Fi. (One example: By 2007, according to IDC Research of Framingham, Mass., 98% of all new notebok PCs will be sold with Wi-Fi capability). That means the next time you invest in hardware, you’re likely to invest in the Wi-Fi label as well. So it makes sense to learn what Wi-Fi does well — and where it still needs work. Wi-Fi refers to products certified to work with the high-tech industry’s global standard for high-speed wireless networking (see “Wi-Fi Phrasebook.”). Hardware carrying the Wi-Fi logo has passed rigorous testing by the Wi-Fi Alliance, a trade association based in Mountain View, Calif. (see “Resources“). Certification means that, regardless of which company manufactured it, the equipment should play nicely with other Wi-Fi devices and networks. As Wi-Fi compatibility grows — to date, the alliance has certified nearly 865 products — so has its popularity. Currently, about 4.7 million Americans regularly use Wi-Fi, according to Stamford, Conn.-based research group Gartner Inc. In four years, that figure will grow to 31 million users in the United States alone. Why is Wi-Fi so widespread — and what’s in it for businesses? It’s fast. Wi-Fi’s latest version is many times faster than DSL or cable connections, and literally hundreds of times faster than those old dial-up connections. That’s particularly handy when you’re working on the run, on the road, or from home: If you’ve ever watched seconds tick by while watching Web pages load, you’ll appreciate the potential productivity gain. It’s convenient. As soon as a Wi-Fi-equipped device is within range of a base station, it’s online. With no wires, you can move your laptop computer from place to place — for instance, from your office to a conference room down the hall — without losing your network connection. (For an online calculator that can help determine ROI on an in-house wireless network,” Resources.”). When traveling, you can set up shop anyplace equipped with a Wi-Fi network: another company’s office, a hotel room, or a convention center. It’s everywhere. Public Wi-Fi access sites — or “hot spots” — are multiplying faster than rabbits on Viagra. They’re in bookstores, airport lounges, fast-food restaurants (including some McDonald’s and Schlotzky’s Deli outlets), and coffee shops (including many Starbucks outlets). In addition, local merchants from Cincinnati to Athens, Ga., to Portland, Ore., are footing the bill for bigger hot spots, accessible throughout a business district or neighborhood. Some companies charge for hot-spot use; others offer free access. All hope they’re creating environments where tech-savvy customers will linger — and, presumably — spend more money on coffee, books, sandwiches, or whatever the hot-spot host sells. Does the idea pay off? Overall, it’s too early to tell. Ultimately, the answer will affect how fast the public hot-spot market heats up. In June 2003, IDC, the Framingham, Mass.-based research company, estimated that the number of commercial Wi-Fi sites would grow 57% annually over the next five years — but warned that the market is young, volatile, and based on unproven business models. In other words, if hot spots don’t generate revenue, expect that growth rate to stall. For all its wonders, the Wi-Fi world comes with some drawbacks. Among them: Range: Although you lose the wires, you’re still limited to the base station’s range, typically 75 to 150 feet indoors and a few hundred feet outdoors, depending on equipment, radio frequency, and obstructions. Power drain: Networks using early versions of Wi-Fi technology tend to quickly gobble power — a disadvantage for battery-dependent laptop users. Interference: Nearby microwave ovens and cordless phones, particularly older models, can slow down Wi-Fi transmissions. Security: Here’s the downside of providing fast, easy access: outsiders can sometimes get into your wireless networks as fast and easily as you can. Check with hardware vendors about the latest security precautions and products. The Wi-Fi Alliance currently recommends using Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA) technology, which both authenticates users and encrypts data. Look for even tougher security measures within the next year. Wi-Fi Phrasebook Entering the world of wireless fidelity, or Wi-Fi, requires knowing just a little local lingo. Here are the most important terms: 802.11: We’re covering this term only because you’ll run across it in learning about Wi-Fi. Pronounced “eight-oh-two-dot-eleven,” it’s usually followed by a letter (mostly a, b, g). Essentially, this is Wi-Fi’s technical name. It refers to a family of specifications for wireless LANs. Higher letters indicate more recent, and presumably improved, versions of the technology. Base station: The heart of a Wi-Fi network, it’s equipped with an antenna that sends a low-powered, short-range radio signal. Wi-Fi-enabled devices within a certain radius detect the signal, letting users access the network. Bluetooth: A specification for very short-range wireless transmission (within 30 feet). Hot spot: Wi-Fi access point. The term usually refers to coffee shops, airports, hotels, and other public locations with local area networks (LANs) that Wi-Fi-equipped users can access free or for a fee. (To find a hot spot, see “Resources.” LAN: Local area network. A WLAN is a wireless local area network. Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA): Wireless network security technology; replaced an older, more vulnerable mechanism known as Wireless Equivalent Privacy (WEP). Wi-Fi Resources As you might expect, the Web is awash in resources about Wi-Fi. Here’s a sampling: Wi-Fi Alliance Main site for the nonprofit trade association behind Wi-Fi certification. Offers a plain-English introduction to Wi-Fi, lists of Wi-Fi certified products, security information, and other resources, including: Wi-Fi Alliance Benefits Calculator Downloadable spreadsheet helps companies calculate the ROI on their Wi-Fi investments. Wi-Fi Glossary: One-stop dictionary defines all those strange wireless-networking acronym.

The State of Small Business, Part 3: How It Works in the Real World

PART 3: HOW IT WORKS IN THE REAL WORLD This section describes the digital economy’s effects on traditional small businesses. “He thought he’d run an herb nursery and garden center, do some mail-order business, and sell plants to local nurseries. But a technological wrinkle called the Internet has since rejiggered – massively so – that idyll. Gage, a closet techie despite the dirt under his fingernails, decided three and a half years ago to move his agrarian, low-growth business onto the electronic grid of the World Wide Web. Today Gage, at age 55, finds himself working 80-hour weeks and forecasting that his sales will quadruple between 2000 and 2003, to more than $2 million. ‘There are a million decisions to make every day,’ says the suddenly unretiring Gage with enthusiasm. ‘This is my Viagra.” From “The Greenhouse Effect,” which explains how a small, nontech business bloomed on the Internet. PART 3 ARTICLES: The Greenhouse Effect Snap, Crackle, Pop! The Name Game PART 1: How It Feels at This Moment PART 2: How It Looks from This Place PART 4: How It Ties to the Future

The Greenhouse Effect

THE REAL WORLD Gene Gage had in mind leading a quiet life in the country while indulging his hobby of growing herbs. That was before he hitched his wagon to an Internet star When Gene Gage left an executive job in New York City, in the late 1970s, he returned to his rural Nebraska roots. He planned to slow down and take more control of his life by being self-employed. After a couple of false starts, he began Papa Geno’s Herb Farm in 1993 to indulge his hobby. He thought he’d run an herb nursery and garden center, do some mail-order business, and sell plants to local nurseries. But a technological wrinkle called the Internet has since rejiggered — massively so — that idyll. Gage, a closet techie despite the dirt under his fingernails, decided three and a half years ago to move his agrarian, low-growth business onto the electronic grid of the World Wide Web. Today Gage, at age 55, finds himself working 80-hour weeks and forecasting that his sales will quadruple between 2000 and 2003, to more than $2 million. “There are a million decisions to make every day,” says the suddenly unretiring Gage with enthusiasm. “This is my Viagra.” Gage’s company offers a telling example of how the Web can take a simple business based in a place that no one’s ever heard of — Roca, Nebr. — and put it on the map. Gage predicts that what was to be his hobby in semiretirement will be, by 2004, the largest direct-to-the-customer supplier of fresh herb plants in the United States. Going for market share The shift in Gage’s customer base has been tectonic. The plantsman has moved totally out of retail and even away from his traditional wholesale customers. “In 1998 I turned down at least $100,000 in business from magazine and catalog coverage,” he says. The reason was simple: Gage was busy building capacity in sync with a new and potent horticultural player in E-commerce, Garden.com. Their relationship is really more of a strategic alliance — on a grand scale. Garden.com has invested $1 million in Gage’s business. The results can be seen behind Gage’s barn door, where state-of-the-art workstations link up to Garden.com’s extranet through a satellite dish. The multimillion-dollar E-tailer shares its proprietary forecasting model with Papa Geno’s so that Gage may hone his numbers in real time and ensure smooth deliveries. “We have to keep raising our estimates monthly,” Gage says. And Garden.com backs up its projections with long-term guarantees in the form of minimum purchase orders. “They are sharing the risk and helping us obtain half our working capital each year,” says Gage. For the fiscal year ending next month, Garden.com will account for 70% of Gage’s sales. Gage sees that figure approaching 90% by 2004. He acknowledges the risk in dancing with this gorilla, but he believes a muscle-bound alliance like this one is the wave of the future. “The Internet is a much more efficient channel for ordering and distribution,” he says. In the past year Gage has been able to cut in half the amount of time required to process and ship an order. The cost of processing that same order has declined by 80% in five years. “Once you learn how to do business online, the other stuff is more poky, and there is more room for mistakes,” he says. But to be a serious player on the Internet you have to jump in with both feet and seize market share. Gage adds that the results — his sales soared 185% last year, while the gardening industry saw low, single-digit growth — speak for themselves. “It’s a rechanneling of the industry,” he says. “With growth like this, we’re obviously taking market share.” Keeping up with growth Gage has insisted upon a similarly wired relationship with his suppliers. “If they can’t handle me electronically, forget it,” he says. Gage replaced his supplier of cardboard boxes. “He couldn’t cut the mustard in terms of keeping up with our online demand,” he says. That’s because not only has Gage’s need for cardboard boxes increased by 400% in two years but the pace of meeting that demand has also increased. He used to grow all his own “plugs” (herb seedlings or cuttings in a clump of dirt) but now farms out the greater part of that chore to 10 different suppliers in order to focus on cultivation and rapid delivery. That has created a new issue — a lack of control over supply. In one case, speaking of a supplier of rare specialty herbs who’s located in Canada, Gage says, “I could take 100 times as much stuff from him.” In the summer of 1998, Gage figured the Roca operation — five greenhouses on four acres — would suffice for five years. It is now at capacity. So he bought a second farm, in nearby Martell, Nebr., on which he’ll build at least six new greenhouses each year for five years. That timetable was too much for a regional contractor, so Gage has put the bid out nationally to about a dozen greenhouse builders. Rather than contracting for one greenhouse at a time, he’s stockpiling the building material on-site and will erect the greenhouses as needed. Finding the right people Once you get to Roca, finding Gage’s farm isn’t hard. It’s the one with the biggest FedEx truck in Nebraska parked near the barn. This spring Gage will ship 130,000 plants in a 15-week period. Making that happen has required big increases in productivity. As for his “picking process” — retrieving plants off greenhouse flats — Gage has streamlined that by reorganizing the back end of the operation. “We are able to do at least four times as many orders per person per hour as two years ago,” he says. And Gage’s operation can now ship one order per person every 46 seconds, compared with an earlier average of 8 to 10 minutes. He says he’s accomplished those efficiencies not only through technology but also by hiring “better people who are better trained.” Gage does not hire part-time migrant labor, a practice common in agriculture. And he pays generous benefits to his 17 full-time employees. That puts his labor costs at 25% above those of anyone else in the industry in the region. Still, finding the right people is a struggle. Gage says some people just “don’t get” the Internet, no matter what he pays them. So he ends up as a de facto “mentor and motivator.” That spills over into his teaching a night course on the E-economy at the University of Nebraska’s business school. That helps out — somewhat — with recruiting. Gage says it’s easy to find young people who know about horticulture and young people who understand the Internet but that finding people who know both is not so easy. When Gage encounters such rare birds he grabs them, but keeping them is problematic, given the company’s less-than-glamorous location. Of the six horticulturalists Gage has hired out of the university in the past two years, four have moved on to livelier locales such as Austin, San Francisco, and Seattle. Moving with the Net economy After blowing out his original business plan, Gage needed a lot more working capital. When his former banker grew nervous about his borrowing needs, Gage interviewed three local bankers. “The first two asked me what kind of collateral I had,” recalls Gage. “They wanted to see my real estate.” The third banker asked Gage about his revenue stream. That was the right question. The banker, John Daubert, understood that in the Net economy assets mattered little compared with cash flow. On top of that, Daubert was part owner of Security First Bank, a 14-branch statewide bank. He had the power to make a decision on the spot. “We could get decisions pretty quickly,” says Daubert. How quickly? “Fifteen minutes.” How much did he lend Gage? Three hundred thousand dollars and counting. By the end of the year, Daubert will hold at least $500,000 worth of loans to Gage. Gage says the need to move with such dispatch is central to his business and drives the types of relationships he seeks. “We make decisions in hours or minutes that used to take days,” he says. Gage has severed relationships with professionals who, relatively speaking, were moving at a snail’s pace. Twice a lawyer didn’t get back to Gage for four days on an important real estate deal. He found another lawyer. “My Web designer didn’t return my calls in two days. She’s out,” Gage says. “Ditto the accountant. He told me, ‘I can spend half an hour with you a week from Tuesday.’ That’s BS.” But for all its new-world ways, Papa Geno’s Herb Garden retains a little of the old. One of Gage’s suppliers is a woman who grows lavender in rural Provence. “I don’t think she’s ever seen a computer,” says Gage. Each year he sends two workers over to France “with cash stuffed in their underwear” to seal the deal over a bottle of wine at the kitchen table. “This woman really has no idea how the Internet has affected her,” says Gage. Except that this year Gage’s employees went over with twice as much money, and his supplier is planting an extra hectare of lavender. Edward O. Welles is a senior feature writer at Inc. Please e-mail your comments to editors@inc.com.