Tag Archives: UAL Corporation

The Real-Time Web and You

One of the biggest technology trends in 2009 has been the emergence of the “Real-Time Web.” The real-time Web is a made up of technologies and practices that can inform users as soon as information is published, instead of requiring users to check for updates. The real-time Web discards the traditional notion of the more static “webpages,” and instead adopts the notion of dynamic “streams” of information. The real-time Web is also very conversational because it makes it possible to get instant responses across very large networks of people. Action in the real-time Web started with companies like Twitter and Friendfeed, which built their own infrastructure for large scale delivery of real-time messages. By providing Web service application programming interfaces (APIs), these companies enabled many other developers to create applications based on the real-time Web. However, Anil Dash, a prominent blogger, points out that real time services need not be built on the back of Twitter and Facebook anymore. Due to emerging technologies, the pieces are falling together for creating a free, open and decentralized “pushbutton platform,” which makes it easy for websites to add real-time messaging services. With these developments, we can expect many more websites to jump onto the real-time bandwagon. Growing importance to business The real-time Web is becoming increasingly important to businesses in multiple ways. Firstly, as many webmasters and Web analytics companies have pointed out, the real-time Web is starting to rival search engines like Google as a source of website traffic. For example, Mark Cuban talked a few months ago about how his blog receives more visits from Twitter and Facebook than from Google. Secondly, the real-time Web opens up communication opportunities that the traditional Web could not have provided. For instance, if an airline wants to sell off its last minute tickets, the real-time Web provides a great outlet for advertising this very time-sensitive deal.  Thirdly, by making information instantaneously accessible, the real-time Web can create, or erase, instances of information arbitrage. As an example, take a look at Skygrid, a service that provides high quality financial news in real time, giving its users an edge, but at the same time leveling the playing field between professional investors and amateurs in terms of the speed of access to reliable information. Finally, because the real-time Web is very conversational, it becomes a repository of people’s sentiment, and mining this sentiment can be very useful to marketers and others. Taking advantage of real-time Web Beyond creating an account on Twitter, how can you take advantage of the real-time Web?  Here are some thoughts to get you started: Engage with the real-time Web with tailored offers and content. Several companies are seeing success with time-sensitive programs that could not have been conceived without the real-time Web. Jet Blue’s “cheeps” and United Airlines’ twares are exclusive Twitter promotions for last minute fare deals. Another company that has encountered great success with offering exclusive deals on Twitter is Dell. A Dell blog post from June mentioned that Dell had surpassed $2 million in Twitter sales fro Dell Outlet, which sells refurbished items, scratch and dent items, and previously ordered new laptops. The real-time Web also acts as a place where people express their intent to shop (e.g. someone may tweet “thinking of buying an ipod touch.”) Selectively targeting such users, without spamming them, might also be a great way to help your customers make real time buying decisions. A service like Twitterhawk can be used to automate this kind of marketing. Make use of real-time Web tools for business intelligence. The real-time Web is a great source of knowledge and sentiment about your customers, your competitors and your industry. You can use services like Firstrain to research the real Web for the news that matters to you. You could also use Twitter’s search functionality in simple ways to keep track of some of this information, or go to one of the many real time search engines. A recent article in mashable talks about the many tools that help analyze Twitter content. Join in the conversation about your company. In one of my previous articles, I had talked about how companies like Comcast are using Twitter to understand their customers’ concerns and address them. The conversational nature of real time web can be very powerful in building relationships with your customers. Create the infrastructure that allows your company to respond in real time. Real-time enterprise data integration has been around for a long time. However, with the emergence of the real-time Web and the opportunities it creates, it is becoming increasingly critical for companies to be able to access all their internal data in real time. In other words, “real-time data integration is no longer a luxury.” Vijay Chittoor is the director of product management at Kosmix, an exploration engine that offers a 360 degree view of any topic on the Web.  A former McKinsey consultant, Chittoor is a graduate of Harvard Business School and the Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay.  He shares his thoughts on technology at his blog.

Booking Travel on the Internet

Editor’s Note: This is the first of a two-part series on making travel reservations on the Internet. This week: Tricks and Tips. Next week: Rhonda reviews the leading online services. When a company gives you truly bad service, wouldn’t you like to tell the world? I recently received such bad treatment from an on-line travel service that I decided to use this as an opportunity to discuss the ups and downs of booking travel on the Internet. This week I’ll provide general on-line booking tips and tricks. In my next column, I’ll review the leading on-line travel services. I travel a lot on business. I’ve used – or checked — all the major travel sites: the airlines’ Web sites, Expedia, Orbitz, Travelocity, Hotwire, etc. Overall, I’ve been pretty satisfied. Most people judge an on-line travel service by: availability of low fares ease of use overall look-and-feel. Remember one other critical factor: customer service. Sooner or later, you’ll have a problem — flights cancelled, trips rescheduled. You’re going to have to deal with the travel service rather than the airline. If they don’t offer adequate support, you’ll have the kind of problem I had with Cheaptickets.com, owned by Trip Network, which also owns Trip.com. The morning after I booked a flight I realized I had made a mistake on the time. I immediately called Cheaptickets, which announces they’re open 24 hours a day, seven days a week. A salesperson told me only customer service could deal with a ticket once booked. I waited on hold for 47 minutes and still couldn’t reach anyone in customer service. Finally I sent an E-mail to the E-mail address provided. I called again the next day. Once again, I couldn’t reach customer service. Once again, I spoke to a salesperson who couldn’t help me. Finally, the third day, I reached a customer service supervisor, who said no one could help me. Why? Because I failed to contact them within 48 hours of booking! I explained I’d spent two days trying to reach them. I could pay for the ticket or challenge the charge with my credit card company! Moreover, this supervisor told me they have more than 2000 E-mails backed up and a typical time on hold is between 20 to 40 minutes. When I spoke with Kate Sullivan, Manager of Corporate Communications for Trip Network, she was apologetic. “There was no excuse for this kind of treatment. It’s substandard to the kind of customer service we try to provide?The volume we’re experiencing is very unusual for this time of year.” However, Cheaptickets was the exception. I’ve used many travel services successfully. Whatever online site you use, here are a few tips and tricks: READ carefully: Some sites automatically include neighboring airports (e.g., Newark for New York, Baltimore for Washington, DC). Make certain you’re going where you want, when you want. Click around: No one site seems to consistently offer the best fare. Some sites have arrangements with travel consolidators or other discounters. Try other routes: Using a nearby airport or breaking one long trip into two shorter ones, may be much cheaper. For instance, booking one roundtrip flight from San Francisco to San Juan, Puerto Rico (via New York) was hundreds of dollars more expensive than booking two separate flights (SFO-JFK) and (JFK-San Juan) though I was on the same flights! Check the”"vacation packages”: On Expedia, I once booked a flight, hotel, and car rental to Houston cheaper than the flight alone. Get a seat: I can usually get a good seat when I book on the American Airlines site. When I book through a third-party site, I may not get a seat assignment at all. You can call the airline for a seat assignment no matter what service you use. Watch out for nasty surprises: United Airlines won’t allow seat upgrades on some discount Web fares. Last minute limits: Some sites won’t book flights within one to five days of travel. You can often find last minute fares cheapest on the airlines’ own sites. Check non-travel sites: As a Costco member, I can often get cheaper car rentals at Costco.com than on a travel Web site. When you find a great fare, grab it! It may be gone next time you check. Finally, be patient, especially on a dial-up connection. This all takes a long time. I sure miss my old travel agent! Copyright Rhonda Abrams, 2002 Rhonda Abrams writes the nation’s most widely-read small business column and is the author of The Successful Business Plan and The Successful Business Organizer. To receive Rhonda’s free business tips, register at www.RhondaOnline.com.

Upstarts: Energy Deregulation

A Shock to the System Where do you buy your electricity? If you don’t have a choice now, you will soon Twenty years ago most Americans got their telephone service from Ma Bell (a.k.a. American Telephone and Telegraph) and their power from the local electric company. Today consumers can pick from among AT&T and roughly a zillion other telecommunications companies — but most people still buy their electricity from a local utility. Shocking, really. But that situation isn’t going to last much longer. As the telecom industry did in the 1980s, the U.S. electricity industry is now undergoing deregulation. State utility commissions are unplugging their tight control on rates and allowing a range of new energy providers to enter the field. For consumers the process hasn’t been uniformly smooth. This past summer electricity users in San Diego and New York City were stung by price spikes after regulators removed long-standing rate caps as part of the deregulation process. Still, within five years, 90% of U.S. consumers will be able to choose where and how they buy their watts and volts, according to the Yankee Group, a research and consulting firm in Boston. As you might expect, the Internet is making things interesting by providing brand-new ways for energy providers to reach consumers. And investors have certainly recognized an opportunity: venture-capital funding in energy-related companies rose from $150 million in 1999 to an estimated $300 million in 2000, according to Venture Economics, a research company. Deregulation appears to be sparking a whole new wave of start-ups. Power to the people Newly empowered consumers in New York City, for instance, can now buy electricity from SmartEnergy.com, which was founded in 1999 by a team that includes five former energy traders from the New York Mercantile Exchange. “We figured that there was a huge market in electricity and natural gas at the retail level,” says SmartEnergy president and CEO Gautam Chandra. Someday, he says, Americans may buy their energy from familiar retailers like Wal-Mart or the Home Depot. But it’s likely that those retailers don’t know much about the complex supply chain in the energy market. That’s where SmartEnergy comes in. “We think of ourselves as a distributor,” Chandra says. That means supplying retailers with the electricity and natural gas that they will in turn sell to consumers. SmartEnergy, based in Woburn, Mass., doesn’t actually generate power. Instead, the company buys it directly from independent producers and is banking on its energy-trading expertise to save consumers at least 10%. (The energy is delivered to customers over existing infrastructure maintained by formerly monopolistic utilities.) So far, SmartEnergy isn’t selling to retailers like Wal-Mart or the Home Depot, but it has struck up partnerships with newly emerging Internet energy retailers such as Essential.com and Energyguide.com. Consumers can also buy directly from SmartEnergy, and the company offers features that it hopes will distinguish its product from that of traditional utilities. Call it commodity branding. “Customer service has been fairly nonexistent in the energy space,” says chief marketing officer Jon Sorenson. With SmartEnergy, customers can use the Internet to sign up for service, reach customer-service agents, and pay their bills with a credit card. They can choose from different service plans — such as one that lets them buy power at a fixed rate for 12 months and one that offers a rebate that rewards them for saving energy. They can even earn frequent-flier miles on United Airlines: 500 miles for signing up and one mile for every dollar spent thereafter. SmartEnergy rolled out in New York in February and aims to be in five more states, including New Jersey and Pennsylvania, by the end of the year. Funded originally by its founders, SmartEnergy has since raised more than $10 million from outside investors. The company expects to be profitable in the third quarter of 2001. SmartEnergy and other upstart providers still have a long way to go to make a dent in the market. As of June, only 2.2% of residential customers and 4.8% of business customers in New York State had switched from their old utility. And now, as the Yankee Group analyst Karl Jessen points out, SmartEnergy and its ilk are facing serious competition — namely, from the NewPower Co., a potential Goliath energy provider that is funded by energy giant Enron. On the plus side, this past summer’s price volatility — which temporarily raised electricity bills in New York City by as much as 30% — gave SmartEnergy a bit of boost. While traditional utility customers were paying wildly varying market rates, SmartEnergy offered consumers a chance to lock in a favorable rate that would remain in place for a year. A conduit for savings For a lot of consumers, having to comparison shop for a commodity they’ve long taken for granted could prove to be quite a jolt. Or so Harvey Michaels figured when he and two cofounders started Nexus Energy Software Inc., based in Newton, Mass., three years ago. “The company’s starting thesis was that consumers of energy don’t know what’s ahead, and that what’s ahead is going to be reasonably complex,” says Michaels. “But consumers’ decisions are going to have a big impact on household budgets or the bottom line of small businesses.” After all, he points out, energy can cost a homeowner $3,000 or more a year. “We’re addressing a very large cost that people don’t really think about” — yet. In his former life as president of energy-consulting firm Xenergy Inc., Michaels helped Fortune 500 companies analyze and reduce their energy consumption and save money. “If you’re a homeowner or a small business, you can’t afford to hire someone to do this,” he says. “We saw software on the Internet as a great enabler, helping consumers to make smart energy choices.” The result was Energyguide, which is the name Nexus Energy now goes under. At the company’s Web site, homeowners or small-business owners can get an analysis of their energy costs by answering an online questionnaire. Based on their data, they receive suggestions on how to reduce those costs. Consumers can compare the energy providers available in their area, sign up for service, and buy products (ranging from fluorescent lightbulbs to energy-efficient space heaters) from Energyguide partners. The company collects a fee for everything sold through the site. The company’s earliest revenues have come from strategic partners, deregulated utilities that were suddenly in the position of having to court their old customers. For them, Energyguide is a service that they can offer as a goodwill-generating freebie to their customers. About 20 utilities pay the company a licensing fee to put the Energyguide software on their own Web sites or to distribute it on CDs. Energyguide also shares in any revenues it generates for the utilities. That solid partner base helped the company rack up revenues of just under $5 million last year. Recently, Energyguide has also broadened its partnerships to include about 20 nonutilities, such as personal-finance Web site Quicken.com. Michaels estimates that the retail-energy market on the Internet could total $40 billion to $50 billion within the next five years. Energyguide is aiming for a tiny sliver of that. “We’re a long way from nailing down what our share ultimately will be,” says Michaels. “Probably in the hundreds of millions.” But to get there, Energyguide will have to fight off challenges from rivals in the consumer-information niche, including ChooseEnergy Inc. In March, Energyguide raised $7 million from a group of investors led by GE Equity, primarily to increase sales staff and develop more partnerships with energy providers. “Going forward it’s going to be a little more interesting,” says Michaels. Emily Barker is a senior staff writer at Inc. Energy Goes Cellular Along with more competition and — theoretically, at least — lower prices, energy deregulation is bringing some uncertainty to the nation’s power grid. After all, California experienced controlled interruptions of service this past summer because utilities had stopped building power plants in anticipation of deregulation. That instability is especially bad news for any company that does business on the Internet, since it takes uninterrupted power to keep Web servers humming. That’s where Sure Power Corp. comes in. Sure Power uses high-tech fuel cells to turn hydrogen and oxygen into electricity — a backup power source that the company claims is both environmentally friendly and available 99.9999% of the time. That availability level translates into a 1% chance of power failure over the course of 20 years, says cofounder and executive vice-president Art Mannion. Although fuel cells are similar to batteries in some ways, they never run down as long as enough fuel is present. Sure Power, based in Danbury, Conn., is betting on a growing need for dependable backup power. Its target market includes data centers, Web-hosting companies, medical facilities, research laboratories, high-tech manufacturers, and any other business that can’t afford to have its computers or equipment go down for even an instant. Using cells manufactured by a partner, ONSI Corp., Sure Power will install several dozen fuel cells for each of its customers and offer maintenance services for those setups. The installations aren’t small or cheap: each fuel cell is about the size of a sport-utility vehicle, and according to Mannion, a typical contract could run into the tens of millions of dollars — hardly a price point that most small businesses or individual homeowners would fall into. But Mannion insists that for a 10-year span, Sure Power’s system can cost two-thirds to one-half of what traditional power-backup systems would run. So far, with seven employees, Sure Power has just one customer — First National Bank of Omaha, which hired Sure Power in 1998 to provide uninterrupted power for its credit-card-processing operations. Sure Power’s revenues for both 1999 and 2000 hover around $2 million, says Mannion, adding that the company is currently negotiating contracts worth up to $50 million each. In landing the First National contract, says Mannion, it helped that some of the bank’s executives were familiar with fuel cells. Unfortunately for Sure Power, however, not every customer is going to be so knowledgeable. “Our biggest job is educating the public,” he says. Q&A Current Events Deregulation can be confusing. To make some sense of the muddle, we spoke with Hugh Holman, a senior analyst at CIBC World Markets who’s been tracking energy deregulation since 1997. Inc.: How did deregulation get started? Holman: The power industry is really the last remaining large monopoly. We’ve broken up almost everything else. California opened its market in 1998, and it looks as though the other states will follow. Inc.: How big is the potential market? Holman: Huge. The power industry is one of the largest in the United States. Revenues are more than $200 billion a year. Opening it to competition is going to have pretty dramatic ramifications throughout the economy. Inc.: Is deregulation spawning many new companies? Holman: There are a lot of newcomers. Some are power marketers who don’t generate any power themselves. They just buy power and resell it. A lot of them are selling on the Internet, which is a natural because the wires for providing electricity are already in place. These companies don’t need to build warehouses and so forth, like Webvan or Amazon.com, because the power can be delivered over the existing infrastructure. Inc.: But how can they make money in what’s historically been a low-margin business? Holman: You have to customize your product, differentiate what you’re selling. Green Mountain Energy, of South Burlington, Vt., has done that by offering environmentally friendly power, branding it, and selling the environmental attributes of the energy it’s providing. In some cases it’s going to be reliability that sells. Users like Amazon.com, eBay, and all of the other Internet service providers can’t be out of power. So they require highly reliable service, and they are willing to pay for it. Inc.: Are consumers ready for deregulation? Holman: I think the proof of the pudding will be whether people switch suppliers. In Pennsylvania they’ve had a very successful program to educate consumers. As much as a third of all the electricity consumed in Pennsylvania is now being purchased from an alternative supplier. So in that sense deregulation seems to work: people do seem to switch suppliers when given a choice. Related resource: Find out about ways to save on energy costs. Please e-mail your comments to editors@inc.com.

Nailing It

They needed it overnight. They wanted the best. In the race to build the first online hardware store, Peter Hunt and Rich Takata put their company in the hands of outright strangers The Company Name: CornerHardware.com Inc. Founded: Incorporated May 1999; Web site launched early 2000 Location: San Francisco Cofounders: Chairman and CEO Richard Takata; president and chief operating officer Peter A. Hunt Employees: 35 full-timers Mission: Creating an online home-improvement store, magazine, and community for do-it-yourselfers URL: www.cornerhardware.com The Developer Name: Xuma Founded: 1998 Location: San Francisco; with offices in New York, Los Angeles, and Las Vegas Cofounders: CEO Joe Cha; chief technology officer Jamie Lerner Employees: 250 Mission: Producing built-to-order Web sites for E-businesses URL: www.xuma.com In December 1998, Peter Hunt set out to tackle what should have been a simple, joyous task: building a tree house for his four-year-old son for Christmas. Hunt couldn’t wait to start the project. It wasn’t just that he welcomed the diversion from his high-powered job as an investment banker. It was more that, ever since he’d been a kid, Hunt had loved working with his hands: making model trains and airplanes, building furniture, fixing things around the house. As an adult he’d dreamed of buying a corner hardware store in some rural New England town, the kind of place with a bell over the door and shelves lined with hinges and screws and doorknobs, where he’d spend his days happily helping customers pick out the right paintbrush or handsaw. But with two kids and a top job at Montgomery Securities in San Francisco, the lanky, thoughtful Hunt didn’t even have time to stop into a local hardware shop, let alone wander through a giant home-improvement warehouse. He assumed he’d save time by buying everything he needed for the tree house — instructions, lumber, materials, and tools — online. So he went to the Web and looked for hardware sites. And looked. And looked. He found nothing except a loose network of like-minded tree-house enthusiasts, many similarly frustrated by their own fruitless online searches for supplies and information. From that experience, Peter Hunt, banker, suddenly figured out how to finally become Peter Hunt, hardware guy. Hunt’s thinking went like this: What if there were lots of little communities out there — tree-house builders and woodworkers and plumbers and fixer-uppers and even contractors — all hungry for online hardware and home-improvement advice? And what if somebody could provide it for them in one friendly, convenient location, sort of a virtual corner hardware store? In early 1999, Hunt, then 35, took a week off to write a business plan for just such a company. But he knew something was missing. He needed a business partner — a veteran hardware retailer, a real insider. When he asked around, he kept hearing the same name: Rich Takata. Richard T. Takata, then of Seattle, had been in the hardware business for 24 years. Takata, who’d most recently been president and CEO of Eagle Hardware & Garden Inc., had remained with the 41-store chain after North Carolina­based Lowe’s Cos. had bought it for $1.4 billion. (In fact, Hunt’s firm had handled the sale.) Although reserved and soft-spoken, Takata, then 49, was hardly averse to risk; in his spare time he occasionally drove race cars. A lifelong do-it-yourselfer, Takata also knew his industry and its customers. Over the years he’d waited on thousands of people, even during store visits when he was the company’s CEO. And like Hunt, whose own company had been acquired by North Carolina­based NationsBank, Takata was ready for a change. Xuma’s founders named their Web-development company after an ancient Chinese battle cry. In April 1999, at the urging of a mutual friend, Hunt and Takata met for dinner to talk about launching a big home-improvement E-commerce site. They discovered they had much in common. Both were quietly intense, articulate, committed. Both were customer-service evangelists, true believers in keeping promises and building long, loyal relationships. Both believed passionately in the Internet’s potential for business. And both had high — some might say almost impossible — standards for themselves, their companies, and those who worked for or with them. Of the two, Takata was more tactical and analytical, a manager with a keen recall of industry statistics and an almost instinctive understanding of business trends. Hunt, very much the money guy and deal maker, was also more sentimental. (He documents CornerHardware.com’s growth in a scrapbook filled with mementos like copies of the company’s incorporation papers and of its early bank deposits, and Polaroid photos of each newly hired employee.) From the start, the two men agreed they wanted to do more than lead the Web in sales of drill bits and deck stain. They wanted to re-create the old-fashioned corner hardware store of Hunt’s dreams and Takata’s experience: a place with well-stocked shelves, knowledgeable clerks, lots of how-to information, and most of all, a friendly, collegial, yes-you-can-do-it-yourself atmosphere. It would, of course, be called CornerHardware.com. They knew it was a big idea with hefty potential; pulling in even a small fraction of the $400-billion-a-year home-improvement business would yield a fortune. They were amazed that nobody had launched the kind of venture they envisioned, and they knew that before long somebody else certainly would. What they wanted to do — build a full-service online hardware store and community — would cost at least $2.5 million. Takata and Hunt knew they needed to move fast — and they did. Within three weeks of their first meeting, both men had quit their jobs; put up $250,000 each of their own money; raised about $500,000 more from angel investors, family, friends, and colleagues; and incorporated their business. But for all the partners knew they needed to do, there was still plenty they needed to learn. Chief among the lessons: just how tough it would be to build a big Web business in a matter of months — and how much tougher it would get when circumstances forced them to launch the site weeks earlier than planned. They didn’t know for sure whether a no-name newcomer like CornerHardware.com could compete with new and upcoming E-commerce arms from brick-and-mortar brands like Sears (which was already selling parts, tools, and appliances online), Home Depot (which plans to launch a full E-commerce site this summer), and Ace Hardware (which would begin selling merchandise online at OurHouse.com late in 1999). In addition, dot-com start-ups were also racing to market. Major projects included HomeWarehouse.com, then under development in nearby San Mateo, Calif., and Amazon.com‘s new tools and hardware store, which would also launch by year’s end. And it was entirely likely that some of those in the race would end up as roadkill. When it came to CornerHardware.com’s technology, Hunt and Takata knew they weren’t looking just for a speedy job. Sure, there was no time to waste — they wanted a beta site before year’s end, a quiet launch by March 2000, and a public launch shortly after that. But building their Web site would also be a big, complex, cutting-edge project. They needed transaction processing capability and complete descriptions and images of some 37,000 products, everything from penny nails to power saws to Phillips-head screwdrivers. They would shoot to double their inventory, which is distributed from a warehouse in Kansas, within their first six months online. True to their customer-service mission, Hunt and Takata also wanted, from day one, to offer how-to articles, visitor message boards, animated step-by-step project instructions, a massive glossary of hardware terms, a superb search engine, and live customer service, online and in real time. That last capability would become, in fact, the real cornerstone, so to speak, of CornerHardware.com. Using interactive windows, customers would be able to chat with service reps in real time — asking questions about products or about a bill, for instance. That kind of service, which the company would contract out to dedicated staffers at Boston-based eSupportNow, would be what Hunt and Takata believed would ultimately distinguish their company not just from other online hardware stores but from their brick-and-mortar brethren as well. As Takata pointed out later, there weren’t many home-improvement stores that were open 24 hours a day. Although Hunt and Takata knew what they wanted their site to do, they didn’t know much about the nuts and bolts required to make it happen. They needed professional help. And they needed it fast. The high-speed, high-stakes scenario isn’t unique to CornerHardware.com — or even to the online home-improvement industry. Today almost any new business-to-consumer Internet company must fight for a foothold in an already crowded market. (Witness the proliferation of online pet stores, drugstores, vitamin stores, and toy stores.) Being first online remains a competitive advantage. But there’s no point in being first without doing it well. As consumers on the Internet grow more sophisticated they’re less willing to tolerate sites that are slow, unreliable, boring, or tough to navigate. And they absolutely won’t return to sites that haven’t provided stellar customer service. E-commerce sites have grown increasingly complex in reaction to the industry’s ever higher standards and well-publicized successes and failures. In many cases, like CornerHardware.com’s, a business simply can’t hire its own team to build a site — even if it could find the right people, it probably couldn’t afford to pay them or retain them. So, like CornerHardware.com, the company opts to stake the future of its business on outside developers — people the company doesn’t know, people who must translate the entrepreneur’s dreams and plans into equipment and software and code. Xuma’s approach bridges the gap between standard and optional E-commerce components. As Takata and Hunt were setting up shop in rented space in San Francisco’s financial district, Joe Cha was building his own business just a few blocks away. About a year earlier Cha had been working at his third consulting job. A friend reintroduced him to Jamie Lerner, a consultant Cha had known slightly when both had worked at Andersen Consulting several years earlier. Like Hunt and Takata, Cha and Lerner found themselves thinking along the same lines. They wanted to try something new, and they didn’t want to create just another San Francisco Web-development company. Instead their thinking went like this: What if you could apply the same approach to building a Web site that Dell Computer applies to building a computer? What if you could create big, complex, flexible, reliable, customized E-commerce systems in record time simply by not reinventing the wheel for every single project? So Cha and Lerner founded Xuma. (The name, pronounced “zoo-ma,” is an ancient Chinese battle cry that the partners found perfect to describe their army of engineers charging into the E-commerce wars.) They adapted the Dell model: just as Dell combines standard and optional components to rapidly create computers, Xuma combines its standard and optional E-commerce components to quickly build Web sites. In the venture’s first year, the quiet, charming Cha (so charismatic that he was among 10 bachelors featured in a Women.com feature on “The Men of Silicon Valley”) sold Xuma’s services to customers ranging from health-and-beauty-products retailer More.com to home-furnishings site GoodHome.com. By its second anniversary, in April 2000, Xuma had launched more than 70 Web-based businesses nationwide and employed 250 people in four offices. But back in mid-1999, Xuma hadn’t yet tackled anything on the multimillion-dollar scale of CornerHardware.com. By the summer of 1999, Takata, CornerHardware.com’s CEO, and Hunt, its chief operating officer, had raised about $6 million in funding: close to $1 million from their own pockets and from family, friends, and angels; and the balance from the first round of venture funding. (A second round early in 2000 would yield an additional $21 million.) And the founders had begun building a staff. Their first hire: vice-president of engineering Steve Finer, who faced the daunting job of actually overseeing the Web site’s construction. (See “Chronicles from the Pit,” below.) Finer, then 33, was an enthusiastic, outspoken technologist who, in a previous life, had managed nightclubs in Boston. He knew something about risk: he’d cofounded an Internet start-up that later collapsed and eventually filed for bankruptcy. And he knew something about working hard; he was always either at the office or connected to it by beeper, cell phone, or computer. (Shortly before the CornerHardware.com launch, when Finer was working 12 to 15 hours a day, he came home one night to find that his lonely dog, Cassius, had disemboweled a sofa cushion.) After joining CornerHardware.com in August 1999, Finer faced his first and toughest task: getting his new bosses “to understand that you don’t build anything — whether it’s a car or a Web site — overnight.” Especially not something as complex as CornerHardware.com. And in Internet terms, what Hunt and Takata wanted was pretty close to overnight. So Finer immediately ruled out doing the job in-house. Given the tight market for top technology staffers, especially in San Francisco, he knew he couldn’t build the talented team he needed to even approach that timetable. Instead, at his recommendation, CornerHardware.com looked outside, holding what Cha describes as a “bake-off” for potential developers late in the summer of 1999. Xuma wasn’t the oldest or the biggest or the best-known contestant. But Hunt, Takata, and Finer liked what Xuma had cooked up. The decisive factor: speed. Cha, Xuma’s CEO, and Lerner, its chairman and chief technology officer, then both 29, promised to do the job faster than anybody else — within six months. They also promised to build systems and databases that would “scale,” or grow quickly without having to be replaced. That’s what CornerHardware.com needed — and that’s why Xuma walked away with a contract worth between $750,000 and $1 million. (Takata says the balance of CornerHardware.com’s launch budget went for interface design, software licensing, equipment, product photography, and related costs.) By Xuma’s standards today — less than a year later — the CornerHardware.com contract is a relatively small one. But at the time it was a huge coup, providing, if all went well, a link in the chain leading to bigger jobs. So Cha took the kind of risk that he would later say no developer should ever take: he went ahead without any built-in contingency plan — no plan B — in case of crisis. True to its own business model, Xuma would build the CornerHardware.com site using many preexisting components — a standard credit-card-processing system, for instance. Still, the Xuma team, headed by senior project manager Phil Lew, then 26, knew that building such a complex E-commerce site wouldn’t be easy. Xuma anticipated it would spend five to six months, beginning in October 1999, building, testing, debugging, and launching the site. The schedule, though ambitious, seemed entirely possible. That is, as long as nothing went wrong. Although CornerHardware.com and Xuma were both new, fast-growing San Francisco­based start-ups, their cultures were entirely different. Sure, they both hired the best they could find: CornerHardware.com’s hiring coups included a Home Depot senior vice-president, a top producer from CNet, and several home-improvement authors and writers, while Xuma lured dozens of “rock-star engineers” away from other Web developers. But theirs were very different workplaces. At CornerHardware.com, a middle-aged artist or writer in a flannel shirt and jeans might sit in meetings with a college-age kid with a nose ring. It was rare for anybody to spend the whole night at work (with the possible exception of Finer, who worked around the clock in the countdown to the launch). In general, it was quiet, especially since most employees worked one or two days at home. (There wasn’t enough office space for everyone to be there at the same time.) In contrast to that relative calm, at Xuma nobody had a private office. Engineers racing to meet project deadlines spent days in the big war room known as “the pit,” living on trucked-in pizza or Thai food, working elbow to elbow at food-littered tables lined with computers. It was a noisy, messy, overwhelmingly youthful atmosphere. For Lew, it was exhausting, but it was also fun. His team bonded in a way that can come only from eating three meals a day together, working side by side until after midnight, then car-pooling home through unusually silent streets. And that bonding meant that together they felt they could do anything, Lew says. They would need to. In late fall, when Lew’s team was already spending most of its time in the pit simply trying to hit the original March launch date, something did go wrong. In mid-November, a CornerHardware.com competitor, HomeWarehouse.com, launched earlier than anybody had expected. About the same time, Amazon.com launched its home-improvement store, and Ace began putting OurHouse.com online. And funding was beginning to dry up for consumer dot-coms in favor of business-to-business ventures. Takata and Hunt decided they had no choice: they had to move the stealth launch from late March to January 15, and follow that with the public launch a few weeks later. They delivered the bad news to Finer, their liaison with Xuma. “They told me, ‘If we wait till March, we’re out of business,’ ” Finer recalls. “At that point I’m holding my stomach.” Finer reluctantly asked Xuma to shave close to six weeks off the initial launch date. Xuma agreed to try moving it up to January 15. “The trouble with being the vendor is that the customer is always right,” Cha says with a sigh. In this case, being right required heroics from Lew’s project team. “We had guys here that didn’t see their families, that were living here 24/7,” Cha says. (See Lew’s diary, below.) “We killed ourselves. But we got on-the-job training there. We learned.” What followed was a series of compromises made by both sides. Five days before the new launch date, the Xuma project team begged for an extension, saying they needed the extra testing time to make sure the site worked well. They asked for two more weeks. Takata and Hunt agreed to wait 10 more days. They knew they wouldn’t be doing themselves any favors by launching sooner if the site frustrated the very people they wanted to attract. Meanwhile, Lew was learning that both Hunt and Takata were demanding, detail-oriented, hands-on managers. “I used to say ‘Retail is detail,’ ” Takata says. “Now I say ‘E-tail is detail.’ ” Both Hunt and Takata closely tracked the site’s development, sometimes requesting changes that would take days of engineering time to complete. “Or they’d say, ‘We need 700 pages [of Web-site content before launch],’ ” Lew says. “We’d say, ‘We can do 200.’ “ Then there was the titanic tinkering on the day before the rescheduled launch. In the afternoon of January 24, Hunt decided the site needed another level of search hierarchy, or ways for customers to view products and information. While other team members frantically tested the site, one engineer spent six hours building in the new function, letting it go live around 8 p.m. After viewing the site that evening, Hunt changed his mind. Lew describes it this way: “Peter sees it. He doesn’t like it. I say, ‘It’s exactly what you guys asked for.’ He says, ‘I want it back like it was this morning.’ ” Lew asked Finer to intercede; Finer returned with this message from Hunt: “Sorry, but it has to happen. And you have to tell me when it’s done.” The same staffer spent the next three hours reversing his earlier work, finishing at about 1:30 a.m., just hours before the quiet launch. And yet Cha, ever the diplomat, doesn’t regard CornerHardware.com as particularly exacting. “All of our customers are very demanding,” he says. In fact, he adds, CornerHardware.com was a relatively easy client because, unlike many enthusiastic dot-com start-ups with ill-defined business plans, from the very beginning Hunt and Takata had clear ideas about what they wanted to accomplish. On January 25 at 3:30 a.m., Lew drove his entire team home from work, and, at 4:45 a.m., finally slept. CornerHardware.com had launched — without fanfare and without any major problems. It also launched without some of the things its founders had wanted. These were the trade-offs: CornerHardware.com had been photographing about 800 products a day, but even at that rate the company couldn’t shoot 37,000 products before the launch. Instead it posted a representative sampling from each category. (Says Hunt, “If you have 72 hammers on the site, do you really need pictures of all 72 from day one?”) It also launched with no way of issuing returns to customers’ credit-card bills. (Initially, refunds would be made by check.) And it launched with fewer products and less content than Hunt and Takata had wanted. But nothing crashed, and the products advertised were available, poised on the shelves in the Kansas City warehouse. Surprisingly, Takata rates the launch at about 95% of what he’d hoped for. “One of the lessons I have learned about the Internet space in general is that you can’t be a perfectionist,” he says. “The Internet is a game of weeks. If you can get your site up four weeks earlier and have a complete customer experience [even without some desired features], I’d say do it.” A month later the public launch went off without any major hitches. Since then, CornerHardware.com’s traffic has grown steadily, with Xuma continuing to run the site. Hunt and Takata won’t release figures except to say that they had more traffic in April than in the entire first quarter. As for the conversion rate — the percentage of people who actually buy something — “some days it’s 19% or 20%,” Hunt says. “And we have days where it’s 1%.” Meanwhile, the purchasing of big-ticket items has increased: in addition to batteries and lightbulbs, customers are buying bathroom vanities and power tools. These days the founders are still keeping an eye on the competition, especially that big orange company from Atlanta. “I’d be lying if I told you we don’t worry about Home Depot,” Hunt says. “But we don’t lose any sleep over it,” because, he says, he doesn’t believe the giant retailer will duplicate the CornerHardware.com business model or its real-time online customer service. As for that tree house, Hunt did build it much later. But he ended up creating it from a kit that he got from a brick-and-mortar retailer. Ironically, he got so busy starting up CornerHardware.com that he didn’t have time to build one from scratch. And in returning to that project, Hunt revisited one big lesson that he and Takata had discovered throughout the building of their business: it’s all about making compromises. Anne Stuart is a senior writer at Inc. Technology. Chronicles from the Pit Steve Finer, vice-president of engineering for CornerHardware.com, and Phil Lew, Xuma’s CornerHardware.com project team leader, each kept diaries for several weeks between the Web site’s “stealth launch,” in January, and its first major marketing pushes, in early March. Here are some excerpts: Steve Finer Thursday, February 17 At 3:45 a.m., we added another Sun Enterprise 4500 server with 16 CPUs. Serious horsepower! As I got off the elevator this morning my coworkers gave me a high five because the new server made the site so much faster. Wednesday, February 23 Two new applications went into alpha testing. One rotates products featured on the home page. The other is a media-tracking application [which tracks the effectiveness of promotional campaigns]. Unique visitors to the site have doubled since last week. Today the site was accessed from all over the world, including from Taiwan, Slovenia, Thailand, Malaysia, Israel, and Japan. Actually shaved for the first time in weeks. Wanted to be presentable for a taping we did today with Xuma and the Mark Bunting video crew [for a business video to be shown on United Airlines and TWA]. Thursday, February 24 Biggest challenge: preparing for the March marketing campaign [a newspaper and online ad campaign with coupons]. We need to be able to support the traffic. Friday, February 25 Added 6,000 new images. Finished quality-assurance process for media tracker and product-feature applications. Also [a New York Times] article gave us a nice boost in traffic and tripled the number of people who went to the customer-support line yesterday. Monday, February 28 We’re all really busy. The engineering team has a lot of projects that need to be completed, including the media tracker and the product-feature device. Tuesday, February 29 Public launch. It has been a difficult day. All departments are asking for additions to the site. It’s a challenge to satisfy all requests and prioritize them properly. Our lack of space [is a problem]. My job would be so much easier if we could hire people to supplement Xuma’s activities. Friday, March 3 We’re really focusing on driving traffic. We added a new disk drive to the development server and a new storage device to help manage all our images. We also added more than 40 new how-to articles. Don Johnson and Cheech Marin filmed their TV show, Nash Bridges, outside our office. We passed out CornerHardware.com hats to the crew, which they all wore during the filming. Saturday, March 4 Had one last meeting with Xuma and my staff to make sure we have the right staffing in place to support [Sunday's marketing campaign]. Monday, March 6 The marketing campaign went off without a hitch. We were able to support all the additional traffic. It blew my mind! Daily traffic today was more than double normal, and we had 10 times as many people buying products as we have on a typical day. Next week the campaign will branch out to a larger part of the country. Since everything today went so well, I’m not too worried. But it is still keeping me up at night. Phil Lew Thursday, February 24 Development seems to be going better than planned. [CornerHardware.com CIO Ken Hite] called me in the morning wanting to track an order number for an order where the money wasn’t captured. The problem was with the file from the third-party fulfillment house. Lesson learned: We need to build in more robust error checking. We cannot assume that the third-party fulfillment house will always give us the correct formatted file. The need to develop a robust process to keep the content and data fresh on the live site is giving me grief. [The process was so slow that when CornerHardware.com updated many items, it could take days for the updates to take effect.] We are working on another solution to load data but don’t know when that will be in place. The media-tracker application needs to be done by tomorrow (that is, in the hands of QA). Things are going great, but I’ve been down this road before. I need to keep the pressure on development to make sure that they follow through on our delivery dates. Friday, February 25 Had our first meeting with [new CornerHardware.com executive producer] Alice Hill. She had some fantastic ideas about the site direction. I look forward to working with her; she’s going to be able to streamline the decision-making process since we will not have to wait on [COO Peter Hunt and CEO Rich Takata] in the future for decisions about where the site is going to be heading. Sunday, February 27 What I’ll remember most about today: talking to Bill [Meehan, Xuma's lead engineer on the CornerHardware project] at midnight on a Sunday night about CornerHardware.com — again. We make this site go. Both of us take a lot of pride in that. We are both emotionally attached to this project and want CornerHardware.com to be the best it can be. That makes it easier to stay up late on Sunday nights to do things for CornerHardware.com. Monday, February 28 Everyone is very excited about the big day tomorrow [the official launch]. I think we have all done due diligence to get ready for this big day, but until the day comes you never know. Tuesday, February 29 Crazy, crazy day. In the afternoon, CornerHardware.com informed us that [there were] 40 additional content pages to be attached to a new front page. At 5 p.m., 6 p.m., 7 p.m., 8 p.m., this content had still not passed the QA check. The new front page will not be able to go up until tomorrow. Traffic was higher than usual. Two articles [about CornerHardware.com] came across my desk: one was from CNet and the other from ZDNet. Didn’t get much sleep, since we were at work until 5 a.m. Sunday, March 5 First thing I did when I woke up today was log on to the Internet via my DSL to check on the site [following that morning's newspaper coupon campaign]. I can see that the orders are already rolling in from Washington and Utah. By 10:30 a.m., we are already at 15 orders for the day. I called Steve Finer at home (I think I woke him up) and let him know the good news: people are hitting the site and buying things. Please e-mail your comments to editors@inc.com.