Tag Archives: Norwalk

The Monster Dilemma

our beautiful site

For business owners plagued by a dearth of candidates for key job openings, the Web was supposed to provide an ideal solution. Job-search sites like Monster.com can put postings in front of millions of applicants instantly. And newer business-oriented social networking sites like LinkedIn provide similarly fertile recruiting territory, supplying access to the contacts of thousands of people. On the other hand, anyone who’s actually tried to hire someone through the Web knows the truth: You post an ad and are immediately flooded with hundreds of resumés, many from people whose backgrounds are wildly inappropriate. So much for the Web making things easier. It’s enough to make you long for the days of print newspaper ads and snail mail. But just as technology created the problem, newer technology aims to solve it. A new generation of hiring tools promises to screen out inappropriate applicants, allow the suitable ones to put their best foot forward, and even hunt down good candidates who haven’t applied. As these new services get better at these tasks, they may well change the balance of power in the job-recruiting industry and could even redefine the way we think about jobs. A shot at diverting a river of weak applicants is the chief advantage offered to employers by Protuo, a Woodstock, Georgia-based start-up that launched its service in January. Protuo isn’t only a job-listing site; it also forwards its clients’ listings to some 270 established job-listing sites, including Monster. But applicants can’t respond to a Protuo posting unless they spend seven minutes or so filling out a survey that asks about experience, skills, workstyles, and job preferences. Employers can customize the survey by choosing from a wide field of prepared questions or by adding their own, and they specify which responses get a candidate’s resumé past the screen. Has the candidate managed a technical project? Is he or she willing to move? The approach is modeled, to some extent, on the sort of compatibility gauging one encounters on a matchmaking site like eHarmony, notes Jennifer Gerlach, Protuo’s co-founder and vice president of marketing. Gerlach went through the dating process on eHarmony just to research the technique. “I learned a lot,” she says. “And I met some very, very nice people.” With online job postings sometimes pulling in more than a thousand applicants, the ability to winnow the flood could mean the difference between being able to retain control of the hiring process and having to bring in a professional recruiter–at a typical cost of $30,000 for a midlevel hire. The time and expense of dealing with a huge influx of resumés is all the more frustrating because much of the flow comes from online applicants who indiscriminately bombard hirers with resumés. You can try a keyword search on the resumés to narrow things down, but applicants have learned to load their resumés with them, often by pasting in phrases from the job posting. Even LinkedIn has suffered from inflation, as many users aggressively build networks of people they don’t really know in order to make themselves appear better connected. “There’s no value in a lot of these contacts,” says LinkedIn user Chris Knudsen, who heads business development for podcasting company Podango in Salt Lake City. “It can just be someone whose card you got at a trade show.” (A LinkedIn spokesperson commented via e-mail: “Anyone can join the LinkedIn network; however, the quality of your own personal LinkedIn network is the responsibility of each individual.”) But a well-designed survey, contends Gerlach, allows users to skim the cream. Fred Donovan, who runs Donovan Networks, a seven-employee computer network security firm, has been flooded with applicants responding to previous postings to Monster.com and other online job boards. He is currently conducting a Protuo search and likes what he’s seen so far. “I can specify that I want to see only resumés from people who say they have 10 years’ experience in negotiating sales and are familiar with the software development process,” he says. “I’m seeing a small, better-qualified subset of the applicants.” There must be something to the idea. Other hiring sites, including Market10, Jobster, and Taleo, are introducing their own approaches to automated candidate screening. And Monster is doing the same, making available–for a fee that adds about 20 percent to the cost of posting a job–the ability to direct applicants to a questionnaire designed to rank the suitability of candidates. Sure, candidates can try to game these surveys by being less than truthful. But Gerlach insists that surveys can be designed to stymie such people by asking questions that don’t have an obviously right answer–such as whether the person prefers to work independently or in groups–and by warning candidates that they can be rated as overqualified. Protuo, which costs hirers $44 to $295 a month depending on the number of jobs they’re posting and is currently free to job seekers, also offers applicants a chance to do more than post a resumé. The firm invites users to create online portfolios that can include whatever documents, photos, videos, or other material that best represents that person’s career to date. (Monster is currently testing a similar capability.) ZoomInfo, in Waltham, Massachusetts, takes a different approach. It assembles profiles of potential job candidates from all available online data, whether or not they’re looking for jobs. Starting with the same techniques that Google uses to gather Web data associated with a person’s name, ZoomInfo adds the significant additional step of crunching the results to pull out the most relevant information, weed out data referring to other people of the same name, and assemble a professional profile. ZoomInfo has an R&D team of 35 working on the technology. So far, the company has assembled some 34 million profiles, and as far as I can tell, most of them are fairly informative and accurate. (Check out your own name to put it to the test.) But somebody has to pay for all those scientists, and that somebody is you. The company charges $5,000 a user per year for the ability to dig up personnel profiles by company or industry. It sounds like a lot, but ZoomInfo’s COO, Bryan Burdick, notes that if you get the right candidate for a single vacancy, the price is one-sixth that of using a recruiting firm. The company also offers less expensive, more limited searching capabilities aimed at smaller companies, as well as free access to searches on individuals. Many major executive search firms, along with some 500 other corporations, already use ZoomInfo, claims Burdick. “I can find personal information, professional backgrounds–and, sometimes, damning evidence–on tens of millions of people without having to go through 1.5 million Google hits on each one,” says John Boehmer, managing partner at executive search firm Barlow Group in Norwalk, Connecticut. Boehmer is quick to point out that as ZoomInfo-like services get better, and more companies get comfortable using them, corporate hirers won’t need professional recruiting firms like his to turn up candidates. “It’s commoditizing the front end of what we do,” he says. “Eventually, everyone will know where everyone is and how to get hold of them, so we won’t be able to charge for identifying and contacting candidates.” Search firms will still be valuable for assessing candidates, he contends, though he acknowledges that new e-hiring systems could eventually eat into that end of the business as they get smarter and have more online data to work with. For that matter, it’s easy to imagine the not-all-that-distant day when online tools make it so easy to find people to fill a specific slot that the notion of permanent jobs becomes irrelevant for many positions. Why hire a manager for years when you can find a new one with exactly the skill set needed for the precise tasks at hand? That’s not necessarily bad for employees: Think of an economy where top employees are constantly being sought out and bid over by companies that recognize them from their Web trails as the perfect short-term solution. And talented employees would be just as smart about whom they choose to work for–using similar services to weed out companies that aren’t good matches for them. You’ll want to treat those people well. If you don’t, and they post that fact online, it could haunt you for a long, long time. Contributing editor David H. Freedman (whatsnext@inc.com) is a Boston-based author of several books about business and technology.

May I Help You?

The customer enters McGrath Acura of Westmont, Ill. Within seconds, the salesperson pounces. “Hello. My name is Grace. How can I help you?” “Just looking,” the visitor replies. “Let me help you with that,” Grace continues. “Are you looking for new or preowned?” It’s a conversation you’d expect to hear at any auto dealership. Except that this didn’t happen in the show room. The exchange took place online, at acurabymcgrath.com. Last year, general manager Ken Girard added a new feature to the dealership’s website: live chat. Now, instead of waiting for a visitor to click on a button and ask for help, a service agent detects the visitor’s presence on the website and initiates a real-time conversation. “It really sets our site apart,” Girard says. For most of its brief history, online shopping has been a largely anonymous process, with Web-based merchants content to wait for browsers to initiate an interaction. But now, more businesses are adding technology that allows them to step up and make the first move and offer a virtual “May I help you?” The idea is to introduce a human factor into virtual shopping. “People like to buy from people,” says Farrakh Azhar, CEO of Live Admins, a Chicago-based company that helped Acura of Westmont create its live-chat experience. “It’s the same as walking into a store and having a staff person greet you. It makes a connection, a one-on-one conversation.” Even now, years into the Internet revolution, e-shopping remains a dicey business. Research shows that 98% of visitors leave without making a purchase. Indeed, about half of all Web shoppers who put an item into a virtual shopping cart leave without buying it, according to the E-Tailing Group. “As an industry, we need to look at why 98% of the people who visit us leave without making a transaction,” says Robert LoCascio, CEO of New York City-based LivePerson, a provider of inbound and outbound chat technology. “Especially since the rate of impulse buying is much higher in the offline world. Why are we still at 2%?” He and others insist that the answer lies in making virtual salesmanship more proactive. Web shoppers should not have to sacrifice service for the privilege of shopping in their bunny slippers at 2 a.m., LoCascio says: “We can do more.” Mark Denham, CEO of 247 Workspace, is onboard. The company, a seller of office furniture based in Los Gatos, Calif., added chat to its website in early 2005. The goal was to provide more qualified leads to the company’s sales reps. Because most customers are other business owners looking for things such as conference tables and cubicles, the sales process is often long and complex, involving a great deal of back-and-forth between the sales rep and the buyers. “There are a lot of choices and particulars in our sales process,” Denham says. “We were finding that having an individual try to sort through 600 pages on our website was overwhelming.” The outbound chat aims to simplify things. It looks a lot like Instant Messenger, though customers don’t have to download software for it to work. Not every visitor to the site gets a greeting. But if you hang around for a few minutes or get seven or eight pages deep into the content, a live agent will say hello and offer to help. In most cases, the agents simply help visitors find the information they’re looking for. “Individuals who have engaged in text chats have a much higher sales probability than a standard lead,” Denham says. “Once we engage in a conversation, we find the probability of a sale goes up dramatically.” Other companies use the tactic with a bit more restraint. Jesse Kelsey, marketing project manager of eRug.com, says he loves to shop online precisely because he knows he won’t have to fight off a lot of pushy salespeople. So his company, based in Redwood City, Calif., is designing a live-chat system that will give shoppers an unmolested five minutes. After that, a text box will appear, saying, “If there’s anything we can do to help, our design consultants are here for you.” The company’s four design consultants will do the chatting, and Kelsey promises that it will be a soft sell. “We offer to help, but we don’t scare the customer away. We don’t want to turn anybody off,” he says. That’s a wise mindset, says Martha Rogers, founding partner of Peppers and Rogers, a management consulting firm in Norwalk, Conn. Approaching Web shoppers, according to Rogers, is a dangerous game. “One reason people shop online is because they don’t want to be harassed by the sales help,” she says. “If they want live help, they know where to get it. The idea that salespeople can now follow you around online is not very appealing.” Maybe not to all shoppers, but anecdotal evidence suggests live-chat technology works. The Internet service provider Earthlink boasts that 15% of its initiated chats result in a customer signing up. E-Trade Mortgage, based in Arlington, Va., added an “invite to chat” program in early 2004. In the first six months, the program improved customer satisfaction ratings and the company found chatters were more likely than nonchatters to become customers. And it also works for smaller outfits–which can get the service for as little as $99 a month. Rackspace, a Web services provider in San Antonio, gets about 80% of new sales via an initiated chat session, according to founder Patrick Condon. And LoCascio found 25% of visitors to his site who were engaged in a chat ended up buying something. “Humanizing the experience helps make the sale,” he says. Resources Tech website TopTenReviews has a live-chat buyer’s guide. For more advice, read “How to Screw Up Live Customer Chat (and How to Fix It).”

The 2001 Inc Web Awards: Winners

The 2001 Inc Web Awards General Excellence Winner All-Outdoors Whitewater Rafting www.aorafting.com First place, Customer Service Second place, ROI Marketing finalist Honorable Mention Nova Cruz Products LLC www.xootr.com First place, Design Third place, Marketing ROI finalist Customer Service First place All-Outdoors Whitewater Rafting www.aorafting.com Second place Cadkey Corp. www.cadkey.com Third place Street Glow Inc. www.streetglow.com Design First place Nova Cruz Products LLC www.xootr.com Second place TidalWire Inc. www.tidalwire.com Third place Mosca www.moscahome.com Management (intranets and extranets*) First place Sunbelt Business Brokers Network Inc. www.sunbeltnetwork.com Second place National Services Group www.nationalservicesgroup.com Third place SLP Capital www.slpcapital.com Marketing First place Merriman Capital Management www.fundadvice.com Second place Earth Treks Inc. www.earthtreksclimbing.com Third place Nova Cruz Products LLC www.xootr.com ROI First place Ipswitch Inc. www.ipswitch.com Second place All-Outdoors Whitewater Rafting www.aorafting.com Third place The Connoisseur.cc Ltd. www.low-carb.com Sole Proprietors First place Limelight www.limelightart.com Second place Somerset Estate Sales www.somerset-estate-sales.com Third place Restaurant Connection Inc. www.restaurantstaffing.com *Management awards are given for Web sites that are password protected, so the URLs are only for the companies’ general sites. How the 2001 Inc Web Awards winners were selected: Earlier this year, 800 small businesses applied online for the 2001 Inc Web Awards. Using an Internet-based judging site, members of the Inc editorial staff screened all applications, eliminating ineligible entries and selecting finalists in six categories: Customer Service, Design, Management (intranets and extranets), Marketing, Return on Investment (ROI), and Sole Proprietors. We then had outside judges (listed on facing page) review the Web sites and submit comments and recommendations. Based on the judges’ input, Inc selected the winners. The Judges Ryan Bernard is president of Wordmark Associates Inc., in Houston, and the author of The Corporate Intranet. Mary E. Boone is the president of Boone Associates, in Norwalk, Conn., and author of Managing Inter@ctively: ExecutingBusiness Strategy, Improving Communication, and Creating a Knowledge-Sharing Culture. Bonny Brown is director of research at Vividence Corp., in San Mateo, Calif. Erik Brynjolfsson is codirector of the Center for eBusiness@MIT at the Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, in Cambridge, Mass. Michelle Chambers is the president and founder of New Tilt, in Somerville, Mass. Larry Chase is a New York-based marketing consultant, author of Essential Business Tactics for the Net, and publisher or Web Digest for Marketers in New York City. Steve Crummey is the cofounder and chairman of Intranets.com Inc., in Woburn, Mass. Bill Demas is an executive vice-president of Vividence Corp., in San Mateo, Calif. Paul Edwards is a self-employment consultant and the coauthor of Home-Based Business for Dummies. He is based in Pine Mountain Club, Calif. Martin T. Focazio is the CEO of Martin T. Focazio LLC, in Upper Black Eddy, Pa., and author of The e-Factor. Jeffrey Harkness is the cofounder of Diesel Design in San Francisco and the host of CNet’s monthly Design Talk radio program. John Hartnett is the CEO and president of BlueMissile, in Minneapolis. Randy J. Hinrichs is the group research manager in Learning Sciences and Technology, Microsoft Research, Microsoft Corp., in Redmond, Wash., and the author of Intranets: What’s the Bottom Line? Donna L. Hoffman is a professor of management, director of the electronic commerce concentration, and codirector of the eLab at the Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University, in Nashville. Peter Kent is president of Top Floor Publishing, in Lakewood, Colo., and the author of Poor Richard’s Web Site. Michael P. Largey is the executive vice-president of IT Web Solutions Inc., in West Long Branch, N.J. Terri Lonier is the president of Working Solo Inc., a consulting firm in San Francisco, and the author of Working Solo: The Real Guide to Freedom & Financial Success with Your Own Business. Harley Manning is a research director at Forrester Research Inc. in Cambridge, Mass. Jakob Nielsen is a principal at Nielsen Norman Group, in Fremont, Calif., and the author of Designing Web Usability. Richard W. Oliver is a professor of management at Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University, in Nashville. Don Peppers and Martha Rogers are founding partners of Peppers and Rogers Group, in Norwalk, Conn., and the coauthors of One to One B2B. Patricia B. Seybold is CEO of Patricia Seybold Group Inc., in Boston, and the author of Customers.com: How to Create A Profitable Business Strategy for the Internet & Beyond and The Customer Revolution. Beerud Sheth is the cofounder and general manager of eLance Inc., in Sunnyvale, Calif. James Slavet is the cofounder of Guru Inc., in San Francisco. Robert Spiegel is the author of The Shoestring Entrepreneur’s Guide to the Best Home-Based Businesses. He lives in Albuquerque. Phil Terry is the CEO of Creative Good Inc., in New York City. Mark C. Thompson is chairman and CEO of Network Public Broadcasting International Inc., in San Francisco, and chairman of Integration Associates Inc., in Mountain View, Calif. Bruce D. Weinberg is an associate professor of marketing and E-commerce at McCallum Graduate School of Business, Bentley College, in Waltham, Mass. Marcia Yudkin is the Boston-based author of Poor Richard’s Web Site Marketing Makeover and other Internet marketing guides. Ron Zemke is the president of Performance Research Associates Inc., in Minneapolis, and coauthor of E-Service: 24 Ways to Keep Your Customers When the Competition is Just a Click Away and other books. The 2001 Inc Web Awards The Best Small-Business Sites in America The 2001 Inc Web Awards: Winners A Web Strategy Runs Through It Traffic Magnets Duh-sign of the Times Home Groan Many Happy Returns Please e-mail your comments to editors@inc.com.

Paging Dr. Wireless

E-Medicine Long resistant to technology, the medical field is finally getting wired. But can anything short of a complete overhaul make a difference? Marcia brier was suffering from vertigo when she arrived for a doctor’s appointment one morning this past winter. But as she soon found out, that wasn’t her only problem. Brier had been referred to an ear, nose, and throat doctor at Boston’s Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, and his office staffers couldn’t locate the referral number that Brier’s internist had given her. They wanted payment up front. But unlike most patients who are powerless in the face of medical bureaucracy, Brier was armed with an unusual tool — online access to her own medical records. “I said, ‘Look, do you have PatientSite access?” recalls Brier, referring to a Web-based repository of the records of 5,000 of the 1 million patients enrolled in CareGroup HealthCare System, based in Boston. The office had access to the site, so Brier dashed behind the counter, took control of the keyboard, logged on to the secure site, and pulled up her referral number. It was in an E-mail from Dr. Steven Flier, Brier’s internist and codeveloper of PatientSite. Up and running since April 2000, PatientSite puts into patients’ hands information that traditionally has been hidden within the confines of medical-records departments. Using the technology, Brier can E-mail her doctor to make an appointment, get a referral, or refill a prescription. She can also review the results of laboratory tests and radiology reports, all on her home computer. “The system lets us take away the trivia of medicine — appointments, prescriptions, referrals — and focus on patient care,” says Dr. John D. Halamka, chief information officer of CareGroup, who also helped develop PatientSite. The service, which CareGroup may begin licensing to other health-care systems, operates within secure firewalls — much like an online financial-transaction service — in order to protect patients’ privacy. A technology that gives customers immediate access to all their own data is old hat in any number of other industries, from banking to office supplies. But it’s downright revolutionary in the medical field, in which papers, pencils, and manila folders are still state-of-the-art. “You can go to an ATM and get $20 from your bank account, but it’s very hard to get an appointment with your doctor,” says Halamka. After years of resistance, the medical field is finally in the process of getting wired — and going wireless. Web technology is empowering patients, and handheld wireless devices are beginning to wean doctors from their dependence on paper. Physicians are beaming prescriptions to pharmacies and scanning bar codes on patients’ wristbands as if they were moving groceries through a checkout line. And doctors and patients alike are finding that technology is beginning to ease the perennial battle with insurance companies. “The medical field is five to seven years behind other industries,” says W. “R.P.” Raghupathi, associate professor at Fordham University School of Business, in New York City. On average, hospitals and doctors groups spend just 3% of revenues on information technology, compared with the 5% spent by financial services and 7% by the communications sector, according to one Gartner Group study. In addition, a network that could seamlessly connect doctors to hospitals to patients to insurance companies seems as elusive as a cure for the common cold. The roadblocks to creating such a system are huge. Many doctors fear that technology will replace their decision-making authority, and patients worry about privacy. Federal legislation and regulations are proliferating to safeguard the exchange of confidential medical data among providers and insurers. But as consumers experience the unfamiliar taste of access to their own medical information, it’s hard to imagine that there will be any turning back. What may truly drive further technological developments are consumers themselves, who may begin voting with their feet for doctors who have access to seamless communications systems and smooth connections to insurance carriers. Creating Patient Communities Phillip L. Webb began surfing the Internet for medical information in the spring of 2000, soon after he was diagnosed as being infected with the potentially fatal hepatitis-C virus. The automotive technician from Bakersfield, Calif., believes that his membership in the online community Hepatitis Neighborhood ( www.hepatitisneighborhood.com) may well have saved his life. “When I first found out I had the virus, I thought it was a death sentence,” says Webb, who was referred to the online community by the pharmaceutical company that manufactured his medicine. “If I hadn’t had access to Hepatitis Neighborhood, I would have been in the dark.” Even though the Web can’t replace doctors, it can collect and disseminate medical information with unprecedented efficiency. Having access to online communities is a breakthrough for chronic-disease sufferers like Webb, who have flocked to the Internet for information not just from doctors but also from people who are similarly afflicted. Hepatitis Neighborhood, which is a combination support group and medical-information warehouse, is a typical example of the new communities. The secure site provides personalized information to hepatitis sufferers, depending on the strain of the virus they have — A, B, or the dreaded C — and offers support and detailed data about treatment. It also monitors patients’ drug therapy and tries to head off problems with medication noncompliance. The Web site depicts a homey neighborhood consisting of a series of buildings that dispense different types of information. The Food Market gives dietary advice; the Clinic and the Library house volumes of data about the disease; the Town Hall offers forums; and the CafÉ hosts chat rooms. “When you have one of these diseases, it dominates your life. You want to communicate with others in the same situation,” says Steve Cosler, president and chief operating officer of Priority Healthcare, which owns the site. The company, based in Lake Mary, Fla., is a specialty pharmacy and distributor that dispenses primarily biotechnology drugs for chronic diseases. Not surprisingly, one of the buildings in the Hepatitis Neighborhood is the Pharmacy. Patients who get a lot of medical support tend to be more compliant about taking their medication, says Cosler. As one indication of that trend, Priority Healthcare’s call center receives slightly fewer phone calls from patients who are members of the Neighborhood, he says. Such encouraging indications have inspired many physicians (primarily gastroenterologists) to recommend that their patients enroll in Hepatitis Neighborhood, and some doctors even provide links to the site from their own Web pages. Cosler estimates that Priority Healthcare entices two to three patients a week to sign up for its distribution services. Drug manufacturers pay about one-third of the cost of developing and maintaining the site, says Cosler, although he declines to disclose what the sum is. “As a stand-alone business, the Web site would be brutal,” he says. “But we’ve got a real business behind the Web site.” Heartened by the success of Hepatitis Neighborhood, Priority Healthcare launched Pulmonary Hypertension Neighborhood in November 2000. And this year it plans to unveil Fertility Neighborhood, Hemophilia Neighborhood, and Anemia Neighborhood. Drug manufacturers will help Priority defray the costs of the new sites as well. Handheld History As technology allows for virtual visits to the doctor, it’s also changing the dynamics of actual medical practices. Dr. Lloyd A. Hey, an orthopedic surgeon and assistant professor at Duke University Medical Center, in Durham, N.C., wields a Palm handheld with a bar-code reader across the top. He uses the device, which was developed by a company called MDeverywhere, to scan patients’ wristbands. That allows him to instantly confirm a patient’s identity and also access the person’s medical records. Hey carries note cards in his pocket that list common orthopedic diagnoses and procedures. Next to each diagnosis or procedure is another bar code. After Hey comes up with a diagnosis, he scans the bar code on the appropriate card, and the diagnostic information eventually becomes part of the patient’s permanent record. Hey isn’t just a client of MDeverywhere, the company that developed the scanner. He’s also its founder. Many years ago, Hey, who studied electrical engineering at MIT as an undergraduate, had ample opportunity to observe the inefficiencies in the health-care system thanks to a leg injury he suffered as a teenager. He landed in the hospital for three months and required subsequent doctors’ visits over the next two years. Now he’s using his experience to help streamline the system for other patients. “I’m trying to lead a compassionate process-control revolution,” he says. That means he’s developing a system that quickly records technical details and allows him — and other doctors who use the scanner — to spend more time focusing on patients. Hey hopes the bar-coding system will eventually eliminate such hospital errors as prescribing the wrong medication or assigning the wrong procedure — or, in extreme cases, operating on the wrong patient. For instance, if Hey enters information into his Palm handheld that says he’s going to perform hip surgery on a patient who is scheduled for a knee arthroscopy, the device beeps and reminds him why the patient is there in the first place. Of course, such warnings go off only if a physician is using the device. But the incentive to use it is built right in. Each time a doctor uses the Palm (or another compatible handheld device, such as the iPAQ Pocket PC), the computer records a “patient encounter” — each of which constitutes billable time. By recording encounters as they happen, the software decreases the amount of time that it takes for a doctor to receive payment. For instance, Dr. David Diduch, an orthopedic surgeon at the University of Virginia, says that his billings have gone up since he started using the device, last September. It used to take two to three weeks from the time he saw a patient until a bill for the visit would leave his office. Diduch would dictate a note; a clerk would transcribe it; Diduch would sign the transcription; then a clerk would assign an “evaluation and management code” to the item and send it to a billing clerk. Now the information goes straight from the handheld to the billing clerk. While Hey and Diduch are using their handhelds in the data-collection process, in Darien, Conn., family physician Stanley R. Skolnick is sending prescriptions through cyberspace. He’s one of some 500 physicians who are using the wireless application PrescriptionCenter, which was developed by LogonHealth, a company based in Morris Plains, N.J. Instead of carrying around a prescription pad, Skolnick uses a tiny Palm keyboard to write up to 40 prescriptions a day. “It saves me not only time but, more important, frustration,” says the 63-year-old physician, who is living proof that the older generation of doctors can learn new high-tech tricks. Skolnick had long ago grown weary of calling in prescriptions to pharmacies, only to encounter busy signals and endless automated menus. It’s no longer necessary for him to speak to pharmacists. After he enters a prescription into his handheld and sends it, the prescription is transmitted to LogonHealth, where computers download the prescription and fax it to whichever pharmacy the doctor has selected. Skolnick has contact information for about two dozen pharmacies already loaded into his Palm. In addition, he has all his patients’ names, dates of birth, and insurance providers recorded there as well. LogonHealth updates the computer system at Skolnick’s two-doctor practice, Darien Medical Group, every week or two, entering or changing patient information, adding new pharmacies or drug choices, and updating information about insurance coverage. The latter feature has been one of the biggest time-savers for Skolnick. If he tries to send a prescription for a drug that a patient’s insurance company doesn’t cover, the Palm will alert him, and he can choose another medicine. As the practice of scrawling prescriptions fades, so too will the horror stories about the illegibility of doctors’ handwriting. But that problem may be coming to an end anyway. Several states are considering “legibility laws” mandating that doctors’ handwriting must be readable. If passed, such legislation would certainly drive more doctors, with their notoriously poor penmanship, to technology for assistance. Staking a Claim If patients and doctors are two legs of the health-care stool, insurance vendors are the third — and the one that often makes the whole operation wobble. Insurance companies and managed-care groups frustrate doctors and patients with rejected claims, denied coverage, and general micromanagement. But insurance vendors also have their beefs — with patients and doctors. Both doctors and patients have been known to submit inaccurate or even fraudulent insurance information, and insurers have been slow to develop systems that can efficiently recognize bad claims. But technology is beginning to catch up with the overwhelming number of medical procedures, laws, and regulations that affect how even the simplest claims are paid. “You need a little army to run a claims department,” says Grace Mary Trocchio, cost-containment manager of Vytra Health Plans, a managed-care organization in Melville, N.Y. The 200,000-member health plan receives an average of 9,000 claims each day. Trocchio’s aim is to make sure that Vytra isn’t paying any more than it must to satisfy those claims. Despite using software that’s designed to catch such billing errors as duplicate claims, Vytra was still seeing money slip through the cracks from overpayments. “We were missing claims-savings opportunities,” says Trocchio, resorting to industry jargon. In October 1999, Vytra started sending its claims for review to a Norwalk, Conn., company called IntelliClaim. Although a redundant system hardly sounds like a model of efficiency, running claims through IntelliClaim’s “extra loop” not only catches errors but also alerts insurance companies to entire categories of mistakes in their claims, according to Kevin F. Hickey, IntelliClaim’s CEO. The company places an extra layer of protection over a system that may not have the personnel or the money to routinely update information from doctors, hospitals, and government regulators. Each business day, Vytra sends its thousands of claims to IntelliClaim in encrypted files over the Internet. IntelliClaim’s computers analyze all the data, matching standards that Vytra has set against the submitted claims. IntelliClaim continually updates its software with changes in regulatory information, such as revisions from the Health Care Financing Administration — a task that would be prohibitively expensive for Vytra to handle. IntelliClaim returns the verified batch of claims over the Internet by the next day. Vytra found it was overpaying doctors for such things as sending out duplicate bills or charging double for supplies — for example, charging for sutures when the cost of the material had already been included in the surgical bill, says Trocchio. So far the extra effort is paying off big time, she says. In 2000 alone, the system saved Vytra more than $1 million. While insurance-company and health- plan executives are working to avoid paying out too much, hospital officials are striving to prevent insurance companies from paying them too little. Reimbursement headaches used to be a chronic problem for the Cape Fear Valley Health System, a North Carolina network of four hospitals and about 500 physicians. The hospital group has now linked up with HDX, a subsidiary of Siemens Medical Solutions Health Services, based in Malvern, Pa., to ease its insurance-reimbursement problems. The system that Cape Fear has adopted is familiar to anyone who has ever used a credit card in a department store, but it’s unusual in many health-care settings. The system checks all patients’ insurance information at the time they enter the hospital. Within two to three seconds, a Cape Fear admitting clerk can find out whether a patient has private insurance coverage, Medicare, or Medicaid; whether the insurer requires a copayment and, if so, how much; and whether the patient will have any out-of-pocket expenses. Once the HDX system verifies the information, the insurance company’s data automatically appear in the hospital’s computer, eliminating the need to rekey any information. “It even tells us if the name is incorrect,” says Keith E. Hullender, director of system support and development for Cape Fear. Prior to implementing the system, Hullender says, “we were getting a lot of denials in cases where the name didn’t match — say, if someone checked in as William rather than Bill. And the insurance company wouldn’t pay.” Before it started using the HDX system in 1996, Cape Fear verified insurance coverage only for certain patients: those who were being admitted to the hospital, having day surgery, or receiving expensive outpatient services, like chemotherapy. Admitting clerks had to contact insurance companies directly for those verifications, which totaled about 2,500 a month. Today Cape Fear verifies as many as 20,000 accounts a month, without having added any additional staff. Hullender estimates that Cape Fear is saving more than $100,000 a year by exposing such simple data-entry mistakes as transposed numbers and misspelled names. The hospital has realized additional savings by identifying patients who were covered by Medicaid but didn’t know — or couldn’t tell hospital staff — they were. “In the past we might have never found out they had any coverage,” says Hullender. And consequently, the hospital wouldn’t have collected a dime. Hullender says that the hospital is passing on its efficiencies from the verification system to both doctors and patients. The hospital gives the insurance information to independent physicians, such as radiologists and pathologists who work at the hospital, thereby serving to boost their collections as well. And patients are seeing fewer denied claims and exorbitant hospital bills that their insurance companies should have paid. That helps keep the three legs of Cape Fear’s health-care stool on even ground. Michelle Bates Deakin is a freelance writer based in Arlington, Mass. Please e-mail your comments to editors@inc.com.

How to Use an Acoustic Coupler

People who have tried them, curse them. They’re seen as bulky, clumsy, and decidedly low tech. Yet acoustic couplers are about the only way to ensure that you will be able to definitely, without a doubt make a connection with your modem from nearly any phone, in any town, in any country in the world. Acoustic couplers may be universally loathed, but whether you need to send a fax or go online, couplers are a form of insurance that is too attractive to disregard. Some of you may remember the early ancestors of acoustic couplers, modems with two large rubber cups that operated at blazing speeds of 300 baud or less. You’ll be pleased to know that even though today’s couplers resemble their predecessors somewhat in appearance, there are few other similarities. First, today’s couplers only couple. They no longer have built-in modems. They must be used in conjunction with your regular laptop modem. Second, couplers are no longer limited to prehistoric transmission speeds. In fact, they are quite capable of operating at 24.4 or even 28.8 kbps. The role of the coupler is to convert audio signals that are traveling over the phone lines to the analog signals that your modem normally encounters when it is connected directly to a phone line. To do this, the acoustic coupler attaches – in a rather inelegant fashion – to the telephone receiver (handset), with one small rubber cup pressing up against the mouthpiece and a second pressing against the earpiece. This simple technique of pressing the coupler against the telephone receiver eliminates many headaches. No more fidgeting with phone line adapter plugs, screwdrivers, alligator clips, or digital phone line converters. With couplers you simply put the receiver in place on the two rubber cups, secure firmly in place with the large Velcro band that is attached, and you’re up and computing. Of course, it’s not all as easy as that. Using a coupler means learning to work around the equipment’s quirks. It means learning a new set of tricks. But in the long run, you may find that acoustic couplers are an efficient and economical way to stay online. Road Test To test my new acoustic couplers under a variety of circumstances, I decided that I would only use the couplers to go online during a week’s trip to central Europe. I traveled with a SureLink AcoustiCoupler 100 sold by Port Inc., a computer accessories company in Norwalk, Conn. I used it with a 28.8-kbps PCMCIA modem in an IBM ThinkPad. I found the learning curve steep at first, but it didn’t take long before I achieved quite satisfactory results. Soon I was making connections from phones that I would never have been able to connect from before, including Swiss pay phones.