Tag Archives: New England States

Tech Talk: Online Meetings Serve Clients

COCC, of Avon, Conn., provides information technology services to community banks and credit unions to help process checking accounts, debit card transactions, loan accounts, ATM transactions and more. The company’s use of online meetings, says vice president Brent Biernat, has allowed COCC to better service customers, avoid travel costs, and expand its offerings to existing customers. Elizabeth Wasserman: Tell me about COCC and how you use technology. Brent Biernat: COCC is a cooperative data center for financial institutions, banks, and credit unions. We provide their transaction processing for them. If you go to a community bank in Connecticut, New England, Ohio, New York, or the Northeast, there is a good chance that your transaction is being processed by COCC. We’ve been around for 40 years and have about 350 employees. Wasserman: Why did you invest in a virtual meeting service? Biernat: Every company in the world says they are very concerned about customer service, and as a cooperative we live and breathe customer service. The presidents of all these financial institutions sit on our board of directors. They fill out report cards about our service. We want to be able to stay high touch as we continue to add more credit unions. We want to be able to communicate with them more readily. And there was a great technology to enable us to do it from GoToMeeting. If you try to do this on a regular phone and conference call, you lose something. You don’t have that collaboration. Wasserman: How do you use it? Biernat: We do a lot of it with our customers. There are various reasons. We do a lot of online training with them to show them a new feature in or product or to give them an update. We use it to introduce them to a new product or show them an entire demonstration. And we also use it to do regular collaboration if we have a project going on with them. We set it up and all join together and we can have some webpages or material in front of us that everyone can see. We also use it internally if we have a lot of production items we want to review and make changes to. In the past, what we’d have to do is gather in a conference room and huddle around for a discussion with a few callers on speaker phones. We have several buildings on our campus. It wastes productivity if you’re trying to have a meeting and gather everyone in a room and you don’t realize how much time that costs when you can have an online meeting with these same folks and they can join in right from their desks. They don’t have to spend that time walking and socializing. It’s much more efficient. Wasserman: What have the results been? Biernat: Essentially, it’s saved us a significant amount of money and still helped us to maintain a very high touch with our customers. In the past, we used a rival technology and an average meeting cost us $250. We found this easier for our customers to use. We’ve saved lots in terms of travel costs alone. Every time we get in a car or on a plane it ends up costing a lot. We figure we’ve saved about $3,000 a month in travel costs. The flip side of that is that we still want to get our executives out in front of our customers so they still have meetings where they have face-to-face time but during the travel time back, they can call in and be part of the regular internal meetings or join another customer call. Wasserman: How long have you been using virtual meetings? Biernat: We’ve been using this technology for four years now. We pay a flat monthly fee per host for the service and can host unlimited meetings. We’ve really incorporated it into our overall strategy. As a financial services company, we’re always concerned about pandemic planning and we’ve made sure we’re set up for it. The virtual meetings are a piece of that. If swine flu seriously increased, it would allow us to have meetings without being face to face in a closed room.

Avoid Security Pitfalls with Subcontractors

our beautiful site

You’re a not-so-big company, and you simply must outsource some sensitive tasks — perhaps payroll or the 401(k) plan. But news headlines about laptops carelessly unencrypted by subcontractors and then stolen are everywhere. How can you protect your company from the errant security breaches of a subcontractor? In March 2008, Santa Clara, Calif.-based Agilent Technologies became the latest victim of this scenario — a subcontractor hired to handle the company’s employee stock plan left the information on an unencrypted laptop. The laptop was later stolen. In Agilent’s case, Agilent had a clearly stated policy that all such data must be encrypted, and that subcontractors must do it, too. But the subcontractor did not honor this policy, according to Amy Flores, an Agilent spokeswoman. While some risk always exists, experts say, you need to make sure the service-level agreement (SLA) you have with your subcontractor is as airtight and specific as possible, and that you constantly keep tabs on whether they are complying. They offer the following advice: Call your lawyer. “Knowing your exposure is specific to your industry,” notes Scott Almas, associate attorney with the Albany, N.Y.-based law firm Lemery Greisler. Almas, who has drafted many an SLA and litigated ones that have gone awry, says that your company lawyer should know what’s needed in terms of data protection to comply with such federal laws as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Health Insurance Portability and Accounting Act (HIPAA). Spell it out. Explain the purpose of the application you are requesting that the subcontractor use and why. “Take the time to explain it — which data is private, what needs to be encrypted, the rules of who has access,” says Jack Danahy, founder and CTO of Ounce Labs, a Waltham, Mass.-based software risk management firm. Require specific protections. Insist on fingerprint sensors on all laptops the subcontractor uses, WPA encryption on their wireless systems, secure networks and careful protections on all remote access, says Almas. Look into NAC. Network access control (NAC) programs can allow you to scan any computer, PDA, or thumbdrive and keep tabs on any remote worker, subcontractor or not, notes Paul Roberts, senior analyst for enterprise security at the 451 Group, a technical analysis form in Boston. “If it’s not okay, you can quarantine the computer until the subcontractor cleans up their act.” NAC tools, offered by Cisco, Mirage Networks, Nevis Networks and others, are expressly designed to address the unique security breach issues raised by laptops and other mobile devices. But some note that the technology remains very new — and perhaps too pricey for the smaller business. A less expensive option is a hosted option, such as those offered by AT&T and other ISPs, says Roberts. Encrypt first. “Encrypting the laptop is one approach, but encrypting the data before ever transmitting it is the better approach,” says Ounce’s Danahy. Reviewing the source code to make sure that the subcontractors’ systems are in order is another approach that Ounce offers its enterprise customers, Danahy says. Include enforcement — and consequences. Reserve the right to enforce the agreement and check up on workers, says Ounce’s Danahy. “Put something in like, if we discover you’ve done this, you’ll be fined 5 percent per month, or we won’t pay you,” he says. Adds Almas: “They need to agree to indemnify and defend you against any losses.” Include destruction policy. When the project is over, make sure you’ve spelled out to the subcontractor how you’d like the sensitive information wiped or destroyed, says Almas. Otherwise, that laptop or PDA could be discarded someday with all that sensitive data still on it. If it’s your company that’s the subcontractor, showing a willingness to take security steps can help you seal the deal, notes Ounce’s Danahy. “Small contractors who ask the right questions and tell their potential client how they’ll encrypt the data, that can be a real differentiator for bigger companies,” he says. SIDEBAR: What to Do if Disaster Strikes Let’s say the worst has happened: your company’s sensitive data has been breached, despite your diligence. What can you do to contain your risk? The first step is to notify your clients or employees — those whose data is at risk — of the breach. Under California’s SB 1386 breach notification law, companies that tell their employees or clients of the breach as soon as possible, and can show that they did everything possible to protect sensitive data, are given a safe harbor. Experts say it’s also wise to offer employees or customers a credit-monitoring service for a time to help them track any possible identity theft. Agilent’s Flores reports offering this service to their employees. Even outside California, companies that don’t inform their customers/employees right away do so at risk. In March 2008, two separate lawsuits were brought against the New England-based Hannaford Bros. grocery chain for failing to notify customers until late March of a credit-card security breach that occurred Feb. 27, according to published reports. A breach can happen to anyone, but companies that show they did what they could will fare better — in the public eye, and in the courts.

Virtual Workouts, Real-World Results?

Best of the Web Online workout sites can help you get fit, but our CEO testers recommend exercising caution Starting an exercise regimen in front of your computer may sound like fodder for a Saturday Night Live skit. (“Now sit! And click! And point! And click!”) But Web-based workouts are no joke. Dozens of sites offer fitness advice, information, programs, and tools, some free, some for a price. Checking them out can be almost as time-consuming as training for a 10K race. We decided to help you cut to the chase by road-testing some top exercise sites. To narrow the field, we focused on general-interest fitness sites. We sought a blend of content and interactive tools, such as training logs, customized workout plans, and discussion groups. We eliminated sites for fitness-industry pros, retailers, and sports and health magazines. We also filtered out several good medical sites offering exercise, diet, and nutrition information. That left us with a handful of contenders that could appeal to busy executives, whether they’re hard-core jocks or novice weekend athletes. Regular Best of the Web readers may notice a change in the way we evaluate sites, beginning this month. We’ll still base the column on frank feedback from independent judges who are, like you, busy entrepreneurs. But rather than compile responses from a large, diverse panel of testers, as we’ve done before, we’ll recruit just a few with serious interest, expertise, or experience in the subject they’re surveying. (Naturally, we’ll always weed out judges with conflicts of interest.) And because we believe you’ll find our judges’ insights particularly valuable, we’ll replace our old letter-grade system with their comments and recommendations. This time around, we recruited three company leaders, all with excellent fitness credentials, and asked them to put the sites through rigorous workouts. They evaluated content and tested free interactive features such as workout builders and training logs. Their general conclusions: Exercise Web sites won’t put health clubs out of business, but they’re a solid source of information and inspiration. And the best of the sites offer a reasonable alternative for healthy folks looking for a fitness regimen without dropping a ton of money. (Of course, as you would with any exercise program, check with your physician first.) “Online fitness sites can’t compare, in terms of personal motivation, with a training partner or personal trainer,” says ServerVault CEO Patrick Sweeney, a former champion rower. “But they have a much higher level of available knowledge that can be quickly and easily mined.” Sometimes, though, that knowledge translates to inaccurate advice, warns Lisa Johnson, founder and president of a Brookline, Mass., exercise studio. For example, some Web sites included exercises that Johnson wouldn’t recommend, because she felt they were ineffective or, if done improperly, could cause injury. (For that reason, she recommends occasionally checking in with a human personal trainer.) But Johnson says workout Web sites do fulfill one critical purpose: “They offer hope.” Former World Games pole-vaulter and Novo Corp. CEO Kelly A. Rodriques emerged as the most critical of our panelists. “Many of the sites fail to deliver on quality,” he says. Among the flaws he pointed out: sloppy design, skimpy content, and poor performance. Despite their reservations, our CEOs each picked a winner. For Sweeney and Johnson: Asimba, no contest. “It fully encompasses the three components of wellness: nutrition, cardio, and resistance training,” says Johnson, who planned to use the site personally for at least a month after the Inc. test period. Sweeney, too, bookmarked the site for return visits. Rodriques, however, didn’t share the other panelists’ enthusiasm for Asimba, which he ranked among his least favorite sites because of what he viewed as limited content. “Users can calculate the number of calories they burn while having sex, but they can’t find a single running event in San Francisco during the upcoming year,” he says. Rodriques chose Active.com as his top pick. “The site speaks well to athletes and adventurers,” he says. He also praised the site’s “sleek and professional” design. Active.com What it’s good for: Serious jocks who are interested in outdoor activities or team and league sports. Don’t waste your time if: You’re sedentary, a fitness-machine aficionado, or a loner. What our CEOs had to say: “Great site for weekend athletes and anyone looking to participate in organized activities.” What you should know: Its features include a comprehensive database of state parks and recreation facilities. The company also makes software for managing league scheduling and similar activities. Asimba What it’s good for: Savvy fitness recommendations; customized progress tracking; training programs for many sports. Don’t waste your time if: An avalanche of ads bothers you. What our CEOs had to say: “The site is geared toward urbanites who train in gyms and city parks.” “Poor design; thin, narrowly focused content.” What you should know: The site offers expert advice by E-mail and a find-a-coach service. FitnessLink What it’s good for: Credible, no-nonsense articles on health and fitness topics ranging from Pilates to pregnancy. Don’t waste your time if: You’re seeking sophisticated applications; you’ll find only a few basic calculators and planners. What our CEOs had to say: “Great repository of information.” “Seems more like a magazine than an interactive Web site.” “Lively online community.” What you should know: Founder Shannon Entin is coauthor of The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Online Health and Fitness. Fitscape What it’s good for: A wealth of searchable, customizable nutrition information. Don’t waste your time if: You’re beyond basic tips like “Exercise more.” What our CEOs had to say: “Most valuable for nutrition information.” “Its strength is its focus on personalization.” “Too slow for me. I didn’t learn anything new or exciting.” What you should know: Medical advisers include a cardiologist and an orthopedic surgeon who specializes in sports medicine. GetFit.com What it’s good for: Personalized workouts. Don’t waste your time if: You object to registering before seeing any content. What our CEOs had to say: “Well-crafted site…a bit of work to get set up, but easy once you’re finished.” “Probably appeals to those looking to get fit rather than to those who already are.” What you should know: The site contains a huge library of exercises with video instruction. JustMove.org What it’s good for: Cardiac information. Don’t waste your time if: You get stressed out by Web problems. (Some testers reported problems accessing the site.) What our CEOs had to say: “Aimed at baby boomers. Information is reliable and well researched.” “Server problem prevented me from even reaching the home page.” What you should know: The site is operated by the American Heart Association. Workoutplan.com What it’s good for: Basic, no-frills instruction. Don’t waste your time if: You want fully explained or challenging information. What our CEOs had to say: “Oversimplified instruction left plenty of room for error.” “The plan that was eventually given to me was for a geriatric couch potato.” What you should know: The site doesn’t indicate who owns and operates it. Our panelists Lisa Johnson is founder and president of Studio Elle, a Pilates training studio in Brookline, Mass. (www.studioelle.com). Johnson, a long-time fitness instructor, was the first person in New England to be certified as a trainer in the Stott Pilates exercise method; she holds many other certifications. Kelly A. Rodriques is chairman and CEO of San Francisco-based Novo Corp. (www.novocorp.com), which develops, builds, and markets E-businesses. Rodriques, a pole-vaulter, competed in the 1986 World Games in Helsinki. Patrick J. Sweeney II is founder, president, and CEO of ServerVault (www.servervault.com), which provides secure, managed Web-hosting and data-storage services. He is a world-class single sculler who spent six years training full-time for the Olympics; he placed second in the 1996 Olympic trials. Anne Stuart is a senior writer at Inc. Technology. The Savvy Entrepreneur’s Guide to Fitness Strengths Likely beneficiaries Content quality/quantity Active.com Active and participatory sports content Outdoor enthusiasts, teams Good to excellent Asimba Comprehensive fitness information General population Fair to excellent FitnessLink Articles; online community People seeking fitness communities Generally good Fitscape Nutrition information People seeking nutrition information Fair to good GetFit.com Online exercise library Beginners and novices Fair to good JustMove.org Healthy-heart information Baby boomers with cardiac questions Excellent (1); unable to access/download (2) Workoutplan.com Very basic fitness information Possibly beginners Poor to fair Please e-mail your comments to editors@inc.com.

On the Wired Front

Cover Story Blue-collar communities are designing their own high-tech networks to attract business Tacoma, Wash. Stand on a street corner and you can feel it. Not the unstoppable rush that hits you when you emerge from a New York City subway station. Not the charged air hovering about MIT in Cambridge, Mass., or the relentless new-day vibe of a Silicon Valley morning. But there’s something brewing in Tacoma, this city on the south shore of Puget Sound. Young men and women on their lunch breaks dot the sidewalks. Men in hard hats pop in and out of boarded-up, abandoned warehouses and mills that they’re renovating into San Francisco-style loft offices. Cranes swing around the waterfront, where new buildings are going up. “I can’t say I’ve ever seen that before in 20 years,” says Rob Grenley, an area native who cofounded two companies in downtown Tacoma: Grenley Stewart Resources Inc. and ID Micro Inc. How is it that after decades of stagnation the city of Tacoma is sputtering back to life? For starters, it’s only about 30 miles south of Seattle, where the high-tech growth spurt has gobbled up almost all the available space and ratcheted up real estate prices to twice what they are in Tacoma. And there’s another ace up the smaller city’s plaid-flannel sleeve: a state-of-the- art, high-speed fiber-optic network that covers the city. Tacoma — rich with small-city business perks like a sane commute, ample parking, and a start-up-friendly permitting process — is now technologically equipped to play ball with the big kids. Two or three years ago, says commercial real estate broker Eric Cederstrand of Colliers International, corporate clients refused to even drive past Tacoma and look out the car window. Seattle was the city they wanted on their business cards. Now, he says, the Tacoma warehouses he’s renovating are filling up faster than he can sandblast the timbers and hang the reproduction windows. “It’s like Tacoma was put in a time capsule,” he says. “All of a sudden we’ve broken open the time capsule, and we are literally creating a brand-new city.” The new network in Tacoma represents another chance at economic viability — perhaps even boomtown success. As is true with many small cities, all this might not have happened if Tacomans had waited for the local cable or phone company to install the high-speed networks that businesses now demand. Frustrated with the inattention of big cable and phone companies, publicly owned utilities in tiny towns and small cities in states all over the country have taken matters into their own hands. They’ve dug up streets, laid fiber-optic cable, and connected residents and businesses to new high-speed lines. Service providers are rushing in to sell Internet access through the new infrastructure. (In some cities, the utilities are even selling the services themselves.) The introduction of choices has made life easier for the businesses already in place and made the cities more attractive to start-ups. For Tacoma, the new network is much more than a tangle of glass threads. It represents another chance at economic viability — perhaps even boomtown success. City of Destiny Nearly surrounded by water, with preposterously huge Mount Rainier looming in and out of the clouds to the southeast, Tacoma tends to hang back behind its sexier sister, Seattle, just up Interstate 5. In 1873 the Northern Pacific railroad chose Tacoma over Seattle for its western terminus, and ecstatic Tacomans tagged their town the “City of Destiny.” For many years paper mills choked the air with an acrid stench that came to be known as “Tacoma’s aroma.” In the 1960s a shopping mall was built in Tacoma. Almost immediately, the downtown retail district started to collapse. Buildings stood abandoned for decades. Crime rose; street gangs moved in. To business owners in those days Tacoma’s nickname must have sounded ironic. “We were the corner business on both corners,” says Steph Farber, whose family’s LeRoy custom-jewelry shop has occupied a storefront in the middle of a downtown block since 1942. For years buildings on both sides were blighted all the way to the end of the block. By the 1980s, Tacoma was standing still as Seattle flourished. Thousands of people from the Tacoma area clogged I-5 every morning on their way to jobs in Seattle and surrounding King County. When Rob Grenley left for college, Tacoma had “a postapocalyptic look,” he recalls. “You didn’t want to do business there unless you had to.” Grenley worked first on Wall Street and then in Seattle, but returned to Tacoma in 1990 to start a truck-fueling business with Greg Stewart, a childhood friend. Things were just beginning to turn around then. City officials were working hard to clean the place up. They threw all their resources at improving public safety. They ripped down offending buildings and put grassy parks in their place. And they clung tightly to Tacoma’s marquee business, the Frank Russell Co., a multimillion-dollar international investment-services firm that is headquartered on Tacoma’s waterfront. But in the early 1990s the city’s communications infrastructure was still stuck in a technological tar pit. “You’d get on the phone and it would be, ‘All circuits are busy,’ ” recalls Steve Klein, superintendent of Tacoma Power, the municipally owned electric utility. The cable service was equally poor. “They had a monopoly, with no incentive to improve the infrastructure,” Klein says. The Energy Policy Act of 1992 had deregulated the wholesale side of the power business. To stay competitive, Tacoma Power was planning a fancy digital network that would allow it to operate switches, read meters, and manage power loads from remote locations. Klein calls this type of service electricom, from electricity and telecom. “Microprocessors are in everything,” he says. “They need electricity to power them, and they need telecom to interact.” The SRI International consultants Klein hired to review the plan told him that while he was at it, it made sense to install a bit more fiber than was called for, to wire the city for high-speed Internet access and other applications. The city surely needed it; its franchise office had been negotiating with cable provider TCI Inc. for service upgrades, but TCI representatives were stonewalling. Klein approached TCI and phone company US West about teaming up to share the cost of the new network. “They told us to get lost,” he says. In 1997 the city council approved Tacoma Power’s plan to spend $100 million on a fiber-optic network. (The money came from the utility’s wholesale revenues; residential and business customers saw no rate increase. Tacoma Power customers have the second-lowest rates per kilowatt hour in the state, according to the company’s government and community-relations manager, Diane Lachel.) Construction of the network began in January 1998, and by July the power company had its first cable customer. Today the Click Network, as it is called, covers 180 square miles. Tacomans now have choices, which forces better customer service. The city’s marketing people claim that 100 start-up companies have located in Tacoma since Click went live; some have relocated from Seattle. Those businesses (and city residents) can choose from five different Internet service providers that the network supports. But the real surprise came along in the same month that Tacoma Power broke ground on Click. TCI suddenly announced a decision to invest $30 million to upgrade its own infrastructure. “When they finally woke up to the fact that we were a reality, they tried to stomp us,” Klein says. But, he adds, Tacoma residents and businesses now have choices, which forces better customer service. Tacomans also have seen hundreds more jobs, more venture capital, and better workforce training in their hometown. Dublin transplant Bill Towey runs a high-tech incubator through his private-investment firm Tacoma Venture Partners LLC. “A lot of these workers were already here,” he says. “They just don’t drive north to Seattle or Redmond anymore.” Towey plans to raise $15 million for his incubator. He and various local companies are involved in a technology boot camp for Tacoma high school teachers. Giddy with the first signs of success, and eager to tout its prospects, Tacoma has retained the New York City marketing firm Development Counsellors International for $127,000. Tacoma’s economic-development director, Juli Wilkerson, is touring the country, promoting “America’s #1 Wired City” to site-selection companies. City employees now have E-mail addresses that end in wiredcityusa.com. And broker Eric Cederstrand is hot on the idea of changing the names of Broadway and Commerce Street to Broadway.com and E-Commerce Street. “There’s a positive-multiplier effect,” Rob Grenley observes. “More people come, which means businesses will grow and flourish, as opposed to people not wanting to come here on a bet. It’s nice to be heading toward that in your hometown.” Naturally, AT&T, which bought TCI in March 1999, says the company had planned to modernize its services all along. “Regardless of whether Click Network was in place or not, TCI would have upgraded Tacoma because plans had always been in place to upgrade at that time,” says Steve Kipp, executive director of communications for AT&T Broadband’s Northwest division in Seattle. Yet the Tacoma experience with TCI was echoed in Cedar Falls, Iowa, and Boulder, Colo. In fact, some 65 municipalities have made end runs around their cable or phone monopolies to offer telecom services, says Martin Gidron, managing editor of UT Digest, a newsletter in Silver Spring, Md., that has chronicled the phenomenon. The trend will continue, Gidron says, since “the demand for telecom services seems to be insatiable.” Heart of the Commonwealth Some 3,000 miles east of Tacoma, nestled among seven green hills far less dramatic than Mount Rainier, lies the city of Worcester, Mass. Worcester — birthplace of Abbie Hoffman, the diner restaurant, the smiley face, and the Pill — has long been known as the Heart of the Commonwealth. The name fits: the city’s central location and highway and rail infrastructure make it a natural for commerce. Worcester has also been known as New England’s utility closet, because it was a manufacturing center for many years. Most of Worcester’s industrial powerhouses have moved on to cheaper pastures, leaving the city with an assortment of old, abandoned buildings, including a cold-storage warehouse that burned catastrophically last December, killing six firefighters. In the 1960s, Worcester replaced a massive piece of its core with a suburban-style mall. The shopping center never really caught on, but like the one in Tacoma, it sparked the collapse of the city’s formerly thriving downtown retail base. In the past few years Worcester officials have staked the downtown’s future on another huge, single-use project — a mammoth medical facility — and have restored the 90-year-old Union Station, a beaux arts train depot that had been left to rot for decades. (Tacoma also recently restored its own Union Station, which is being used as a courthouse.) Worcester residents have always suffered from a bit of an inferiority complex, partly because their town, like Tacoma, is within the shadow of a larger, more vibrant city (in this case, Boston). Even the restoration of Union Station, the pride of the city, came only after years of contentious intracity squabbling and institutional paralysis. Now, nearly a year after the project was completed, its beckoning retail space is almost entirely unoccupied. Like Tacomans, Worcester, Mass., residents have always suffered from a bit of an inferiority complex, partly due to their proximity to a larger, more vibrant city. Another part of the problem may be Worcester’s form of government. The chief executive is not the mayor but rather the city manager, who is appointed by the city council instead of being elected by residents. Worcester has had only three city managers since 1953 (when business leaders succeeded in instituting this “professionalized” municipal structure), and none of them has been directly accountable to voters in the way elected officials are. That can make it difficult to create real change. “Worcester has gotten a little bit behind the curve,” says Arthur Couture, an entrepreneur who eyed neighboring towns before choosing Worcester and its easy commute for his software and computer-services company, ICAL Systems. Now, Couture says, Worcester officials are being pressured to leapfrog ahead. A new fiber-optic network has been installed in the city, and local businesspeople are relying on it to lure new companies to their hometown. A marketing brochure only slightly less effusive in tone than Tacoma’s PR avalanche labels Worcester “America’s #1 Cyber City.” Worcester’s network differs from Tacoma’s in one fundamental way: a private-sector builder of fiber-optic networks called NEESCom, which was established as the telecom subsidiary of the electric utility formerly known as New England Electric System, installed it at no expense to the city. Gidron of UT Digest says that more than 150 private electric utilities have similarly entered the telecom market. Tom Wharton, a former bankruptcy-turnaround consultant, is the man who turned NEESCom’s head. In 1998, Wharton bought a bankrupt Internet service provider. Bell Atlantic was going to charge him $6,000 a month for connectivity in Worcester. So he drove 45 minutes to Providence, R.I., where he could colocate his servers with another provider for $250 a month. On the drive back to Worcester, he mused that it was unfortunate he couldn’t locate his business in the city where he lived. Why, he wondered, was Worcester’s technology infrastructure so far behind that of other New England cities? Wharton wrote a letter to the editor of the city’s daily newspaper. “The next thing I knew,” Wharton says, “I was heading a task force.” He began working with the Worcester Area Chamber of Commerce to bring the city’s technology infrastructure up to speed. Hearing about Wharton’s efforts, NEESCom figured that Worcester would make a great hub for its new regional fiber-optic network and offered to wire the city at its own expense. About half a dozen competitive telecom companies have since moved in and started selling services on the new network, and Wharton estimates that the influx of providers has drawn at least 10 start-ups to Worcester. That includes a new venture for native entrepreneur Steven Rothschild, who, after having run a family furniture business for 16 years, had started Furniture.com in Worcester. In 1997, Rothschild’s high-speed T1 line was costing him $1,800 a month. He was having trouble finding tech-savvy executives who were willing to work in Worcester, and venture capitalists weren’t breaking down the door to fund a company in the former mill town. All of that, combined with the tough time he was having in getting tax credits, prompted him to move the company to Framingham, halfway between Worcester and Boston. But earlier this year Rothschild launched an online lightbulb store, called Bulbs.com, in Worcester. High-speed Internet service costs him $168 a month — less than a tenth of what he was paying three years ago. He’s also having an easier time recruiting managers. And there’s even a new $15-million fund for early-stage Worcester businesses. “The technology infrastructure is taking out some of the roadblocks to staying in the city,” Rothschild says. Wharton’s task force — the Worcester InfoTech Project — has taken on the mantle of marketer for the city’s new high-tech offerings. But the NEESCom network hasn’t been a panacea. “This isn’t Field of Dreams — ‘If you build it, they will come,” says Couture, who hasn’t even been able to connect his business to the network yet. Another prominent local company, Tatnuck Bookseller, is situated just a few hundred feet away from one of the city’s three network rings, which cover the downtown business district, a biomedical park, and Worcester Polytechnic Institute. “We are betting our company’s future on giving our customers access to us and having access to them,” says Tatnuck owner Larry Abramoff. “Not being wired is hurting my business right now.” (Until the network reaches him, he’s making do with leased T1 lines and a wireless service.) Still, Worcester’s model — in which a private company, rather than a public utility, installs the network — may prevail in future business-community resurrections. Tacoma’s model has goosed some big privately owned phone companies. In Washington state, GTE Northwest sued the Douglas County Public Utility District to stop it from expanding its fiber-optic network (the suit was later withdrawn following changes in state law), and the Washington Independent Telephone Association took Pacific County Public Utility District to court to stop it from providing Internet service to customers. So far, Texas, Missouri, and Virginia have passed laws limiting publicly owned electric utilities from offering telecommunications services. AT&T’s Kipp views the public companies’ inroads in this area as a conflict of interest. “We’re beholden to our shareholders,” he says. “Then we have to go in and compete with the government, who’s also the regulator. That could have a chilling effect on competition.” Steve Klein of Tacoma Power doesn’t really care if Click loses residential customers to the new AT&T offerings; he built the network for the power company’s own purposes, and the Internet-access stuff is just gravy. The mayor’s office doesn’t mind if some Tacoma residents think “Wired City” sounds as if a bunch of caffeine addicts have staged a coup. Some of the new start-ups may not even survive. But 100% success is not the point. The point is to get things going. The more that entrepreneurs hear about Tacoma, the more seriously they will consider starting or relocating a business there. For the first time the people of Tacoma — and Worcester and other old-economy communities like them — are leveraging their technological assets to promote entrepreneurial businesses. They’re grabbing the reins and kissing destiny good-bye. Jill Hecht Maxwell is a reporter at Inc. Technology . Question Authority Small cities want their zip codes on your letterhead, and they’ll try their darnedest to convince you that their technology is state-of-the-art. Don’t believe the hype. Here are some key questions you should ask regarding tech infrastructure before you relocate: Can I connect to a fiber-optic network in your city? How much will it cost to plug in? How long will it take? Who’s competing to provide me with service? What are the rates? Is the network connected to major cities nearby? How many other companies are there? Do they use the network? Can residents connect to the high-speed network and telecommute? Are wireless services available? Up to Date in Kapolei Remember when every burg across the nation was billing itself as the next Silicon Whatever? Well, now several cities and at least one state want to be known for their wired wonders. Here’s a sampling of the claims: The Wired City Kapolei, Hawaii America’s Most Wired City Louisville, Ky. The Most Wired City in America Stillwater, Okla. America’s #1 Wired City Tacoma, Wash. America’s #1 Cyber City Worcester, Mass. The Internet Capital The state of Virginia Please e-mail your comments to editors@inc.com.

Upstarts: Personal-Finance Niches

Money Markets A slew of start-ups are storming the personal-finance industry by targeting populations that traditionally have been underserved What do women really want? Some start-ups think the answer is customized financial advice and business services. Those companies want to be the vehicle through which women do all their money-related tasks: paying bills, buying stocks, seeking loans, selecting insurance, and so on. They insist that women’s financial needs are different from men’s, especially because women tend to earn less than their male counterparts yet live longer lives. The thinking is that those two conditions have created a distinct marketing niche — a “niche,” mind you, that comprises 51% of the U.S. population. Do women truly need specialized financial attention? Predictably, the founders of the aforementioned start-ups believe they do. They cite the needs of the aging baby-boomer market — a megapopulation of educated women now entering their peak years of earning and spending. Those women, the first female generation to wear the proverbial pants of financial planning, will begin to look for advice on the Web and elsewhere. And the information that they’ll need will not only cover the basics but also emphasize “more relationship-oriented and life-stage topics than bottom-line transactions,” says Liz Davidson, founder and CEO of Financial Finesse, a company in San Francisco that’s dedicated to serving women’s investment needs. Such target marketing — be it to women or to any other population subgroup — dovetails nicely with the audiences that already exist on the Internet. “For some time, the Internet has been aggregating people in communities,” says Chris Musto, director of financial services and an analyst at Gomez Advisors Inc., a research firm in Lincoln, Mass., that focuses on Internet commerce. “So a start-up can work with sites that have already congregated certain groups.” Indeed, the Web — already home to such affinity sites as Women.com Networks, Gay.com, and AsianAvenue.com — lends itself to businesses hoping to attract a given demographic. Still, common sense suggests that all personal-finance customers — regardless of gender, ethnicity, or sexual orientation — would want the same commodity: trustworthy advice. Yet the specialization of personal-finance businesses, both on and off the Web, is well under way. Name a target market — teens, Hispanics, newlyweds, high-tech workers — and you’ll find a financial start-up whose raison d’être is serving it. Wrapping it up Lenda Washington first had the notion of putting a female spin on traditional investment products during her days at PaineWebber. As a thirtysomething junior broker learning the art of cold calling, she was taught to ask, “Is your husband home?” if a woman answered the phone. For Washington, those days of making cold calls inspired the idea for a business targeting female investors. Sure enough, Washington’s new start-up is now calling on women to buy its first product. The company, Allison Street Advisors, based in Washington, D.C., is selling an investment vehicle called a wrap account, which gives customers with $250,000 in assets access to big-name institutional money managers. (Normally, that kind of access requires $5 million. A wrap bundles smaller amounts into an aggregate that’s still worth a manager’s time.) For years, brokerages have sold wraps as an investment option. Allison Street’s wrap has a novel twist: the managing institutions are owned by women or minorities. Washington hopes her wrap fund will appeal to women, minorities, and institutional investors such as schools and pension funds — all of whom, she thinks, will appreciate the precept of investing through female- and minority-owned firms. The obvious issue is, Wouldn’t the potential return on investment matter more to an investor than conscientiousness about social causes? Washington, who’s African American, doesn’t disagree. But she stresses that study groups show that investors have an affinity for advisers of a similar gender or ethnic background — those “who ‘get them’ and share common experiences,” she says. Her concept is no different in principle from an environmentally aware mutual fund, for which performance is “the meat,” but “the social ticket is the gravy,” she says. Getting minority-owned money managers to sign on was the easy part. The hard part has been persuading the Merrill Lynches of the world to offer Allison Street’s wrap fund among their investment products. The sales challenge, besides navigating through bureaucratic straits, is convincing brokerage firms that customers will favor Allison Street’s wrap if they are deciding between it and an equally performing but less diversely managed fund. So far, the fund hasn’t been around long enough for its popularity to be compared with that of other wrap funds. At press time, the fund retailed only at five brokerages — including W.S. Griffith, in Hartford — and had less than $500,000 in assets under management after six months of active selling. But Washington believes the wrap could be a $50-million fund five years from now. Even if the fund isn’t a smash with women or minorities, she says, it’s sure to lure investors from large institutions. Which means it just might be a hit with anyone who has $250,000 to invest. “White males would also be interested in top managers,” she says. “We’re not excluding anyone.” Pride of ownership “You want two guys buying a one-bedroom condo to be comfortable,” says Brian Farley, founder of Pride Mortgage Inc., in Provincetown, Mass. “They don’t want a starchy banker asking, ‘Where’s he going to sleep?’ “ It’s hard to doubt Farley’s credentials on the subject. His $1.4-million business brokered $67 million in loans in 1999, and gay men and lesbians constitute a sizable portion of the business’s clientele. It’s a population that he classifies as very loyal to good service — and quick to bolt from bad, even when the bad service comes from a company that’s gay-and-lesbian-friendly. “If you don’t do a good job, it doesn’t matter if you’re called Rainbow Mortgage,” he says. Though he chose the name Pride in part because it connotes the gay and lesbian community, Farley says, “we don’t market solely to them,” and his efforts to target that community are no different from any other group marketing at Pride. In fact, the company’s eight other loan officers, some of whom head regional offices, have considerable leeway in how they promote Pride’s services. The Seattle office, for example, could market to that city’s large Asian population. As Farley sees it, the commission-earning officers’ motives are simple: to close as many loans as possible. If that means targeting a niche, many niches, or no niches at all, then so be it. At the same time, Farley’s pitch to the gay community is not some affinity-marketing facade. He’s well aware of how that community’s needs differ from those of conventional mortgage applicants. Besides facing the ever-lingering issue of potential discrimination, gays and lesbians face the possibility of being outed at their workplaces when a lender, seeking employment verification, sends paperwork to employers that lists the names of both applicants. There are also complications surrounding breakups of home-owning couples: an exiting partner will often neglect to notify the lender of the change in status and is still bound to a mortgage even if his or her name has been removed from the deed. Farley founded the company in 1998, and he generated $700,000 in revenues as Pride’s only loan officer for most of that year. By year’s end, he was ready to bring on more loan officers. Rather than expanding locally, Farley simply opened offices wherever prospective employees happened to live, which is why Pride’s non-New England locations are in the random states of Washington, Nevada, Florida, and California. Coordinating their efforts hasn’t been a problem, because loan officers don’t need much day-to-day management, and all loan applications are electronically sent and processed at the company’s operations center. Farley has a wait-and-see attitude about further plans to expand. “There’s no rock-solid business plan,” he says. One thing he knows for sure: niche marketing will continue. In fact, Farley is touring nationally to speak on the topic for Mortgage Originator magazine. “We’ve found,” he says, “that niche marketing is the best way for us to get into a city and do a good job.” The young and the eager Todd Romer’s initiation into the world of personal finance began at 15, when he watched his father use a magnifying glass to scan the small numbers of the newspaper stock listings. More curious about bulls and bears than birds and bees, Romer asked for a lesson in where to invest his lawn-mowing money. Now 32, Romer has started a magazine called Young Money, based in Loveland, Ohio. He’d had the idea since college, when — despite what he’d learned from his dad — he found the personal- finance magazines of the adult world both too difficult to understand and “too targeted to the married, working adult.” And so, after six years of building his own nest egg as a salesman for Syncor International Corp., a publicly traded pharmaceuticals company, Romer launched the magazine that he’d longed for since boyhood. With nine issues on the books and a barely profitable first year based on $275,000 in sales, Romer is pleased with the project so far. In typical new-economy fashion, he isn’t just trying to sell magazine ads; he’s hoping Young Money‘s Web site can become a popular destination for preadult investors. He’s struck a deal with Stein Roe to resell that company’s mutual funds at www.youngmoney.com and is transforming his site — now just an online face for the magazine — into a transaction-oriented one that he describes as “E*Trade for kids,” where they can do online trading with very little money. So far, Young Money‘s audience has been composed, in large part, of teenage boys. Romer didn’t plan it that way, but he believes he can parlay that following into ad sales because he can tell advertisers that he has “a young male readership that can’t be seen outside of Thrasher,” a skateboarding monthly. Romer doesn’t know why his readership is mostly male, but he guesses that it’s for the same reasons that business magazines have always had larger male audiences. These days, as more teenage boys ponder forgoing college for high-tech jobs or starting their own companies, his young male audience seems larger than ever. Because Young Money‘s audience is driven to succeed, Romer thinks he can convince advertisers that his readers are more than “just boys”; they’re the boys who’ll make a difference. “We can say that our readers are savvy, they take action, they want to get ahead,” he says. It’s not lost on him that potential investors would also have an interest in a Web site that attracts teenage boys, particularly those with a high-tech or entrepreneurial bent. Romer himself is wasting no time courting angels and venture funds. “We’re doing a full-court press on the investment community,” he says. Q&A Does Niche Marketing Make Sense? Personal finance is a hot topic. These days it seems that people everywhere are more conversant about money and investing than they were just a few years ago. That’s largely because the nation’s record prosperity has brought unprecedented wealth to many different groups, including women, minorities, and other demographic subsets. Hoping to reach those prospective investors, a bevy of start-ups are specifically targeting one group or another with their finance offerings. Will target marketing work? We asked Cheryl Russell, demographer, author, and editor-in-chief of New Strategist Publications Inc., in Ithaca, N.Y., to tell us. Inc.: For personal-finance start-ups, is simply targeting a niche enough to lure customers? Russell: Only if the start-up also provides products and services that are worthy of attention. Because women live longer and are often widowed, they will have different financial situations than the general market will. But whether those differences alone will attract women to these start-ups remains to be seen. Financial advisers worth their salt will customize a plan to suit the individual customer. So does the field require a Web site just for women? I have my doubts. Inc.: But the start-ups keep coming, and they keep attracting tons of funding. Why will they have such a tough time? Russell: It’ll be difficult for them to get people’s attention. The giants have the advantage already. The start-ups will have to offer something more than the financial advice you can get anywhere, or they somehow have to be perceived as cool or hip. Otherwise, they’ll get lost in the shuffle. On the Web, the cream is already out there, and it’s hard to get people to change their Web patterns. It’s like getting people to watch new TV shows: a daunting task. You almost have to use traditional forms of advertising, like TV and radio, which can get very expensive. Inc.: So where will all those personal-finance start-ups be five years from now? Russell: That’s anybody’s guess. It’s a huge pie. In just about any business area, you end up with two or three dominant players, and business on the Internet is no different. Women might emerge as one separate area, especially if the start-ups capture a lot of the baby boomers who are now in their mid-fifties and are financially peaking. But for other targeted groups, like the superwealthy or high-tech workers, we’re dealing with more myth than reality. For most of the country, having a lot of wealth doesn’t define your twenties and thirties. That’s the type of niche that sounds like marketers’ just trying to go after the latest thing. It’s the sort of fad that’s going to change as soon as the stock market crashes. Please e-mail your comments to editors@inc.com.

Nailing It

They needed it overnight. They wanted the best. In the race to build the first online hardware store, Peter Hunt and Rich Takata put their company in the hands of outright strangers The Company Name: CornerHardware.com Inc. Founded: Incorporated May 1999; Web site launched early 2000 Location: San Francisco Cofounders: Chairman and CEO Richard Takata; president and chief operating officer Peter A. Hunt Employees: 35 full-timers Mission: Creating an online home-improvement store, magazine, and community for do-it-yourselfers URL: www.cornerhardware.com The Developer Name: Xuma Founded: 1998 Location: San Francisco; with offices in New York, Los Angeles, and Las Vegas Cofounders: CEO Joe Cha; chief technology officer Jamie Lerner Employees: 250 Mission: Producing built-to-order Web sites for E-businesses URL: www.xuma.com In December 1998, Peter Hunt set out to tackle what should have been a simple, joyous task: building a tree house for his four-year-old son for Christmas. Hunt couldn’t wait to start the project. It wasn’t just that he welcomed the diversion from his high-powered job as an investment banker. It was more that, ever since he’d been a kid, Hunt had loved working with his hands: making model trains and airplanes, building furniture, fixing things around the house. As an adult he’d dreamed of buying a corner hardware store in some rural New England town, the kind of place with a bell over the door and shelves lined with hinges and screws and doorknobs, where he’d spend his days happily helping customers pick out the right paintbrush or handsaw. But with two kids and a top job at Montgomery Securities in San Francisco, the lanky, thoughtful Hunt didn’t even have time to stop into a local hardware shop, let alone wander through a giant home-improvement warehouse. He assumed he’d save time by buying everything he needed for the tree house — instructions, lumber, materials, and tools — online. So he went to the Web and looked for hardware sites. And looked. And looked. He found nothing except a loose network of like-minded tree-house enthusiasts, many similarly frustrated by their own fruitless online searches for supplies and information. From that experience, Peter Hunt, banker, suddenly figured out how to finally become Peter Hunt, hardware guy. Hunt’s thinking went like this: What if there were lots of little communities out there — tree-house builders and woodworkers and plumbers and fixer-uppers and even contractors — all hungry for online hardware and home-improvement advice? And what if somebody could provide it for them in one friendly, convenient location, sort of a virtual corner hardware store? In early 1999, Hunt, then 35, took a week off to write a business plan for just such a company. But he knew something was missing. He needed a business partner — a veteran hardware retailer, a real insider. When he asked around, he kept hearing the same name: Rich Takata. Richard T. Takata, then of Seattle, had been in the hardware business for 24 years. Takata, who’d most recently been president and CEO of Eagle Hardware & Garden Inc., had remained with the 41-store chain after North Carolina­based Lowe’s Cos. had bought it for $1.4 billion. (In fact, Hunt’s firm had handled the sale.) Although reserved and soft-spoken, Takata, then 49, was hardly averse to risk; in his spare time he occasionally drove race cars. A lifelong do-it-yourselfer, Takata also knew his industry and its customers. Over the years he’d waited on thousands of people, even during store visits when he was the company’s CEO. And like Hunt, whose own company had been acquired by North Carolina­based NationsBank, Takata was ready for a change. Xuma’s founders named their Web-development company after an ancient Chinese battle cry. In April 1999, at the urging of a mutual friend, Hunt and Takata met for dinner to talk about launching a big home-improvement E-commerce site. They discovered they had much in common. Both were quietly intense, articulate, committed. Both were customer-service evangelists, true believers in keeping promises and building long, loyal relationships. Both believed passionately in the Internet’s potential for business. And both had high — some might say almost impossible — standards for themselves, their companies, and those who worked for or with them. Of the two, Takata was more tactical and analytical, a manager with a keen recall of industry statistics and an almost instinctive understanding of business trends. Hunt, very much the money guy and deal maker, was also more sentimental. (He documents CornerHardware.com’s growth in a scrapbook filled with mementos like copies of the company’s incorporation papers and of its early bank deposits, and Polaroid photos of each newly hired employee.) From the start, the two men agreed they wanted to do more than lead the Web in sales of drill bits and deck stain. They wanted to re-create the old-fashioned corner hardware store of Hunt’s dreams and Takata’s experience: a place with well-stocked shelves, knowledgeable clerks, lots of how-to information, and most of all, a friendly, collegial, yes-you-can-do-it-yourself atmosphere. It would, of course, be called CornerHardware.com. They knew it was a big idea with hefty potential; pulling in even a small fraction of the $400-billion-a-year home-improvement business would yield a fortune. They were amazed that nobody had launched the kind of venture they envisioned, and they knew that before long somebody else certainly would. What they wanted to do — build a full-service online hardware store and community — would cost at least $2.5 million. Takata and Hunt knew they needed to move fast — and they did. Within three weeks of their first meeting, both men had quit their jobs; put up $250,000 each of their own money; raised about $500,000 more from angel investors, family, friends, and colleagues; and incorporated their business. But for all the partners knew they needed to do, there was still plenty they needed to learn. Chief among the lessons: just how tough it would be to build a big Web business in a matter of months — and how much tougher it would get when circumstances forced them to launch the site weeks earlier than planned. They didn’t know for sure whether a no-name newcomer like CornerHardware.com could compete with new and upcoming E-commerce arms from brick-and-mortar brands like Sears (which was already selling parts, tools, and appliances online), Home Depot (which plans to launch a full E-commerce site this summer), and Ace Hardware (which would begin selling merchandise online at OurHouse.com late in 1999). In addition, dot-com start-ups were also racing to market. Major projects included HomeWarehouse.com, then under development in nearby San Mateo, Calif., and Amazon.com‘s new tools and hardware store, which would also launch by year’s end. And it was entirely likely that some of those in the race would end up as roadkill. When it came to CornerHardware.com’s technology, Hunt and Takata knew they weren’t looking just for a speedy job. Sure, there was no time to waste — they wanted a beta site before year’s end, a quiet launch by March 2000, and a public launch shortly after that. But building their Web site would also be a big, complex, cutting-edge project. They needed transaction processing capability and complete descriptions and images of some 37,000 products, everything from penny nails to power saws to Phillips-head screwdrivers. They would shoot to double their inventory, which is distributed from a warehouse in Kansas, within their first six months online. True to their customer-service mission, Hunt and Takata also wanted, from day one, to offer how-to articles, visitor message boards, animated step-by-step project instructions, a massive glossary of hardware terms, a superb search engine, and live customer service, online and in real time. That last capability would become, in fact, the real cornerstone, so to speak, of CornerHardware.com. Using interactive windows, customers would be able to chat with service reps in real time — asking questions about products or about a bill, for instance. That kind of service, which the company would contract out to dedicated staffers at Boston-based eSupportNow, would be what Hunt and Takata believed would ultimately distinguish their company not just from other online hardware stores but from their brick-and-mortar brethren as well. As Takata pointed out later, there weren’t many home-improvement stores that were open 24 hours a day. Although Hunt and Takata knew what they wanted their site to do, they didn’t know much about the nuts and bolts required to make it happen. They needed professional help. And they needed it fast. The high-speed, high-stakes scenario isn’t unique to CornerHardware.com — or even to the online home-improvement industry. Today almost any new business-to-consumer Internet company must fight for a foothold in an already crowded market. (Witness the proliferation of online pet stores, drugstores, vitamin stores, and toy stores.) Being first online remains a competitive advantage. But there’s no point in being first without doing it well. As consumers on the Internet grow more sophisticated they’re less willing to tolerate sites that are slow, unreliable, boring, or tough to navigate. And they absolutely won’t return to sites that haven’t provided stellar customer service. E-commerce sites have grown increasingly complex in reaction to the industry’s ever higher standards and well-publicized successes and failures. In many cases, like CornerHardware.com’s, a business simply can’t hire its own team to build a site — even if it could find the right people, it probably couldn’t afford to pay them or retain them. So, like CornerHardware.com, the company opts to stake the future of its business on outside developers — people the company doesn’t know, people who must translate the entrepreneur’s dreams and plans into equipment and software and code. Xuma’s approach bridges the gap between standard and optional E-commerce components. As Takata and Hunt were setting up shop in rented space in San Francisco’s financial district, Joe Cha was building his own business just a few blocks away. About a year earlier Cha had been working at his third consulting job. A friend reintroduced him to Jamie Lerner, a consultant Cha had known slightly when both had worked at Andersen Consulting several years earlier. Like Hunt and Takata, Cha and Lerner found themselves thinking along the same lines. They wanted to try something new, and they didn’t want to create just another San Francisco Web-development company. Instead their thinking went like this: What if you could apply the same approach to building a Web site that Dell Computer applies to building a computer? What if you could create big, complex, flexible, reliable, customized E-commerce systems in record time simply by not reinventing the wheel for every single project? So Cha and Lerner founded Xuma. (The name, pronounced “zoo-ma,” is an ancient Chinese battle cry that the partners found perfect to describe their army of engineers charging into the E-commerce wars.) They adapted the Dell model: just as Dell combines standard and optional components to rapidly create computers, Xuma combines its standard and optional E-commerce components to quickly build Web sites. In the venture’s first year, the quiet, charming Cha (so charismatic that he was among 10 bachelors featured in a Women.com feature on “The Men of Silicon Valley”) sold Xuma’s services to customers ranging from health-and-beauty-products retailer More.com to home-furnishings site GoodHome.com. By its second anniversary, in April 2000, Xuma had launched more than 70 Web-based businesses nationwide and employed 250 people in four offices. But back in mid-1999, Xuma hadn’t yet tackled anything on the multimillion-dollar scale of CornerHardware.com. By the summer of 1999, Takata, CornerHardware.com’s CEO, and Hunt, its chief operating officer, had raised about $6 million in funding: close to $1 million from their own pockets and from family, friends, and angels; and the balance from the first round of venture funding. (A second round early in 2000 would yield an additional $21 million.) And the founders had begun building a staff. Their first hire: vice-president of engineering Steve Finer, who faced the daunting job of actually overseeing the Web site’s construction. (See “Chronicles from the Pit,” below.) Finer, then 33, was an enthusiastic, outspoken technologist who, in a previous life, had managed nightclubs in Boston. He knew something about risk: he’d cofounded an Internet start-up that later collapsed and eventually filed for bankruptcy. And he knew something about working hard; he was always either at the office or connected to it by beeper, cell phone, or computer. (Shortly before the CornerHardware.com launch, when Finer was working 12 to 15 hours a day, he came home one night to find that his lonely dog, Cassius, had disemboweled a sofa cushion.) After joining CornerHardware.com in August 1999, Finer faced his first and toughest task: getting his new bosses “to understand that you don’t build anything — whether it’s a car or a Web site — overnight.” Especially not something as complex as CornerHardware.com. And in Internet terms, what Hunt and Takata wanted was pretty close to overnight. So Finer immediately ruled out doing the job in-house. Given the tight market for top technology staffers, especially in San Francisco, he knew he couldn’t build the talented team he needed to even approach that timetable. Instead, at his recommendation, CornerHardware.com looked outside, holding what Cha describes as a “bake-off” for potential developers late in the summer of 1999. Xuma wasn’t the oldest or the biggest or the best-known contestant. But Hunt, Takata, and Finer liked what Xuma had cooked up. The decisive factor: speed. Cha, Xuma’s CEO, and Lerner, its chairman and chief technology officer, then both 29, promised to do the job faster than anybody else — within six months. They also promised to build systems and databases that would “scale,” or grow quickly without having to be replaced. That’s what CornerHardware.com needed — and that’s why Xuma walked away with a contract worth between $750,000 and $1 million. (Takata says the balance of CornerHardware.com’s launch budget went for interface design, software licensing, equipment, product photography, and related costs.) By Xuma’s standards today — less than a year later — the CornerHardware.com contract is a relatively small one. But at the time it was a huge coup, providing, if all went well, a link in the chain leading to bigger jobs. So Cha took the kind of risk that he would later say no developer should ever take: he went ahead without any built-in contingency plan — no plan B — in case of crisis. True to its own business model, Xuma would build the CornerHardware.com site using many preexisting components — a standard credit-card-processing system, for instance. Still, the Xuma team, headed by senior project manager Phil Lew, then 26, knew that building such a complex E-commerce site wouldn’t be easy. Xuma anticipated it would spend five to six months, beginning in October 1999, building, testing, debugging, and launching the site. The schedule, though ambitious, seemed entirely possible. That is, as long as nothing went wrong. Although CornerHardware.com and Xuma were both new, fast-growing San Francisco­based start-ups, their cultures were entirely different. Sure, they both hired the best they could find: CornerHardware.com’s hiring coups included a Home Depot senior vice-president, a top producer from CNet, and several home-improvement authors and writers, while Xuma lured dozens of “rock-star engineers” away from other Web developers. But theirs were very different workplaces. At CornerHardware.com, a middle-aged artist or writer in a flannel shirt and jeans might sit in meetings with a college-age kid with a nose ring. It was rare for anybody to spend the whole night at work (with the possible exception of Finer, who worked around the clock in the countdown to the launch). In general, it was quiet, especially since most employees worked one or two days at home. (There wasn’t enough office space for everyone to be there at the same time.) In contrast to that relative calm, at Xuma nobody had a private office. Engineers racing to meet project deadlines spent days in the big war room known as “the pit,” living on trucked-in pizza or Thai food, working elbow to elbow at food-littered tables lined with computers. It was a noisy, messy, overwhelmingly youthful atmosphere. For Lew, it was exhausting, but it was also fun. His team bonded in a way that can come only from eating three meals a day together, working side by side until after midnight, then car-pooling home through unusually silent streets. And that bonding meant that together they felt they could do anything, Lew says. They would need to. In late fall, when Lew’s team was already spending most of its time in the pit simply trying to hit the original March launch date, something did go wrong. In mid-November, a CornerHardware.com competitor, HomeWarehouse.com, launched earlier than anybody had expected. About the same time, Amazon.com launched its home-improvement store, and Ace began putting OurHouse.com online. And funding was beginning to dry up for consumer dot-coms in favor of business-to-business ventures. Takata and Hunt decided they had no choice: they had to move the stealth launch from late March to January 15, and follow that with the public launch a few weeks later. They delivered the bad news to Finer, their liaison with Xuma. “They told me, ‘If we wait till March, we’re out of business,’ ” Finer recalls. “At that point I’m holding my stomach.” Finer reluctantly asked Xuma to shave close to six weeks off the initial launch date. Xuma agreed to try moving it up to January 15. “The trouble with being the vendor is that the customer is always right,” Cha says with a sigh. In this case, being right required heroics from Lew’s project team. “We had guys here that didn’t see their families, that were living here 24/7,” Cha says. (See Lew’s diary, below.) “We killed ourselves. But we got on-the-job training there. We learned.” What followed was a series of compromises made by both sides. Five days before the new launch date, the Xuma project team begged for an extension, saying they needed the extra testing time to make sure the site worked well. They asked for two more weeks. Takata and Hunt agreed to wait 10 more days. They knew they wouldn’t be doing themselves any favors by launching sooner if the site frustrated the very people they wanted to attract. Meanwhile, Lew was learning that both Hunt and Takata were demanding, detail-oriented, hands-on managers. “I used to say ‘Retail is detail,’ ” Takata says. “Now I say ‘E-tail is detail.’ ” Both Hunt and Takata closely tracked the site’s development, sometimes requesting changes that would take days of engineering time to complete. “Or they’d say, ‘We need 700 pages [of Web-site content before launch],’ ” Lew says. “We’d say, ‘We can do 200.’ “ Then there was the titanic tinkering on the day before the rescheduled launch. In the afternoon of January 24, Hunt decided the site needed another level of search hierarchy, or ways for customers to view products and information. While other team members frantically tested the site, one engineer spent six hours building in the new function, letting it go live around 8 p.m. After viewing the site that evening, Hunt changed his mind. Lew describes it this way: “Peter sees it. He doesn’t like it. I say, ‘It’s exactly what you guys asked for.’ He says, ‘I want it back like it was this morning.’ ” Lew asked Finer to intercede; Finer returned with this message from Hunt: “Sorry, but it has to happen. And you have to tell me when it’s done.” The same staffer spent the next three hours reversing his earlier work, finishing at about 1:30 a.m., just hours before the quiet launch. And yet Cha, ever the diplomat, doesn’t regard CornerHardware.com as particularly exacting. “All of our customers are very demanding,” he says. In fact, he adds, CornerHardware.com was a relatively easy client because, unlike many enthusiastic dot-com start-ups with ill-defined business plans, from the very beginning Hunt and Takata had clear ideas about what they wanted to accomplish. On January 25 at 3:30 a.m., Lew drove his entire team home from work, and, at 4:45 a.m., finally slept. CornerHardware.com had launched — without fanfare and without any major problems. It also launched without some of the things its founders had wanted. These were the trade-offs: CornerHardware.com had been photographing about 800 products a day, but even at that rate the company couldn’t shoot 37,000 products before the launch. Instead it posted a representative sampling from each category. (Says Hunt, “If you have 72 hammers on the site, do you really need pictures of all 72 from day one?”) It also launched with no way of issuing returns to customers’ credit-card bills. (Initially, refunds would be made by check.) And it launched with fewer products and less content than Hunt and Takata had wanted. But nothing crashed, and the products advertised were available, poised on the shelves in the Kansas City warehouse. Surprisingly, Takata rates the launch at about 95% of what he’d hoped for. “One of the lessons I have learned about the Internet space in general is that you can’t be a perfectionist,” he says. “The Internet is a game of weeks. If you can get your site up four weeks earlier and have a complete customer experience [even without some desired features], I’d say do it.” A month later the public launch went off without any major hitches. Since then, CornerHardware.com’s traffic has grown steadily, with Xuma continuing to run the site. Hunt and Takata won’t release figures except to say that they had more traffic in April than in the entire first quarter. As for the conversion rate — the percentage of people who actually buy something — “some days it’s 19% or 20%,” Hunt says. “And we have days where it’s 1%.” Meanwhile, the purchasing of big-ticket items has increased: in addition to batteries and lightbulbs, customers are buying bathroom vanities and power tools. These days the founders are still keeping an eye on the competition, especially that big orange company from Atlanta. “I’d be lying if I told you we don’t worry about Home Depot,” Hunt says. “But we don’t lose any sleep over it,” because, he says, he doesn’t believe the giant retailer will duplicate the CornerHardware.com business model or its real-time online customer service. As for that tree house, Hunt did build it much later. But he ended up creating it from a kit that he got from a brick-and-mortar retailer. Ironically, he got so busy starting up CornerHardware.com that he didn’t have time to build one from scratch. And in returning to that project, Hunt revisited one big lesson that he and Takata had discovered throughout the building of their business: it’s all about making compromises. Anne Stuart is a senior writer at Inc. Technology. Chronicles from the Pit Steve Finer, vice-president of engineering for CornerHardware.com, and Phil Lew, Xuma’s CornerHardware.com project team leader, each kept diaries for several weeks between the Web site’s “stealth launch,” in January, and its first major marketing pushes, in early March. Here are some excerpts: Steve Finer Thursday, February 17 At 3:45 a.m., we added another Sun Enterprise 4500 server with 16 CPUs. Serious horsepower! As I got off the elevator this morning my coworkers gave me a high five because the new server made the site so much faster. Wednesday, February 23 Two new applications went into alpha testing. One rotates products featured on the home page. The other is a media-tracking application [which tracks the effectiveness of promotional campaigns]. Unique visitors to the site have doubled since last week. Today the site was accessed from all over the world, including from Taiwan, Slovenia, Thailand, Malaysia, Israel, and Japan. Actually shaved for the first time in weeks. Wanted to be presentable for a taping we did today with Xuma and the Mark Bunting video crew [for a business video to be shown on United Airlines and TWA]. Thursday, February 24 Biggest challenge: preparing for the March marketing campaign [a newspaper and online ad campaign with coupons]. We need to be able to support the traffic. Friday, February 25 Added 6,000 new images. Finished quality-assurance process for media tracker and product-feature applications. Also [a New York Times] article gave us a nice boost in traffic and tripled the number of people who went to the customer-support line yesterday. Monday, February 28 We’re all really busy. The engineering team has a lot of projects that need to be completed, including the media tracker and the product-feature device. Tuesday, February 29 Public launch. It has been a difficult day. All departments are asking for additions to the site. It’s a challenge to satisfy all requests and prioritize them properly. Our lack of space [is a problem]. My job would be so much easier if we could hire people to supplement Xuma’s activities. Friday, March 3 We’re really focusing on driving traffic. We added a new disk drive to the development server and a new storage device to help manage all our images. We also added more than 40 new how-to articles. Don Johnson and Cheech Marin filmed their TV show, Nash Bridges, outside our office. We passed out CornerHardware.com hats to the crew, which they all wore during the filming. Saturday, March 4 Had one last meeting with Xuma and my staff to make sure we have the right staffing in place to support [Sunday's marketing campaign]. Monday, March 6 The marketing campaign went off without a hitch. We were able to support all the additional traffic. It blew my mind! Daily traffic today was more than double normal, and we had 10 times as many people buying products as we have on a typical day. Next week the campaign will branch out to a larger part of the country. Since everything today went so well, I’m not too worried. But it is still keeping me up at night. Phil Lew Thursday, February 24 Development seems to be going better than planned. [CornerHardware.com CIO Ken Hite] called me in the morning wanting to track an order number for an order where the money wasn’t captured. The problem was with the file from the third-party fulfillment house. Lesson learned: We need to build in more robust error checking. We cannot assume that the third-party fulfillment house will always give us the correct formatted file. The need to develop a robust process to keep the content and data fresh on the live site is giving me grief. [The process was so slow that when CornerHardware.com updated many items, it could take days for the updates to take effect.] We are working on another solution to load data but don’t know when that will be in place. The media-tracker application needs to be done by tomorrow (that is, in the hands of QA). Things are going great, but I’ve been down this road before. I need to keep the pressure on development to make sure that they follow through on our delivery dates. Friday, February 25 Had our first meeting with [new CornerHardware.com executive producer] Alice Hill. She had some fantastic ideas about the site direction. I look forward to working with her; she’s going to be able to streamline the decision-making process since we will not have to wait on [COO Peter Hunt and CEO Rich Takata] in the future for decisions about where the site is going to be heading. Sunday, February 27 What I’ll remember most about today: talking to Bill [Meehan, Xuma's lead engineer on the CornerHardware project] at midnight on a Sunday night about CornerHardware.com — again. We make this site go. Both of us take a lot of pride in that. We are both emotionally attached to this project and want CornerHardware.com to be the best it can be. That makes it easier to stay up late on Sunday nights to do things for CornerHardware.com. Monday, February 28 Everyone is very excited about the big day tomorrow [the official launch]. I think we have all done due diligence to get ready for this big day, but until the day comes you never know. Tuesday, February 29 Crazy, crazy day. In the afternoon, CornerHardware.com informed us that [there were] 40 additional content pages to be attached to a new front page. At 5 p.m., 6 p.m., 7 p.m., 8 p.m., this content had still not passed the QA check. The new front page will not be able to go up until tomorrow. Traffic was higher than usual. Two articles [about CornerHardware.com] came across my desk: one was from CNet and the other from ZDNet. Didn’t get much sleep, since we were at work until 5 a.m. Sunday, March 5 First thing I did when I woke up today was log on to the Internet via my DSL to check on the site [following that morning's newspaper coupon campaign]. I can see that the orders are already rolling in from Washington and Utah. By 10:30 a.m., we are already at 15 orders for the day. I called Steve Finer at home (I think I woke him up) and let him know the good news: people are hitting the site and buying things. Please e-mail your comments to editors@inc.com.

Name That Domain

After the domain name rush? What’s in a domain name? More than you realize. Getting your own catchy corner in cyberspace can mean the difference between your site being an out-of-the-way pit stop or a prime destination for throngs of surfers. But catchy domains are going fast. Network Solutions alone counted more than 5 million new domain names in 1999 — a 164% increase over 1998. Within two years, predicts one Florida-based Web designer, 100 million domain names will be claimed, and you can bet that the remaining ones will be as out of fashion as betamax.com or vanilla-ice.net. Alarmed because you have yet to register your site? You shouldn’t be. There’s still time to get a creative, marketable name if you act quickly and know where to look. Find Your Domain Type a domain name you’re interested in: Note: This search will take you to the Whois.net Web site. To return to inc.com, use the “Back” button of your browser. Also, once you know that your selected domain name is available, you can register it at any of the following sites: Network Solutions Register.com DomainRegistry.com Buy Domains Think globally, act locally Feeling down because your business has a simple name that someone else grabbed before you even knew there was an Internet? Try including a geographic reference in your name. For example, say your name is “Joe” and your business, “Joe’s Pizza,” is located in New Hampshire. The Web address JoesPizza.com has already been claimed, but “newhampshirepizza.com” is not. You could even take advantage of your address and turn your site into a de facto source of fun facts about the Granite State. Surfers are pleasantly surprised when sites offer more than meets the URL. Geographic references can also be easier to remember than the name of your actual business. For example, Ron Richards and Co., a New England-based wedding band, registered as BostonMusic.com. That’s a smart way to make sure altar-bound couples — who usually screen several musical acts before making a decision — keep them in mind for the big date. An even better choice might be “BostonWeddingMusic.com,” which would help ensure that users know you’re a wedding band and not a music store. Don’t be afraid to go after “.net” and “.org” domains Alternative top-level domains such as “.net” and “.org” aren’t going as fast as “.com,” but are nonetheless good alternatives if available. A common misconception about these is that “.net” is only for network businesses, and “.org” is only for nonprofits. Though they originally identified such organizations, there is nothing keeping you from registering your business with them. Just keep in mind that your users might look for you at a “.com” by default and not find you. If you are lucky enough to find your own “.com,” it’s a smart idea to buy up its “.net” and “.org” versions as well. Owning all three names will make it that much easier for visitors to find your site, not to mention prevent competitors from buying them up and luring users away. Also, keep in mind that seven new domain name registrations will be available for use sometime in 2001, according to NIC.net; the official provider of .com, .net and .org domains. They are: .info .biz .name .aero .museum .coop .pro Of the seven — .info and .name are the only two open to the general public. The other five domains are limited to professionals and professional organizations. Other options include reserving a domain in a specific country. These will give you an address that ends with a two-level code such as “.uk” for Great Britain, “.to” for Tonga, or “.nu” for the Niue Islands. Some countries require you to have a connection to the country, but some smaller countries with cool country codes (such as Tonga and Niue) are open for business. The Norwegian domain registry maintains a complete list. Note that international policy on who can get and register these domains is still evolving, and the Swedes who have grabbed yahoo.nu will probably have to give it up if yahoo.com complains. Now you can register longer names Recently, the powers-that-be in cyberspace decided to more than triple the allowable length of Web addresses to 67 characters in a domain name. Smart entrepreneurs are registering catchy words and phrases that relate to their businesses. For example, JustLikeMomUsedToMake.com is a site for swapping recipes. Another, RainingCatsandDogs.com, is the address of a Florida-based pet store, and is in its own way just as catchy as Pets.com. One way to avoid having a really long domain name confuse users is to use dashes. They also might better your chances at finding that catchy slogan. For example, “rainingcatsanddogs.com” may be registered, but “raining-cats-and-dogs.com” is not. If you do go for a hyphenated name, spend the extra few bucks to grab the unhyphenated version as well, or someone else might take it and confuse the heck out of people trying to find you. Number yourself Don’t forget that you can use numbers in your address. For example, when Fairfax, Va., entrepreneur Frank Borges Llossa was launching a search engine for finding stock photos on the Web, the name “onestopstock.com” was already taken. So he registered 1StopStock.com. A wise choice, especially because many Web directories list sites alphabetically. Having the number “1″ in his address got his site listed first in the stock photography catagories on Yahoo. Everything is for sale OK, so maybe you’ve tried everything we’ve suggested, but that catchy domain name remains elusive because someone already owns it. Few things in the world don’t have a price attached, so it can’t hurt to hunt down the owner (the contact information of people who own domains can be gleaned from any registrar) to see if you can buy it. Of course, you’ll have better luck if you’re going after an uncommon name — or have truckloads of cash to spend. “Business.com” sold for $7.5 million in November 1999. Copyright © 2000 inc.com

A Word to the (Web) Wise

Just when we thought the saga of Krystal Kleen Karpet Kare’s Web site and subsequent design contest was over, a reader pointed out some glaring errors in the text of the winning entry. Not only did Krystal Kleen CEO Mark McNutt miss them, but so did the second judge, Jim Sterne, who’d written the original story on the carpet-cleaning service’s site (” Even a Child Can Do It,” Inc. Technology, 1999, No. 2). Cindy Wagner, founder and president of Editing Ink, a copyediting and proofreading service, caught several grammatical errors and stylistic inconsistencies in the site’s copy. For instance, on the “About Us” page, the word Care was spelled with the traditional C rather than Krystal Kleen’s more stylized K. And though the site sports a handsome photo of former California congresswoman Andrea Seastrand presenting McNutt with a “Best of Business” award from Strictly Business magazine, there was no caption identifying the two. When Wagner sent a copy of her suggestions to McNutt, she got a speedy reply. “Before I knew it, Mark had called me and asked if I would edit his entire site,” she says. Instead of charging her usual fee of $35 an hour, Wagner accepted a mention of her services on Krystal Kleen’s home page and a link from that site to her own (www.editingink.com). This latest installment in the Krystal Kleen story got us thinking: Just how important is text editing for a Web site? Very, according to Nan Fritz, president of nSight, a media company in Cambridge, Mass., that provides editing as well as design and Internet services. The company, which Fritz founded in 1982 as Editorial Services of New England, moved into electronic media a few years ago to meet the need for Web-site editing. “Many companies are realizing that if they don’t take time to evaluate how something is written, it’s going to come back to haunt them because it’s there on the screen,” she says.