Tag Archives: Mie-Yun Lee

How can I increase my hard drive space without sacrificing speed?

Offices & Operations mentor Mie-Yun Lee responds to the following question from an Inc.com user: Each month I delete old files from my hard drive, but I still don’t have enough space. Is there any way to get more space without buying a new system, and without sacrificing speed? Mie-Yun Lee’s response: It’s not easy for me to throw out anything, including my old computer files, so I know how easy it is to use up space on a hard drive. But there’s no need to shell out all that cash for a new computer system if more space is all you need. Buying an additional hard drive will do the trick. When choosing a hard drive, size, performance, and compatibility with your system are usually the deciding factors. Sounds like speed is a priority with you, so look into getting a Small Computer System Interface (SCSI) hard drive. This will make saving files and opening programs quick (some systems don’t support SCSI drives so you may have to buy a SCSI card, which will cost $50 to a couple hundred dollars). Choosing a drive with a minimum rotational speed of 7,200 revolutions per minute and an access time of fewer than 10 milliseconds will allow quick disk scanning when you search for data. As far as space goes, you’ll want at least 10 gigabytes (GB) of space, preferably partitioned to maximize management of your files. In the end you’ll end up paying $200 to $300 — a pretty good price tag compared to buying a whole new system. To get a free quote for computer storage, try www.buyerzone.com. Copyright © 2001 inc.com LLC

How do I choose a phone and voice mail system?

Offices and Operations mentor Mie-Yun Lee responds to the following question from an inc.com user: I have a small (5-person) but hopefully growing staff. How should I go about shopping for a phone and voice mail system? Mie-Yun Lee’s response: Even the least expensive phone system option is pretty pricey. So before you invest in any phone equipment, you should try to determine as best you can how large your firm is likely to grow over the next few years. Making this determination now could potentially save you thousands of dollars. If you’re fairly certain that you’re going to remain under 10 employees for the next two years, I’d recommend outfitting your office with a beefy-style phone that’s commonly referred to as a KSU-less phone. (The name comes from the fact that the set up lacks the central Key System Unit of a full-blown system.) With KSU-less phones, you can typically support up to four lines with eight to 12 phones in one office. A KSU-less phone system is relatively cheap (about $85 to $225 for each phone station) and very easy to install because you do not permanently wire the phones into your office. Therefore, the phones can be easily unplugged and moved to a new location. You’ll be able to put calls on hold, transfer calls, and have a 3-way conference. A disadvantage of using KSU-less phones, however, is that they do not allow you to integrate a separate voice-mail system. You’ll have to use a service from your phone company instead. Voice-mail service costs will vary across the country, but fees average around $7 per month per phone station. If you’d really like your own integrated voice mail system or can realistically predict that your firm will be expanding rapidly over the next few years, you may want to consider a traditional KSU phone system. The KSU system can support up to 40 phone extensions. If you want a full-featured package with voicemail and new cabling, you’ll probably pay upwards of $200 per phone station. For a business with less than 100 workers, vendors will probably recommend something called a Hybrid Key system. It offers any features a small- to mid-size business could want. It can also save you money with your phone service by being able to work with a T1 line and bundle your voice and data traffic. System prices can be as much as $500 per phone station. There’s also a newer but quickly growing option for small businesses — the PC-based (also known as server-based) phone system. It consists of a standard PC that’s been equipped with telephony software and a special card to receive and route calls just like a traditional phone system. A PC-based system with software, PC, and boards will run around $4,000 for 10 to 25 people. But all the things that would cost thousands extra to integrate with a regular phone system, such as voice mail, automated attendants, unified messaging, and call forwarding, are standard on a PC-based phone system. To learn more about phone systems, see BuyerZone’s Buyer’s Guide: Phone Systems. Copyright © 2001 inc.com

Should we invest in voice recognition software?

Offices & Operations mentor Mie-Yun Lee responds to the following question from an inc.com user: Should we invest in voice recognition software, or will it be a flash in the pan? What should I look for? Mie-Yun Lee’s response:Had you asked me this a few years ago, I would have said to forget it. But voice recognition software has improved greatly since its inception. It is still not perfectly accurate, though. At this point, I think your best bet may be to hang onto your keyboard. Voice recognition software may be good for limited dictation, such as composing e-mails and data entry, but, in my opinion, trying to dictate something long can prove trying. If you decide to purchase voice recognition software, you have a variety of packages to choose from. You can get a software package that will allow you to maneuver around your PC — from using your applications to browsing the Web — for $200 or less. Or you can get a package with more limited options for $50 or less. Just remember to choose software that will be compatible with the hardware and software you already have on your PC. Copyright © 2000 BuyerZone.com Inc.

Local Color

Shop Talk: CEOs search for the right technology Digital color copiers enable you to produce everything from coupons and posters to brochures in-house For fans of the Utah Grizzlies, most of the action takes place on the ice. For the managers of the minor-league hockey team, however, it’s the scores outside the rink that really get the blood pumping. Those scores could make a quantum leap during the next 15 years because the Grizzlies’ arena, the E Center, in West Valley City, Utah, has been selected as the site of the 2002 Winter Olympics men’s ice-hockey event. How the $10-million company chooses to exploit that coup — through sponsorships and especially through selling the naming rights for the arena — could boost revenues by as much as 7%. Faced with the arena’s impending celebrity status, Grizzlies president Tim Mouser knew one thing for certain: the company’s marketing materials — including coupons that are distributed at games, statistics sheets for autograph signings, and presentations for sponsors — needed to be produced both more efficiently and more economically. It was time to move from outsourcing color jobs to producing them in-house with a digital color copier. Although color copiers that use top-quality laser imaging start at about $14,000 (compared with the less sophisticated ink-jet copiers that cost less than $1,000), more and more small businesses are buying the digital copiers in lieu of relying on outside print shops to do their color work. The machines can produce everything from small coupons and letter-size flyers to full-color double-sided brochures and full-bleed 11-by-17-inch posters. And when the copiers are loaded with any number of optional features, they can double as either a printer or a scanner. For example, with the addition of a print controller — which turns a color copier into a color printer — the machine can produce everything from color proofs of an original design to endless copies of the final product. Once you’ve launched a program like Adobe Photoshop on your PC, the print controller also lets you use the copier as a scanner. Add a color editor into the mix, and you gain desktop control of tones while the image is sitting on the platen glass. For many businesses, those applications make a color copier worth its hefty price. The six-year-old Grizzlies team got its first splash of in-house color with a Xerox DocuColor 5750, a $19,995 machine that an office-equipment dealer had dropped off in September 1999 for a two-month free test-drive. Up to that point, the company’s three-person graphics department had been driving 90 miles round-trip to the print house it preferred just to get color proofs — a hefty order even when a job didn’t require same-day turnaround for last-minute tweaking. “There was never enough time,” says Mouser, one of several Grizzlies executives who collectively take on at least 20 presentations a week. The marketing materials for the naming-rights sale brought the time and cost discrepancies into clear focus. For each company that’s bidding for the naming rights, the Grizzlies create a 50-page presentation that includes images of the bidding company’s logo on such structures as the arena’s walls, marquees, roof, floor, and dasher boards (the boards that the hockey players crash into), on street signs surrounding the arena, and in the ice. Each packet produced in-house, Mouser calculates, would cost the Grizzlies about $7; each one outsourced, he says, costs roughly $450. “The whole organization ultimately realized that a color copier is not necessarily a luxury — it’s a tool of profitability,” he says. Though Mouser was happy with the efficiency of the Xerox DocuColor 5750, he wanted to see how a couple of other models — a Minolta CF910 and a Sharp AR-C150 — measured up. After all, spending $30,000 to $40,000 on a single item for a 30-employee organization is not something a company president does lightly. Having already established contact with Xerox, Mouser undertook a decidedly unscientific search for dealers that handled Minolta and Sharp products. He found a Minolta dealer through a primitive medium by today’s standards: the phone book. And a Sharp dealer essentially fell into the company’s lap. “I drive by their place every day on the way to work,” says Devin Allen, director of marketing and sales. The features of the Minolta CF910 (list price, $20,495) impressed the team during a one-month in-house test-drive of the machine. With its ability to print on 12-by-18-inch paper to produce an 11-by-17-inch, full-bleed image with crop marks — dimensions that the Grizzlies needed to customize posters for its game sponsors — the Minolta clearly had the technology that the company required. But it fell a bit short in the resolution department: to achieve the quality Mouser was looking for, a copier needed to have a resolution of 600 dots per inch (dpi); the Minolta came in at just 400 dpi. Moreover, though the Minolta did have a module — called a Fiery Z4 print controller — that allowed users to turn the copier into a network printer, it cost $19,950. The option was important, because with the increase in volume of graphics-heavy, customized presentations, the Grizzlies would need the machine as a printer as much as a copier. The team could use it to design a layout, refine the color choices, and print out a final version, all with the click of a mouse. Handling the work in-house would cost the Grizzlies 12¢ to 24¢ a page, compared with $14 to $20 a page for the color press check alone. Next Mouser revisited the Xerox DocuColor 5750, which was still on loan. The Xerox was a strong contender from the beginning since the Grizzlies already had a taste of what the machine could do. That machine, too, could handle the full-bleed, 11-by-17 image that the Grizzlies needed for its sponsors’ designs. But the Xerox missed the mark with its 400-dpi resolution; like the Minolta, that was about 200 dpi short of the Grizzlies’ goal. And even with the Fiery X2 print controller (list price $10,495), the machine was a little below par for the color quality the Grizzlies wanted. Mouser moved on to the Sharp AR-C150 (list price, $22,995), which he viewed at the dealer’s site for several hours at a time over a two-week period. Like the others, the copier could produce 11-by-17, full-bleed printouts, also by printing on 12-by-18 paper. And it had a print controller, called a Fiery AR-PE1, whose price of $14,995 was well below that of the Minolta. But particularly pleasing to Mouser was the Sharp’s 600-dpi resolution and its speed of 25 copies a minute for black-and-white, letter-size sheets and 15 copies a minute for color — well ahead of the competition. “The whole organization ultimately realized that a color copier is not necessarily a luxury — it’s a tool of profitability,” says Tim Mouser, president of hockey team Utah Grizzlies. After two months of searching, the time finally came to review the choices. Here’s how the cards fell: After Mouser tacked all the options he wanted onto the standard $20,495 price tag, the Minolta exceeded the Grizzlies’ budget by about $10,000, knocking it out in round one of the purchasing process. And while Mouser and company considered the Xerox to be an excellent machine despite its lower resolution, the salesperson they had been working with left the supplier midway through the comparison stage. Though his departure wasn’t a determining factor, it definitely didn’t help boost Xerox’s position in the race. The Sharp AR-C150 had triumphed. Mouser purchased the Sharp color copier outright in February for about $40,000, passing on the option to lease for 36 months at $782 a month or for 60 months at $552 a month. To the standard copier, he added a reversing automatic document feeder (which allows both sides of a two-sided document to be copied automatically) for $1,400 and a duplex module (which enables the machine to automatically copy both sides on the same sheet) for $1,100. And, of course, he opted for the Fiery AR-PE1 print controller. For the service plan, Mouser opted for a guaranteed maintenance service agreement, which meant that the company would pay 12¢ per color print and 4¢ per black-and-white print monthly. A counter on the copier determines the invoice. In return, when the copier needs to be serviced, Mouser doesn’t have to pay any additional charges. Mouser figures that the copier will save the Grizzlies a whopping $15,000 a year. And if the customized designs and quick turnaround help it attract sales, the copier will have paid for itself after signing on just three or four new sponsors. “As they say, a picture is worth a thousand words,” adds Allen. “I can describe something all day long, but if a company can see players standing in front of its logo, the value of the product that we’re trying to sell is really enforced.” Quick Fix Last year Sherri Leopard was debuting a new service for one of her biggest clients, a division of IBM, when she realized that her color printer would have to go. The Tektonix Phaser 340 that she’d relied on for 4 of the 16 years that her marketing-consulting firm, Leopard Communications Inc., had been in business just wasn’t fast or sophisticated enough to produce the “brand toolkit” that her consulting team had developed for the E-business folks at Big Blue. And the project — 30 copies of a 132-page document stuffed with color-logo comparisons and positioning statements — would have cost a small fortune to send to a print house. Convinced that the future growth of her $12-million company, based in Boulder, Colo., depended in part on her ability to offer brand toolkits to customers, she asked the company’s director of operations, Wayde Austad, to search for a solution. Austad’s wish list was short: The new machine would have the capability to digitally transform brand -toolkit files from designers’ computers, and it would be able to print more than the six pages a minute that the old color printer cranked out. And though the company would continue to outsource the printing of its customers’ marketing materials, stationery, and business cards, Austad needed a machine that could produce sharp color proofs, complete with vivid ink tones, for customers to review. In the past, customers didn’t see the final version of Leopard’s work until proofs came back from the printer, and by then even tiny changes cost some $400 a page — an expense that Leopard either absorbed or split with the customer, depending on the nature of the revision. Austad’s first move was to call friends in the service-printing industry and a few of the outside color print houses that Leopard used. Each recommended a different brand, with a different supporting argument: Kodak offered top-notch color quality, Ricoh assured reliability, Xerox provided solid service. Someone fired off the Canon name as well. Austad had wanted to bring the color printers in-house to try them out, but he quickly learned that with his company’s relatively small output — about 3,000 color printouts a month — vendors were reluctant to loan out the expensive machines. So he downloaded a bunch of images onto disks and drove 25 or so miles to the dealers’ Denver showrooms. Austad’s first stop was Xerox. When he explained what he was after, the sales rep showed him the DocuColor 12, a higher-end version of the DocuColor 5750 used by the Grizzlies, as noted earlier. The DocuColor 12 (list price, $31,495) spit out 12 color pages a minute — twice the speed of the old Tektonix printer. “That’s a big difference when you’re trying to make 350 printouts in time for FedEx and you have 10 designers sending print jobs at the same time,” says Austad. The Xerox satisfied on color quality as well. Its resolution of 600 dpi was twice that of the old machine. Moreover, the DocuColor 12 had trays for standard letter, legal, and 11-by-17-inch sheets of paper, and 12-by-18-inch sheets could be fed through manually. In addition, the DocuColor’s feeder was specially designed to grip glossy or extra-thick paper. Taken together, the features made printouts that closely resembled an offset printer’s final output — just what Austad was looking for. Austad was also impressed with the service he had received from Xerox. “The rep was very attentive and very patient,” Austad recalls. “I would point something out, and he would explain it honestly.” He was particularly grateful for the rep’s explanation of the difference between the two print controllers — the Splash G620DFE (list price, $26,000) and the Fiery EFI XP12DFE (list price, $19,500) — that the machine could use. Austad had used Fiery at a previous job, but the Splash, it turned out, was better suited to producing the brand toolkit because instead of transforming a digital file repeatedly — a time-consuming process — it transforms a file once, saves it, and prints multiple copies. So far, so good. Still, Austad thought, it would be too easy to buy the first machine he tried. To lay his doubts to rest, he set off to check out the competition, using the Xerox as a benchmark. Austad knew he was on the right track with the DocuColor: the next step up was printers that whipped out 40 pages a minute, at almost triple the price. “There’s no cost justification in that for me,” Austad says. So when he went to the Ricoh showroom, he asked to see a model in the same class as the DocuColor. The sales rep introduced him to the Aficio Color 6010. With a resolution of 600 dpi, a copying speed of 10.5 color pages per minute, the ability to handle thick paper stock, and a price tag of $28,950, plus an additional $18,995 for the Fiery print controller (here called an E-800) that went with it, the Ricoh was a close cousin to the Xerox. But one factor put the Ricoh out of the running altogether: the Aficio Color 6010 couldn’t handle the 12-by-18-inch originals. “We really need that size for double-page magazine spreads,” says Austad. “The clients need to know how their ads will look.” Next up was Canon’s Color Laser Copier 1150 (list price, $33,500). This machine offered 400 dpi with automatic image refinement (AIR) technology, which increases image resolution to the visual equivalence of 800 dpi, but its copying speed, at 11 color pages a minute, fell short of the Xerox model’s. The print controller available that met Austad’s needs was a Fiery: the ColorPASS Z60, which cost $19,500. But as Austad fed the machine pieces of a heavy-stock paper, the 1150 repeatedly jammed. When he asked the Canon salesman about the problem, the salesman blamed it on the fact that the sales-floor demo got so much use. Austad saw a red flag. “I figure your demo ought to run a lot smoother than your live product,” he says. The salesman then waved away Austad’s concern about the paper jams, claiming, “They all have the same mechanism.” (Not true: the Xerox’s gripper feeder, for example, is designed for heavier paper.) Austad says that the salesman’s surliness really turned him off. That, and the Canon machine’s apparent inability to handle thick or glossy paper, left Xerox alone at the top of Austad’s list. It was at the Kodak dealer that Austad found something really different: the ColorEdge 1550 Plus. It uses what’s known as dye sublimation technology. Instead of laying flakes of toner on top of a piece of paper like the other models that Austad saw, the ColorEdge actually dyes the paper. Though the resolution was lower than what Austad wanted — 400 dpi instead of 600 dpi — the dyed color images looked more like photographs. Austad considered the ColorEdge because the sharp images — which come at a price of about $8 apiece — would give clients the best possible idea of their final product, and any necessary changes could be made in-house before the digital file was sent to the printer, thereby cutting back on the expensive changes to printer’s proofs. But the ColorEdge wouldn’t do anything for the company’s mission-critical brand toolkit or other high-volume, high-speed projects. Satisfied that he’d explored the options, Austad concluded that the Xerox was the machine for Leopard. Sherri Leopard’s investment will pay off because her employees are working faster and her clients are more comfortable with her designs. One final incentive for going with the Xerox was the cost of “consumables” like toner and cleaner. Austad calculated the cost of consumables for each of the models he’d looked at based on an 11-by-17-inch page with 80% coverage. Consumables for the Xerox machine, he found, would cost him several cents a page less than one competitor’s and half as much as another’s. (Austad demurs when asked to name names.) In December, two months after CEO Sherri Leopard had sent him shopping, Austad signed on with Xerox. The company happened to be the manufacturer of the black-and-white copier that had served Leopard for years. Austad told the Xerox rep about his comparison shopping, and the rep made a deal: Xerox would wipe out the remaining three years on Leopard’s five-year lease on the black-and-white copier and set up a new five-year lease for the color machine. Payments would be set at $1,700 a month, which was only $250 more than the old lease and a very competitive price, says Austad. And Austad negotiated a service agreement whereby the company would pay 12¢ per color copy — about half the usual Xerox price — and receive free maintenance for the machine. (Since then, Xerox has lowered its color click charge to 10¢ a sheet.) For the first few months after the Xerox machine arrived, Austad tracked how much time workers spent on projects. Because the new machine prints and copies projects like the brand toolkits much faster, he says, employees spend less time waiting around. He estimates the company now saves a few grand a month on employee productivity alone. Thanks to the Xerox, the company reduced its outsourcing by 77.6% for the first six months of the year, a figure that amazes Austad. He adds that the color-proof changes — the ones that used to cost $400 a page — are way down, too. The business’s investment in the new machine will pay off, Leopard says, because her employees are working faster and her clients are more comfortable with the designs they’re paying for. “This machine helps us be a better partner, which helps us grow along with our clients,” she says. Mie-Yun Lee is editorial director of BuyerZone.com (www.buyerzone.com), an Internet buying service that features expert purchasing advice and tools for small and midsize businesses. You can use its tools to explore color copiers for your company at www.buyerzone.com/office_equipment/copiers-color/index.html. Jill Hecht Maxwell is a reporter at Inc. Technology. Doreen Vianzon contributed to this story. Please e-mail your comments to editors@inc.com.

Should we buy, build, or lease our new office?

Offices & Operations mentor Mie-Yun Lee responds to the following question from an inc.com user: We are a small engineering firm (11 people), and the lease on our two small offices will be up in one year. We need one big office. Would it be better to buy, build, or lease an office? Mie-Yun Lee’s response:The quick answer to your question is it would be best to lease, but let me explain why. The type of office you need is widely available. As an engineering firm, your requirements are probably pretty straightforward. You probably need a combination of closed offices and open space to house workstations, a conference room or two, a reception area, a computer server room, and a kitchen area. While you could build this kind of office, it is the least practical option unless you have very specific needs. If you really want to own your own building, buying an existing property is a better, but still pricey, option.On the downside, real estate prices are at an all-time high in many parts of the country. Also, owning your own office building comes with a lot of additional work and expenses. You’ll have to deal with nuisances such as annual property taxes, as well as daily tenant-related maintenance issues if you plan to lease some of your space to others. However, if you are looking for another revenue stream or already have building management experience, owning your office building does have some perks. You can do whatever you like to the design and décor. You won’t have to worry about losing your space to a higher bidder every time your lease is up for renewal. And if the building is large enough, you’ll have room to grow your business. But in most cases, leasing is the most practical and affordable option for a small business. A commercial real estate broker can help you locate available office space. But before you even start talking to one, you should calculate roughly how much space you’ll need. To get you started, private offices are 120 to 200 square feet each, workstations are around 36 to 80 square feet, and conference rooms for 10 to 12 people are around 200 to 375 square feet. © 2000 BuyerZone.com Inc.

Safe House

Shop Talk CEOs Search for the Right Technology A good data backup system can preserve not just your company but your sanity As the Y2K panic proved, the most common culprit for lost computer data is not system failure. It’s plain old user error. And the only way to combat that is with an electronic safeguard — a data backup system. Patrick Guthrie, president and chief technology officer of the Pajo Group, a $15-million Internet service provider in Long Beach, Calif., learned that the hard way. In early 1998 a manager’s tinkering rendered the company’s customer database inaccessible. Guthrie wasn’t too worried because he had easily recovered backed-up copies in the past. This time, however, none of his ideas worked. “We were frantic,” he says. Finally, he was forced to do something he hated: call in a consultant. “We paid him his $125 an hour,” Guthrie says ruefully. “It’s amazing how monetary limitations don’t apply when you’re trying to get your data back.” The incident was enough to spur him into looking for a backup system with more capacity and faster access. Like many start-ups, the Pajo Group had built its backup system around the Band-Aid principle — an effective enough method when it had to find lost E-mail for its 20 customers. The company’s first purchase was a Hewlett-Packard Colorado Trakker 350 tape drive that cost about $500. “Back then [in late 1997] we were running pretty lean and mean,” says Guthrie, “so we fixed problems as they happened.” The tape drive stored all Pajo’s data — a customer database, financial files, customers’ files, and the company’s own ISP-related files — on 350MB magnetic tapes that resembled double-thick cassettes. Each tape had cost about $20 or $30. Guthrie himself executed the backup, inserting a tape into the drive each night and removing it the next morning. He completed the procedure by storing the tapes in a fireproof box in the company’s offices in case of disaster. The system worked fine, but Guthrie found that the recovery process averaged 10 minutes per file — an inordinate amount of time — because he had to rewind and search the entire tape for the lost data. True, he had to go through the process only about two times a month, but he knew that the number of requests was going to grow. Plus, because of his expanding client base, 350MB was too little space per tape; on many nights the tapes filled up before backup was complete. Pajo hadn’t yet begun offering 24-hour technical support, so there was no one around in the wee hours to replace the full tapes with empty ones. Then came the last straw: the customer-database fiasco. Determined to have a more robust system, Guthrie purchased an Iomega Jaz drive for $300 at a computer superstore after spending time at Iomega’s booth at a trade show. It was bigger than his tape drive — up to one gigabyte (1,000MB) of data could be stored on a Jaz cartridge. And it was much faster. As he watched the Jaz drive back up the amount of data in 10 minutes that the Colorado drive had handled in two hours, Guthrie became an instant fan. But he realized too late that he’d made his decision too quickly. Business was still booming, and nightly backups were running about 650MB and climbing. He was now using one cartridge a day that cost $80 to $90 for storage. That meant Guthrie was paying more each week to store his data than he had spent on the drive itself. “Up until then I had always relied on our vendors for accurate technical advice,” says Patrick Guthrie. “I couldn’t do that anymore.” By early 1999, Pajo’s menu of services had expanded to include hosting Web sites, colocating Web servers (meaning that his customers’ servers actually resided at Pajo), and handling thousands of E-mail accounts and more than 150 T1-line customers. To support all the traffic, Pajo had a United Nations­like network that featured operating systems ranging from Windows NT to Linux to Unix and even to the Mac OS. If Pajo were ever to move beyond the Band-Aid approach to backup, the time had come. Guthrie started asking around for advice. The consensus, from Pajo vendors like Ingram Micro and Tech Data as well as some consultants, was that a digital audiotape (DAT) drive would be the way to go. A DAT drive can store up to 40GB of data on one tape, at a cost comparable to that of storing data on magnetic tapes — less than 10¢ per megabyte and half that for storing fully compressed data. However, compared with magnetic tapes, a DAT drive is less unwieldy to use for retrieving data. And although it’s not as fast as a Jaz drive, a DAT drive takes only about 40 seconds to locate a file. To run the DAT drive, Guthrie’s vendors suggested that he use Seagate Technology’s Backup Exec 7.2 software (it’s now a product of Veritas) — a far more sophisticated brand of backup software than he had used with the other drives. Guthrie wasn’t quite sold, but then his sanity-check Internet search for “backup software” turned up Seagate’s name repeatedly. So he purchased Seagate’s Backup Exec software in conjunction with Hewlett-Packard’s HP SureStore DAT24 drive, so named because it was capable of holding 24GB of data (again, in a perfectly compressed world). The price: $840 for the software and $1,251 for the drive. Guthrie installed the software as well as the DAT drive on a server running Windows NT. That was a snap, but configuring the software to back up data across a smorgasbord of operating systems wasn’t. To facilitate communication between Linux and the company’s other systems, Guthrie earlier had created shortcuts called “Samba shares.” For three days Guthrie tried to get the Backup Exec software to recognize the Samba shares, convinced that he had to be doing something wrong. Being a computer guy, he figured that if he couldn’t fix things himself, he was as good as doomed. “You’re S.O.L. once you call tech support,” he says. It certainly felt that way as he waded through Seagate’s voice-mail system. When he finally reached a technician on the third call, he explained his problem and was told he’d receive a callback. In the mean- time, he relied on the Jaz drive for backup. After two weeks had passed without a word from Seagate, he tried again. A manager assured him that he’d receive a call the next day. He did — and got some bad news: version 7.2 of Backup Exec didn’t include the right agents (technology used to accommodate different operating systems) to support any Linux shortcuts. But there was also some good news: the next version of the software would have the capability. (According to Stacey Ruscette, a spokesperson for Veritas, which purchased Seagate’s software division in May 1999, versions 7.3 and 8.0, released in June 1999 and February 2000 respectively, include the appropriate agent to support Linux.) Guthrie couldn’t wait, so he returned the software. “I kept the DAT drive,” he says, “but I was back to square one.” The experience showed him how little was commonly known about backup systems. “Up until then I had always relied on our vendors for accurate technical advice. I couldn’t do that anymore.” Guthrie instead turned to one of his young technicians, a recent college graduate with plenty of friends in other Internet companies. The technician made a few calls. He reported back to Guthrie that the highest praise for backup software capable of supporting a variety of operating systems went to Knox’s Arkeia, a product that was popular with Linux users. A few times Guthrie E-mailed Knox some questions that he was “looking for yeses to” — namely, whether the software would work with all Pajo’s operating systems (except the Mac OS), whether he could try the software risk free before buying, and whether he could get technical support 24/7. He also hoped to find a system that would allow him to start the backup from any machine, running any operating system, by means of an easy-to-navigate graphical user interface. He got his yeses. With the guarantee of a 30-day free trial, Guthrie’s young technician downloaded the Arkeia trial software from Knox’s Web site and installed it on Pajo’s Windows NT server that day — no snags, no glitches. “It was pretty sweet,” says Guthrie. Then, when he had to call Knox to clarify some settings, he got a bonus: he found himself on the phone with Sam Siegel, the company president. (As Knox was at that point only a six-person company, Siegel took his share of customer calls.) When he found out that Siegel had had a large hand in designing the software, Guthrie took great pleasure in grilling him about the product. Guthrie also got some free advice. When Siegel heard that Pajo was using a Windows NT server for primary backup, Siegel made a suggestion he’d made many times before to Linux users: why not speed up the process by running the backup from the Linux machine rather than from the Windows NT one? To Guthrie, the idea was a classic example of overlooking the obvious. “We were letting our primary operating system [Windows NT] dictate where we were going to do the backup from,” he says. Guthrie moved the DAT drive from the NT box to the Linux box. “It took longer to move the DAT drive from one computer to the next than it did to install the software. We had everything up and running within 20 minutes.” Not only did the system work perfectly, but Siegel’s claim that the backup would be 10 times faster using the Linux box was substantiated. Guthrie particularly liked the real-time graphic that monitored just how fast the backup was going. “We were all watching it, screaming, ‘Go, go, go!’ We’re men — we like to see meters,” he says. To date, the system has never failed. And it’s no problem to find that E-mail address that’s been lost in the abyss. With the DAT drive, an administrator just selects the file in question from Arkeia’s Explorer-like log, and a dialog box tells him which tape to insert into the drive to retrieve it. The process takes, at most, three minutes. Safety net Matthew Barrer calls his old method for backing up his company’s data “half-assed,” but his system is not as uncommon among small businesses as you might think. Barrer copied key files from one hard drive to another through his local area network before leaving for the night. In 1998, Barrer bought the five-year-old Philadelphia Enterpriser magazine, which is targeted at business owners and entrepreneurs in the metropolitan area. The following year he made his mark on the publication by instituting a few changes: he made the content truly regional in focus, since he knew he couldn’t compete with deep-pocketed national magazines, and he improved the company’s technology. His first upgrade was to implement GoldMine contact-management software. Instead of using Microsoft Access to house the subscriber database and boxes of note cards to keep track of advertisers, the company began operating off three GoldMine databases: one for the Enterpriser‘s 18,000 active subscribers, one for its advertisers, and one for Barrer’s own personal contacts. His second upgrade was to jury-rig that file-copying backup system to minimize the chance of losing files. But not having an official backup system gnawed at him. He didn’t want his company to become a statistic in some backup-system manufacturer’s brochure. “Reader data in the subscriber database is not something we can reconstruct easily,” he says. “Those demographics are what our advertising revenue depends on. I needed it to be secure.” Barrer started his search for a backup system as a relative novice. “I knew about tape drives,” he says, “but I didn’t know what else was out there at all.” To learn about his options, he began asking everyone he ran across about backup systems — both online and off. Barrer knew he wanted something that was not labor-intensive. And from what he was hearing, online systems virtually took care of themselves. No one would have to change the tapes and make sure the data were moved off-site. “I’d much prefer that the data be in some big data warehouse, where I’m the control point,” he says. “I don’t have a full MIS department; no one’s going to be able to do that for me.” Identifying vendors was as easy as launching his browser and searching for “online backup.” “I was looking for something that I could control and access with minimal effort, and that I could trust — it had to be encrypted and safe,” he says. He also wanted a solution that backed up any changes in his data on a daily basis. “I didn’t want to have to go back on more than a day’s activity,” he says. He ended up focusing on three Internet-based backup services that met his criteria: @Backup, Connected, and NovaStor. Using each company’s software, Barrer could connect to the Internet and automatically back up his company’s data. Further, the software allowed incremental backups to automatically launch at the same time every day (he could even choose the time) to ferret out the files that had changed in the past 24 hours. Barrer liked the sound of that — a workable day-to-day backup solution that would require little to no involvement from him. Now he just had to discover which one would best meet the Enterpriser‘s needs. With @Backup, for a $99 annual fee, users could back up as much as 100MB of data by means of a simple Internet connection. The company also offered a deal in which users could pay $300 a year to back up 500MB of data. Although both plans would have worked for Barrer personally, neither was good enough for his business. For the Enterpriser he wanted to make sure that he could restore everything, including applications and his Windows 98 operating system — 6.5GB of data — since he didn’t have an internal technical team to handle such a task. Besides, he didn’t much cotton to the idea of signing a long-term contract. Connected’s Online Backup and NovaStor’s NovaNet-Web (which is hosted by Compaq) both had the monthly, commitment-free pricing he liked — around $20 a month. Plus, they offered enough storage space for a systemwide backup. (In NovaStor’s case, if a company wants the initial backup to be done on-site, it must purchase a $200 NovaNet software package.) Price considerations alone would have made it easy to go with Connected, but Barrer was drawn to NovaStor’s connection with Compaq. Although both companies backed up clients’ data onto digital linear tape (DLT) at secure data facilities, NovaStor used a Compaq-owned data center whereas Connected had its own. (DLT drives start at twice the price of DAT drives, and their smallest capacity is 40GB — which is the largest capacity for DAT drives.) Moreover, Compaq was actually the provider to whom Barrer would be paying his monthly NovaStor bill; it offered backup service with NovaStor’s software through its Web site. “If it was good enough for Compaq,” Barrer says, “it sure as heck was good enough for me.” “If NovaStor backup was good enough for Compaq,” Matthew Barrer says, “it sure as heck was good enough for me.” The decision made, Barrer turned to an expert for the follow-through. InfoQuest, a NovaStor value-added reseller also located in Pennsylvania, installed NovaStor’s NovaNet 7 onto the Enterpriser‘s Windows NT and oversaw the initial backup, which involved 6.5GB worth of applications and operating systems on two tapes. Two copies of the information were made. One was transferred off-site to the Compaq data bank, and the other resides at InfoQuest, where it’s available for easy retrieval in case of a full-blown disaster. The rest of the Enterpriser‘s data — financial files, business correspondence, the GoldMine databases — were backed up by InfoQuest using NovaNet-Web, NovaStor’s online backup software. All Barrer had to do was install his own CD-ROM of software on the Enterpriser‘s server. Although he did call NovaNet’s customer-service reps to guide him, he was able, with virtually no problems, to use the software’s wizard to answer a series of questions that automatically set up the schedule of when he wanted his data backed up. “It passed my software test,” he said. “I was able to install it without looking at a manual.” Now, every night when the clock strikes 12, NovaNet-Web scans Barrer’s computers for changes and performs backups of any changed files. The whole process takes about 10 minutes. NovaNet-Web also backs up Barrer’s laptop nightly. “If I’m online at that late hour, I’ll get a message saying, ‘Do you want to back up now?” says Barrer. “And if I miss it, I can just back up the next time I connect to the Internet.” Barrer couldn’t be more pleased. Not only does he have a backup system that operates without human intervention, but he also has a system that works. In one case Barrer used NovaStor to restore his 45MB database of contacts, which, according to NovaStor, had been corrupted when something malfunctioned. Although the parties don’t agree on how the data were lost or whose fault it was, Barrer doesn’t particularly care. He just made sure he got a restored file, because into the void had gone the one record he’d never dare to delete: his mother’s. Mie-Yun Lee is the editorial director and founder of BuyerZone, an Internet buying service that features expert purchasing advice and tools for small and midsize businesses. You can conduct your own search for an online backup system at www.buyerzone.com/computers/backup-remote/index.html. Sandra Boncek contributed to this article. Please e-mail your comments to editors@inc.com.

What points should I remember when setting up a new office?

Offices & Operations mentor Mie-Yun Lee responds to the following question from an inc.com user: We are in the process of setting up an office. What things should I be careful to not forget? Mie-Yun Lee’s response:You may have already decided on specific items such as computers, a phone system, a printer, and a fax machine. But here are a few points to remember when thinking about each. Computers. These days, I recommend that you get computers that run at least a Pentium III 450 MHz processor and have a minimum 10-gigabyte hard drive. That way you can run multiple applications and store files without a problem. And if you plan on having the computers networked, either now or in the next 6 to 12 months, the computer should have a built-in Ethernet connection. Phone system. If you want voice mail, make sure that the phone system supports it, even if you don’t buy it right now. In my experience, too many businesses have had to throw away their phone system because they could not add voice mail to it. Printer.Don’t forget to factor in the cost of toner when comparing ink-jet vs. laser printers. You’ll probably find a laser printer to be more cost-effective overall than an ink-jet one, even if it’s more expensive up front. Fax machine. If you expect to receive a lot of faxes daily, you’ll need a dedicated fax machine — not just a printer that includes faxing as one of its functions. In addition, I also suggest that you do the following: Make plans to back up your computers at least weekly (preferably daily). Plan well ahead when ordering phone lines. You may be surprised at how long this can take to set up. Keep temperature in mind if you expect to be using a server for your computer network. You need a cool place for the server to live. Believe me, it’s not a pretty sight when the switches or servers fail because of overheating. Look into a high-speed Internet connection. It is essential for almost any business. You don’t want to waste time waiting for pages to load. Buy business insurance. It’s easy to overlook the financial requirements that come with owning a business, but they are critical. Help out your mailman. Label the inside of your mailbox with the names of everyone and every company name under which you might receive mail. © 2000 BuyerZone.com Inc.

Meet Mie-Yun Lee

Mie-Yun Lee is an expert on businesspurchasing for the office. Since she founded BuyerZone.com, Lee has given small and midsizebusinesses advice on purchasing issues of all types,and her opinion has been sought for articles and programs in leading media,including USA Today, The Wall Street Journal, Business Week, and CNBC. In addition, Lee regularly contributes buyer’s guides forpublications like Entrepreneur magazine and Inc. Technology,and writes “Savvy Business Shopper,” a weekly syndicated column carried in leading businessjournals, including Crain’s and American City Business Journals publications. Lee’s book-writing credits incude The Essential Business Buyer’s Guide,available in bookstores nationwide. She was formerly the editor of BusinessConsumer Guide, a bimonthly publication providing in-depth information andexpert buying advice on thousands of office products and services. She currently serves as editorial director of BuyerZone.com, an Internet purchasing hubfor small and midsized businesses.Site visitors can post messages to Lee with questions or tips, and she also overseesresearch and development activities for the site. Lee is a graduate of Yale University. She cofounded her company in 1992 as a provider of business purchasing advice. Selected articles about Mie-Yun Lee: ” Taking the Pain out of Purchasing“