Tag Archives: Microsoft Windows NT

Making the Switch to VoIP

In the March 2003 Inc article, “Good Call,” Hamon Corp.’s move to voice-over Internet protocol (VoIP) helped the company more effectively — and affordably — handle intracompany calls. Though the Somerville, N.J., manufacturer’s switch went off with nary a hitch, it’s not always that seamless. Craft Diston Industries, a shower-door manufacturer in Wichita, Kan., first tried a VoIP system in 1999, hoping to cut the cost of calls between headquarters and 10 factories and distribution centers scattered throughout the United States. That initial system, which happened to be from AltiGen, ( http://www.altigen.com), a maker of Internet phone systems in Fremont, Calif., “was pretty rough,” CFO Michael Gayeski recalls. Calls echoed or faded or cut out; sometimes transmission was so slow that callers’ sentences overlapped. Craft Diston quickly switched to another vendor’s system, which also ultimately failed. Still desperate to control telecom costs, Craft Diston decided to give AltiGen one more chance, after the phone-system business assured its former customer that it had corrected all the quality problems. The result? “It’s 10 times improved,” says Gayeski of the new system, which was installed in mid-2002. “No problems whatsoever.” The 240-employee company, which had about $30 million in sales last year, now saves more than $9,000 a month on its phone bills. IT director Jesse Santana calls the system simple to use because it works on the familiar Windows NT network and doesn’t require any special training or equipment.

Dedicated Hosting Essentials

If you’re running an e-commerce or database-driven site, or if you need greater access to software choices and the hardware itself, you’re probably shopping for a dedicated host. A dedicated host is a server devoted exclusively to your Web site that you rent from a Web host. In addition, the Web host you rent the server from gives you control over maintenance and software configurations. But once you’ve decided you need a dedicated server, how do you go about choosing the right host? Here are five factors to consider when choosing a host for your dedicated server. Platform Obviously, the platform, or operating system, you choose will depend to a large extent on the applications you use and the skills and knowledge you already possess. The two most well-known operating systems are Windows NT and UNIX (which includes the Linux and Solaris platforms). Windows NT, the more expensive option, is regarded as the most user-friendly and the easiest to install, especially for those who use Windows on their PCs. UNIX is cheaper, but people unfamiliar with the text environment experience a much steeper learning curve. Choose a host that uses a platform most compatible with the systems you’re used to. This will simplify the setup, and you’ll save time and money by not having to convert to new applications and operating systems. Data Transfer Most dedicated server providers allow you to choose among data transfer levels, usually in gigabytes per month. Because you pay more for higher levels, do not purchase more than is realistically needed. You can always increase the amount as needed. Data BackupIf you run a site that is constantly updated, you’ll need to back it up frequently. This can be a hassle to do yourself. Look for a hosting provider that offers back-up services. You’ll probably have to pay an added fee, but the convenience will be worth it. Monitoring Your server must be monitored constantly to prevent service interruptions. Check to see if your host can provide such monitoring and how frequently it occurs — every five minutes, for example. Ask what measures are used to handle problems when they are detected. Automation As mentioned, running a dedicated server requires a greater level of technical knowledge than shared hosting. However, those lacking technical expertise can still operate a dedicated server if the host offers some form of Web-based automation to simplify the management process. If you want full control over your server, make sure your host can offer such automation. Copyright © 1995-2001 Pinnacle WebWorkz Inc. All rights reserved. Do not duplicate or redistribute in any form.

Free Hosts: 4 to Grow On

You’re running a successful business and you’re thinking about taking it online. Maybe you want to test the waters before shelling out large sums of money to set up a Web site. Or you’re looking to save as much money as possible. Whatever your reason, at some point you’ve probably considered using a free Web host. A huge selection of free hosts exists, and you probably don’t have time to research them all. Here are four of the better-known free hosts offering services that set them apart from the crowd. Take a Choice Each offers virtual domain hosting, e-mail services and approximately 20 to 40 megabytes of storage space. Each also provides online form processing abilities via FrontPage extensions or CGI scripting. Most require you to accept banner advertising on your site, although they offer upgrades to banner-free hosting for a fee. These are the commonalties. How about the differences? What sets these hosts apart from each other, and why would you choose one over another? The answer depends on your priorities. If you’re seeking beefy technical support and the opportunity to join a marketplace, your first choice should be HyperMart. HyperMart is a good all-around host. It offers a full range of features, including CGI and FrontPage support, and many resources to help you build your online business. HyperMart offers free technical support and several site tools, such as statistical reports and e-mail services. Set up Shop If your priority is to set up an online shopping cart and merchant account, look closely at FreeMerchant.com, which specializes in providing shopping carts for small business merchants. FreeMerchant.com allows users to attach free shopping cart functionality to existing Web sites. It does not require your site to host banner ads — a big plus. However, its reliance on templates severely limits your ability to customize site design. If you hold a non-U.S. domain name, Netfirms should be your first call. Netfirms can host any country-specific domain name. The hosts mentioned above are UNIX-based. If you prefer a Windows NT environment, consider AtFreeWeb.com. Notable features include support of Active Server Pages (ASP) and FrontPage extensions. Free Web hosts are a great introduction to hosting and a low-cost way to become accustomed to Web publishing. Once comfortable, you’ll be poised to upgrade to a paid host. Copyright © 1995-2001 Pinnacle WebWorkz Inc. All rights reserved. Do not duplicate or redistribute in any form.

We’ve Been Hacked

Not scared of losing your data to a corporate thief? You should be Bob McNeal sits down in a cubicle in his Alexandria, Va., office with his morning coffee. He turns on his computer and flips open his notebook to check out the specifics of today’s assignment. He clicks a couple of buttons on the screen and runs his usual scripted program, entering in a few numbers from those that are scribbled in his notebook. He types in some commands, following routine instructions from his database of tools. Then he patiently waits for the computer to process his programs and answer his questions — questions that could be worth thousands of dollars to his client. Two hours later, McNeal has completed his assignment. He has broken into the computer network of MBA Management Inc., located some 20 miles away in Fairfax, and verified that he can access every computer and every database in the company. And, McNeal tells his boss, he can read the user ID and password of every single employee. Is that enough, he asks, or should he continue? That’s hacking. Sorry to make it seem so banal. But it doesn’t take some wild-eyed rocket scientist with a supercomputer and nothing better to do but type ingenious code into the wee hours of the morning to perform it. Most of what hackers do is disarmingly simple. Often they use readily available vulnerability-seeking software programs, which some experts call “point, click, and attack tools.” And most of the time hackers are pretty successful — especially when they target small companies, which typically don’t spend either the time or the resources they need to protect themselves. The simplest tricks can do tremendous damage. (Witness the “I Love You” bug that was sent earlier this year in an E-mail attachment.) Most small companies that are hooked up to the Internet do what James Mugnolo, president of MBA Management, did: assume that their Internet service provider will furnish a secure connection. It took McNeal just one morning to reveal how faulty an assumption that was. Fortunately for MBA Management, a $5-million executive-search business, Bob McNeal works for the good guys: Para-Protect Services Inc., an E-commerce and network-security company. Mugnolo, who recently moved his company to Chantilly, Va., hired Para-Protect in October 1998 to find the holes in his company’s network and recommend ways to stitch them up. McNeal stopped his penetration test into the MBA Management network after those first two hours. Normally, such a job can take two days. “We stopped when we found we could get into everything,” says Chuck Downs, Para-Protect’s vice-president and director of operations. “There was no sense in beating that horse to death.” Close call: James Mugnolo’s company received a nasty virus that read, “Enclosed is my résumé.” Mugnolo had decided to test his company’s security and to spend some money upgrading it after a former employee was suspected of stealing customer data. Like most employers who have such suspicions, Mugnolo doesn’t like to discuss the details. Still, he clearly felt betrayed, and worse, the incident scared him. In its database the company keeps information on more than 50,000 workers throughout North America, as well as on an equal number of companies that are looking for employees. “Their whole business is that database,” says Downs. Though Mugnolo didn’t hire “white hat” hackers until the company had lost data, other small-business owners are rushing to secure their networks before disaster strikes. In some cases the critical or private nature of the company’s data pushes them to it; in other cases companies see security as a differentiator for their product or service. But many have just plain seen the writing on the wall — or more precisely, in the newspaper headlines, which have blared a stream of reports on security breaches. Though well-publicized stories about computer viruses have lately brought security into the public consciousness, it’s often other threats that are more dangerous to a company’s profits and reputation. Those can include attacks that shut down Web servers, for instance, or that replace Web sites with obscene or insulting graphics. Hackers can also get in and rummage through a company’s files. Sometimes data just disappear — consider the case earlier this year at the U.S. State Department, where Madeleine Albright ordered a crackdown after a classified laptop vanished, and at Los Alamos National Laboratory, where two hard drives containing classified nuclear-weapons data were missing for more than a month. Those sorts of events — from the annoying to the frightening — are often what it takes to make an entrepreneur recognize the need for computer security, says Terry Gudaitis of information-protection consultant Global Integrity Corp., based in Reston, Va. After all, you don’t want your company to be the next one in the headlines. Certainly, Mugnolo doesn’t. And he has thus far been successful. In March, Para -Protect Services ran an unscheduled penetration test of MBA Management’s systems, and this time the company passed with flying colors. Since it adopted its new security measures, “we haven’t had a single instance of systems penetration,” says David Denne, MBA Management’s vice-president of marketing. That has left the company free to concentrate on growth: this year’s second quarter was its best ever, and the business grew from 35 employees to almost 60 in the first six months of the year. In perhaps its closest call, the company escaped damage from a virus that was seemingly designed for a headhunting company: code disguised as a E-mail attachment on a résumé. That message, signed “Janet Simons,” read: “Attached is my résumé with a list of references contained within. Please feel free to call or E-mail me if you have any further questions regarding my experience. I am looking forward to hearing from you.” The attachment, however, carried a virus that could have methodically erased every single drive on MBA Management’s network. Needless to say, that particular virus could have been disastrous for the company, where résumés flow in regularly through the E-mail system. “It probably shut down several of our competitors,” says Denne. “Our system immediately scrubbed anything that came in through the firewall, flagged it, and kept it on a server outside the firewall.” Like Mugnolo, Denne believes that MBA Management has gained a competitive edge through its stepped-up security. “I find it comforting, and therefore I think my clients find it comforting,” Denne says. Hire a Hacker At Para-Protect Services, Chuck Downs was surprised but not shocked that McNeal was able to break into MBA Management’s systems in just two hours. Doing what Mugnolo did — relying on his ISP to configure his connection to the Net — meant by definition that it was an open connection, Downs says. But if Downs wasn’t appalled, Mugnolo certainly was. His business’s competitive edge — the reason companies go to him rather than to other headhunters — is his deep compilation of information on thousands of potential employees. Included in that data is sensitive information on job openings, including postings that haven’t been made public — perhaps because an employee doesn’t yet know that he or she is on the way out. Companies can unwittingly reveal a lot about their strategic plans, for example, by listing the specific skills required for various jobs. “The last thing in the world the client wants is for that information to get back to his staff or to a competitor,” says Denne. In particular, a company that’s developing a new product doesn’t want anyone to know the nature of its work. “A breach in a program could spell the end of the whole market for their idea,” Denne adds. Still, it’s not surprising that few people spend a lot of time worrying about Internet security. As the user looks out onto the superhighway of the Web, it’s easy to see it as a one-way street. But in fact, when you open a Web page or do virtually anything on the Internet, you send a request to the faraway computer on which that Web page is stored, and that computer sends you back information, which is opened by your browser or other software. That means your computer — and, in a company setting, the server — must be constantly open and able to receive data feeds from the outside. That openness is exactly where vulnerability lies. For a fee of about $10,000, Para-Protect restricted the openness of MBA Management’s systems in two ways. First, the company installed a simple firewall from Prism Servers Inc., in Allison Park, Pa., at a cost of less than $3,000. The firewall was configured according to a simple rule, Downs says: “Anything coming from the Internet that is not requested from the inside is denied.” It does that by using a Unix filter to distinguish between information — like a Web page — that is coming in at a user’s request and any unknown traffic that arrives unbidden. When someone inside the network requests something from outside the firewall, the firewall issues a tag number with the request. If incoming data packets don’t contain a matching tag, the firewall won’t let them in. There are two big exceptions. One is E-mail, which arrives unrequested. Downs put MBA Management’s E-mail system onto a separate server, which redirects incoming mail and scans it for viruses before users can access it. The other exception is the company’s own Web site, which anyone from the outside should be able to access. MBA Management disconnected the site from its corporate network and arranged to have it hosted off-site. Second, Downs made sure that each computer went on the internal network, which is invisible to outsiders. In a normal office network with Internet access, each workstation has a unique Internet Protocol (IP) address. It was those addresses that McNeal was able to identify and attack in the penetration test. Downs changed each workstation’s IP address to a nonroutable address — meaning that outsiders can only see the address of the firewall. The result: nobody from outside can discover the IP address of an internal computer and use it as a port into the network — a common hacking procedure. Downs says that the firewall’s logs reveal that hackers have frequently scanned MBA Management’s system looking for ports since Downs put the firewall in place. Although $3,000 is low-end for a commercial firewall, Downs says, it’s all that a small company needs. “The only thing you limit is the number of people you can service,” he says, since the small firewall has limited bandwidth capacity. The Prism product, he says, can easily handle 200 users. That should cover the short-term needs of MBA Management, which plans to double its number of networked users within a year. As the company has grown, it has periodically added servers behind the main firewall and is now running six of them. Now that Downs feels the company is secure from outside intruders, the next move is to provide greater internal security for the databases. Currently, MBA Management uses a proprietary database running on NT servers. It is about to split the database into several parts using software called Adapt, which will allow the company to use the operating system’s security-administration features to carefully control who can have access to different levels of data. Since installing the firewall, Para-Protect has conducted monthly tests as part of a routine security checkup. That is not to say that MBA Management’s security is 100% foolproof. But the company has put a pretty solid defense in place — solid enough to send hackers on to easier targets. And that’s a big part of what Internet security is about: making sure yours is not the easiest lock to pick. Virtual Privacy You could say that a kindergarten play cost entrepreneur Dana Dodds $120,000 a year, and you wouldn’t be that far off. One afternoon in 1996, Dodds, CEO of San Diego auto insurer Reliant General Insurance Services Inc., left work to watch his daughter perform in a school play. He was immediately struck by guilt. “I had a customer-service rep whose daughter was in that class, too, but she couldn’t be there, and it bugged me,” Dodds says. A virtual private network lets Dana Dodds’s employees work from home without sacrificing security. Soon, about 15 of Reliant General’s employees were working from home, with no time clock — just quotas for the number of applications they processed and standards for the quality of the work they did. Back then, the workers connected to the corporate network directly through a dial-in 800 number. The phone bills for those lines ran about $120,000 a year. Reliant General is a fast-growth company — it’s made the Inc. 500 twice, as #341 in 1998 and #417 in 1999. And Dodds is all for using the newest technology to keep his company growing at a rapid pace. So in 1997 he hired information-services director Cary White to help him do just that. When White, 32, joined the company, he took one look at the exorbitant phone bill and told Dodds that the company could eliminate most of it by letting the telecommuters connect over the Internet. Dodds liked the idea but knew there had to be a catch. “He’s a very sharp guy when it comes to technology,” White says with a laugh. “Almost too smart for his own good.” The catch, White responded, lay in the open nature of the Internet. Essentially, the Internet is a very large collection of routers that are wired to one another. When you send a packet of data into cyberspace, it wanders, asking at each router, “Have you seen this IP address?” If the answer is no, the packet moves on to the next router. However, nobody should trust that every router on the Internet will simply shoo data packets along. Hackers can put tools, called “sniffers,” on those routers and use them to peek inside every packet of data that comes along. If a packet’s contents or destination seems juicy enough, the sniffers can read everything inside. An extra layer of worry exists for Dodds and his colleagues working in California’s auto industry: 11 years ago actress Rebecca Schaeffer was murdered by a stalker who obtained her address from the state Department of Motor Vehicles. (Since then, California has tightened its DMV privacy laws.) Not surprisingly, Dodds is passionate about the need to protect his customers. “Information for us is a trust, and we can’t give it away, and we can’t let anybody get it,” he says. “We’re talking about where they live, what cars they drive, where they work, the children that drive in the household, their driving records, their claims history — it’s very similar to credit information. It’s very private.” For White, simply using the wide-open Internet was out. So he called in a local consultant, Paradise Technology, which built a virtual private network. At the time, VPNs were a fresh concept, and few companies of any size had tried them out. The VPN creates a tunnel of sorts between the Reliant General network and telecommuters’ computers, shielding its content from the view of the myriad routers along the way. Axent Technologies’ PowerVPN was one of the first of its kind on the market, so Paradise chose it for Reliant General. In addition, Reliant General purchased Axent’s Defender product to authenticate users on its dial-up lines. The system works this way: Telecommuters like Reliant policy underwriter Mike Lemieux connect to the Internet through a cable modem or a dial-up ISP. Lemieux, who works full-time from his home in El Cajon, Calif., clicks on an icon to start his session with Reliant General. Lemieux’s request then passes through several stages. First, the firewall lets it through only if it is a request for a VPN session on the Axent machine. Anyone — even an authorized user like Lemieux — who tries to bypass that machine and connect directly to the corporate server will be blocked by the firewall. Approved requests for VPN sessions make it to the next stage: authentication by the Defender hardware. Lemieux enters his user ID and, just as he would at an ATM machine, types in a personal identification number. But in addition, using that PIN and secret data stored on Lemieux’s hard drive, the system creates a onetime password that allows him to access it. This two-level authentication means that someone would have to know Lemieux’s password and use his computer in order to impersonate him and gain access to the corporate server. When Defender gives the go-ahead to Lemieux’s session, the PowerVPN establishes a secure tunnel that keeps all transmissions out of harm’s way. In addition, it encrypts the contents. Once the secure connection is established, Lemieux logs in to the corporate server — using yet another password — and begins working on applications just as if he were on the network in the office. So far the system has worked so well that Reliant General uses the VPN not just for its own telecommuters but also for approved outsiders, like insurance-claims reps. Installing the system for about 25 telecommuters cost Reliant General about $20,000. Given a yearly savings of $100,000 on the phone bill, “it was pretty clear-cut, pretty much a slam-dunk decision,” says chief financial officer Greg Goodrich. Instant reassurance: Joseph Rosmann guarantees that the children’s records are shielded from harm. According to Dodds, the phone-bill savings haven’t been the only gain. He says telecommuters’ productivity has increased sharply — a phenomenon supported by a new poll conducted by the International Telework Association & Council, which found that nearly half of the telecommuters surveyed felt they were more productive working at home, while less than 10% thought they were less productive. According to Dodds, underwriters who used to process about 70 applications a day in the office are now doing at least 100 a day working at home. And giving a staffer time off to attend a school play no longer costs the company a small fortune. Bedside Manner If you think that storing kids’ immunization records doesn’t sound like a business bonanza, then you haven’t been talking with Joseph Rosmann. Rosmann’s soft-spoken manner belies his passion about his Internet start-up, HealthRadius. The company — Rosmann’s obsession since he launched it in 1996 — will soon make many millions of dollars from its Web-based repository of children’s vaccination records, he explains in measured tones. Doctors, he says, have free access to the records. Public-health agencies pay a fee to access the records of children in their area. Health plans pay $1 a child for basic data and as much as $4 a child for more complete records. Individuals, through their employers or insurers, can access their own children’s records for a family subscription fee of $15 a year. Eventually, every time a doctor’s office wants to check on a new patient’s history or a parent wants to sign up a kid for summer camp, money will flow into HealthRadius. What companies like Healtheon/WebMD Corp. have become for the Web-based administrative side of health care, Rosmann’s company will be for the patient-records side of it, he says. Rosmann, 56, who formerly worked as a health-care consultant, has had to make his pitch many, many times, to venture capitalists, state health officials, doctors, and health-care administrators. Though they may expect the caricature of an Internet-start-up entrepreneur with plans as big as the sky — a young, brash, fast-talking braggadocio — what they get instead is the calm assurance of Joe Rosmann, with his mellifluous voice that never rises or rushes. Like a family doctor explaining your test results, he provides instant reassurance with his smile and bearing. Reassurance is an important element of Rosmann’s plan. To make it work, he must collect and distribute the type of information that everyone agrees should be held in utmost privacy: medical records. Without strict assurance of the data’s security, Rosmann says, his company could never meet the requirements of health-care privacy laws — newly tightened in the wake of consumer outrage over privacy violations. And just as important, without that security, Rosmann could never sell anyone on the idea. And these days it’s a Herculean task to ensure that Web-based transactions are private and secure. Still, for cost, speed, and simplicity, Rosmann wants to do it all — including data collection and access — over the Web. His approach seems to be working. HealthRadius, based in Bellevue, Wash., will expand its immunization-records service to four new states this fall and expects to have more than half a million physicians involved within two years. Although the company took in just $100,000 in revenues last year, venture capitalists value the company at about $20 million. Rosmann expects revenues of close to $5 million this year. Four years ago, when Rosmann launched HealthRadius, doctors and health-care administrators were just beginning to eye the potential of the Internet. Washington state health officials brought Rosmann in to study how to salvage a failed medical-records-exchange initiative, the Community Health Information Network. Their request, he says, was straightforward: “Get something simple started to prove that you can safely exchange medical-health records and automate the transactions between doctors, health plans, and hospitals.” Out of that effort came two companies: Rosmann’s and a payment-exchange provider called Pointshare. Rosmann’s response to the state’s request was to break into the potentially enormous health-care-records field through the single entry point of children’s immunization data. That category is a good testing ground for the broader health-records field, he believes. For one thing, parents must frequently provide immunization records to new schools, new summer camps, and new doctors. A child typically has seen three doctors and had 23 immunizations by age six, according to HealthRadius’s research. Who wouldn’t want to make managing and exchanging all that data easier? Rosmann believed it was a market waiting to be served. One of Rosmann’s key early contacts was information-law specialist John R. Christiansen of the Seattle office of law firm Stoel Rives LLP. Christiansen began consulting for HealthRadius in the fall of 1996. “There is no standard-setting organization out there” for electronic medical records, Christiansen says. “You can’t just go out there and say, ‘What are the steps I need to take?” He advised Rosmann to draft his contracts with clients in a way that holds HealthRadius to an unusually high level of liability for the privacy and security of the data it collects. Only by doing so could Rosmann hope to reassure the doctors, health insurers, and parents who were HealthRadius’s targeted customers. If you’re going to put your business on the line like that, you’d better make sure you can live up to your promises. So the first person Rosmann brought on board was not a health-care adviser, but information-security veteran Gene Shook, now vice-president of the company’s operations and development. Rosmann and Shook, working together in their quiet offices on the outskirts of Seattle, laid out a long list of steps they would take to keep medical data both secure and private. First, they needed to be able to verify the identity of any client trying to access their records over the Web. Then they had to encrypt the data sent to and from HealthRadius servers so that only people holding the keys to unscramble it could read it. In addition, since participating doctors’ offices would submit information directly to the HealthRadius database when they performed immunizations, the company had to guarantee an even greater level of security for those transactions. Different employees at doctors’ offices — even those using the same computer — would need to have varying levels of access; for instance, some workers would be able to read but not edit patient records. The first employee Rosmann brought on board was Gene Shook, who took charge of security. Shook will soon install a VPN, which will offer a high degree of security. In the meantime, he turned to the encryption built into standard versions of Netscape Navigator and Microsoft Internet Explorer (called Secure Socket Layer encryption) and other Microsoft tools. For authentication, Shook currently uses the access-control system built into the Microsoft Windows NT operating system as well as the company’s own custom-developed access-control system. To ensure that changes that are made to HealthRadius’s database are verifiable and legally valid, Shook decided to use a method that should soon become more widespread: digital signatures that use public key interchange (PKI). Those digital signatures, provided through an authorized third party, verify two parties to each another, like a secret handshake. Washington state has recently authorized a Utah company called Digital Signature Trust to act as the licensed certificate authority for supplying digital PKI signatures. Anyone in the state can sign up with Digital Signature Trust and receive the hardware or software to generate digital IDs. Two parties that are both using those digital IDs — for instance, HealthRadius and a physician’s office — can be certain that the information that was sent exactly matches what the other party receives. In Washington, such electronic documents can now legally take the place of paper. Shook is hoping that other states adopt compatible systems; if they don’t, HealthRadius may have to install a vast and confusing array of different digital-signature systems. (Without a common standard, Shook fears that HealthRadius may have to establish its own PKI service for its customers. That not only would be more costly and difficult — HealthRadius would have to license and distribute software to everyone who is authorized to access its data over the Web — but also would open HealthRadius up to liability for its digital-signature system.) So far HealthRadius has spent about $1 million on technology, including security. By the time it rolls out nationally during the next year or two, Rosmann expects he will have spent $2 million to $3 million on technology. But perhaps most important, the company has already subjected itself to an intensive security audit (in the spring of 1998) and will undergo another one early next year. It also requires periodic audits of the 50 clinics and hospitals that supply it with medical-records data, and a randomly selected 5% of clients’ sites will be audited each year. In such a review, an independent outside party rigorously examines the procedures and technology that a company is using to handle its data. In HealthRadius’s case, the auditors were interested in seeing whether the company could live up to the security standards of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. That legislation established ground rules for medical-records privacy — always a delicate subject and one made even more so in the Internet age. (DrKoop.com got into hot water recently when its advertising partner, DoubleClick, sold lists that included members’ health information. HealthRadius’s contract with its clients bars it from selling its information.) The audit, which takes about three weeks to complete, includes interviews and a systematic review of the technology itself. That may seem like a lot of effort to secure something as relatively uncontroversial as immunization records. But a market test in 1998 confirmed that the HealthRadius service had no chance of acceptance if people felt even a slight concern that someone could access its demographic information on the more than 2 million people in its system. “We needed to act as a bank — you have direct access and no one else has access,” says Shook. In addition, managing immunization records is just HealthRadius’s initial foray into the arena of electronic-medical-records exchange. In the not too distant future, Rosmann plans to start databases that will contain patients’ disease histories and other medical matters. At that point, he wants an unblemished security track record. The company’s biggest vote of confidence so far has come in black and white: a letter from the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), an independent nonprofit organization that evaluates the quality of managed-care organizations. The letter, dated January 1999, stated that NCQA considered HealthRadius’s registry of immunization records an allowable source of data for its own system, which is used almost universally by health plans. “NCQA gave its blessing because we had provided the privacy,” says Rosmann. “As soon as that letter was issued, about every health plan became a customer.” That’s not to say Rosmann is satisfied. “We still have a little sensitivity around the subject of security,” he says, still in that calm, careful voice. In fact, he has Shook shopping for three more security items. One, HackerShield from BindView Development, scans for known intrusion methods, similar to the way antivirus software checks for familiar computer viruses. A second, IPsec, is a computer-security standard that keeps unwanted data traffic from bothering a company’s servers. One benefit of that would be protection against denial-of-service attacks that can overload and disable a server. (Remember that disastrous day for Amazon.com and eBay last February?) The third product Rosmann and Shook want, WebTrends, monitors and analyzes firewall logs for unusual activity. That will help Shook manage the company’s defenses more actively and will also help the company prosecute any hackers who try to break in. Because catching a hacker would make the kind of headlines that Rosmann would like to be in. David S. Bernstein is a freelance writer in Watertown, Mass. What Are You Afraid Of? So what’s the worst that can happen? There are several types of hacker attacks, all of which have occurred in recent months. Denial of service. Much like protesters’ barring the entrance to a physical store, hackers can shut down your E-business by making sure no customers can get through to your site. Typically, they bombard the site with data traffic, rendering the Web server useless. That is the type of attack that brought down ZDNet, E*Trade, CNN.com, eBay, Buy.com, Amazon.com, and Yahoo, each for about three to five hours, all during a period of several days in February. Electronic theft. This scenario is just like a physical robbery: the hacker breaks into your system, finds something he wants, and downloads it to his own computer. In most cases you may retain your copy of the data, but now someone else has it as well. Is that so bad? Ask the folks at CD Universe, an Internet music retailer based in Wallingford, Conn. Last December someone describing himself as a 19-ye

Bidding on Linux

The Linux operating system is hot. It’s cheap. And it works. But can you run your company on it? Wearing a blue windbreaker with a James G. Murphy Co. logo on it, Julie Murphy stands in the company’s muddy auction lot in Kenmore, Wash., just north of Seattle. As she looks on, men in flannel shirts and logging boots inspect the tires and climb into the cabs of the used backhoes and dump trucks that will be going on the block shortly. Each year Murphy’s company auctions off some $30 million worth of this sort of heavy equipment, along with used police cars, tools, and even the contents of an entire restaurant or sawmill. But today’s auction is different. For one thing, nearly 1,500 bidders have registered, far more people than the monthly auctions usually attract. And there’s more than the average air of expectation in the auction yard. That is largely because of just one item: a one-of-a-kind, baby blue 1971 convertible Plymouth Hemi Barracuda “muscle car.” Seized by police in Everett, Wash., in connection with a drug arrest, the car is in mint condition. No one knows how much it will go for when the bidding starts at noon, but it won’t be small change: the city of Everett has suggested that the minimum bid be set at $250,000. One fellow has flown up from Phoenix to try his luck. Other bidders are on the phone from places like Blue Springs, Mo., and St. Paul, Minn. “This is one of the most exciting things we’ve ever sold,” says Murphy. In a previous life, Murphy was a certified public accountant at Arthur Andersen. Now she is chief financial officer, controller, and office manager of James G. Murphy Co. The company was founded in 1970 by her father, James. Murphy’s older brother, Tim, is CEO and head auctioneer. Along with her many other duties, Julie Murphy is responsible for the company’s computers. Not every small business will be able to (or should) jump on Linux immediately. And this auction, like all the others her father and his fellow auctioneers have held for the past four years, will run on Linux. In the company’s cramped mail room, Murphy proudly points to a metal rack sitting in a corner behind the copier. It holds two computers that run Linux, the software program that has taken the computing world by storm. Since 1996 — long before most people had ever heard of it — James G. Murphy Co. has been using Linux to run its auctions. Today the company uses the program to run almost its entire business. Linux, a computer operating system, is essentially a version of Unix, the software that runs powerful workstations sold by companies like Sun Microsystems and Hewlett-Packard. It has two big advantages over competing operating systems (like Microsoft Windows NT, for one), says Bill Campbell, the Seattle computer consultant who installed the Murphys’ Linux system: It is dirt cheap. And it is incredibly reliable. That reliability is important if you’re in charge of a 30-employee family business running auctions that sometimes draw more than 1,000 bidders. This morning, while most of the crowd is jockeying for seats in the indoor auction hall to get the best view of the bidding on the Hemi ‘Cuda, others are lining up in the office to pay for the heavy equipment and trucks they acquired during the morning’s auctions. Using computer terminals and PCs hooked up to the Linux server, 10 cashiers are taking payments. All the information they need is already in the server: descriptions of the items to be sold were entered before the auctions began. Prospective buyers received bidder numbers when they arrived this morning. During the auction itself, workers frantically typed winning bids into the system, so when bidders come in to settle up, says Murphy, “you just punch in their number, and it tells you what lots they bought and how much they paid.” Just to be on the safe side, Murphy still uses every auctioneer’s favorite manual backup system: slips of paper. That’s how the business handled payments before buying its first computer in 1986. What would happen if the company’s computer system were to fail during a huge auction like today’s? It wouldn’t be a pretty sight, says Murphy. “I would probably just jump out the window.” Fortunately, the system has never crashed. That sort of reliability is typical of Linux computers. “Some of our clients have Linux systems that have been running for a year solid,” says Jim Capp, president of Keystone Programming Inc., a computer-consulting company in Harrisburg, Pa., that sells a lot of Linux systems. Linux holds another attraction for small businesses: it is essentially free. That’s because it was developed completely by volunteers, led by Linus Torvalds, arguably the world’s best-known computer programmer after Bill Gates. Torvalds, who started work on Linux in 1991 while he was a student at the University of Helsinki, distributes the software free on the Internet. It takes patience and Web know-how to download it, however. So most people pay a modest price — typically $30 to $59 — to get Linux from companies like Red Hat Inc., Caldera Systems Inc., and Corel Corp., which provide it on a CD-ROM, along with manuals, tech support, and other applications. Linux can also save small companies money because it runs well on older, less powerful machines. When Campbell installed E-mail and a firewall — a security gateway between the company’s computers and the Internet — at James G. Murphy Co., two years ago, he used an old 486 computer that Murphy was preparing to jettison. “I could have sold them a new computer,” Campbell says. “But Linux runs just fine on that computer, so why sell them hardware they don’t really need?” Linux also runs well on laptops, says Campbell. That’s useful to Julie Murphy, because most of her company’s auctions are run on location, sometimes at customer sites as far away as Texas or Virginia. Last November, for example, Tim Murphy and three employees headed off to the small logging town of Philomath, Oreg., where they auctioned off the saws, conveyor belts, and other equipment at two lumber mills. They took the auction software with them on an IBM ThinkPad 560 notebook computer running Linux. As with the computer system in the company’s home office, the auction cashiers used computer terminals networked to the laptop to take payments. Two years ago few people had heard of Linux. Then its impressive reliability and low cost started attracting attention. Now major computer companies like IBM, Dell, and Gateway sell it. It is widely used on the Internet — 31% of Web sites are powered by Linux — and Linux companies have pushed aside Web start-ups to become the hottest items on Wall Street. The initial public offering last December of VA Linux Systems Inc., a Sunnyvale, Calif., company that sells computers with Linux preinstalled, shot up 698% on the first day. That set a record for the highest gain made by a new stock offering. As Linux has become more widely accepted, several large companies — such as Burlington, N.J., retailer Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corp. and New York City’s Cendant Corp., which owns Ramada hotels and inns and Avis Rent A Car — are starting to use it. Now small organizations as well are discovering that Linux may be a good choice for them. Sam Brown, a private investigator in San Francisco, uses three Linux computers to do research on the Internet and to pick up E-mailed reports from his six investigators. And the Paducah Sun — a 135-employee newspaper in Paducah, Ky., with a circulation of about 30,000 — bought a Linux system last fall to archive stories and photographs. The newspaper considered buying an archiving system running on a computer from Sun Microsystems but decided to go with Linux instead. “It was significantly cheaper,” says publisher Jim Paxton. Both Brown and Paxton were introduced to Linux in the same way that the Murphys were, through a computer consultant. That’s now happening a lot, as folks like Campbell begin using Linux more and more. James G. Murphy Co. was the first of Campbell’s customers to begin using the system. Now nearly all the computers he installs run Linux. “In the last year I’ve put in 3 systems on SCO Unix,” Campbell says. “In the same time period I’ve installed at least 30 new systems running Linux.” Not every small business will be able to (or should) jump on Linux immediately. One problem: many software programs still don’t run on the system, says George Weiss, a research director at the Gartner Group, in Stamford, Conn. Campbell’s three customers who are not using Linux, for example, are running an accounting package from RealWorld Corp., in Manchester, N.H., which doesn’t work on Linux. And Microsoft, which views Linux as a threat, has yet to issue such software mainstays as Word or Excel for Linux. The lack of Microsoft Office apps isn’t necessarily a showstopper, however. Julie Murphy, for example, is using an office suite for Linux called Applixware, from Applix Inc., in Westboro, Mass. “If someone E-mails me a Microsoft Word file, it converts it cleanly,” she says. “You don’t know you’re not on a Windows system.” Weiss also suggests that support can be a crucial issue. “Linux is no simpler than any other version of Unix,” a notoriously complicated system, he warns. Small organizations that don’t have a trained programmer on staff should make sure they have a Linux-savvy computer consultant to install and support it, he says. Murphy was confident that Campbell knew what he was doing when he suggested switching to Linux. She’s been relying on Campbell’s computer know-how since 1988. “I don’t care what the computer is running,” she says, “as long as it works.” The bidders packed into the auction hall this morning don’t care either. Not with that one-of-a-kind Hemi on the block. At a few minutes past noon, the crowd falls silent as the bidding begins. The first bid is immediately doubled to $200,000. A man seated high up in the bleachers waves his hand — he’ll pay $225,000. That figure is immediately raised by a bidder on the phone from San Mateo, Calif. In less than five minutes, the price has jumped to $350,000. The man in the bleachers drops out. It’s now down to two: the bidder on the phone and a guy on the floor, who’s practically holding his breath as he stands next to the car he hopes to take home with him. There is a pause while the bidder on the floor converses on his cell phone and considers what to do. At last he bids $380,000. All eyes are now on the auctioneer holding the phone. Almost immediately he stabs the air with his hand, signaling yes — the bidder on the phone will go higher. The man on the floor shakes his head. He’s done. The car has just been sold to the bidder from San Mateo for $400,000. For that amount of money, you could buy a lot of Linux systems. Dan Orzech is a freelance writer in Philadelphia. For more about Linux, see “Good Stuff Cheap” in Book Value. Please e-mail your comments to editors@inc.com.

Safe House

Shop Talk CEOs Search for the Right Technology A good data backup system can preserve not just your company but your sanity As the Y2K panic proved, the most common culprit for lost computer data is not system failure. It’s plain old user error. And the only way to combat that is with an electronic safeguard — a data backup system. Patrick Guthrie, president and chief technology officer of the Pajo Group, a $15-million Internet service provider in Long Beach, Calif., learned that the hard way. In early 1998 a manager’s tinkering rendered the company’s customer database inaccessible. Guthrie wasn’t too worried because he had easily recovered backed-up copies in the past. This time, however, none of his ideas worked. “We were frantic,” he says. Finally, he was forced to do something he hated: call in a consultant. “We paid him his $125 an hour,” Guthrie says ruefully. “It’s amazing how monetary limitations don’t apply when you’re trying to get your data back.” The incident was enough to spur him into looking for a backup system with more capacity and faster access. Like many start-ups, the Pajo Group had built its backup system around the Band-Aid principle — an effective enough method when it had to find lost E-mail for its 20 customers. The company’s first purchase was a Hewlett-Packard Colorado Trakker 350 tape drive that cost about $500. “Back then [in late 1997] we were running pretty lean and mean,” says Guthrie, “so we fixed problems as they happened.” The tape drive stored all Pajo’s data — a customer database, financial files, customers’ files, and the company’s own ISP-related files — on 350MB magnetic tapes that resembled double-thick cassettes. Each tape had cost about $20 or $30. Guthrie himself executed the backup, inserting a tape into the drive each night and removing it the next morning. He completed the procedure by storing the tapes in a fireproof box in the company’s offices in case of disaster. The system worked fine, but Guthrie found that the recovery process averaged 10 minutes per file — an inordinate amount of time — because he had to rewind and search the entire tape for the lost data. True, he had to go through the process only about two times a month, but he knew that the number of requests was going to grow. Plus, because of his expanding client base, 350MB was too little space per tape; on many nights the tapes filled up before backup was complete. Pajo hadn’t yet begun offering 24-hour technical support, so there was no one around in the wee hours to replace the full tapes with empty ones. Then came the last straw: the customer-database fiasco. Determined to have a more robust system, Guthrie purchased an Iomega Jaz drive for $300 at a computer superstore after spending time at Iomega’s booth at a trade show. It was bigger than his tape drive — up to one gigabyte (1,000MB) of data could be stored on a Jaz cartridge. And it was much faster. As he watched the Jaz drive back up the amount of data in 10 minutes that the Colorado drive had handled in two hours, Guthrie became an instant fan. But he realized too late that he’d made his decision too quickly. Business was still booming, and nightly backups were running about 650MB and climbing. He was now using one cartridge a day that cost $80 to $90 for storage. That meant Guthrie was paying more each week to store his data than he had spent on the drive itself. “Up until then I had always relied on our vendors for accurate technical advice,” says Patrick Guthrie. “I couldn’t do that anymore.” By early 1999, Pajo’s menu of services had expanded to include hosting Web sites, colocating Web servers (meaning that his customers’ servers actually resided at Pajo), and handling thousands of E-mail accounts and more than 150 T1-line customers. To support all the traffic, Pajo had a United Nations­like network that featured operating systems ranging from Windows NT to Linux to Unix and even to the Mac OS. If Pajo were ever to move beyond the Band-Aid approach to backup, the time had come. Guthrie started asking around for advice. The consensus, from Pajo vendors like Ingram Micro and Tech Data as well as some consultants, was that a digital audiotape (DAT) drive would be the way to go. A DAT drive can store up to 40GB of data on one tape, at a cost comparable to that of storing data on magnetic tapes — less than 10¢ per megabyte and half that for storing fully compressed data. However, compared with magnetic tapes, a DAT drive is less unwieldy to use for retrieving data. And although it’s not as fast as a Jaz drive, a DAT drive takes only about 40 seconds to locate a file. To run the DAT drive, Guthrie’s vendors suggested that he use Seagate Technology’s Backup Exec 7.2 software (it’s now a product of Veritas) — a far more sophisticated brand of backup software than he had used with the other drives. Guthrie wasn’t quite sold, but then his sanity-check Internet search for “backup software” turned up Seagate’s name repeatedly. So he purchased Seagate’s Backup Exec software in conjunction with Hewlett-Packard’s HP SureStore DAT24 drive, so named because it was capable of holding 24GB of data (again, in a perfectly compressed world). The price: $840 for the software and $1,251 for the drive. Guthrie installed the software as well as the DAT drive on a server running Windows NT. That was a snap, but configuring the software to back up data across a smorgasbord of operating systems wasn’t. To facilitate communication between Linux and the company’s other systems, Guthrie earlier had created shortcuts called “Samba shares.” For three days Guthrie tried to get the Backup Exec software to recognize the Samba shares, convinced that he had to be doing something wrong. Being a computer guy, he figured that if he couldn’t fix things himself, he was as good as doomed. “You’re S.O.L. once you call tech support,” he says. It certainly felt that way as he waded through Seagate’s voice-mail system. When he finally reached a technician on the third call, he explained his problem and was told he’d receive a callback. In the mean- time, he relied on the Jaz drive for backup. After two weeks had passed without a word from Seagate, he tried again. A manager assured him that he’d receive a call the next day. He did — and got some bad news: version 7.2 of Backup Exec didn’t include the right agents (technology used to accommodate different operating systems) to support any Linux shortcuts. But there was also some good news: the next version of the software would have the capability. (According to Stacey Ruscette, a spokesperson for Veritas, which purchased Seagate’s software division in May 1999, versions 7.3 and 8.0, released in June 1999 and February 2000 respectively, include the appropriate agent to support Linux.) Guthrie couldn’t wait, so he returned the software. “I kept the DAT drive,” he says, “but I was back to square one.” The experience showed him how little was commonly known about backup systems. “Up until then I had always relied on our vendors for accurate technical advice. I couldn’t do that anymore.” Guthrie instead turned to one of his young technicians, a recent college graduate with plenty of friends in other Internet companies. The technician made a few calls. He reported back to Guthrie that the highest praise for backup software capable of supporting a variety of operating systems went to Knox’s Arkeia, a product that was popular with Linux users. A few times Guthrie E-mailed Knox some questions that he was “looking for yeses to” — namely, whether the software would work with all Pajo’s operating systems (except the Mac OS), whether he could try the software risk free before buying, and whether he could get technical support 24/7. He also hoped to find a system that would allow him to start the backup from any machine, running any operating system, by means of an easy-to-navigate graphical user interface. He got his yeses. With the guarantee of a 30-day free trial, Guthrie’s young technician downloaded the Arkeia trial software from Knox’s Web site and installed it on Pajo’s Windows NT server that day — no snags, no glitches. “It was pretty sweet,” says Guthrie. Then, when he had to call Knox to clarify some settings, he got a bonus: he found himself on the phone with Sam Siegel, the company president. (As Knox was at that point only a six-person company, Siegel took his share of customer calls.) When he found out that Siegel had had a large hand in designing the software, Guthrie took great pleasure in grilling him about the product. Guthrie also got some free advice. When Siegel heard that Pajo was using a Windows NT server for primary backup, Siegel made a suggestion he’d made many times before to Linux users: why not speed up the process by running the backup from the Linux machine rather than from the Windows NT one? To Guthrie, the idea was a classic example of overlooking the obvious. “We were letting our primary operating system [Windows NT] dictate where we were going to do the backup from,” he says. Guthrie moved the DAT drive from the NT box to the Linux box. “It took longer to move the DAT drive from one computer to the next than it did to install the software. We had everything up and running within 20 minutes.” Not only did the system work perfectly, but Siegel’s claim that the backup would be 10 times faster using the Linux box was substantiated. Guthrie particularly liked the real-time graphic that monitored just how fast the backup was going. “We were all watching it, screaming, ‘Go, go, go!’ We’re men — we like to see meters,” he says. To date, the system has never failed. And it’s no problem to find that E-mail address that’s been lost in the abyss. With the DAT drive, an administrator just selects the file in question from Arkeia’s Explorer-like log, and a dialog box tells him which tape to insert into the drive to retrieve it. The process takes, at most, three minutes. Safety net Matthew Barrer calls his old method for backing up his company’s data “half-assed,” but his system is not as uncommon among small businesses as you might think. Barrer copied key files from one hard drive to another through his local area network before leaving for the night. In 1998, Barrer bought the five-year-old Philadelphia Enterpriser magazine, which is targeted at business owners and entrepreneurs in the metropolitan area. The following year he made his mark on the publication by instituting a few changes: he made the content truly regional in focus, since he knew he couldn’t compete with deep-pocketed national magazines, and he improved the company’s technology. His first upgrade was to implement GoldMine contact-management software. Instead of using Microsoft Access to house the subscriber database and boxes of note cards to keep track of advertisers, the company began operating off three GoldMine databases: one for the Enterpriser‘s 18,000 active subscribers, one for its advertisers, and one for Barrer’s own personal contacts. His second upgrade was to jury-rig that file-copying backup system to minimize the chance of losing files. But not having an official backup system gnawed at him. He didn’t want his company to become a statistic in some backup-system manufacturer’s brochure. “Reader data in the subscriber database is not something we can reconstruct easily,” he says. “Those demographics are what our advertising revenue depends on. I needed it to be secure.” Barrer started his search for a backup system as a relative novice. “I knew about tape drives,” he says, “but I didn’t know what else was out there at all.” To learn about his options, he began asking everyone he ran across about backup systems — both online and off. Barrer knew he wanted something that was not labor-intensive. And from what he was hearing, online systems virtually took care of themselves. No one would have to change the tapes and make sure the data were moved off-site. “I’d much prefer that the data be in some big data warehouse, where I’m the control point,” he says. “I don’t have a full MIS department; no one’s going to be able to do that for me.” Identifying vendors was as easy as launching his browser and searching for “online backup.” “I was looking for something that I could control and access with minimal effort, and that I could trust — it had to be encrypted and safe,” he says. He also wanted a solution that backed up any changes in his data on a daily basis. “I didn’t want to have to go back on more than a day’s activity,” he says. He ended up focusing on three Internet-based backup services that met his criteria: @Backup, Connected, and NovaStor. Using each company’s software, Barrer could connect to the Internet and automatically back up his company’s data. Further, the software allowed incremental backups to automatically launch at the same time every day (he could even choose the time) to ferret out the files that had changed in the past 24 hours. Barrer liked the sound of that — a workable day-to-day backup solution that would require little to no involvement from him. Now he just had to discover which one would best meet the Enterpriser‘s needs. With @Backup, for a $99 annual fee, users could back up as much as 100MB of data by means of a simple Internet connection. The company also offered a deal in which users could pay $300 a year to back up 500MB of data. Although both plans would have worked for Barrer personally, neither was good enough for his business. For the Enterpriser he wanted to make sure that he could restore everything, including applications and his Windows 98 operating system — 6.5GB of data — since he didn’t have an internal technical team to handle such a task. Besides, he didn’t much cotton to the idea of signing a long-term contract. Connected’s Online Backup and NovaStor’s NovaNet-Web (which is hosted by Compaq) both had the monthly, commitment-free pricing he liked — around $20 a month. Plus, they offered enough storage space for a systemwide backup. (In NovaStor’s case, if a company wants the initial backup to be done on-site, it must purchase a $200 NovaNet software package.) Price considerations alone would have made it easy to go with Connected, but Barrer was drawn to NovaStor’s connection with Compaq. Although both companies backed up clients’ data onto digital linear tape (DLT) at secure data facilities, NovaStor used a Compaq-owned data center whereas Connected had its own. (DLT drives start at twice the price of DAT drives, and their smallest capacity is 40GB — which is the largest capacity for DAT drives.) Moreover, Compaq was actually the provider to whom Barrer would be paying his monthly NovaStor bill; it offered backup service with NovaStor’s software through its Web site. “If it was good enough for Compaq,” Barrer says, “it sure as heck was good enough for me.” “If NovaStor backup was good enough for Compaq,” Matthew Barrer says, “it sure as heck was good enough for me.” The decision made, Barrer turned to an expert for the follow-through. InfoQuest, a NovaStor value-added reseller also located in Pennsylvania, installed NovaStor’s NovaNet 7 onto the Enterpriser‘s Windows NT and oversaw the initial backup, which involved 6.5GB worth of applications and operating systems on two tapes. Two copies of the information were made. One was transferred off-site to the Compaq data bank, and the other resides at InfoQuest, where it’s available for easy retrieval in case of a full-blown disaster. The rest of the Enterpriser‘s data — financial files, business correspondence, the GoldMine databases — were backed up by InfoQuest using NovaNet-Web, NovaStor’s online backup software. All Barrer had to do was install his own CD-ROM of software on the Enterpriser‘s server. Although he did call NovaNet’s customer-service reps to guide him, he was able, with virtually no problems, to use the software’s wizard to answer a series of questions that automatically set up the schedule of when he wanted his data backed up. “It passed my software test,” he said. “I was able to install it without looking at a manual.” Now, every night when the clock strikes 12, NovaNet-Web scans Barrer’s computers for changes and performs backups of any changed files. The whole process takes about 10 minutes. NovaNet-Web also backs up Barrer’s laptop nightly. “If I’m online at that late hour, I’ll get a message saying, ‘Do you want to back up now?” says Barrer. “And if I miss it, I can just back up the next time I connect to the Internet.” Barrer couldn’t be more pleased. Not only does he have a backup system that operates without human intervention, but he also has a system that works. In one case Barrer used NovaStor to restore his 45MB database of contacts, which, according to NovaStor, had been corrupted when something malfunctioned. Although the parties don’t agree on how the data were lost or whose fault it was, Barrer doesn’t particularly care. He just made sure he got a restored file, because into the void had gone the one record he’d never dare to delete: his mother’s. Mie-Yun Lee is the editorial director and founder of BuyerZone, an Internet buying service that features expert purchasing advice and tools for small and midsize businesses. You can conduct your own search for an online backup system at www.buyerzone.com/computers/backup-remote/index.html. Sandra Boncek contributed to this article. Please e-mail your comments to editors@inc.com.

Can I use microwave technology to connect two offices?

An inc.com user asks:I need to network offices located three and ten miles apart. Can I connect them via microwave? Information Technology mentor Glenn Weadock responds:Yes. The good news is that you have many products from which to choose. That’s also the bad news, in that choosing one isn’t always easy. I suggest that you consider microwave and another technology called Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum (DSSS) in the context of other, more traditional options, some of which I discuss here. You will find a fairly linear relationship between data throughput capability and cost, so you can decide how much speed your business can justify buying. Microwave technology is worth considering, in my opinion, if you require high-speed connections and you have a bunch of money in the bank. Such systems need a line of sight between buildings or a satellite link. You can achieve data throughput rates of 10 Mbps, 20 Mbps, and higher, over a range up to 10 miles (or more with satellite support). However, you will need FCC licenses if you choose this technology. Pinnacle Communications and Digital Microwave are two examples of vendors of microwave systems. DSSS, another wireless option, is a radio technology that offers data throughput in the range of 1.5 Mbps over a three- to five-mile range, although you can stretch the range to ten miles or so with amplification equipment. Wave Wireless’s SpeedLAN is an example of this type of system. DSSS is typically less expensive than microwave, and it uses an unlicensed part of the radio spectrum so you don’t need government approval to use it. Microwave and DSSS are both cool technologies, but don’t forget more traditional options, especially if line-of-sight problems or budget constraints place wireless networking out of reach. A T1 line is a digital link that uses two pairs of wires, can handle data, video, and voice, and runs at speeds up to around 1.5 Mbps. (If you can tolerate slower speeds, you can look at a “fractional T1,” which is proportionally slower and less expensive.) For slower leased-line connections that are still faster than analog ones, DSL and ISDN lines can represent a cost-effective solution, with many businesses today favoring DSL. The traditional analog leased line is a fixed point-to-point conditioned phone line between offices. Dial-up links using unconditioned POTS (Plain Old Telephone System) lines are definitely the least expensive connections, but they suffer from fairly severe speed limitations. Today’s 56K modems often connect at speeds of 33 kbps to 45 kbps, but you can use a bank of several modems to create multilink connections that go faster. In closing, I should mention that you don’t have to have private, dedicated links between your offices to network them. You can create a private network inside the public Internet. If you already use an Internet service provider, you can use those connections to create a secure “tunnel” of communication that serves your company. Such links constitute a “virtual private network,” or VPN. You can set up a VPN with readily available software, such as Windows NT or Windows 2000. Network communications over a VPN are encrypted so that other Internet surfers can’t see your VPN traffic. Copyright © 2000 inc.com

When Something Clicks

Editor’s introduction: Sometimes it seems as if the Web has turned the world upside down. In the hype-ridden landscape called “dot-com,” it’s easy to assume that only the young, the new, the original idea conceived by two kids in their basement will survive. Out with the old. How untrue that is. The two companies profiled here, Plural in ” The Metamorphosis” and Camera World in “When Something Clicks,” are hardly start-ups. Their leaders have been running steady, profitable companies for years. They’re taking those years of experience managing entrepreneurial brick-and-mortar companies and using every ounce of their knowledge to transform their businesses into winners in the online world. CEO Roy Wetterstrom, never a guy to fear change, is rebirthing his 11-year-old company to take great advantage of the new economy. And Camera World has built on its 22 years of experience fulfilling customers’ expectations to transform itself into an E-commerce business. BRAVE NEW COMPANIES Over 22 years Camera World Co. honed its expertise in fulfillment, customer service, and supplier relationships. Today, as Cameraworld.com, it can teach Internet start-ups a thing or two about what matters most It’s a sodden, gray pre-Christmas workday in Portland, Oreg., but the jeans-sporting photographers who handle incoming calls at Camera World Co. (a.k.a. Cameraworld.com) are oblivious to the weather. Sitting in their white cubicles, they dispel the clouds with their cheerful “Thanks for calling Cameraworld- dot-com!” They repeat order information and occasionally murmur soothing guidance to Ansel Adams wanna-bes on the other end of the line, who need to know things like the difference between the Hasselblad 203FE Medium Format Chrome single-lens reflex camera and the 202FA model. In the 20,000-square-foot warehouse behind the front office, 15 workers scurry down long concrete aisles, clutching sales orders fresh off the network printer. To the casual observer, these warehouse folk seem to have X-ray eyes. Quickly scanning the metal racks loaded with thousands of indistinguishable-looking boxes of equipment, they have an uncanny ability to tell a box holding a $10,000 lens from a virtually identical package bearing a $1,000 one. When they locate the box they’re after, they place it in a plastic tub; a bar-code check at the packing station ensures that the order is complete. There, a young man nodding to rock music on a boom box pours Styrofoam peanuts into labeled cardboard shipping boxes and then seals the goods with a deft pull and twist of tape. Camera World’s order-fulfillment and delivery systems have stood the company in good stead. During the 1999 holiday season many of the company’s stalwart 300,000 customers came back and spent an average of $600 a pop. And thanks largely to the explosion of interest in digital cameras, sales soared last year, growing from $80 million in 1998 to more than $115 million. Last December the company’s Web site handled an average of 25,000 unique users a day, and Web sales rose by 245% over the previous year’s figure for the month. (At the same time mail-order business shot up 67%, and sales at the company’s downtown Portland store were up 22%.) Some 90% of Web and mail-order shipments left the warehouse within 24 hours. Return rates for Web sales hovered around 4%, paralleling the rate of returns from the store and the mail-order business. “We maintained heavy inventories to ship on time, and it all worked pretty well,” says Camera World’s new CEO, Terry Strom. “But one thing’s for sure: the Internet is raising the standard of performance for any retailer.” No kidding. This past Christmas season, during which shoppers spent an estimated $6 billion online, saw many a Web site disappointing customers. According to a November 1999 report by the New York City Internet research firm Jupiter Communications, 46% of business-to-consumer Web sites took five or more days to respond to a query, never responded, or failed to post an E-mail address on the site for customers’ inquiries. “If we didn’t make our goals,” says Walt Mulvey, “we couldn’t make payroll.” “An awful lot of Web sites don’t realize that customer service should be a priority,” says Jupiter analyst Cormac Foster. “They focus on customer acquisition but don’t spend time on the unsexy stuff, like customer-support infrastructure. Infrastructure doesn’t get you headlines, but if you don’t have a staff of people to take care of business behind the firewall, you won’t get much.” Case in point: Toys “R” Us, whose online subsidiary ToysRUs.com (announced with great fanfare in June 1998) found itself suffocating under the rush of online holiday traffic and was unable to fulfill orders on time. The company’s back-end infrastructure was built to send truckloads of products to hundreds of stores — not to ship single orders to millions of consumers. Don’t call Camera World a “click-and-mortar” or an old-fashioned retailer with a Johnny-come-lately Web site. Call it, rather, a dot-com with lots of back-end “not-com” experience. Camera World has long known that the boring stuff — attention to the fine details of customer service, simple and solid fulfillment processes, and trusted supplier relationships — is what really matters. Unless you master those three areas well before you put up a Web site, no amount of bells and whistles or transactional and design prowess online will make the Web component of your business successful. To understand how Cameraworld.com operates, view the company through a wide-angle lens. Founded in 1977 by a Korean-born businessman, Jack Shin, Camera World began as a 4,000-square-foot mom-and-pop shop for shutterbugs in a musty downtown area of Oregon’s sprawling, river-straddling city. Shin had come to Portland by way of New Jersey, where for about two years he’d owned a camera store that catered to well-heeled amateur photographers with National Geographic daydreams. From the moment he began his business until the day he said good-bye to Camera World in 1997, Shin refused to sell the cheap “gray market” goods that many dealers were hawking at the time — a practice that stood him in excellent stead with his suppliers. ( Gray market refers to goods that are not meant to be sold in the United States and generally are not covered by warranties.) Building on the relationships he’d established in New Jersey, Shin developed close contacts with executives from Fuji, Canon, Nikon, and the other rulers of the photo world. Ultimately, he constructed an intimate universe comprising 15 primary suppliers. “The gray market is a big problem for the industry,” says Eliott Peck, director and general manager of the camera division of Canon USA. “Canon has had an excellent relationship with Camera World because the company adds value to our products. It’s always provided the best customer support, sold only fresh merchandise, stocked all our products, and had very loyal repeat customers.” On a scale of 1 to 10 among camera dealers, Peck adds, “I’ve always given them a 10.” In return, the manufacturers saw to it that Shin was first in line to receive new or on-order stock. The Internet is raising the standard for retailers. Shortly after opening the retail store, Shin added a mail-order component to the business. “Mail order was easy — we didn’t have to speak much English,” explains Young Ui Shin, who acted as her husband’s business partner and interpreter. The Shins and Young Ui’s brother ran the mail-order business in a space five floors above Camera World’s street-level retail store, which also doubled as a warehouse. Their goal was for customers to receive their merchandise within five days of placing their order, compared with the standard mail-order lag of three to six weeks. Within 10 years the company was earning close to 70% of its revenues from the distant customers it reached through back-of-the-book advertisements in magazines like Popular Photography. On the back end, Shin put together a supersimple order-fulfillment and shipping infrastructure that the company still uses today. Prior to computerization, sales staffers would write a phone order on paper, then send along a copy to the warehouse for picking, packing, and shipping. Working with those paper “pick tickets,” warehouse workers would pull the cameras and lenses (and occasionally camcorders and televisions, which Camera World also sold) from the shelves and place them in plastic tubs. Before the items were packed, other workers checked to make sure that the products matched the order, recorded the product serial numbers, and filled out a receipt. Then shippers packed the items and loaded the boxes onto a waiting UPS truck, which carted off the packages every afternoon. If an item was out of stock, the warehouse workers would pass the information along to the sales reps, who would find out from Shin when the shelves would be replenished, so they could tell the customer when to expect the order. Returns were handled similarly: When a customer called, a sales staffer issued a return number and ordered a UPS pickup at the customer site. When the product came in, the return number was recorded; if the package had been opened, the product was sold at discount, since it could not be returned to the manufacturer or sold as new. The paper-based system stayed in place until 1992, when Shin discovered that a networked computer system could increase efficiency. He purchased a set of Compaq 386 computers, one of which was installed in the warehouse area, and a Platinum database-management system for which he had a consultant design a unique order-fulfillment, inventory, and shipping program. Using the new system, salespeople keyed in orders on PCs at their desks. Hourly, a warehouse worker would download and print out a batch of orders for picking and packing. The computerized system allowed Camera World’s sales reps to maintain an easy-to-access record of customer purchases; it also allowed Shin to keep better track of inventory and to speed up deliveries. The Shins’ five-day shipping goal had become a consistent reality. Shortly thereafter, Shin added a bar-coding system. By passing a wand over the various products prior to packing them up, workers were able to match orders in the database to actual shipments, and the inventory manager was able to see which models had gone out the door. From the get-go, Shin went the extra mile for his customers, retail and mail-order alike. He staffed the phones with a sales force of professional photographers (or photographers with day jobs), who could guide callers through the technical complexities of camera selection. If customers weren’t happy with their purchases, they could return them for a full refund, no questions asked. In one instance, a company selling five-year extended warranties on Camera World’s equipment went belly-up. Though Shin was under no obligation to do so, he set up a fund to cover the cost of repairs for the customers who were left hanging. “We make customers very happy, and they remember we give service, service, service. Repeat customers big part of our business,” Shin recalls in emphatic, if stilted, English. “We never cheat. If customers happy with service, they trust us.” “We had to completely change the mentality of the organization,” says Mulvey. In the early 1990s, despite Camera World’s computerization, a confluence of external and internal problems began to slow the company’s growth. The market for the high-quality 35mm single-lens reflex (SLR) cameras in which the company specialized had flattened by the late 1980s and stayed that way, thanks to a saturated market and a recession. Until digital cameras appeared on the scene, in 1998, the market for SLRs never moved substantially beyond the 700,000-units-per-annum mark. By 1999, according the Boston-based market-research firm Lyra Research Inc., the number of 35mm SLRs sold in the United States had actually declined to 600,000. Shin’s management style also kept Camera World from rising off that plateau. His operations gave new meaning to the phrase lean and mean. He selected office supplies, shipping companies, telephone services, and other necessities on the basis of low price, and replaced equipment only when it fell apart. The company had long outgrown its warehouse, but Shin balked at moving from the low-rent building. “Mr. Shin ruled with an iron fist,” says the company’s longtime buyer, Shawn Weishaar. From a glassed-in loft perched above the retail store, Shin would keep a sharp, Big Brother­like eye on his workers’ activities. Employees did stay — they were well paid by Portland standards — but because promotions were few and far between, their motivation waned as the years passed. “Mr. Shin had great insight, but he didn’t allow mistakes,” says Weishaar. “He wanted full control over everything.” In 1996, frustrated by flat sales and worn out by the demands of the business (according to company veterans, Shin never took a day off in all his years at Camera World), Shin decided to sell. He hired a retail-management veteran, Walt Mulvey, to help ready the company for sale. A former banker who’d had experience in helping stagnant companies improve their operations, Mulvey saw a profitable company with a good reputation — but one with cramped quarters and lackluster employees. Mulvey reorganized, setting up an incentive program and a “no-blame” management system that allowed workers to air problems openly. Within a year, sales had climbed 31%, and Mulvey helped Shin put out the word that the company was for sale. Word of the sale reached Alessandro Mina. A gentle native of Sweden who’d lived in Italy, Switzerland, and France, the multilingual entrepreneur came to the United States in 1989, at the age of 27. While working on his M.B.A. at Stanford, he embarked on an investment project with two fellow European students. In 1993 the trio founded Sverica International, an investment fund designed to help transform old-fashioned companies into aggressive-growth companies and often into Web-based businesses, and rounded up contributors. Camera World “fit all our criteria,” Mina recalls. “It was profitable. Sales were stagnant, but there was growth opportunity. The owner was retiring, and there was a successful mail-order business in place. It had a huge database of happy customers who came to Camera World in the same way people go to Amazon.com for books or Dell Computer for computers — they go there pretty much knowing what they want. I held the view that Internet and mail-order sales are basically the same that way, so I thought it had all the ingredients for a great Web business.” Another plus: Camera World had a sound infrastructure; there was no need to develop one from scratch. The company had already figured out how to take in orders, process them, and ship them out. Moreover, Shin had long-established relationships with top-tier suppliers and innovative systems in place to provide customer service. The company even had a Web site, though visitors couldn’t use it to buy products. And unlike any pure-play dot-com, Camera World had the unheard-of pedigree of profitability. “We saw this terrific sleeper and thought we could turn it into a full-fledged Net business,” Mina recalls. Mina and his colleagues bought Camera World Co. and named the online arm Cameraworld.com. Temporarily taking over the reins as CEO, Mina — along with Mulvey, who stayed on as chief operating officer — set about morphing the company from a primarily mail-order business into a primarily online business, knowing that companies like Dell (which had gone from no revenues to $26 billion in 15 short years) had followed the same path. As Mina had predicted, the path was clear of the thorny issues that trip up novices. The niche was already nailed: unlike pure dot-commers, he didn’t have to spend time and money on brand development, market research, and focus groups. Mina and company preserved and expanded the long-standing relationships with suppliers and customers that Shin had built. “We made it a point to visit every supplier personally, take them out to dinner, and assure them that the business would continue,” Mina says. “Walt and Alessandro had a vision,” says Canon’s Peck. “At first we had some doubts about their ability to take over the business and move it to the Net, but they were able to build on the infrastructure to handle it.” The nitty-gritty back end has come to matter enormously to investors. In forging a new business plan for the company, Mina spelled out his goals. For starters, the company’s Web pages would have to be transformed from simple brochureware into a true transaction site. And its back-end systems would have to be married to whatever happened on the Web. The company itself would have to move into a larger, better-organized space, with a warehouse that would allow orders to be shipped within 24 hours, as opposed to the five days required by the mail-order business. “We wanted to one-up everyone else,” Mina says. “To speed everything up, we had to cut out obstacles. We needed to staff up, to fix the bugs in the computer systems, to upgrade the telephone systems for more lines. In the past Mr. Shin had to check everything. Things were duplicated. We decided to streamline processes and empower people.” The toughest challenge was time. Mina wanted Cameraworld.com to become the leading online vendor of cameras — before a competitor could. “We had to completely change the mentality of the organization, from collect-a-paycheck mode to survival mode,” says Mulvey. “We ran the company on two urgent premises: We assumed that there was a competitor out there who would beat us to market with the biggest Web site in the world. And we told ourselves that if we didn’t make our goals, we couldn’t make payroll.” Camera World moved to a less expensive location in Portland four times the size of its former quarters. Though the order-fulfillment process remained the same, Mina and Mulvey reorganized the warehouse to speed up shipping. Frequently ordered products, like film, were kept closest to the packing and shipping stations, while rarely ordered equipment was kept in the back. The company added inventory and packing stations; instead of one packing station, for example, it now had four. And it upped the number of PCs in the warehouse from one to five. The move, Mina estimates, saved the company $7,000 a month in rent and about $4,000 in reduced manpower requirements in the shipping, receiving, and returns departments. (The displaced employees were reassigned elsewhere in the company.) “Because the warehouse was larger and better organized, we made more shipments on time with fewer errors,” he says. To turn the existing, 300-visitor-a-day Web site into an E-commerce factory, Camera World hired the company that had designed its original Web site, Web Northwest. With just six months in which to transform the site, Web Northwest owner Pete Chiboucas teamed up with a Camera World veteran, Internet administrator Gil Rocha, and together the pair hand-coded the pages as Active Server Pages to create a visually appealing, highly interactive site. Visitors could click on an image of a camera, a lens, or another product and order it using a shopping cart. The Webmeisters also cranked up the fire under the site, spending $20,000 to install a network of six high-powered Windows NT-based servers that could handle thousands of concurrent users at a time. Today Camera World’s site, which costs roughly $10,000 a month to maintain, handles at least 15,000 unique visitors and 400 transactions a day. It’s now a full-fledged community for shutterbugs. It keeps visitors interested with increasingly snazzy features — 3-D images of featured products, an online auction area, forums, online chats with celebrated photographers, a selection “wizard” that helps customers choose the right camera by assessing their expertise and frequency of use, and so on. Customers can also get quick answers to their E-mailed questions. Professional photographers respond to them by E-mail or phone — and customers even receive a notice via E-mail showing them where their question is in the queue. (“We try to get back to them within 24 hours,” says Rocha.) And for those who eschew telephone handsets, an Internet-telephony feature lets customers whose computers are equipped with a sound card and a microphone connect over the Internet to talk with the sales and support staff. When a customer orders a camera through the Web site, the transaction is zapped from the servers to the order-fulfillment database via a dedicated high-speed T1 line. A software interface between the Web site and the database reads the order and translates it into the order-entry system. Sales reps, customer-support personnel, and shippers and other warehouse workers can review the order by tapping into Camera World’s database from PCs. Every few hours, warehouse personnel print out a batch of 50 or so orders. Rush orders are printed on red paper; white paper signifies a standard UPS ground order. After a worker locates the correct product and places it in a plastic tub along with the paper order, he carts it to the shipping station, where the bar-code checking occurs. If the bar code doesn’t match the order, a computer screen at the station notes the mismatch. If the match is correct, the inventory database records the product model number; when inventory reaches a low-enough level, Camera World reorders. Once the product is packaged for shipping, it’s loaded onto a waiting UPS van, which departs at the end of the day. Meanwhile, an E-mail message is sent to the customer, noting the time the package is scheduled to ship. Using a confirmation number supplied by the company, the customer can check the Web site to track the order. Picking and shipping, of course, are hardly sexy stuff. But in the crazed world of cyberspace, the nitty-gritty back end has come to matter enormously — especially to prospective investors. “Back in 1996, when I was looking at Camera World, the guiding principle for Internet start-ups — according to venture capitalists — was to start from scratch with the model based on the new paradigm, and everything traditional was bad,” Mina recalls. “Early on, VCs were not interested in us because we had a history. But now infrastructure, customer service, and the ability to ship on time with inventory on hand are all key elements when the VCs come knocking.” So far, Camera World is keeping customers happy. “The consensus is that there are a few retailers out there that have a great reputation and that Camera World is among the few,” says Richard Rabinowitz, vice-president and group publisher of Popular Photography and American Photo. One of the happiest customers is Aneel Bhusri, who — like Victor Kiam of the old Remington razor commercials — liked the company so much that he bought (into) it. Bhusri is a partner with Greylock, based in Palo Alto, Calif., one of the six venture-capital firms that have just poured $60 million into Cameraworld.com. (The other major investor is Technology Crossover Ventures, also of Palo Alto.) Bhusri also happens to be an amateur wildlife photographer and a repeat customer. “I bought my first camera from them four years ago, and their staff were very helpful in explaining the pros and cons of the different models,” he says. “I found it unique that their customer-service people were trained professionals.” Last summer, when Greylock was looking for a photography Web portal to back while casting an eye at a future initial public offering, Bhusri remembered Camera World. “I gave Alessandro a cold call,” he recalls. “I said, ‘I’ve been a customer for a while. Are you interested in outside capital to help the business?” The infusion from Greylock was welcome. The cash, the executives say, will allow the company to move to an even larger physical site this year, add more products to the 7,000 items it currently offers, hire 20 more sales and support people, and keep the computer system shipshape. The marketing mix will remain roughly the same as it has been for years — mailing out catalogs and advertising in photography publications, on the radio, on television, on the Web, and on outdoor billboards — “but it will scale up,” says vice-president of marketing Tom Steele. The venture funding also frees Mina, the serial entrepreneur, to hatch another company. “Alessandro did a fantastic job of running the company, but his goal was never to run Camera World for the rest of his life,” says Bhusri. “So he helped us look for a new CEO.” Bhusri and Mina chose a man who had lots of experience with fast-growth and Internet companies: Terry Strom, who had been the CEO of Egghead Software and the marketing vice-president for Digital River Inc., a Minnesota service provider for E-commerce sites. (Bhusri is now chairman of the board, and Mulvey has moved to the president’s office.) Mina, now living in Boston, is glad to let others grow the company. “Aneel, Terry, and Walt can take the company from an Internet start-up to an established E-commerce player,” he says. “I can go back to what I do best — finding good companies to invest in.” For his part, Bhusri is thrilled to be the rudder of a company that, as he says, “gets it.” “If you look at what makes a Web site successful, most of it is logistics,” he says. “Camera World had this figured out a long time ago. Why don’t others? I honestly don’t know the answer. These guys are rare. I think they can be the Dell of the camera business.” Bronwyn Fryer is a contributing writer for Inc. Technology. Read about another Brave New Company in ” The Metamorphosis“