Tag Archives: Israel

Magisto Automatically Edits Your Video Footage

0 magisto

If you’ve ever wanted to edit video that you’ve shot but either haven’t had the time or the ability to do it, there’s a fun new automated service that just launched. Magisto is an Israel-based start-up that will take your unedited footage, run it through its sophisticated computer vision technology to pick out the best scenes, stabilize your images, remove excess “noise” and add smart effects and transitions that interact with the content in the video. READ MORE »

Dome9 is Latest Company Moving Toward Cloud Security

cloud security

Last week we heard about a new bill coming through the Senate now that, if passed, could carry hefty fines for any company that loses online data. Luckily, security companies like Dome9 keep popping up, looking to make your cloud doesn’t burst. READ MORE »

TechCrunch’s Disrupt Battlefield: Entertain Us

tcdisrupt_sf11-7-7-1

From Monday to Wednesday in San Francisco, TechCrunch’s latest Disrupt Start-up Battlefield competition will showcase entrepreneurs from 30 start-ups vying for a $50,000 prize by making six-minute-long pitches to a rotating panel of venture capitalists, tech influencers, angel investors and Silicon Valley players. Monday featured three sessions of Start-up Battlefield, titled Disrupting Traditional Markets, Moving the Web Forward and Entertain Us; here are the start-ups presented in session three: Entertain Us. READ MORE »

Have Tech, Won’t Travel

Special Report: Tools that will let you stay grounded Alex Stanton would have swum across the Atlantic to woo that special prospective client in the United Kingdom. Ultimately, he only had to go downstairs. Stanton, CEO of Stanton Crenshaw Communications, in New York City, passionately wanted a contract to represent a certain European telecommunications company. He and his team planned to fly to London in mid-September to pitch their proposal in person. But then came September 11, when terrorist hijackings grounded all U.S. air travel for three days and delayed many overseas flights for several days longer. With the Twin Towers wreckage billowing smoke just a few miles away, Stanton asked his prospective clients to postpone the meeting. They politely declined. They wanted to pick their public-relations firm that week to get an overdue marketing campaign off the ground. In seeking options, Stanton didn’t have to look far. He dropped in on ICE Inc., a marketing-communications company located two floors below his office, on the hunch that the company might have videoconferencing equipment. In the spirit of post-attack camaraderie, Stanton’s neighbors offered to let him borrow their boardroom, their equipment, and a technician. Thrilled, Stanton called London. Fortunately, the prospective client had a compatible setup, and its executives were perfectly happy to meet virtually. So, at the appointed time, Stanton’s team went downstairs, faced the cameras, and put on a one-hour show for a five-person audience across the pond. “We did a couple of rehearsals,” Stanton says. “We found you have to stage it a little more than you might in person. You have to decide who’s going to talk when, and you can’t interrupt as much.” While the transatlantic sound was fine, the video occasionally jerked or froze. And the presentation didn’t feel quite natural. The executives in London faced a fixed camera, which never moved even when they did, and occasionally someone would shift out of view, forcing the presenters to address a disembodied voice. “You’re sort of at the end of a tunnel,” Stanton says. “It’s hard to see how people are reacting to your ideas.” Despite the drawbacks, Stanton’s team members felt they’d made their case, even after the telecom company awarded the contract to a competitor (which, coincidentally, was another New York City PR agency forced by circumstances to pitch by videoconference). “We didn’t win, but at least we were on equal footing,” Stanton says. Like Stanton’s company, many small and midsize businesses have built their reputation on traveling to meet far-flung colleagues, customers, partners, and prospects. And like Stanton, who’s now considering a blend of videoconferencing and personal visits, many CEOs are now reexamining the assumption that being in business means being on the road. The most urgent soul-searching, of course, stems directly from the September 11 attacks. And the November 12 crash of an American Airlines plane in Queens, N.Y., did little to allay the fears of an already leery traveling public. But even before those events, the slumping economy prompted many companies to curb their travel expenses. In April 2001 the National Business Travel Association, a trade group based in Alexandria, Va., polled 200 companies of all sizes and found that 33% were using or considering collaboration technologies, primarily videoconferencing, to eliminate costly trips. Five months later, following the suicide jet crashes, nearly 90% of those polled said they’d now consider high-tech options to travel. It’s too early to say if increased scrutiny of business travel represents a true change in thinking, a permanent shift away from our economy’s air dependency. Right now many CEOs seem to be in wait-and-see mode: Wait and see what happens in the U.S.-led “war on terrorism.” Wait and see whether there are more hijackings, air disasters, or other threats at home. Wait and see whether the economy starts to rebound. But it’s safe to draw a few conclusions. First, for both financial and security-related reasons, many CEOs are developing restrictive new travel policies. In addition, many companies are experimenting with high-tech options that let them do their jobs closer to home. Some are already finding those alternatives surprisingly attractive compared with long-distance business trips with all their expense, time investment, and hassles. ON SOLID GROUND: Alex Stanton, CEO of Stanton Crenshaw Communications, needed to make his pitch without getting on a plane. Ultimately, though, nobody expects to eliminate the need for business travel. As Daniel P. Brogan, president and CEO of the San Diego architecture firm Earl Walls Associates, puts it: “I see this as an opportunity to rethink the way we do business. But we’re never going to get away from traveling. Our business is still very much hands-on.” When it comes to substituting technology for travel, options range from the almost-free to those requiring another line on next year’s budget. On the low end: making better use of existing equipment, an approach as simple as spending more time on conference calls. On the high end: renting a television studio for a satellite broadcast or even investing in an in-house, state-of-the-art videoconferencing studio. In between: options like Web-based conferencing and broadcasting, setting up virtual private networks, using peer-to-peer technology, and — especially in an era of germ-tainted mail — increasing use of E-mail, fax, and instant messaging. (See “The Next Best Thing to Being There,” below.) Obviously, picking the right option depends on what the company needs to accomplish and what barriers it must overcome to get there. The following are several common postattack headaches and the technology prescription for relieving them: Your former “road warriors” are skittish about taking to the skies. Earl Walls Associates specializes in designing scientific laboratories. Thanks to that narrow niche market, the company serves clients all over the world. But in recent months “I’ve definitely told people not to travel if they don’t have to,” says CEO Brogan. Instead, the company increasingly runs client meetings from two rented videoconferencing facilities located close to its office. Even at $1,000 a day, videoconferencing is cheaper than sending a team in person, especially when you figure in the loss of productivity on travel days. Of course, architects must sometimes meet face-to-face with clients to review plans, but Brogan is now trying to do as much virtual up-front and follow-up work as possible. He’s even earmarked $25,000 this year for an in-house videoconferencing studio. But just as you can’t call somebody who doesn’t have a telephone, you can’t videoconference with somebody who doesn’t have a compatible setup. So before he actually spends a dime, Brogan is polling the company’s clients to find out whether they’ve got equipment — or at least access to it — on their end. On September 11, employees at Whale Communications Ltd., a network-security company with offices in Fort Lee, N.J., just across the Hudson River from Manhattan, watched the World Trade Center towers burn and collapse after being hit by hijacked jets. Not surprisingly, many Whale employees didn’t want to fly after that. CEO Elad Baron, who grew up amid the threat of terrorism in his native Israel, couldn’t blame them; he immediately declared all air travel optional. Fortunately, Whale had started scrutinizing its travel costs earlier in 2001, when many of the company’s 60 employees were spending up to 75% of their time traveling to visit clients across the United States or in the company’s research-and-development facility in Israel. “Even before September 11, we figured out that was not very efficient, so we really began cutting back,” Baron says. So he invested $38,000 in Web-conferencing and videoconferencing hardware, software, and services. By September, he’d cut travel time for most employees to just 20% to 25% of their total hours. Because of the savings on travel expenditures, he expects to recoup his investment early this year. However, some employees’ jobs still require travel. If they’re afraid to board a plane, Baron expects them to make other arrangements. In the most extreme case, a sales rep who’d previously flown nationwide started driving everywhere instead. His longest trek: from New Jersey to Charlotte, N.C. — about 1,300 miles round-trip. Because the rep traveled on weekends, he lost no work time — and got no objections from the boss. “I don’t mind, as long as the customer gets served,” Baron says. Your chief ambassador wants to stay home. In many companies, there’s one person — sometimes the CEO, sometimes another executive — who has long served as the public face of the business. But now the ambassador wants to spend less time, or no time, in the air. That’s the case at Phenix & Phenix Literary Publicists Inc., an 11-person agency based in Austin, far from the nation’s major news and publishing centers. A year ago, CEO Leann Phenix created the position of national media director, a job requiring frequent coast-to-coast travel to attend book-launch events, meet with the media, and speak at writers’ conferences. Staff publicist Marika Flatt was promoted into the new job and at first rather enjoyed all those cross-country flights. But Flatt, the mother of a 14-month-old daughter, hasn’t been on a plane since the terrorist attacks. A NEW ATTITUDE: “I see this as an opportunity to rethink the way we do business,” says Daniel P. Brogan. “But we’re never going to get away from traveling. Our business is still very much hands-on.” Like other companies, Phenix & Phenix has considered videoconferencing and other high-tech options. But because Flatt is the only employee who needs to travel extensively, the business’s executives have decided that such an investment wouldn’t make sense for the company — at least so far. Instead, Flatt is building and maintaining some other long-term relationships: with the telephone and the computer. “If there’s a writer I haven’t been introduced to yet, I’ll send an E-mail and say, ‘Can I call you at such-and-such a time?” she says. “It’s obviously not as good as meeting face-to-face.” But that’s how things will have to be, she says, “until things simmer down a little bit and we build our confidence back up in the airlines.” Meanwhile, will staying close to home hurt business? “Definitely,” Flatt says, sighing. “Definitely.” You need to do hands-on work with faraway partners, but you don’t necessarily need to see them. Network Orange Inc., in Boca Raton, Fla., which manufactures and sells network-testing and -control equipment, serves customers all over the United States. These days president Mike Vislocky has been concerned about sending employees across the country to touch base with customers. “It’s not just a fear of flying,” he says. “It’s the prospect of being stranded away from home.” So Network Orange invested in a Web-conferencing software called WebDemo, which lets the Florida team have virtual visits with customers. The product allows a meeting’s participants to view a PowerPoint presentation or edit a document together, screen by screen, in real time over the Internet. Meanwhile, they’re on a conference call, discussing what they’re seeing. Overall, “it’s not bad,” says Vislocky. “You can take breaks; you can put your phone on mute and just listen until it’s time for you to say something. I have a portable phone, so I can even walk around until I need to come back to the screen.” Vislocky hasn’t used videoconferencing and says he probably won’t. “None of the stuff we do benefits from being able to see other people.” You don’t travel much, but your clients do. Royce Carlton Inc., a New York City-based speakers’ agency, represents about 50 famous clients. Among them: Anna Quindlen, the former New York Times columnist turned best-selling novelist. Agency CEO Carlton Sedgeley had booked Quindlen to speak at a Houston fund-raiser in late September. But after the attacks, Quindlen, who lives in Manhattan, refused to get on a plane. So Sedgeley arranged for her to speak by videoconference, a solution he calls less than ideal. “It’s second-best,” he says. “It’s just not as satisfying as someone being there. You don’t get to press the flesh. You don’t get the book signing.” On the other hand, for an investment of about $350, the show went on, and Sedgeley collected his fee, albeit a reduced one. BUSINESS AS USUAL: Rob DeRocker of Development Counsellors International has flown 16 times since September 11. Sedgeley has been using travel-obviating technology since well before September 11. In November 2000, he helped political analyst Jeff Greenfield give a virtual talk using technology far more sophisticated than videoconferencing. Greenfield was scheduled to address a group in Palm Springs, Calif., but when the U.S. presidential race stayed too close to call for weeks, Greenfield couldn’t leave Florida, where officials were recounting the ballots by hand. Instead, he addressed the California crowd via satellite from a TV studio in Palm Beach, Fla. The satellite link provided a much higher quality transmission than even the best videoconferencing and, not surprisingly, bore a price tag to match: about $4,000 for that particular venture, Sedgeley says. In the weeks following the attacks, he arranged appearances broadcast by satellite or videoconference for several other speakers. You must travel, period. For some companies, no technology alternative can replace being there. As Andrew Zacharakis, professor of entrepreneurship at Babson College, in Wellesley, Mass., puts it: “If you have some hot sales prospects and you need that face-to-face contact, I would say you have to get on the plane.” Rob DeRocker did just that shortly after the attacks. DeRocker is executive vice-president and part owner of Development Counsellors International, a 30-person company that develops marketing campaigns promoting tourism. He flew to Kansas City the Monday following September 11. Over the next several weeks, he boarded 16 airplanes. (On one flight, owing to increased security, he had to remove his shoes and run them through a metal detector.) And so far, he’s requiring his account executives to fly because the company’s survival depends on it. “We can’t forgo traveling if we stay in this business,” he says. “It’s hard to lead a press trip to Tacoma unless you’re there, and driving isn’t an option.” There’s just one thing that might change his insistence on flying: another terrorist incident involving aircraft. Meanwhile, many companies continue to seek the perfect balance of technology and travel. For Alex Stanton, who used videoconferencing to make his pitch to the European telecom company, it’s a matter of compromise. “Often, when we’d go and do these things, we’d send two or three or four people to show them our whole team,” he says. Now he considers sending one person — perhaps the team leader — to present in person and having other employees attend by videoconference. “It’s not perfect,” he says, “but we don’t live in a perfect world.” Anne Stuart is a senior writer at Inc. The Next Best Thing to Being There Nothing digital can duplicate a hearty handshake. But if you want to keep your company aloft without putting yourself — or anybody else — on an airplane, you can consider a wide range of electronic alternatives. If you’re strapped for cash, build on your existing technologies, starting with the telephone. Make those once-deadly conference calls far more palatable with high-quality speakerphones (such as the Polycom SoundStation models, which start at $499) or the dial-in teleconference services offered by many telecom companies. Next stop: the Internet. Create an online environment in which employees, partners, and customers can swap documents, create group mailing lists, or post messages in forums. Host your company’s intranet, extranet, or password-protected Web site yourself, or, for a small monthly fee, pay a service provider (such as Intranets.com) to host one for you. If you need to see people’s faces, consider videoconferencing, two-way video, and audio communication over high-speed lines. Pictures may freeze or look grainy, and shy participants may clam up on camera. And videoconferencing works only if both parties have compatible equipment. But it’s probably the closest thing to sitting in the same room. Costs range from $100 or so for a home-use camera and microphone to $5,000 for a portable videoconferencing system to $75,000 for a customized in-house studio with good acoustics, professional lighting, high-quality monitors, and cameras. Rentals range from $250 an hour to a flat $1,000 a day at local videoconferencing studios and some Kinko’s outlets. Another option when visuals matter: a satellite hookup. Satellite communications offer superior transmission quality — but at a superior price because of the cost of renting satellite time. Figure on spending at least $1,000 an hour. If you want to put on a show for a widely scattered audience, consider Web conferencing with tools such as WebEx or WebDemo, both of which let meeting participants share documents and applications online in real time. Web conferencing lets far-flung participants view documents simultaneously from their own desktops. It’s a handy option for PowerPoint presentations, sales demonstrations, whiteboard-style diagramming, and collaborative document editing. Some products include audio, while others require a simultaneous telephone conference call if participants need to talk while they’re working. The costs range from $100 for install-it-yourself conferencing software to $1,000 or more for a professionally hosted conference. If you want to share documents safely, look into creating a virtual private network (VPN). This highly secure technology creates a private “tunnel” into a company’s systems. It’s an outstanding way to provide remote users — including distant partners, traveling employees, and people who work at home — with full access to important documents and applications. The costs range from a few hundred to several thousand dollars, depending primarily on the number of users. Please e-mail your comments to editors@inc.com. For more electronic alternatives, see 5 Travel-Reducing Technologies.

A Helping Hand With Taxing Matters

Best of the Web Tax pointers are available from several online sites at no charge. Twelve CEOs assess what the advice is really worth Print neatly. That’s the kind of advice that the IRS considers a “dynamite” tax tip, Dave Barry once wrote in his Miami Herald column. “If you ask them a real tax question, such as how you can cheat,” Barry said, “they’re useless.” The IRS won’t tell you how to cheat, but it does attempt to mitigate the tax-filing (if not the tax-paying) ordeal by offering a helping hand, and now it does so online. In partnership with the Small Business Administration, the IRS makes tax information for business owners quickly and easily accessible on a Web site titled Small Business Corner ( www.irs.ustreas.gov/bus_info/sm_bus). The site offers the government’s latest intelligence on such things as its rules for business-expense deductions and what the tax agency considers the best record-keeping systems for small companies. If the IRS is the authoritative source of tax information, is there any reason to look elsewhere on the Net for tax expertise? Several privately owned sites say yes. Each site has its own spin, depending on what group it aims to attract — a general small-business audience or merely start-up entrepreneurs, for example. Like the IRS site, the private offerings are free. They contrast with the tax-prep sites, such as Intuit’s TurboTax or H&R Block’s TaxCut, which enable users to fill out their tax returns online for a fee. To determine which of the tax-advice sites were worthwhile, Inc. asked 12 small-business CEOs to evaluate seven of the most popular ones. Two of the sites belong to Big Five accounting firms: Deloitte & Touche’s Dtonline.com and Ernst & Young’s TaxCast.com. Individual accountants operate others, including TaxMama.com, which began as an online newsletter. Another site that was a newsletter before it evolved into an in-depth source of complex tax matters is TaxProphet.com. It has 40,000 users and registers about 300,000 hits a month, according to tax lawyer Robert L. Sommers, who runs it. Although the sites don’t charge user fees, some make money by selling ads posted alongside the tax advice. Others are marketing tools. For example, Sommers, who’s also a columnist for the San Francisco Examiner, says that TaxProphet.com brings in clients for his law practice — and generates ideas for his column. Sommers claims that even taxpayers who have the assistance of a certified public accountant can benefit from consulting the tax-code nuances laid out in TaxProphet.com. “At tax time, CPAs are working 18-hour days and may not have time to ponder the gray areas, like whether you need a W-4 for the Israeli teacher you employed or if a treaty with Israel makes that unnecessary,” he says. Traffic is heaviest on the sites in the run-up to the April 15 tax-filing deadline, but they post information for all seasons. One tip on TaxMama.com last fall, for instance, suggested that tax-payers consider charging business expenses to a credit card up until December 31, 2000. The charges are deductible on the 2000 return, even if they weren’t paid before year-end. If you’re perplexed by some tax wrinkle or want an update on lawful tax-avoidance schemes, which of the seven sites is your best bet? Here’s what our CEOs had to say. www.bankrate.com What it’s good for: A well-organized, clearly defined primer. “The entire site has a lot of value,” said one CEO. Bankrate.com contains a Calculations section, which is useful for computing gross profit margins and a variety of business ratios. Don’t waste your time if: You want a hard-core, business-oriented site or you’re a lender or you’re doing tax work for a financial institution. What our CEOs had to say: “It will make my favorites list,” commented one reviewer. A second panelist said, “This site is easy to navigate, easy on the eyes, and gives you a good, brief understanding of each topic.” What you ought to know: The site’s owner is Bankrate Inc. (formerly known as Bank Rate Monitor), based in North Palm Beach, Fla., a longtime publisher of financial information. Bankrate.com’s content now appears in the Money section of Usatoday.com. www.dtonline.com What it’s good for: A guide for personal financial planning. It also contains useful tidbits, including a schedule of gift- and estate-tax rates and a rundown of 10 “essential” practices for growing a company. Don’t waste your time if: You need access to tax schedules or links to other sites. What our CEOs had to say: “One visit was all it took” to sour one CEO on the site because he found it lacked forms that he could download. A fellow panelist, however, said the site was “very informative, especially for small businesses.” What you ought to know: Dtonline.com contains a weekly online missive, “Tax News & Views,” a Deloitte & Touche compilation of the latest tax news from Washington. www.irs.ustreas.gov/bus_info/sm_bus What it’s good for: Comprehensive tax information furnished by the IRS and tailored for small businesses, plus links to other useful tax-related sites, such as www.tax.gov (which covers the tax- and wage-reporting basics). Don’t waste your time if: You seek tax loopholes. What our CEOs had to say: “Excellent tax information for small businesses,” one panelist said. It’s great for “getting a handle on tax issues relating to a start-up,” said another. Still, one CEO disliked the site and said he couldn’t find valuable advice there. What you ought to know: The IRS also offers online sites not specifically devoted to small businesses, including www.irs.ustreas.gov, a guide for filing electronic tax returns. www.smbiz.com What it’s good for: News and tax tips are updated daily. It also has a host of useful links to other sites. Don’t waste your time if: You need answers to specific tax questions. What our CEOs had to say: They agreed that the site is valuable mostly as a “link farm,” in the words of one of them. They generally faulted its design as lacking pizzazz. What you ought to know: The genesis of the site is the Small Business Tax Review, a newsletter published since 1980 by the A/N Group, in Melville, N.Y., a provider of tax news and analyses for small businesses. www.taxcast.com What it’s good for: Tax-law summaries and a trove of tax documents mostly suited to accountants and financial planners. Don’t waste your time if: You want a fast, easy-to-understand tour through the tax landscape. One business owner said the site, though rich in complex information, was “too sterile” and “does not keep my interest.” What our CEOs had to say: They applauded its many links and other resources, but craved a more inviting format. “It’s very vanilla,” said one panelist. What you ought to know: Affiliated sites furnish many kinds of Ernst & Young tax help. One example is www.ey.com, a site well known for financial counseling for individuals and families. www.taxmama.com What it’s good for: A joyful and occasionally informative romp through the tax world for inexperienced businesspeople. This site’s “personal commentary and humor make it unintimidating,” said one CEO. Another recommended it only for tax filers with rudimentary questions. Don’t waste your time if: You’re looking for a highly professional format or need more than a casual presentation of everyday tax issues. What our CEOs had to say: This is a site “more geared toward the consumer than toward businesses,” said one CEO. Another echoed the assessment, saying, “It just doesn’t have the kind of information I need” as a business owner. However, a third CEO said that this is a “great site with good information.” What you ought to know: The site’s founder, Eva Rosenberg, holds the Enrolled Agent credential, which the U.S. Treasury Department issues to qualified accountants. Rosenberg claims to respond to every E-mail query she receives. www.taxprophet.com What it’s good for: Basic facts. The site’s a good do-it-yourself reference for those who are just starting a business and can’t afford an accountant. “If you know what you’re looking for,” one CEO said, “you can do full-text searches of a large tax-law database,” which will give you a heap of hits to sift through. You just need to have the time to do it. Don’t waste your time if: You want quick answers to your questions. What our CEOs had to say: It’s better to leave to an accountant the kind of time-consuming tax research that’s available on the site. “I don’t have the time to just browse,” one CEO said, and “it’s cheaper for me to call my accountant for a quick answer.” But for those with the stomach for truly in-depth tax research or an education in tax law, the site may be useful, according to another reviewer. What you ought to know: In the spirit of fulfilling Robert Sommers’s mission of educating its users about everything to do with taxes, the site posts advisories about tax scams on an online bulletin board. The bottom line For overall tax advice that’s accessible and relevant to small businesses, our CEOs favored the IRS site, Dtonline .com, and Bankrate.com. The reviewers singled out Bankrate.com for its supe- rior ease of navigation, and they appreciated TaxProphet.com’s extensive tax- research database. They lauded Smbiz.com for links to other tax-related sites. The panelists scorned TaxMama.com in many respects yet couldn’t help liking it for its sheer fun. Sara Trainor Callard is a freelance writer based in Quincy, Mass. The savvy entrepreneur’s guide to online tax advice Comments Would CEOs go back? What are the site’s pluses? CEOs’ quick take www.bankrate.com Yes. “The news section, which seems to be updated often.” “This is a worthwhile site to visit.” www.dtonline.com Maybe. “Clear and concise language.” “Very informative.” www.irs.ustreas.gov/ bus_info/sm_bus Maybe. “Quick and easy to explore.” “Would recommend for tax issues relating to start-ups and small businesses.” www.smbiz.com Probably not. “The links.” “Could use a redesign.” www.taxcast.com No. “A comprehensive listing of links.” “It was loaded with information but was a little overwhelming for the tax novice.” www.taxmama.com No. “Good basic information that’s well categorized.” The site can give you the basics for “general tax queries.” www.taxprophet.com Maybe. “Searches of a large tax-law database.” For extensive tax research without a CPA’s services, this is a “good reference.” Grades Ease of navigation Variety User- friendliness Technical reliability Average grade www.bankrate.com A- A- B B B+ www.dtonline.com B B B- A B www.irs.ustreas.gov/ bus_info/sm_bus A- B B A- B+ www.smbiz.com B- B C- A- B- www.taxcast.com B- C B B B- www.taxmama.com C C B C C www.taxprophet.com B- C B- A B- Our panelists John Auger, cofounder, Operations Associates Gary Barras, CEO, Integral Systems Henry L. Foster, CEO, Call Henry Dr. Jim Goodnight, CEO, SAS Kevin J. Goslin, CEO and cofounder, Construction Technology Group Tim Handley, CEO, Advantage Credit International Duncan Harrison, CEO, Alaskan Automotive Distributing Dean Hunt, president, Certified Associates James Matuszewski, CEO, FeelGood for Life George G. Mueller, CEO, Color Kinetics Victor Tsao, CEO, Linksys Ross Youngs, CEO, Univenture Please e-mail your comments to editors@inc.com.

Nailing It

They needed it overnight. They wanted the best. In the race to build the first online hardware store, Peter Hunt and Rich Takata put their company in the hands of outright strangers The Company Name: CornerHardware.com Inc. Founded: Incorporated May 1999; Web site launched early 2000 Location: San Francisco Cofounders: Chairman and CEO Richard Takata; president and chief operating officer Peter A. Hunt Employees: 35 full-timers Mission: Creating an online home-improvement store, magazine, and community for do-it-yourselfers URL: www.cornerhardware.com The Developer Name: Xuma Founded: 1998 Location: San Francisco; with offices in New York, Los Angeles, and Las Vegas Cofounders: CEO Joe Cha; chief technology officer Jamie Lerner Employees: 250 Mission: Producing built-to-order Web sites for E-businesses URL: www.xuma.com In December 1998, Peter Hunt set out to tackle what should have been a simple, joyous task: building a tree house for his four-year-old son for Christmas. Hunt couldn’t wait to start the project. It wasn’t just that he welcomed the diversion from his high-powered job as an investment banker. It was more that, ever since he’d been a kid, Hunt had loved working with his hands: making model trains and airplanes, building furniture, fixing things around the house. As an adult he’d dreamed of buying a corner hardware store in some rural New England town, the kind of place with a bell over the door and shelves lined with hinges and screws and doorknobs, where he’d spend his days happily helping customers pick out the right paintbrush or handsaw. But with two kids and a top job at Montgomery Securities in San Francisco, the lanky, thoughtful Hunt didn’t even have time to stop into a local hardware shop, let alone wander through a giant home-improvement warehouse. He assumed he’d save time by buying everything he needed for the tree house — instructions, lumber, materials, and tools — online. So he went to the Web and looked for hardware sites. And looked. And looked. He found nothing except a loose network of like-minded tree-house enthusiasts, many similarly frustrated by their own fruitless online searches for supplies and information. From that experience, Peter Hunt, banker, suddenly figured out how to finally become Peter Hunt, hardware guy. Hunt’s thinking went like this: What if there were lots of little communities out there — tree-house builders and woodworkers and plumbers and fixer-uppers and even contractors — all hungry for online hardware and home-improvement advice? And what if somebody could provide it for them in one friendly, convenient location, sort of a virtual corner hardware store? In early 1999, Hunt, then 35, took a week off to write a business plan for just such a company. But he knew something was missing. He needed a business partner — a veteran hardware retailer, a real insider. When he asked around, he kept hearing the same name: Rich Takata. Richard T. Takata, then of Seattle, had been in the hardware business for 24 years. Takata, who’d most recently been president and CEO of Eagle Hardware & Garden Inc., had remained with the 41-store chain after North Carolina­based Lowe’s Cos. had bought it for $1.4 billion. (In fact, Hunt’s firm had handled the sale.) Although reserved and soft-spoken, Takata, then 49, was hardly averse to risk; in his spare time he occasionally drove race cars. A lifelong do-it-yourselfer, Takata also knew his industry and its customers. Over the years he’d waited on thousands of people, even during store visits when he was the company’s CEO. And like Hunt, whose own company had been acquired by North Carolina­based NationsBank, Takata was ready for a change. Xuma’s founders named their Web-development company after an ancient Chinese battle cry. In April 1999, at the urging of a mutual friend, Hunt and Takata met for dinner to talk about launching a big home-improvement E-commerce site. They discovered they had much in common. Both were quietly intense, articulate, committed. Both were customer-service evangelists, true believers in keeping promises and building long, loyal relationships. Both believed passionately in the Internet’s potential for business. And both had high — some might say almost impossible — standards for themselves, their companies, and those who worked for or with them. Of the two, Takata was more tactical and analytical, a manager with a keen recall of industry statistics and an almost instinctive understanding of business trends. Hunt, very much the money guy and deal maker, was also more sentimental. (He documents CornerHardware.com’s growth in a scrapbook filled with mementos like copies of the company’s incorporation papers and of its early bank deposits, and Polaroid photos of each newly hired employee.) From the start, the two men agreed they wanted to do more than lead the Web in sales of drill bits and deck stain. They wanted to re-create the old-fashioned corner hardware store of Hunt’s dreams and Takata’s experience: a place with well-stocked shelves, knowledgeable clerks, lots of how-to information, and most of all, a friendly, collegial, yes-you-can-do-it-yourself atmosphere. It would, of course, be called CornerHardware.com. They knew it was a big idea with hefty potential; pulling in even a small fraction of the $400-billion-a-year home-improvement business would yield a fortune. They were amazed that nobody had launched the kind of venture they envisioned, and they knew that before long somebody else certainly would. What they wanted to do — build a full-service online hardware store and community — would cost at least $2.5 million. Takata and Hunt knew they needed to move fast — and they did. Within three weeks of their first meeting, both men had quit their jobs; put up $250,000 each of their own money; raised about $500,000 more from angel investors, family, friends, and colleagues; and incorporated their business. But for all the partners knew they needed to do, there was still plenty they needed to learn. Chief among the lessons: just how tough it would be to build a big Web business in a matter of months — and how much tougher it would get when circumstances forced them to launch the site weeks earlier than planned. They didn’t know for sure whether a no-name newcomer like CornerHardware.com could compete with new and upcoming E-commerce arms from brick-and-mortar brands like Sears (which was already selling parts, tools, and appliances online), Home Depot (which plans to launch a full E-commerce site this summer), and Ace Hardware (which would begin selling merchandise online at OurHouse.com late in 1999). In addition, dot-com start-ups were also racing to market. Major projects included HomeWarehouse.com, then under development in nearby San Mateo, Calif., and Amazon.com‘s new tools and hardware store, which would also launch by year’s end. And it was entirely likely that some of those in the race would end up as roadkill. When it came to CornerHardware.com’s technology, Hunt and Takata knew they weren’t looking just for a speedy job. Sure, there was no time to waste — they wanted a beta site before year’s end, a quiet launch by March 2000, and a public launch shortly after that. But building their Web site would also be a big, complex, cutting-edge project. They needed transaction processing capability and complete descriptions and images of some 37,000 products, everything from penny nails to power saws to Phillips-head screwdrivers. They would shoot to double their inventory, which is distributed from a warehouse in Kansas, within their first six months online. True to their customer-service mission, Hunt and Takata also wanted, from day one, to offer how-to articles, visitor message boards, animated step-by-step project instructions, a massive glossary of hardware terms, a superb search engine, and live customer service, online and in real time. That last capability would become, in fact, the real cornerstone, so to speak, of CornerHardware.com. Using interactive windows, customers would be able to chat with service reps in real time — asking questions about products or about a bill, for instance. That kind of service, which the company would contract out to dedicated staffers at Boston-based eSupportNow, would be what Hunt and Takata believed would ultimately distinguish their company not just from other online hardware stores but from their brick-and-mortar brethren as well. As Takata pointed out later, there weren’t many home-improvement stores that were open 24 hours a day. Although Hunt and Takata knew what they wanted their site to do, they didn’t know much about the nuts and bolts required to make it happen. They needed professional help. And they needed it fast. The high-speed, high-stakes scenario isn’t unique to CornerHardware.com — or even to the online home-improvement industry. Today almost any new business-to-consumer Internet company must fight for a foothold in an already crowded market. (Witness the proliferation of online pet stores, drugstores, vitamin stores, and toy stores.) Being first online remains a competitive advantage. But there’s no point in being first without doing it well. As consumers on the Internet grow more sophisticated they’re less willing to tolerate sites that are slow, unreliable, boring, or tough to navigate. And they absolutely won’t return to sites that haven’t provided stellar customer service. E-commerce sites have grown increasingly complex in reaction to the industry’s ever higher standards and well-publicized successes and failures. In many cases, like CornerHardware.com’s, a business simply can’t hire its own team to build a site — even if it could find the right people, it probably couldn’t afford to pay them or retain them. So, like CornerHardware.com, the company opts to stake the future of its business on outside developers — people the company doesn’t know, people who must translate the entrepreneur’s dreams and plans into equipment and software and code. Xuma’s approach bridges the gap between standard and optional E-commerce components. As Takata and Hunt were setting up shop in rented space in San Francisco’s financial district, Joe Cha was building his own business just a few blocks away. About a year earlier Cha had been working at his third consulting job. A friend reintroduced him to Jamie Lerner, a consultant Cha had known slightly when both had worked at Andersen Consulting several years earlier. Like Hunt and Takata, Cha and Lerner found themselves thinking along the same lines. They wanted to try something new, and they didn’t want to create just another San Francisco Web-development company. Instead their thinking went like this: What if you could apply the same approach to building a Web site that Dell Computer applies to building a computer? What if you could create big, complex, flexible, reliable, customized E-commerce systems in record time simply by not reinventing the wheel for every single project? So Cha and Lerner founded Xuma. (The name, pronounced “zoo-ma,” is an ancient Chinese battle cry that the partners found perfect to describe their army of engineers charging into the E-commerce wars.) They adapted the Dell model: just as Dell combines standard and optional components to rapidly create computers, Xuma combines its standard and optional E-commerce components to quickly build Web sites. In the venture’s first year, the quiet, charming Cha (so charismatic that he was among 10 bachelors featured in a Women.com feature on “The Men of Silicon Valley”) sold Xuma’s services to customers ranging from health-and-beauty-products retailer More.com to home-furnishings site GoodHome.com. By its second anniversary, in April 2000, Xuma had launched more than 70 Web-based businesses nationwide and employed 250 people in four offices. But back in mid-1999, Xuma hadn’t yet tackled anything on the multimillion-dollar scale of CornerHardware.com. By the summer of 1999, Takata, CornerHardware.com’s CEO, and Hunt, its chief operating officer, had raised about $6 million in funding: close to $1 million from their own pockets and from family, friends, and angels; and the balance from the first round of venture funding. (A second round early in 2000 would yield an additional $21 million.) And the founders had begun building a staff. Their first hire: vice-president of engineering Steve Finer, who faced the daunting job of actually overseeing the Web site’s construction. (See “Chronicles from the Pit,” below.) Finer, then 33, was an enthusiastic, outspoken technologist who, in a previous life, had managed nightclubs in Boston. He knew something about risk: he’d cofounded an Internet start-up that later collapsed and eventually filed for bankruptcy. And he knew something about working hard; he was always either at the office or connected to it by beeper, cell phone, or computer. (Shortly before the CornerHardware.com launch, when Finer was working 12 to 15 hours a day, he came home one night to find that his lonely dog, Cassius, had disemboweled a sofa cushion.) After joining CornerHardware.com in August 1999, Finer faced his first and toughest task: getting his new bosses “to understand that you don’t build anything — whether it’s a car or a Web site — overnight.” Especially not something as complex as CornerHardware.com. And in Internet terms, what Hunt and Takata wanted was pretty close to overnight. So Finer immediately ruled out doing the job in-house. Given the tight market for top technology staffers, especially in San Francisco, he knew he couldn’t build the talented team he needed to even approach that timetable. Instead, at his recommendation, CornerHardware.com looked outside, holding what Cha describes as a “bake-off” for potential developers late in the summer of 1999. Xuma wasn’t the oldest or the biggest or the best-known contestant. But Hunt, Takata, and Finer liked what Xuma had cooked up. The decisive factor: speed. Cha, Xuma’s CEO, and Lerner, its chairman and chief technology officer, then both 29, promised to do the job faster than anybody else — within six months. They also promised to build systems and databases that would “scale,” or grow quickly without having to be replaced. That’s what CornerHardware.com needed — and that’s why Xuma walked away with a contract worth between $750,000 and $1 million. (Takata says the balance of CornerHardware.com’s launch budget went for interface design, software licensing, equipment, product photography, and related costs.) By Xuma’s standards today — less than a year later — the CornerHardware.com contract is a relatively small one. But at the time it was a huge coup, providing, if all went well, a link in the chain leading to bigger jobs. So Cha took the kind of risk that he would later say no developer should ever take: he went ahead without any built-in contingency plan — no plan B — in case of crisis. True to its own business model, Xuma would build the CornerHardware.com site using many preexisting components — a standard credit-card-processing system, for instance. Still, the Xuma team, headed by senior project manager Phil Lew, then 26, knew that building such a complex E-commerce site wouldn’t be easy. Xuma anticipated it would spend five to six months, beginning in October 1999, building, testing, debugging, and launching the site. The schedule, though ambitious, seemed entirely possible. That is, as long as nothing went wrong. Although CornerHardware.com and Xuma were both new, fast-growing San Francisco­based start-ups, their cultures were entirely different. Sure, they both hired the best they could find: CornerHardware.com’s hiring coups included a Home Depot senior vice-president, a top producer from CNet, and several home-improvement authors and writers, while Xuma lured dozens of “rock-star engineers” away from other Web developers. But theirs were very different workplaces. At CornerHardware.com, a middle-aged artist or writer in a flannel shirt and jeans might sit in meetings with a college-age kid with a nose ring. It was rare for anybody to spend the whole night at work (with the possible exception of Finer, who worked around the clock in the countdown to the launch). In general, it was quiet, especially since most employees worked one or two days at home. (There wasn’t enough office space for everyone to be there at the same time.) In contrast to that relative calm, at Xuma nobody had a private office. Engineers racing to meet project deadlines spent days in the big war room known as “the pit,” living on trucked-in pizza or Thai food, working elbow to elbow at food-littered tables lined with computers. It was a noisy, messy, overwhelmingly youthful atmosphere. For Lew, it was exhausting, but it was also fun. His team bonded in a way that can come only from eating three meals a day together, working side by side until after midnight, then car-pooling home through unusually silent streets. And that bonding meant that together they felt they could do anything, Lew says. They would need to. In late fall, when Lew’s team was already spending most of its time in the pit simply trying to hit the original March launch date, something did go wrong. In mid-November, a CornerHardware.com competitor, HomeWarehouse.com, launched earlier than anybody had expected. About the same time, Amazon.com launched its home-improvement store, and Ace began putting OurHouse.com online. And funding was beginning to dry up for consumer dot-coms in favor of business-to-business ventures. Takata and Hunt decided they had no choice: they had to move the stealth launch from late March to January 15, and follow that with the public launch a few weeks later. They delivered the bad news to Finer, their liaison with Xuma. “They told me, ‘If we wait till March, we’re out of business,’ ” Finer recalls. “At that point I’m holding my stomach.” Finer reluctantly asked Xuma to shave close to six weeks off the initial launch date. Xuma agreed to try moving it up to January 15. “The trouble with being the vendor is that the customer is always right,” Cha says with a sigh. In this case, being right required heroics from Lew’s project team. “We had guys here that didn’t see their families, that were living here 24/7,” Cha says. (See Lew’s diary, below.) “We killed ourselves. But we got on-the-job training there. We learned.” What followed was a series of compromises made by both sides. Five days before the new launch date, the Xuma project team begged for an extension, saying they needed the extra testing time to make sure the site worked well. They asked for two more weeks. Takata and Hunt agreed to wait 10 more days. They knew they wouldn’t be doing themselves any favors by launching sooner if the site frustrated the very people they wanted to attract. Meanwhile, Lew was learning that both Hunt and Takata were demanding, detail-oriented, hands-on managers. “I used to say ‘Retail is detail,’ ” Takata says. “Now I say ‘E-tail is detail.’ ” Both Hunt and Takata closely tracked the site’s development, sometimes requesting changes that would take days of engineering time to complete. “Or they’d say, ‘We need 700 pages [of Web-site content before launch],’ ” Lew says. “We’d say, ‘We can do 200.’ “ Then there was the titanic tinkering on the day before the rescheduled launch. In the afternoon of January 24, Hunt decided the site needed another level of search hierarchy, or ways for customers to view products and information. While other team members frantically tested the site, one engineer spent six hours building in the new function, letting it go live around 8 p.m. After viewing the site that evening, Hunt changed his mind. Lew describes it this way: “Peter sees it. He doesn’t like it. I say, ‘It’s exactly what you guys asked for.’ He says, ‘I want it back like it was this morning.’ ” Lew asked Finer to intercede; Finer returned with this message from Hunt: “Sorry, but it has to happen. And you have to tell me when it’s done.” The same staffer spent the next three hours reversing his earlier work, finishing at about 1:30 a.m., just hours before the quiet launch. And yet Cha, ever the diplomat, doesn’t regard CornerHardware.com as particularly exacting. “All of our customers are very demanding,” he says. In fact, he adds, CornerHardware.com was a relatively easy client because, unlike many enthusiastic dot-com start-ups with ill-defined business plans, from the very beginning Hunt and Takata had clear ideas about what they wanted to accomplish. On January 25 at 3:30 a.m., Lew drove his entire team home from work, and, at 4:45 a.m., finally slept. CornerHardware.com had launched — without fanfare and without any major problems. It also launched without some of the things its founders had wanted. These were the trade-offs: CornerHardware.com had been photographing about 800 products a day, but even at that rate the company couldn’t shoot 37,000 products before the launch. Instead it posted a representative sampling from each category. (Says Hunt, “If you have 72 hammers on the site, do you really need pictures of all 72 from day one?”) It also launched with no way of issuing returns to customers’ credit-card bills. (Initially, refunds would be made by check.) And it launched with fewer products and less content than Hunt and Takata had wanted. But nothing crashed, and the products advertised were available, poised on the shelves in the Kansas City warehouse. Surprisingly, Takata rates the launch at about 95% of what he’d hoped for. “One of the lessons I have learned about the Internet space in general is that you can’t be a perfectionist,” he says. “The Internet is a game of weeks. If you can get your site up four weeks earlier and have a complete customer experience [even without some desired features], I’d say do it.” A month later the public launch went off without any major hitches. Since then, CornerHardware.com’s traffic has grown steadily, with Xuma continuing to run the site. Hunt and Takata won’t release figures except to say that they had more traffic in April than in the entire first quarter. As for the conversion rate — the percentage of people who actually buy something — “some days it’s 19% or 20%,” Hunt says. “And we have days where it’s 1%.” Meanwhile, the purchasing of big-ticket items has increased: in addition to batteries and lightbulbs, customers are buying bathroom vanities and power tools. These days the founders are still keeping an eye on the competition, especially that big orange company from Atlanta. “I’d be lying if I told you we don’t worry about Home Depot,” Hunt says. “But we don’t lose any sleep over it,” because, he says, he doesn’t believe the giant retailer will duplicate the CornerHardware.com business model or its real-time online customer service. As for that tree house, Hunt did build it much later. But he ended up creating it from a kit that he got from a brick-and-mortar retailer. Ironically, he got so busy starting up CornerHardware.com that he didn’t have time to build one from scratch. And in returning to that project, Hunt revisited one big lesson that he and Takata had discovered throughout the building of their business: it’s all about making compromises. Anne Stuart is a senior writer at Inc. Technology. Chronicles from the Pit Steve Finer, vice-president of engineering for CornerHardware.com, and Phil Lew, Xuma’s CornerHardware.com project team leader, each kept diaries for several weeks between the Web site’s “stealth launch,” in January, and its first major marketing pushes, in early March. Here are some excerpts: Steve Finer Thursday, February 17 At 3:45 a.m., we added another Sun Enterprise 4500 server with 16 CPUs. Serious horsepower! As I got off the elevator this morning my coworkers gave me a high five because the new server made the site so much faster. Wednesday, February 23 Two new applications went into alpha testing. One rotates products featured on the home page. The other is a media-tracking application [which tracks the effectiveness of promotional campaigns]. Unique visitors to the site have doubled since last week. Today the site was accessed from all over the world, including from Taiwan, Slovenia, Thailand, Malaysia, Israel, and Japan. Actually shaved for the first time in weeks. Wanted to be presentable for a taping we did today with Xuma and the Mark Bunting video crew [for a business video to be shown on United Airlines and TWA]. Thursday, February 24 Biggest challenge: preparing for the March marketing campaign [a newspaper and online ad campaign with coupons]. We need to be able to support the traffic. Friday, February 25 Added 6,000 new images. Finished quality-assurance process for media tracker and product-feature applications. Also [a New York Times] article gave us a nice boost in traffic and tripled the number of people who went to the customer-support line yesterday. Monday, February 28 We’re all really busy. The engineering team has a lot of projects that need to be completed, including the media tracker and the product-feature device. Tuesday, February 29 Public launch. It has been a difficult day. All departments are asking for additions to the site. It’s a challenge to satisfy all requests and prioritize them properly. Our lack of space [is a problem]. My job would be so much easier if we could hire people to supplement Xuma’s activities. Friday, March 3 We’re really focusing on driving traffic. We added a new disk drive to the development server and a new storage device to help manage all our images. We also added more than 40 new how-to articles. Don Johnson and Cheech Marin filmed their TV show, Nash Bridges, outside our office. We passed out CornerHardware.com hats to the crew, which they all wore during the filming. Saturday, March 4 Had one last meeting with Xuma and my staff to make sure we have the right staffing in place to support [Sunday's marketing campaign]. Monday, March 6 The marketing campaign went off without a hitch. We were able to support all the additional traffic. It blew my mind! Daily traffic today was more than double normal, and we had 10 times as many people buying products as we have on a typical day. Next week the campaign will branch out to a larger part of the country. Since everything today went so well, I’m not too worried. But it is still keeping me up at night. Phil Lew Thursday, February 24 Development seems to be going better than planned. [CornerHardware.com CIO Ken Hite] called me in the morning wanting to track an order number for an order where the money wasn’t captured. The problem was with the file from the third-party fulfillment house. Lesson learned: We need to build in more robust error checking. We cannot assume that the third-party fulfillment house will always give us the correct formatted file. The need to develop a robust process to keep the content and data fresh on the live site is giving me grief. [The process was so slow that when CornerHardware.com updated many items, it could take days for the updates to take effect.] We are working on another solution to load data but don’t know when that will be in place. The media-tracker application needs to be done by tomorrow (that is, in the hands of QA). Things are going great, but I’ve been down this road before. I need to keep the pressure on development to make sure that they follow through on our delivery dates. Friday, February 25 Had our first meeting with [new CornerHardware.com executive producer] Alice Hill. She had some fantastic ideas about the site direction. I look forward to working with her; she’s going to be able to streamline the decision-making process since we will not have to wait on [COO Peter Hunt and CEO Rich Takata] in the future for decisions about where the site is going to be heading. Sunday, February 27 What I’ll remember most about today: talking to Bill [Meehan, Xuma's lead engineer on the CornerHardware project] at midnight on a Sunday night about CornerHardware.com — again. We make this site go. Both of us take a lot of pride in that. We are both emotionally attached to this project and want CornerHardware.com to be the best it can be. That makes it easier to stay up late on Sunday nights to do things for CornerHardware.com. Monday, February 28 Everyone is very excited about the big day tomorrow [the official launch]. I think we have all done due diligence to get ready for this big day, but until the day comes you never know. Tuesday, February 29 Crazy, crazy day. In the afternoon, CornerHardware.com informed us that [there were] 40 additional content pages to be attached to a new front page. At 5 p.m., 6 p.m., 7 p.m., 8 p.m., this content had still not passed the QA check. The new front page will not be able to go up until tomorrow. Traffic was higher than usual. Two articles [about CornerHardware.com] came across my desk: one was from CNet and the other from ZDNet. Didn’t get much sleep, since we were at work until 5 a.m. Sunday, March 5 First thing I did when I woke up today was log on to the Internet via my DSL to check on the site [following that morning's newspaper coupon campaign]. I can see that the orders are already rolling in from Washington and Utah. By 10:30 a.m., we are already at 15 orders for the day. I called Steve Finer at home (I think I woke him up) and let him know the good news: people are hitting the site and buying things. Please e-mail your comments to editors@inc.com.

A New Chapter for E-Books

Inc.ubator Entrepreneurs are rediscovering the digital book. This time their start-ups might fly Ahem. A reading from Stephen King’s The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon: “The water was not quite up to her knees. The stuff her feet were sinking into felt like cold, lumpy jelly. …” Contemplate the absurdity of reading a chunky Stephen King novel — or anything longer than a stock quote, really — on a tiny handheld-computer screen. Reading a book is a visceral experience impossible to duplicate in liquid crystal display. In the early 1990s, companies like Voyager and Vertigo Development Group sold books on disk, but their products failed to catch on. Many readers’ computers didn’t have the CD-ROM drives necessary to “play” books on their screens. Besides, “you don’t curl up with your computer,” says Patrick Breen, former senior architect at Vertigo. And publishers were still typesetting manuscripts, making it a huge hassle to digitize a book. But now it looks as if E-books, despite the absurdity factor, might take off. The Internet’s distribution power, together with higher-resolution screens and powerful processors, have made the world a much friendlier place for electronic books than it was just five years ago. And publishers now create books on computers, so the files are already in digital form — “a complete revolution, and it happened between 1993 and 1996,” says Paul Hilts, technology editor for Publishers Weekly. Last fall, several E-book companies joined forces with Microsoft and, with the blessings of publishers like Simon & Schuster and Bertelsmann, defined a technical standard for publishers’ electronic files so that books can be read from desktop computers, dedicated reading devices (portable gizmos used solely for reading books), and handheld computers. That flexibility should help develop consumer confidence and thus a market, says Kevin Hause, a consumer-products analyst for IDC, in Mountain View, Calif. Hause projects that by 2004, electronic books and periodicals will be a $2.5-billion market — hardly pennies, but still just a fraction of today’s $25-billion market for good old-fashioned books. Pricing for reading devices has been a hurdle, but the costs are starting to drop. Last November the price of the Rocket eBook, a reading device from NuvoMedia, also in Mountain View, dropped to $199 from $499 a year earlier. Another company, SoftBook Press, in Menlo Park, Calif., has also brought reading devices to market. (In January, Gemstar International Group Ltd., in Pasadena, Calif., acquired NuvoMedia and SoftBook. Gemstar markets the VCR-programming system VCR Plus+. The E-book companies will remain separate entities.) Another E-book contender, Librius.com, in Bellevue, Wash., abandoned plans for its reading device last summer to focus on software after president Don Ledford realized that handhelds were going to swamp his Millennium Reader. “Everyone who’s in this business is in it for the content,” Ledford says. “Why struggle upstream to try and sell 20,000 units at cost so you can try and sell some books, when 10 to 20 million new handhelds are flowing in?” That’s where Peanutpress.com comes in. The Maynard, Mass., start-up offers free software, called Peanut Reader, for reading books on Palm OS or Windows CE handheld devices. Peanut Readers let readers flip through, dog-ear, and write all over books. To soothe publishers worried about readers “sharing” books without paying for them, E-book producers are developing encryptions and passwords that safeguard content. Such measures have convinced major publishers — like Random House and Simon & Schuster, which signed deals with Peanut — to join the smaller publishers that jumped in earlier. Peanut president Jeff Strobel, who cofounded the company in April 1998, says that by the end of last year, some 10,000 people had bought the company’s books, which cost the same as or less than a paperback. Strobel says revenues, currently in the six figures, increased sevenfold during 1999. Lending further legitimacy to the E-book market, Microsoft plans to release new reading software this year. Still, it remains to be seen whether readers will become as fond of E-books as they are of, say, that battered, beloved paperback copy of The Catcher in the Rye. After all, it’s probably not wise to read your E-book in the bathtub. Search: “Red + Bumps” Got a weird rash? MotherNature.com has created what it believes is a compelling reason to eschew the mall pharmacy for E-commerce: online you don’t have to query a stranger behind a counter about rash remedies. Instead, Web surfers can find answers for themselves in online books from $500-million health-and-fitness publisher Rodale Inc. — all without leaving MotherNature.com. Jeffrey Steinberg, the online vitamin vendor’s chief marketing officer, believes that good content, such as that offered by health books from the Emmaus, Pa., publisher of Prevention magazine, will increase the site’s “conversion” rate — in other words, more visitors will become spenders. So last summer the Concord, Mass., start-up gave Rodale 8% equity in exchange for the rights to 150 Rodale books for the next 10 years, as well as direct-marketing access to the publisher’s database of 25 million magazine and book buyers. MotherNature.com programmers converted the books to digital form and cross-referenced them with the site’s products. When customers search for rash treatments in one of the books, for example, products containing calendula appear for sale in a frame to the left of the book text. Although he has no conversion data, Steinberg says the content gives MotherNature.com an edge over its competitors, which include VitaminShoppe.com and drugstore.com. Rodale also provides content to Women.com and Petsmart.com. This Way to My Library Imagine your own private library, only instead of having to build bookshelves and buy overstuffed leather chairs, you only need to log on to the Internet. That’s precisely the service Versaware Inc. hopes to provide. At the company’s eBookCity.com Web site, visitors build personal collections that include a free dictionary, thesaurus, and encyclopedia plus many other free titles and competitively priced newer books. The books reside on Versaware servers, so the library doesn’t clutter a user’s hard drive, though downloading is an option at no extra cost. So far, the company — which employs some 400 people in India, Israel, and the United States — has added the E to more than 2,000 books. But these aren’t just any old texts. “There’s a misperception that merely digitizing content is adequate,” says Harry Fox, who cofounded the New York City -based company in 1997. “People are not going to prefer reading on a screen.” So Versaware jazzes up the content with sound, video, and a collection of 350,000 photos. Customers organize their books by category on separate shelves and can perform targeted searches on them. Someone interested in, say, the spawning habits of salmon can search for the fish on the science shelf and leave out the cookbooks. Once a book has been digitized, Fox says, Versaware can make money from it more than once by posting it on other sites. Case in point: Lycos hosts Versaware reference materials, like Funk & Wagnall’s multimedia encyclopedia, on the Lycos Research Center Web page. Lycos and Versaware share advertising revenues from the page. Lycos director of business development Tom Murphy says that surfers using the reference materials stick to the Lycos research pages 50% longer than they did before Lycos posted the Versaware content. Versaware, which in its third round of funding garnered $30 million, faces a significant competitor in NetLibrary Inc. The Boulder, Colo., start-up caters primarily to the higher-education and research market and has received $100 million in venture capital from investors that include Houghton Mifflin and McGraw-Hill. To date, Versaware has multimillion-dollar revenues but no profits. It makes most of its money converting textbooks into CDs for publishing companies, including McGraw-Hill. Jill Hecht Maxwell is a reporter at Inc. Technology. E-BOOK WHO’S WHO AND WHAT THEY DO These companies make dedicated reading devices or sell E-books on the Web Everybook: Plans to market a dedicated reader for professionals; $1,600; www.everybook.net Glassbook: Sells software; has a secure-distribution server for selling books online; free to $39; www.glassbook.com Librius.com: Offers free software; sells E-books at a price comparable to paperbacks; www.books2read.com netLibrary: Provides access to an online library; $30 a year; www.netlibrary.com NuvoMedia: Sells a dedicated reader; $199; www.nuvomedia.com peanutpress.com: Offers free software; sells E-books for handhelds; www.peanutpress.com SoftBook Press: Sells a dedicated reader and E-books; $599; www.softbookpress.com Versaware: Sells E-books; offers online library; free to $50; www.eBookCity.com

The Portable Surfer

Options: Technologies on the Horizon The Internet now reaches your digital phone — without wires. But it’s not the Internet you know By now, you’re probably already aware that E-mail and Web surfing are available on digital phones and other handheld devices. Well, if the prospect of watching people in restaurants and ticket lines tap away at their mobile phones to exchange E-mail, shop, or trade stocks bugs you, look at the bright side: Would you rather they were talking? The top two tool-toys of the new millennium — the mobile phone and the Internet — have finally melded. Through Sprint’s PCS Wireless Web service, the itty-bitty displays of properly equipped digital phones now present live Internet E-mail, news, shopping, and trading. Sprint’s service tips an iceberg of wireless Internet services now coming online not only for phones but for pagers and handheld computers as well. By 2003, according to GartnerGroup’s Dataquest, 33 million people will add themselves to the ranks of those in the United States already sending and receiving E-mail and other nonvoice data — like that airline reservation to Omaha and your sister’s E-auction bid on that great Farber Bros. decanter — wirelessly. If you need anywhere, anytime access to E-mail and the services of the most popular Web sites (and only the most popular Web sites), Internet-connected digital phones, handheld computers, and other wireless gizmos soon to come promise powerful convenience. But don’t take promises of “the power of the wireless Internet in your hand” or “Web w/o Wires” too literally. None of these devices enable you to hop onto the Web and browse around wherever you will, as you can do on a bona fide computer. The “Mini” in the Browser Phones equipped for Sprint’s Wireless Web feature a “MiniBrowser” program. Pay close attention to the first four letters of that name. The “browsing” available from Sprint allows you to choose from among a list of popular Web sites — Yahoo, Amazon.com, CNN.com, and AmeriTrade, to mention a few — that have repackaged their content in a special text-only, simplified version for display on a phone. At this writing, the list features a few hundred sites, but that number is growing steadily. You do just about everything on the Wireless Web simply by pressing the phone’s dialing buttons to make choices from text menus on the phone’s display. Graphics are gone — including the banner ads that clog many sites. Going graphics-free not only permits practical use of a phone’s tiny display but also keeps performance snappy — which is important, since you pay for Wireless Web by the minute. (See “Early Adopter,” below.) In addition to using the featured sites, Sprint users can sign up for “Web updates” — data such as sports scores, stock prices, and auction status delivered to your phone automatically. You choose which updates you want to receive from the Sprint PCS site or from the site where the news originates (such as Yahoo Mobile). Unlike Wireless Web, Web updates require no special phone; all Sprint PCS users can sign up for them. But How Do I Type? On the wireless Web you occasionally have to do something other than choose from menus. Composing messages, telling Amazon.com which book to find, or selecting a stock all require typing text. And that’s when an Internet phone’s biggest drawback becomes most obvious. For activities requiring text entry (such as composing E-mail messages or adding a speed-dial name), each dialing button has four characters assigned to it; for example, press the 2 button once to type a, twice for b, thrice for c, and four times for 2 . Obviously, this is not the means by which you would want to ask Amazon.com to find Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Sex (But Were Afraid to Ask). But it’s tolerable for short search terms, stock symbols, and boilerplate replies such as “Thx 4 msg. Will call u.” There’s a stopgap to the text trouble: you can buy a cable ($100 to $200) to connect Wireless Web-enabled phones to a Palm or Windows CE handheld computer or to the standard serial port in a notebook (or desktop) PC. The phone then functions as a wireless modem, enabling the computer to dial up any Internet provider. That’s not as perfect a solution as it sounds: current wireless technology limits the connection speed to 14Kb, one-quarter the speed of a regular dial-up 56Kb connection and pretty poky for Web surfing — though adequate for E-mail. But the pitch is that users can do much of their work from the phone alone and need to resort to the cable scenario only rarely. Limitations notwithstanding, it’s surprising how much one can actually do on these downsized sites through the phone alone. Yahoo, for example, offers access to all its services (other than Web searches), including E-mail, a personal scheduling service called Calendar, and Web updates of scores, auctions, and stock prices. When your E-mail and calendar are on the Yahoo portal, you can access them from any computer (notebook, desktop, Palm, or Windows CE) that has Web access and from your mobile phone. Shopping sites generally offer catalog searches and full ordering capability — though without graphics, of course, you buy sight unseen. More Handheld Net Coming At this writing, Sprint Wireless Web is the only nationwide carrier offering anything approaching true Internet content over a telephone, although a few regional digital-phone companies (like Bell Atlantic Mobile) are rolling out similar Internet phone services. Some other telecom carriers provide limited sorts of wireless Internet-based services. GTE Wireless and BellSouth Mobility, for example, both let you compose a short text message on a Web site or in an Internet E-mail program and then send that message to appear on the display of a GTE or a BellSouth Mobility subscriber who pays for the optional text-messaging service. BellSouth customers can also get automatic news updates from CNN, similar to Sprint’s Web updates. But is all this the same thing as getting the Internet on your phone? Hardly. Other devices also provide their own versions of Web access to a limited number of sites. Some new digital pager models from Motorola and other manufacturers also access Web-portal content and retrieve E-mail from portals. And the Palm VII Organizer can connect to Palm’s own Palm.Net wireless Internet service to retrieve live Web content and send and receive text messages. But just like Sprint’s Wireless Web, Palm.Net doesn’t let Palm VII users wander the entire Web. Instead, Palm users can access only a certain number of sites (about 130, at press time) that employ a “Web-clipping” application. The program delivers selected data to the user in a format that the Palm VII can display. Of course, it’s appealing that you can access Internet services wirelessly at all. But today the lack of flexibility afforded to wireless aficionados is the biggest drawback to these services. At this moment, your choices are pretty limited. If you choose a Sprint phone, you get Wireless Web. If you choose Palm, you get Palm.Net. Do I Need It? When it comes to portable communications and the Internet, the “Do I need it?” question is moot. These things really come down to “Do I want it?” And you already know the answer to that, don’t you? But seriously, how useful are wireless portal services? Well, as they’re now configured, these services deliver the greatest value to subscribers who already use a portal as their E-mail hub and restrict their Web surfing mainly to such Ôbersites as Amazon.com or CNN — at least when they’re on the road. If you’re dependent on your ISP E-mail account (not a portal) and you really need to surf esoteric sites, wireless portals don’t offer you much. Consider coverage, too, when you’re deciding whether to plunge into wireless Internet. Although Sprint’s national PCS network covers all U.S. metro areas, many rural areas are not included. If you already subscribe to a digital-voice plan, like Sprint PCS or Bell Atlantic Mobile’s SingleRate, you’re probably aware that if you travel outside the digital service area, you can continue to chat, thanks to “roaming” agreements that send your call through the networks of other carriers. But Sprint’s Wireless Web functions only within the smaller confines of Sprint’s all-digital network, cutting out when you stray into roaming regions. Similarly, the Palm.Net network covers more than 260 metro areas but leaves many locations between the cities unserved. (You can examine coverage maps on the www.SprintPCS.com and www.PalmNet.com sites.) More important, watch for an industry association called the WAP Forum made up of more than 200 companies. The group, which includes every heavy hitter in communications and digital hardware, has developed Wireless Application Protocol, a new global specification that will standardize the way wireless devices exchange and display voice and data. Already in use in Europe and Japan and set to explode in the U.S. market this year, WAP defines a new language — WML (wireless markup language) — for creating Web pages intended for use by wireless devices. What does this mean to you? A variety of digital-phone makers, including Nokia and Ericsson, are building so-called “WAP-enabled” devices that are part phone, part personal digital assistant. When they hit the United States this year (priced at around $500), these hybrid handhelds should be able to display any Web page that’s been translated into the new language. To get the goodies from WAP, you must be holding a WAP device — meaning that virtually every U.S. user of an Internet phone at this writing will need a new phone (pardon, new device). The full transition to WAP will take several years. During that time companies like Spyglass and Digital Paths are delivering software that automatically converts everyday HTML Web sites into WML. The software promises to enable WAP users to see any Web site online, including the millions of pages that may not have been retooled in wireless-friendly WML. If you’re ready to run out this instant to visit Mel, the take-no-prisoners electronics salesman (“Want the extended warranty on that, pal?”), you’re probably also the type who’ll be drooling over sexy new WAP devices by year’s end. By then, your sexy pre-WAP communicator may seem as obsolete as a CB radio. You may want to hold on to your money until the new toys arrive. Ned Snell is a freelance writer living in Florida. He is the author of 16 books, including Teach Yourself the Internet in 24 Hours , Third Edition (Sams, 1999). Who Are the Players, and What’s the Cost? Wireless Internet service is sold in the same sorts of mind-twisting packages in which voice services are sold, although minute for minute it’s more expensive. For example, with Sprint, $50 will get you 500 voice-only minutes, and $60 will purchase 300 minutes that you can use for both voice and Wireless Web. The information below was accurate at press time, but prices in this market change rapidly. Check with providers for current details, and watch for discounts and special offers, which are common. DEVICES Internet-Ready Phones Digital phones compatible with Sprint Wireless Web start at around $130 and are available from several manufacturers. You can get them in all-digital or dual-band models. Major makers include: NeoPoint : 858-458-2800 Ericsson : 800-374-2776 Motorola (phones and pagers) : 800-453-0920 Nokia : 888-665-4228 Qualcomm : 800-349-4188 Palm Computers Palm Inc. : 800-881-7256 Palm VII Organizer: $500 (street) SERVICES Sprint PCS Wireless Web : Monthly plans range from $60 for 300 minutes (combo of voice and Internet) to $180 for 1,200 minutes. All such plans also include 200 Web updates. Additional minutes cost 25¢ to 30¢ each, depending on the plan, and additional Web updates are 10¢ each. You can add 50 minutes of data and 50 Web updates for another $10 to your existing voice plan of $30. (No matter how you work it out, adding data to the mix increases the per-minute cost. Sprint’s twist of plan options can make that hard to notice.) Finally, you may also sign up for a voice-only plan, purchase no Wireless Web plan, and still use the Wireless Web as needed for 39¢ a minute. (You must purchase a compatible phone for any Wireless Web; Web updates may be received on any phone used on Sprint PCS.) Palm.Net : Three plans are available, all tying cost to the number of “transactions” performed per month. A transaction is one message, one stock quote, one score, and so on. The basic $10 plan includes 80 transactions. For $25, you get 240 transactions. Up it to $40, and you can tick away 480 transactions. EARLY ADOPTER What’s the business benefit of tapping the Internet through a telephone? Well, have you heard about the guy who started a company while riding an airport courtesy bus? Howard Gerson, president and co-owner of Certified Safety Inc., a 200-employee Kansas City­based maker of first-aid supplies, was itching for E-mail from a business partner in Israel. Gerson saw getting that message and posting a reply pronto as a vital relationship volley in founding a new “M-commerce” (that’s “M” for mobile) venture to be co-owned by Gerson, his family, and TeleVend, a one-year-old, Jerusalem-based company that supplies network services and applications to the vending-machine industry. But by the morning on which Gerson was packing up his family for a trip, the missive from the Land of Milk and Honey hadn’t arrived. After dropping his family at the airport terminal, parking the car, and boarding the courtesy bus to ride back to the terminal, Gerson connected to Sprint’s Wireless Web service through his NeoPoint 1000 digital phone. He opened the Yahoo portal from the phone’s MiniBrowser menu, retrieved his Yahoo E-mail — and breathed a sigh of relief. The message he’d been waiting for had finally arrived. Using the phone’s keypad, he quickly replied. Gerson says that the exchange — with “no cables connected, on a bus in the middle of Kansas” — was a critical step in the formation of Wirca Inc., which will develop and market wireless cash-transaction technologies. Gerson says Wirca’s products will make it possible, for example, to pick up a hamburger and fries at the local fast-food palace without handing over cash or a credit card — the transaction will take place automatically, wirelessly, as you drive through. Admitting that text entry is cumbersome, Gerson says it’s manageable enough for brief responses. For more full-featured E-mailing, he hooks his phone to his notebook PC through the optional cable and wirelessly dials his regular Internet provider. That comes in handy not only on the road, says Gerson, but also at home, where having four kids can make the availability of an open phone line “a challenge.” Tapping into the Web solely from his phone, Gerson has dipped into the MiniBrowser’s other offerings. He has made wireless transactions on AmeriTrade’s site and recently ordered a book from Amazon.com during a lull at a breakfast meeting. Though he has been a Yahoo portal customer for two years and an avid user of Yahoo mail, Gerson doesn’t manage his schedule on the portal, preferring to keep his calendar in his phone’s built-in, off-line scheduling application. Such phone features, along with the NeoPoint’s large (for a phone) display, blur the boundaries between mobile phones and personal digital assistants. The blur has come far enough for Gerson; a longtime Palm user, he has abandoned his PDA in favor of his phone.