Tag Archives: Indiana

Ask Inc.

Q. Scammers have been downloading software from my website using stolen PayPal accounts. What can I do? Jerry Montealto Ecommercemax Solutions, Winnetka, Calif. Those PayPal accounts may have been swiped with the identity-theft technique known as phishing. Unfortunately, it’s your business that’s on the hook. PayPal’s seller-protection policy covers only physical goods, leaving digital dealers, who must refund scammed customers, out of luck. PayPal is considering extending coverage to digital goods this year, says spokesperson Amanda Pires. Your best bet is to beef up security. A number of tools let vendors vet orders before granting approval. For example, most shopping cart software can be customized to flag certain orders for rejection or further review. Companies such as Cybersource, based in Mountainview, Calif., also offer souped-up antifraud services. Rates vary, but prices start at $495 a month, plus 12 cents per transaction. How can you tell if a transaction looks hinky? First, check a map. Flag any order with a shipping address more than 50 miles away from a billing address (a must even for downloadable orders), says Doc Vaidhyanathan, VP of Product Marketing & Corporate Development for Arcot Systems, based in Sunnyvale, Calif. Computer IP addresses are also revealing. Last year, for example, online novelty store ThinkGeek experienced a surge in fraudulent credit card orders from computers in Singapore and Nigeria. So director William Vandais set the site to reject orders from those countries. The site also weeds orders from places with small upticks in fraud for manual review. Once you’ve directed an order to step out of line, give it the once-over. For example, make sure that the information on the order form matches that on the shopper’s PayPal account. Check that orders from repeat customers aren’t out of the ordinary: a guy who shells out $50 a pop suddenly slapping down $1,000, say. If an order still smells phishy, call the account holder for verbal authorization, explaining the fraud problem. “You don’t want to make it difficult for people to buy your merchandise,” says Vandais. “But you can’t give it away, either.” You should also estimate how much you spend on refunds each quarter and set aside funds to cover that loss. A few bad orders are going to sneak in no matter how many bouncers you station at the door. Q. I sell lampshades to niche retailers. Recently, some big chains have approached me. Should I sell to them under private label? Brandon Grinwis A’Homestead Co., Lapaze, Ind. The public doesn’t know from private. If your shades are sold under one name at Wal-Mart and another at Lamps Unto My Feet, consumers won’t get that it’s the same product. As a result, private-label deals have proliferated along with big-box stores, allowing manufacturers to play the field without coming off as a cheap date. But beware: A rose by any other name smells. At least it will to your existing customers if you try to keep them in the dark, says Todd Maute, vice president of marketing at Daymon Worldwide, a marketing firm based in Stamford, Conn., that specializes in private labels. Maute recommends telling your niche customers if you plan to go mass market, assuring them that the private label will protect your brand’s equity. You can further reassure them by adding value to the products you sell to specialty clients. Mary Swaab, CEO of Colorlab Cosmetics, based in Rockford, Ill., sells $5 lipsticks in plain silver tubes to mass retailers that package them as in-house brands. Swaab sells the same lipsticks to such high-end stores as Saks Fifth Avenue for $11 each. But Saks also gets colorful packaging and the Colorlab logo. Before signing a deal, determine whether the mass market is for you. Two years ago, Mark Dwight, CEO of San Francisco-based bag maker Timbuk2, backed out of an agreement to sell messenger bags at CompUSA stores under his own label. Sales were great, he says, but his $6 million business couldn’t handle the slim margins and CompUSA’s insatiable hunger for product. Dwight has turned down private-label offers as well; instead he is pursuing a larger share of the specialty market under the name Timbuk2. “The magic and the value of what you are creating in your business is in your brand,” he says. Looking for answers? Stumped by a thorny business problem? Let Inc. help. Send your questions to Askinc@inc.com.

2002 Web Awards Honorable Mention Winners

The following 10 companies, ranging from a one-person marketing agency to a famous cheesecake bakery, weren’t among the ultimate winners in the 2002 Inc Web Awards competition. But because all demonstrated outstanding returns — some financial, some less tangible — on their Web investments, judges decided they special recognition. So here are this year’s honorable-mention winners, along with a snapshot of the ROI payoffs that earned our judges’ admiration: Company: Advanced Circuits, Aurora, Colo.URL: www.4pcb.comWhat it does: Manufactures custom-printed circuit boardsWhat we liked: This bare-bones Web site won’t win any design awards, but CEO Ron Huston says it’s gotten great results, generating $15 million annually in new revenues. The site provides a range of self-service functions, including customized price quotes delivered in a few seconds, automatic order entry, and ability to check order status. Company: CustomInk LLC, Fairfax, Va.URL: www.customink.comWhat it does: Promotional product vendor; provides custom-printed T-shirts and other itemsWhat we liked: CEO Mark Katz credits Web site with helping company track and target on-line advertising. For instance, in September and October of 2002, CustomInk’s $33,221 expenditure on on-line ads reaped $337,407 in sales. Web technology also helps CustomInk reduce errors from the industry average of 8-12% to less than 2%. Company: Beverly Shores Group, Beverly Shore, Ind.URL: www.beverlyshoresgroup.com What it does: Marketing communications agencyWhat we liked: Web site allows soloist Deborah S. Ramstorf to attract clients from Canada and Australia as well as the United States; she now receives 60% of her business via the Internet. She credits search engine placement and content on her Web site as two ways she drives traffic — and sales. Over 75% of her total sales come from her on-line presence. “My Web site has definitely been worth the investment,” Ramstorf adds. Company: Eli’s Cheesecake Co., ChicagoURL: www.elicheesecake.comWhat it does: Dessert bakeryWhat we liked: The famous cheesecake-maker’s Web site lets customers design their own customized “C-Cakes” on-line. Buyers choose from among 800 options for toppings (such as whipped cream or chocolate mousse), decorations (such as gummy bears, marshmallows, or sprinkles), and personal messages. On-line sales increased 65% since Eli’s introduced the $49 product in September 2000. Company: My Virtual Corp., Louisville, Ky.URL: www.myvirtualcorp.com What it does: Business service outsourcer; provides virtual work teams for client projects What we liked: CEO Merrily Orsini credits Web site with helping produce an 120% increase in new clients in 2001; monthly revenues in 2002 exceeded previous year’s by an average of 450%. Company: Recom Group Inc., San Dimas, Calif. URL: www.recomgroup.com and 12 related industry-specific sites What it does: Provides displays for merchandising of products and servicesWhat we liked: In 1999, Recom Group made $5,000 on-line. The company expects to finish 2002 with approximately $2 million in sales. Thanks to sales through spin-off sites like cardboarddisplays.com and musicdisplays.com, 55% of those sales come from the Internet. Company: ROI Teleservicing Corp., Weston, Fla. URL: www.teleplaza.com What it does: Consulting firm; specializes in call centers and customer-service operationsWhat we liked: Web site serves as a telecom industry portal, serving clients by offering well-organized collection of links to 850 relevant sites. This year, Teleplaza.com saw a 94% renewal rate on paid listings, which is up from 78% in 2001. CEO Jim Moylan credits a related site, CallCenterJobs.com, with increasing overall revenues by 35% over the past two years and attracting 18 new paid advertisers for the TelePlaza Digest e-mail newsletters. Several new products added to both CallCenterJobs.com and TelePlaza.com also have increased the company’s overall sales by 45% since September. Company: Shoebuy.com, BostonURL: www.shoebuy.comWhat it does: On-line shoe retailer What we liked: Web site helps customers overcome reluctance to buy shoes without trying them on. Revenues continue to increase by 50% per quarter. Shoebuy.com spends less than $7 per customer acquired for an average transaction of nearly $84, resulting in nearly a $30 profit per transaction. Company: The Wireless Source Inc., Bloomfield Hills, Mich. URL: www.thewirelesssource.com What it does: Distributes new, used, and remanufactured wireless phones What we liked: Web site automates sales, customer service, and returns processing. CEO Bob Sullivan credits site with expanding the company’s prospect base by 300% and its customer base by 25%. It’s also generated more than $1 million in new business and reduced costs by allowing customers to process their own returns, without employee intervention. Says Sullivan: “Our best ROI is yet to come.” Company: VirtualBank Mortgage, Palm Beach Gardens, Fla. URL: www.virtualbankmortgage.com What it does: Mortgage lender; specializes in “jumbo” and “super jumbo” mortgages of $200,000 to $4 millionWhat we liked: VirtualBank Mortgage credits its Web site with increasing its average monthly loan volume by 50% and saving nearly $8,000 per week by eliminating the company’s massive fax barrages to its partners. Because customers can now check their own loan status anytime, the site has also cut the number of incoming telephone inquiries by 90%.

Payday

Best of the Net Four sites to turn to when you want to benchmark your salary structure. To launch or expand a company in times like these is an act of defiant optimism. But even optimists need to make payroll. How much will you have to pay to attract or keep the kind of talent your new venture will need? The Web can help. Dozens of sites report salary data: sites for job hunters, for corporate managers relocating to a new city, and for compensation professionals who set pay rates in large companies. There are even salary-data sites for entrepreneurs like you. All that information would be too much of a good thing — if it were useful to growing businesses. The bad news is that even the best salary sites get most, if not all, of their data from surveys conducted at large companies. Small businesses are for the most part left out of the picture. Even small cities are often ignored. Moreover, some sites — admittedly the very worst — let Web surfers input their own data with no external checks on the accuracy of their entries. One challenge, then, is to find reliable, useful numbers that you can access quickly, preferably at no cost. With those criteria in mind, we narrowed the field of salary-data Web sites to just four: Salary.com, SalaryExpert.com, CareerJournal.com, and the online version of Occupational Outlook Handbook, posted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Then we asked a panel of compensation experts to review them: Matt Ward, CEO at WestWard Pay Strategies Inc., an executive-pay consulting firm in San Francisco; Raylana S. Anderson, owner and president of Anderson Consulting, an HR adviser in Peoria, Ill.; and Kathy B. Rogers, president and CEO of staffing company Time Services Inc., in Fort Wayne, Ind. While our judges liked much of what they saw, they also warned that salary surveys should be only one of many sources you consider when setting pay scales. Similarly, they unanimously recommended checking out multiple salary sites rather than relying on just one; reading the survey notes carefully; and taking what you find with a large grain of salt. For one, consider that most salary surveys are out-of-date as soon as they appear, the judges said. Also, try to determine when, why, and how the raw information was collected; then look at how the site reached its conclusions. Most important, remember that only you can decide whether a salary site’s findings are relevant to your company, job descriptions, and goals. Jane Salodof MacNeil is a freelance writer in Groveland, Mass. The Savvy Entrepreneur’s Guide to Salary Data on the Web Site What it’s good for Don’t waste your time if What our CEOs had to say What you should know Salary.com www.salary.com Base pay for 4,000 job titles, searchable by either keyword or job category. You want to see pay levels sorted by company size or industry. “It’s comprehensive, quick, and easy to navigate,” said Kathy Rogers, who ranked Salary.com as her favorite of the four sites. Data for national averages are purchased from compensation consultants. SalaryExpert.com www.salaryexpert.com Salary data by city, state, and job position — plus comparisons with national norms. You want pay levels sorted by company size or industry, or pay levels for executive-level jobs. SalaryExpert was Raylana Anderson’s favorite of the four sites. She praised its valid data and solid methodology. Salary data come from the Economic Research Institute, a well-respected industry source. CareerJournal.com www.careerjournal.com General career, relocation, and headhunter information. You expect the site’s salary wizard to follow a consistent standard. Matt Ward called it his least favorite of the four sites. “Not for CEOs,” he said. “Can’t find pay info that’s meaningful.” Editorial content comes from the Wall Street Journal. (Both the site and newspaper are owned by Dow Jones & Co.) Occupational Outlook Handbook http://www.bls.gov/oco/ Detailed descriptions of occupations, useful in defining job responsibilities. You want the latest pay data. Most of the salary numbers date back to 1998. Two reviewers complained that the salary numbers were both outdated and buried in text. On this government site, the key word is outlook. Job-market changes are forecast through 2008. Copyright © 2001 Jane Salodof MacNeil. The Whole New Business Catalog The Downsizer’s Dilemma Risk Factors No More ‘Etch A Sketch’ Planning The 24-Hour Recovery Plan Squeeze Plays ‘Strap on Your Helmets’ Payday Please e-mail your comments to editors@inc.com.

Video Births the Internet Star

Convergence New technologies stand to make Internet video as useful and ubiquitous as the telephone. How will it work for your company? You’ve heard it all before, and not that long ago. Teleconferencing was supposed to drive airlines into the ground. Telecommuting was going to make office complexes obsolete, and we were all going to work in our bathrobes. Television was going to converge with the Internet and the computer to form one big box. It’s easy to mistake the progress of the present day for the revolution of the near future. In 1993, Time magazine wrote, “Suddenly the brave new world of video phones and smart TVs that futurists have been predicting for decades is not years away, but months.” And that was not the first time such a promise had been made. Gad Liwerant, president and CEO of VideoShare, a provider of Internet video services in Watertown, Mass., says, “More than 35 years ago the big telecom carriers were always saying the phone was going to come with a screen, but it never really took off.” Well, this time it’s different. Really. This time there’s not just one silver-bullet technology that will supposedly revolutionize the ways in which we do business but rather a convergence of technologies that are all advancing at once. And they will all help deliver cheap, convenient high-quality video over the Internet. “Video’s going to be integrated into everything from your PC and your TV to your cell phone or PDA,” says Neal Manowitz, vice-president of marketing and business development for Vingage, a Reston, Va., company that creates server software for online video delivery. “If you launched a Web page today, you’d be shocked if there wasn’t a picture on that page. Five years from now, you’ll be surprised if you don’t see video. It would be like turning on the TV today and seeing a still image.” Sounds like the grandiose pronouncements of the past, no? But here’s what’s different now: advances in the software used to compress and deliver video, combined with increased computing power and the spread of high-bandwidth delivery services, are fostering the creation of new Internet video technologies. Providers are already creating wild new consumer services. Sony’s ImageStation.com, for instance, allows users to archive and share home movies online. And on the way are new tools that will offer even small businesses the capability of using live and recorded video for everything from Web brochures to training to customer service. Of course, we heard the same kind of promises about the picture phone. And a video clip, or even a two-way live videoconference, will never replace a face-to-face schmooze with your best customer or lead investor. “People have been dreaming about video as a travel substitute since the oil crisis,” says Paul Saffo of the Institute for the Future, in Menlo Park, Calif. “It’s a myth. The more we communicate electronically, the more we go to face-to-face meetings.” So the new promise of video is not the replacement of air travel or television or telephones as we know them. It’s about technologies that are satisfying, cheap, and easy to use, and that don’t require special equipment. You can see the difference already with devices like Web cameras. “Even a few years ago, you had to open your machine, install software, and then set up the camera,” says VideoShare’s Liwerant. “Now all you have to do is plug the camera into a USB port.” In the same way, Internet video is finally getting good. “Video technologies are going to provide a revenue-generating opportunity that never existed before. It’s an entirely new channel,” says James Canton, president of the Institute for Global Futures, a high-tech think tank based in San Francisco. Canton’s research predicts that E-commerce sites with live video will generate more sales than competitors without such features will be able to do. Right now, says Canton, 75% to 80% of people who are looking to make a purchase online fail to do so, largely because they get confused. “There’s no one there to help them,” Canton says, adding that video — either a product demo or a live, two-way help center — could conceivably provide that assistance. “Small businesses should be adopting this stuff faster. It will give them a chance to establish brand awareness, whereas big companies aren’t going to change so fast.” Taking that step shouldn’t be too scary, says Dominic Milano, editor-in-chief of DV (digital video) magazine, in San Francisco. “There’s no real barrier to entry anymore. The tools are more powerful, and they’re really cheap. It really all came to a head at some point in the middle of last year. It’s like somebody threw all the pieces in a big stew pot, and it started to congeal.” The new promise of video is not the replacement of air travel or television or telephones as we know them. It’s about technologies that are satisfying, cheap, and easy to use. One of the advancing technologies bringing better video to the Net is compression software. Here’s how it works: A piece of software reviews a video file, effectively “deciding” which parts of the picture don’t have to be duplicated for every frame. Think of the passionate beach scene in From Here to Eternity, in which Deborah Kerr and Burt Lancaster are all over each other on the sand as the surf encroaches. A compression algorithm would review that scene and see that the sand and the sky are pretty much static. Only the wriggling actors and wild waves would need to be updated in every frame. That cuts down the size of the file. Once the file is compressed, it’s translated into file formats (such as those developed by RealNetworks, Microsoft, and Apple) and delivered to viewers through streaming-video service providers (such as Yahoo Broadcast, I-Beam Broadcasting, Activate, or Digital Island). Competition among such developers and providers has kept up pressure to make delivery more efficient. RealNetworks now uses an Intel compression system called SureStream, which functions like the advance team for a presidential candidate. When a user clicks on a video file, SureStream shoots out ahead to detect the speed at which he or she is connecting to the Internet. Then it matches the downloading speed to the user’s connection. That way, even users with slow-modem Internet connections will be able to watch the clip, although not with the same quality enjoyed by someone with a broadband connection. Improvements in compression and delivery of video files have boosted traffic on the Internet to the point where it often threatens to overwhelm the Net’s capacity. So there is a third technology in play that will help expand access to high-quality Web video: improvements in the capacity of the Internet itself. “The Internet became its own worst enemy,” says Sanjay Srivastava, vice-president of enterprise services for Akamai Technologies, a kind of Internet traffic cop headquartered in Cambridge, Mass. Akamai helps manage traffic on the Internet through hundreds of networks it has installed in countries all over the world, which it operates from a room that looks like the NORAD command center, with giant screens displaying maps of the continents. You can store multiple, or redundant, copies of Web pages — including video — on Akamai’s servers. So if your company is in Indiana and you want to stream your financial presentation to investors in New York City, you can hook it up to a server in Manhattan, rather than one in Muncie, to send it more efficiently. “We’re a visual species. You can go back and find cave drawings from thousands of years ago” to prove it, says James Canton, president of high-tech think tank Institute for Global Futures. A fourth frontier that technology has now crossed enables users to receive fat video files, thanks to the increased power of personal computing and the spread of broadband delivery. According to senior analyst Jeremy Schwartz of Forrester Research in Cambridge, Mass., about 5 million homes will have broadband Internet access at the end of this year, with a critical mass of 19 million households wired up by 2002. So where are the great new business tools? They’re coming, and very soon. Already, developers are providing new products that make video more flexible. For example, there’s Krishna Pendyala, who six years ago was assistant director of a National Science Foundation project at Carnegie Mellon University that focused on making video a more meaningful communication tool. “Text can communicate only 7% of a message,” Pendyala says. “The rest is body language, the audio, the visual content.” Or as futurist James Canton says, “We’re a visual species. You can go back and find cave drawings from thousands of years ago” to prove it. Pendyala and his fellow researchers tried using technology to map out important messages on video, including software that could “recognize” speech and language patterns as well as images. Essentially, they were indexing video electronically, a task traditionally carried out manually by a lot of employees fortified with cases of Pepsi. By 1997, Pendyala and his team had founded MediaSite in Pittsburgh, and last year they launched an Internet-video search engine. That Carnegie Mellon project has spawned a technology that will surely be a boon for companies with archived video, and it’s ready now. Businesses that are already using it include a health-information Web site and a conference producer. Companies are also already using Internet video to communicate with customers and investors. CUseeMe Networks, headquartered in Nashua, N.H., has launched two-way videoconferencing on the Web at www.cuseemeworld.com. The service is free, except for the $99 Web cam you need to beam your gorgeous mug out over the Internet. “Teleconferencing was a niche market with a few hundred thousand units worldwide running on ISDN lines,” recalls CEO Killko Caballero. “The proprietary equipment cost $100,000. Early-stage PCs couldn’t handle video.” Today, Caballero says, the company makes money by hosting the back end of other companies’ face-to-face Web call centers. Novell and Ericsson recently launched a video instant-messaging service with CUseeMe’s technology. Liwerant’s VideoShare offers video E-mail as well. Most of the business tools being forecasted for the new age of Web video, however, have yet to be invented. Not until Internet video is truly ubiquitous will all the possibilities become apparent. “Streaming is one of the first truly converged voice, video, and data applications on the Web,” says Alex Benik, an analyst at the Yankee Group in Boston. “It’s the forerunner of truly futuristic next-generation applications that will run on IP-based networks.” Applications now in development include “hotspotting,” a kind of video version of Amazon’s “1-Click.” Hotspotting would allow you to, say, watch a clip of an Olympic snowboarder and click on his board. That would process an E-commerce transaction. Two days later a snowboard would appear at your door and a charge would show up on your Visa bill. Some new tools may be built from current technologies. For example, there’s Princeton Video Image’s virtual advertising technology, which is used at sporting events to superimpose digital images on stadium walls. The company says the same effect could be created using Internet video. And MediaSite introduced a video-skimming product at the end of last year. Video skimming uses speech- and language-comprehension software to find key themes of a video presentation and take out all the “Thank you very much for coming” stuff. The resulting thumbnail videos are as much as 90% shorter than the originals, so they save time and bandwidth. Progress on another tech frontier — wireless — will help make video easier to use. Japan is leading the way on this one, but industry watchers predict it will be only a year to 18 months before the United States sees streaming video on a handheld personal digital assistant or a Web-enabled phone with an improved display screen, no cables necessary. “Right now you can access the Internet and get some content delivered to your cell phone,” says Vingage’s Manowitz. “Imagine how much more powerful it will be when that content is video.” In video, content is the killer app. And the first companies to explore the new uses of Web video are, so far, content producers and providers like E Screening Room. Founder Ward Bouwman spent a year in E-mail conversation with RealNetworks engineers before deciding that the time was right to launch his documentary-film E-commerce site. Bouwman, a former Discovery Channel documentary associate producer, says technology has caught up to his business concept: using the Internet to eliminate the middlemen who take big cuts from a film’s profits. “It’s hard for documentaries to find the right target audience because the audience is not geographically oriented. They’re communities of interest. That’s why the Internet is an ideal medium,” Bouwman says. “So I’ve been watching the technology, building the Web site, and testing it. For us, the video is of good-enough quality right now.” But for most business users, the issue isn’t so much quality as it is utility. “The next step is, How do you take all this streaming capability and tie it in to your back end — your employee-learning management and your customer- relationship-management database?” says Akamai’s Srivastava. “When you do a live video presentation online and Joe Blow customer asks a question, you want to know that Joe buys $40,000 worth of stuff a month or that he hasn’t bought anything in three months. You can respond to his question a lot more intelligently.” Video can be tied in to just about any business function. Training is an obvious application. But there are industry-specific applications as well. In manufacturing, for example, you’ll be able to diagnose and repair machinery from a remote location. “We should stop looking at video as something discrete or separate from the rest of the world. It’s like telephony,” says Christine Perey, a video-technology consultant based in Placerville, Calif. “It’s part of HR, part of supply-chain management, part of financial planning with your retirement consultant. It’s embedded. It doesn’t have to be considered the primary application. The primary application is, What do you want to do today?” “Right now you can access the Internet and get some content delivered to your cell phone,” says Neal Manowitz, vice president of marketing for Vingage, which creates server software for online video delivery. “Imagine how much more powerful it will be when that content is video.” Skeptics will — and should — wonder whether any of this will happen, and if it does, what it all will mean. According to Perey, even if you removed all the technological barriers, there would still be the human factor. “Do you remember how uncomfortable we used to feel leaving voice mail and how awkward it was to receive it? Today getting a live person is the exception to the rule,” she says. “It’s the same with video. We need to get to a level of user familiarity, user comfort. Then not only will people not be afraid of it, but it will be one more step in lowering the perceived difference between small and large businesses, just as the Internet has lowered the access barrier of small businesses to global audiences.” Another detail that will have to be worked out before video reaches the no-brainer status of the telephone: billing. How will all the new streaming-media providers charge customers for their services? “Pricing is an extremely deep black hole,” says Perey. “Think about how a cell phone works,” says MediaSite’s Pendyala. “When you’re on a call, the signal jumps from one tower to another, each one owned by somebody else. Imagine if you got 150 bills a month from all those tower owners. I guarantee I would not use a cell phone. There needs to be a whole industry cooperating for video. It has to be easy to buy, easy to install, and easy to use.” Perey predicts, “The most successful model in the future is going to be a blend of a subscription model and a premium fee for services as you go.” It’s likely that the greatest benefits of video are things we haven’t even thought of yet. “The next-generation Internet will become more secure and faster, but ultimately it will become more intelligent as well. Video enablement is just a part of that,” says futurist James Canton. Jill Hecht Maxwell is a reporter at Inc. Technology. Please e-mail your comments to editors@inc.com.

Start-Up Diaries: A Vexing Catch-22

Start-Up Diaries: Update Unable to find funding, 10 Minute Manicure reluctantly takes a step backward 10 Minute Manicure Company: Would-be chain of manicure kiosks in airports Founders: Vivian Jimenez, 32; Lorraine Brennan O’Neil, 36; and Karen Janson, 34 Making the call to the Pittsburgh Airport Authority was one of the toughest things that 10 Minute Manicure cofounder and CEO Karen Janson ever had to do. She was, she knew, admitting defeat. Janson and her cofounders — Vivian Jimenez and Lorraine Brennan O’Neil — had to back out of their hard-won agreement for space for the first of what they had hoped would be a chain of manicure-on-the-fly kiosks in airports throughout the country. Stepping back from that dream “was absolutely not what I wanted,” Janson recalls. But instead she did have something else that she had wanted for much longer — her first child was on the way. And with the unexpected, but happy, news of her pregnancy, Janson and her colleagues found themselves in a vexing catch-22. They had already achieved what everyone — in their minds — had doubted they could in getting the airport contract in the first place. “It was beyond our wildest dreams that we got Pittsburgh to buy into our concept,” says Janson. But the one thing they had failed to do was to find a much-needed financial backer. “So far we still haven’t found cushion money,” explains Janson. “You go to these meetings with a certain little bit of cynicism at this point. We’ve met with so many people.” Originally, the three women had thought that Janson, the only cofounder who had completely given up a job to launch the business, could travel regularly to Pittsburgh until they had the funds (a minimum of $250,000, they calculated) to hire permanent staff. But Janson’s pregnancy changed all that, and finding a backer became essential. Months into the money hunt, the women were becoming used to the objections: most prospective investors wanted to see proof of concept, up and running. “Most of them don’t want to put money in a concept without money on the books,” says Janson. “They’d like to see the actual thing happening.” But perhaps more frustrating was the fact that many of the investors that they talked to had unrealistic expectations — anticipating a return on investment in line with some of the Nasdaq stars. “One company we talked to wanted, in three years, $100 million,” says Janson. “We just can’t compete with that.” For now, the women have not given up. They are allowing themselves another 90 days (from June 1) to see if they can launch a more modest site closer to home — perhaps in a local Miami office building. “We’ve already started talks with several different leasing companies that manage buildings in both Miami and Fort Lauderdale,” Janson reports. “We felt like if we can get one store up and running, we’ll go back to the investors who said maybe.” But they know that time is starting to run out. If they can’t get a site launched in the next few months, Janson says, “it’s going to be very difficult for us to overcome.” In hindsight the founders realize that pursuing only the airport-kiosk business was probably a strategic mistake. But for the time being, they are still willing to stick it out longer if there is a chance of success. Even if 10 Minute Manicure fails to get off the ground, the experience already has been life changing for at least one of the cofounders. “Even if this disappears, I’ve had a taste of this kind of life,” Jimenez explains. “I can’t imagine going back to the drudgery of the corporate world.” –Karen Dillon Where they are now Hire authority Company: edu.com, in Boston, creator of a Web site where college students can buy stuff cheap and where the companies selling that stuff can do research on a students-only audience Founder: Adam Kanner, 29 Status: Kanner has been in Mike Wallace mode recently: all he seems to do is interview people. Edu.com’s founder and CEO spent most of the spring sizing up close to 75 candidates for a slew of senior-management positions — -including a chief technology officer, a vice-president of customer insight, and, most important, a president. “We were looking for a COO but hired a CEO-caliber person, meaning he and I are going to run this business in partnership,” says Kanner. The president will free Kanner from “process and organization and all those wonderful internal things,” says the CEO. It also means a new, probably healthier, reporting relationship for Linda Kanner, vice-president of marketing and Adam’s mom. “That’s going to be good for us,” says Adam Kanner. Meanwhile, the CEO, who still lives in a fourth-floor walk-up the size of a postage stamp, is contemplating buying a washer and dryer for Edu.com’s offices. “It would certainly make my life easier,” he says. –Leigh Buchanan License for success Company: Application Technologies, in San Diego, a licenser of new packaging technology, notably the Appli-K Pouch Founder: Johann Verheem, 34 Status: Solid licensing agreements mean the pouch will be used in dozens of skin-care and medical products by mid-2001. The company won’t break $1 million in revenues this year, but long term, revenues should well exceed expectations. In six to nine months the technology will be established, and Verheem is already thinking exit strategy and on to the next venture. –Michael Warshaw On the shelf Company: Inca Quality Foods, in South Bend, Ind., a distributor and “micromerchandiser” of Hispanic foods in grocery stores Founder: Luis J. Espinoza, 49 Status: Espinoza, after exploring a few potential joint ventures that have not worked out, has reduced Inca Quality Foods to a warehouse operation for local Hispanic grocery stores in the South Bend area. He has several ideas for future projects, but none has been compelling enough to pull him away from his full-time job and the pension he’ll be eligible for in two years. –Nancy Lyons 3-D operation Company: FÚxito Worldwide Inc., in Cambridge, Mass., a Web site offering E-commerce, news, and recruiting data for the international soccer community Founders: Richard Powell, 21; and Daniel Hoffer, 22 Status: When interviewed on his 21st birthday, CEO Powell knew exactly what would make an ideal gift: $10 million. Not coincidentally, that’s how much FÚxito hopes to raise in its second round of funding. In the meantime, in order to “make sure we can last out any hiccups in the Nasdaq or in general investor sentiment,” Powell negotiated a short-term cash infusion from existing investors. He’ll spend the money acquiring and creating content for the site, which has lately grown to include coverage of women’s soccer and has introduced a 3-D component. “We’re seeing a consolidation in our market, but we’re unfazed,” says Powell, who expects to return to Harvard University as a senior this fall. “We’ve built our company on a solid foundation.” –Joshua Hyatt Read the complete Start-Up Diaries series. Please e-mail your comments to editors@inc.com.

The Forks in Their Roads

Start-Up Diaries The forks in their roads Our story so far… It’s been just three months since the January issue of Inc. launched the Start-up Diaries, introducing five new businesses and their founders, and promising to report on their progress — or lack of it — in future issues. But that’s three months of start-up time. Which is to say, time when anything can happen. Luis Espinoza, the electronics technician moonlighting as a Hispanic-foods entrepreneur, was offered a potential revenue windfall and turned it down for want of the $250,000 he would have needed to pursue it. He seems happy enough with his choice, but where does it leave his company? Meanwhile, edu.com’s Adam Kanner did get his money ($30 million in new capital, to be exact) but still can’t be sure it’s sufficient to make his E-commerce Web site for students work the way it needs to. Still looking for funding or strategic partners were Johann Verheem of Application Technologies as well as the three cofounders of 10 Minute Manicure — though the three have scored a major contract by changing their concept. Will that decision hurt them later? And as for the two Harvard students squeezing in their start-up chores between classes, they may have a surprising new deal, too. Levi’s has approached them about modeling their jeans. For more details, read on. In the money COMPANY: edu.com, in Boston, creator of a Web site where college students can buy stuff cheap and where the companies selling that stuff can market to and do research on the students FOUNDER: Adam Kanner, 29 AT OUR LAST LOOK: Kanner was hunting for desperately needed capital in amounts that would dwarf the $4 million he’d already raised. The site was struggling technologically. And Kanner was sorting out his working relationship with his chief operating officer — Linda Kanner, his mother. LAST DIARY ENTRY: ” Mother Is the Necessity of Invention“ Things at edu.com have ballooned. A small, discreet sign remains affixed to the start-up’s front door, but it’s dwarfed by a back-lighted, billboard-size “monstrosity” (as CEO Adam Kanner calls it) above that loudly proclaims edu.com’s presence to workers in Boston’s financial district. The company’s staff of 60 or so people, who’d previously worked two to a desk in a spartan, 3,000-square-foot office, has swelled to 75 and moved up a flight of stairs into 24,000 square feet of carpeted nirvana, complete with Foosball tables and a built-in putting green. And the start-up’s war chest has grown to the size of a small closet, thanks to several months of vigorous fund-raising in which Kanner brought home an additional $30 million. The new capital came from a variety of sources, including the two Silicon Valley venture firms that had backed him originally and, for geographic diversity’s sake, four firms in Boston, one in New York, and one in Chicago. “We were trying to raise between $20 million and $25 million,” Kanner says, “so we’re oversubscribed.” He’s especially excited about a $5.3-million investment from Student Advantage Inc., a large, well-established provider of student-discount cards and related services, which had loomed as a major competitor. A new partnership, in which edu.com acts as the commerce arm for Student Advantage’s community-oriented Web sites, drastically reduces Kanner’s customer-acquisition costs. (Student Advantage’s 1.5 million members are automatically sent to edu.com’s site whenever they want to buy something.) It also suggests that edu.com may find happiness covering the back end for other student-focused marketers. As for Linda Kanner, Adam’s mother, she’s devoting less time to operations and more to her new duties as chief marketing officer. That, together with the fact that the two no longer share an office, gives mother and son some welcome space. “The more the organization grows and her role becomes defined, the less we overlap and bump into each other,” says Adam. “And the better our working and personal relationships become.” –Leigh Buchanan Starting over COMPANY: Inca Quality Foods, in South Bend, Ind., a distributor and “micromerchandiser” of Hispanic foods in grocery stores FOUNDER: Luis J. Espinoza, 48 AT OUR LAST LOOK: Espinoza, a moonlighter struggling to balance his ambitions for Inca with his work at a satisfying full-time job, was wondering how fast Inca should — or needed to — grow. LAST DIARY ENTRY: ” Moonlight over Indiana“ Luis Espinoza’s secretary has found another job. So have his two full-time truck drivers. Espinoza says that in early December, Kroger’s supermarket chain, which had Inca’s display cases in 20 of its stores, notified him that either he should gear up to add operations in 30 more stores in 30 days (at $4,000 a pop just for the new displays) or the chain would find another Hispanic-foods vendor. “The amount of money I needed was tremendous,” Espinoza says. “A quarter of a million dollars. I can’t come up with that amount of money.” (Even the smaller sums Espinoza located required him to put up his house as collateral, which he refused to do.) And so by the end of December the Kroger business — 60% of Inca’s revenues — was gone. He may be down, but he’s not out. “It’s like we’re starting all over again,” he says, describing the small stores he’s continuing to serve in the South Bend area. “It took a lot of pressure off. It’s like regrouping.” What about just giving it all up and being satisfied with his regular job at the steel-finishing plant? “I would never let my business go,” he says. “Never. I could even get to the point when springtime comes around that I wouldn’t mind getting a little cart selling ice cream in the street.” –Nancy Lyons Dream inflation COMPANY: 10 Minute Manicure, in Miami, a would-be chain of manicure kiosks in airports FOUNDERS: Karen Janson, 33; Vivian Jimenez, 31; and Lorraine Brennan O’Neil, 35 AT OUR LAST LOOK: The founders were closing in on their first airport contract (Dallas-Fort Worth) and were negotiating with an angel for the capital ($500,000) they needed to launch their company. LAST DIARY ENTRY: ” Three Women and a Kiosk“ In the early months of winter, the elegantly simple kiosk idea got, shall we say, a little bigger. Several hundred square feet bigger, to be exact. When the Dallas-Fort Worth airport deal stalled, the 10 Minute Manicure founders turned to Pittsburgh. The good news was that the concession management at Pittsburgh International Airport liked their concept enough to send them lease terms by mid-January. The bad news was, there were some catches. The Pittsburgh people had just one space available, and they were thinking “hair.” Within 24 hours, Karen Janson and Vivian Jimenez had revised their concept. Nails and hair. Instead of just manicures, the newly conceived Style Express would also offer quick, inexpensive hair services for women and men. Not that the enlarged operation would replace the goal of building manicure kiosks in other airports, the founders say. As they see it, the Pittsburgh Style Express will be kind of a showplace, a foot in the door of the airport industry. “It’s a brand extension,” says Janson. Or it will be, provided the women can come up with the $150,000 needed to launch it. The good news was that the Pittsburgh-airport people liked their concept. The bad news was, there were some catches. They had just one space, and they were thinking not nails but hair. Within 24 hours, Janson and Jimenez had revised everything. Nails and hair. “It’s a brand extension,” says Janson. They are, they would acknowledge, increasingly desperate for financing. By mid-January, they had reached their personal investment limit (about $35,000 among all three cofounders) and had yet to seal a deal with any angel or investor. But even as they worried about raising the bare minimum of cash, something dramatic was happening to the founders of 10 Minute Manicure. As they talked to more and more prospective investors about putting up the $500,000 they thought they needed to start, they began to understand that there wasn’t some big secret about financing a start-up that everyone knew but them. There was no one right answer. “Some people say you have to give away 70% of your company; some people say 30%,” says Janson. “There’s no standard whatsoever.” And as they realized that not everyone knew more than they did, they gained confidence. “The funny thing is, I think our hopes have gone up higher,” says Jimenez. “I think that we value ourselves more. Now we’re looking for more than just a $500,000 investor. We’re looking for a partner that will invest up to $5 million — one that will stick around with us and help us expand very aggressively.” So now the founders of 10 Minute Manicure cum Style Express are talking about a rapid national launch. They’re in search of financing partners who understand the size and scope of their ambition. “If you really look at the way to do business today,” says Janson, “it’s either get brand recognition from the get-go or you’re in the wasteland.” The small kiosk concept has, again, gotten just a little bit bigger. –Karen Dillon Model attraction COMPANY: FÚxito Worldwide Inc., in Cambridge, Mass., a Web site for the international soccer community, which offers E-commerce, news, and a recruiting database FOUNDERS: Richard Powell, 20, and Daniel Hoffer, 22 AT OUR LAST LOOK: The two Harvard University students were searching for capital, employees, and ways to attract more visitors to www.fuxito.com. LAST DIARY ENTRY: ” The Player“ Not long ago the cofounders of FÚxito were struggling to refine their business model. Now they may very well redefine the whole concept of what a business model is. Since they appeared on our January 2000 cover, Powell and Hoffer have been approached by Levi’s about modeling jeans. “To be honest, this is really small and inconsequential for me,” says Powell, a Harvard junior who began developing the soccer-focused Web site in late 1998. “I don’t let it take priority over the other things we really need to do.” Such as? Recruiting seasoned talent, raising venture capital, and enhancing the Web site — the same challenges they faced three months ago. But if those challenges aren’t new, the environment in which FÚxito faces them is. Since last fall FÚxito has encountered three new direct competitors, Internetsoccer .com, LiveSoccer.com, and Goalnetwork.com. “We have to make sure we’re not working too slowly,” says Powell. To boost its working capital, in January the company raised about $1.2 million, the bulk of it from three New York City­based institutional investors. That represents FÚxito’s first funding from nonangel sources — and begins a pattern Powell hopes will continue as he sets out to raise as much as $12 million from venture capitalists. Hoffer predicts the valuation of FÚxito, which this year is on track to post revenues of more than $5 million (from selling soccer merchandise), will get a kick from the expected relaunch of www.fuxito.com, which included the long-awaited addition of an online store. Soon, thanks to a partnership with a virtual-reality vendor, FÚxito expects to add “really cool” features, Hoffer says. Even so, he adds, “we need some people with solid business experience to turn this into a $1-billion company.” The key to attracting such folks? Well, it couldn’t hurt to have the company’s name on all those jeans ads. “But,” notes Powell, taking a break from studying for an econometrics exam, “being plastered over billboards everywhere won’t do anything if we’re not building more value for our users.” –Joshua Hyatt Package deal COMPANY: Application Technologies, in San Diego, a developer of new consumer-product packaging, including the Appli-K pouch FOUNDER: Johann Verheem, 33 AT OUR LAST LOOK: The Appli-K pouch was designed, but Verheem needed capital to develop manufacturing processes, as well as customers to build the market share that would protect him against knockoffs. LAST DIARY ENTRY: ” Plan B-Minus” Verheem and company marketing manager Natasha King are no longer seeking to raise significant capital. While Verheem and his wife, Emmarance, were back in their native South Africa for an extended family visit over the Christmas and New Year’s holidays, he negotiated an agreement locking in a deal with a strategic partner that will develop the manufacturing processes and prototypes for the Appli-K pouch, the product he’s basing his business on. Verheem plans to let his strategic partners fund development of the Appli-K. He realizes the pouch alone is not enough to grow the business on; he needs a whole line of products. So while he locks in the relationships he needs for the pouch, he is also starting to look for new products to bring out. –Michael Warshaw Please e-mail your comments to editors@inc.com. Read the complete Start-Up Diaries series.

Can You Survive the Ebay Economy?

Online auctions aren’t just for collectibles anymore. They’re selling everything from moving services to real estate — and they may be muscling into your turf. Online watch retailer Grandwatches sells Omega, Seiko, and other quality brand-name watches at steep discounts not only on its own Web site but also on eBay’s and Yahoo’s online auctions. The discounts are possible because Grandwatches operates with gross margins ranging from 1% to 12%, compared with as much as 50% at traditional jewelry stores. How does the company get by with such razor-thin margins? Low overhead, of course. In fact, overhead can’t get much lower than it does at Grandwatches. The company consists of only Omar Nuno, a full-time Medicare claims processor at HMO Kaiser Permanente in Pasadena, Calif., who stays up late at his home computer putting up listings for new merchandise and trading e-mail with his customers. “It takes me a couple of minutes to put up another watch,” notes Nuno. “I have a vacation coming up, so I should have time to double my listings.” Nuno’s company is an example of a class of tiny enterprises — call them “microbusinesses” — that have come into their own online and may well be giving conventional small businesses a run for their money. The Web was supposed to level the playing field between large and small companies. It hasn’t, because small companies’ Web sites have been buried out of view from consumers in a sea of competitive entries. Large companies, meanwhile, whether they’re conventional corporations fortified by brick-and-mortar sales or dot-coms wielding vast piles of cash hurled at them by giddy investors, are buying eyeballs via massive advertising campaigns. But what the Web has done is level the playing field between small businesses and the micro-businesses that until now barely showed up on anybody’s radar screen. Those microbusinesses are individuals without a substantial — or in many cases, any — business history or infrastructure behind them. Operating with virtually no overhead, typically with little inventory, and sometimes in legal gray zones, these one-person shows are often able to offer fire sale prices and still maintain a modest margin. And the billions of dollars in revenues that they in aggregate are piling up come, to a certain extent, out of the coffers of more traditional businesses. The market Microbusinesses are tapping into powerful markets. Grandwatches’ Nuno, for instance, has sold watches to customers in Belgium and Japan. Another example is Ed Ciliberti, a Pacific Grove, Calif., real estate broker who three years ago opened a booth at a local antiques mall. It was a pleasant hobby, but he wasn’t clearing much. Last September he tried his hand at selling on eBay, and within three months he had earned about $30,000 on sales of $70,000. An antique peanut roaster that he’d bought for $250, and that failed to sell at the mall or at local auction, went for $2,950 on eBay. A copy of the first issue of Playboy magazine, which he’d bought for $900 and had autographed by Hugh Hefner, went for $11,100. Now he spends 60 hours a week online, whereas his real estate activities have been pruned back to 15 hours. Although the major online auctions have long been known for collectibles, an important change has quietly taken place during the past year or two: the auctions have become popular conduits for everything from real estate to automobiles. “This isn’t the tchotchkes business,” says Tony Surtees, general manager of the Commerce Group at Yahoo, which runs the second-largest online auction. EBay, the granddaddy of online-auction sites, lists more than 130,000 computer items and 6,000 cameras. “We have never wanted to limit ourselves in any way, shape, or form to the collectibles market,” says Brian Swette, eBay’s chief operating officer. As a sign of the times, he notes, the company plans to relabel its thriving “sports memorabilia” section as simply “sports” to reflect the fact that collectibles are being shouldered aside by “practicals.” Still, Swette and other eBay employees refer to their site as a trading community, apparently to preserve the notion that the online auction has more in common with swap meets than with malls or other retail outlets. “We offer something more personal, more special,” says Swette. “Almost every item has some level of uniqueness to it.” Really? I did a few quick searches of eBay and came up with the following counts of listings: 295 for screwdrivers, 65 for guitar strings, 108 for staplers, more than 7,000 for sweaters, 4 for disposable diapers, and 10 for hamster cages. Throw in countless watches, cameras, and baseball cards, and that short list places eBay in direct competition with almost every retail store in the downtown area of the midsize suburb in which I live. There is certainly no shortage of buyers. On any given day about 1.5 million people visit eBay, which lists close to 4 million objects. According to Forrester Research Inc., in Cambridge, Mass., online auctions got $1 billion out of consumers in 1999, and the firm predicts that that number will rise to $19 billion by 2003. As for sellers, none of the online auctions release a detailed breakdown, but eBay’s Swette says that there are hundreds of thousands of casual sellers on eBay who pull in less than $2,000 in auction revenues a month, and at least 25,000 “power sellers” who rake in from $2,000 to $500,000 a month. Who are those power sellers? Again, the auctions themselves don’t give out details. But Munjal Shah, CEO of Andale Inc., a company in Santa Clara, Calif., that provides financial and other services to high-volume online-auction sellers, claims that about 60% of all power sellers are conventional businesses that have opened up online-auction arms, often after having struck out with their own Web sites. That was the case with Marcello Veloso, who opened his Natick, Mass., sports card store eight years ago. But the business really took off, he says, when he started selling cards on eBay, two years ago. He’s kept the store, largely because it provides a handy facility for auction surfing, inventory storage, and shipping. “Right now,” Veloso says, “the money is on the Internet.” The other 40% of power sellers, says Shah, are individuals. Why are so many people creating one-person businesses focused on online auctions? Because they can. “The online-auction markets are creating the lowest barrier to entry that has ever existed,” says Shah. Microbusinesses could even spring up in the rapidly growing business-to-business auction market. I went to Bizbuyer.com’s Web site, spent about three minutes filling out a form to register as a moving company — sure, I had liability insurance, and no, my state didn’t require a license — submitted it, and a moment later found a “You have buyers!” button waiting for me. Clicking on it brought up an invitation to bid on moving a 50-employee telecommunications company from Massachusetts to Alabama. If I had gone on to bid and won the business, I suppose I could have subcontracted the job out or rented a truck and hired some college students with moving experience. Voilà: instant commercial mover. The competitive advantages For anyone who wants to remain with a business old-fashioned enough that it encompasses such relics of the pre-eBay era as employees, offices, showrooms, catalogs, and the like, it’s worth considering what one is up against in microbusinesses. EBay’s Swette estimates that an individual power seller achieves from 5 to 15 times the return on assets that a conventional small business does. No wonder: Not only do power sellers avoid major sources of overhead, but since many of them work from their homes, they often can take more tax deductions as well. And there is widespread recognition that many aren’t paying all sales and income taxes on their online take. “At the antiques mall, everyone had to have a resale license, and the mall took out sales tax,” says Ciliberti, the online antiques seller. “Online I don’t have to pay taxes on sales outside of California, and there’s nothing the state can do about it.” If, despite a low or nonexistent overhead, decent profits still manage to elude a microbusiness, that’s not necessarily a showstopper. Since many microbusiness founders are part-time entrepreneurs or have gainfully employed spouses, they can in effect operate like miniature dot-coms, allowing other sources of cash to subsidize the low prices they need to offer to undercut conventional businesses. If they do make a profit, eBay won’t take much of it: a listing fee ranging from 50¢ to $2 and a final-value fee based on the winning bid’s sales price — 5% of the first $25, plus 2.5% of the amount from $25 to $1,000, plus 1.25% of the amount over $1,000. (The fees for automobiles and real estate are higher.) Amazon.com and Yahoo, meanwhile, charge sellers nothing for auction listings (in hopes of drawing businesses away from eBay). At his local antiques mall, in contrast, Ciliberti was paying $550 a month for his booth plus a 10% commission on all sales. Besides not needing money to plunge into online auctions or cyberboutiques, microbusinesses also don’t need any operational expertise. Companies like Andale set up auction listings, process credit card payments, and help with accounting and inventory management, all for a modest fee. Amazon’s cyberboutiques, which the company calls “zShops,” come with a button that allows many of Amazon’s more than 15 million customers to charge an item in the boutique to their credit cards with a single click. The cost for a zShop: $10 per month and 5% or less of the sale price. “You don’t have to touch product or invest capital to get into this business,” says Andale’s Shah. Think that customers’ concerns about getting ripped off by a fly-by-night auction seller will keep them coming to your store? Don’t count on it. The feedback system pioneered by eBay — and imitated by Amazon, Yahoo, and others for their auctions — provides a simple and convincing means for determining at a glance whether a seller is trustworthy. It works like this: if a seller does anything to annoy a buyer, the buyer can give the seller a black mark that lowers the seller’s prominently displayed rating. Buyers who are still hesitant can use inexpensive escrow services like i-Escrow Inc., which will hold onto a buyer’s payment until the purchased item has passed the buyer’s scrutiny. EBay offers buyers up to $175 worth of insurance at no charge, and Amazon guarantees its zShop customers satisfaction on purchases up to $1,000. A brick-and-mortar store has to build an identity in the public’s mind and then make sure it has products on hand to back up that identity. Microbusinesses, in contrast, with their ultrafast inventory turnover and automatic exposure to potential customers through product listings, can leap opportunistically from market to market without penalty. Veloso, the sports card seller, jumped into the Beanie Babies market before it peaked, made a killing, and then jumped out when it flattened and on into the then-nascent Pokémon market. “The online world gives the little guys the flexibility to change their entire inventory overnight,” says Robert Robicheaux, a professor of retail marketing at the University of Alabama. As for marketing, microbusinesses gain intimate, precisely targeted access to the largest aggregation of shoppers in the history of humankind, and at virtually no cost. On the online auctions or in the cyberboutiques, sellers are essentially guaranteed that their product listings will pop up in front of interested buyers on a more or less equal basis with those of larger businesses with large overheads. It doesn’t take much photography or copywriting expertise to create maximum appeal within a listing. There’s one other marketing edge a microbusiness can exploit, and from the point of view of conventional small businesses it might be considered an especially insidious one. That’s the ability to penetrate the Internet’s somewhat guarded network of virtual communities — the message boards, chat rooms, and e-mail lists that millions of people use to make friends, swap information, and let off steam. Nick Mannarino, president of Modern Performance Inc., in West Long Branch, N.J., has found himself up against that edge. Mannarino has been a longtime contributor to an e-mail list of 800 enthusiasts of Merkur, a German-made sports sedan imported to the United States in small numbers by Ford in the mid to late 1980s. Modern Performance provides custom components for Merkur. Last year a rather heated debate on the merits of one of the components all but took over the list for several days, but Mannarino, who not surprisingly knows more about the workings of the component than any other human on the planet, was utterly silent. He had to be; according to the list’s rules, he says, businesses aren’t allowed to plug their products in any way. That’s a standard rule of most electronic communities — and he knew from personal experience that the Merkur list’s moderator applies the rule strictly. So he kept his mouth shut. That enforced silence was particularly frustrating, notes Mannarino, because several of the people who had weighed in against the component — or against other components sold by Modern Performance and other specialty manufacturers — sell competing products. Some of those enterprising list members scavenge and recondition parts from junkyards, others make their own, and some buy them from manufacturers. Not only can the resulting products be found on Web sites, on online auctions, and in cyberboutiques, but in many cases they are openly advertised in messages on the mail list. Those people are running microbusinesses, of course, but because they don’t wrap themselves in the formal trappings of a real business, they slip in under the community’s radar and get to market directly to the most highly select audience imaginable, at zero cost. Microbusinesses are using such marketing ploys in virtual communities Internet wide. Says Robicheaux: “A business has to spend a few thousand dollars getting a mailing out, while others can spend a few hours in a chat room reaching thousands of people for free.” The entire world of online auctions and related microbusinesses is still rather small, accounting for perhaps 1% of annual U.S. retail sales. Relatively few owners of conventional businesses perceive their existence to be imperiled by online microbusinesses. But that will change if online auctions and cyberboutiques continue to grow explosively. The popularity of microbusinesses may have already begun to tilt the playing field away from even Web-savvy small businesses by rendering irrelevant many of their competitive advantages, turning their cost structures against them, and excluding them from the powerful new forms of online marketing wide open to microbusinesses. We may increasingly find ourselves living in a sort of “eBay economy,” in which small businesses face tremendous pressure either to invest heavily in sharply distinguishing themselves or to dramatically shed costs and switch competencies to beat microbusinesses at their own game. David H. Freedman is a contributor to Inc. Online Auctions: A Shopper’s Delight Like many shoppers, I’m willing to pay at least a small premium for the opportunity to buy locally. But occasionally, certain advantages of shopping online prove irresistible. For example, my wife and I recently bought a sleeper sofa from an online retailer because the delivered price was several hundred dollars lower than the price of any similar sofa we found in brick-and-mortar stores. We also do most of our grocery shopping online, saving us an hour or so of hassle every week. Another advantage of online shopping can be selection. That was the lure recently when I became interested in a particular diving watch, a Citizen product called the Aqualand. Though it’s not a rare or an exotic watch, it’s apparently specialized enough to fail to warrant shelf space at any retailer within striking distance of my home. So I hit the Internet. Surprisingly, an “Aqualand” search on AltaVista turned up only one slick comprehensive watch site of the sort that might reasonably be called a dot-com operation. The price at that site for the particular model of Aqualand I was interested in was $446.25. However, the search also turned up a few listings for boutique-type online shops, all of which had Yahoo addresses. Taking the hint, I went to Yahoo and searched its own internal shopping listings. Up popped 89 listings among Yahoo’s “cyber-boutiques” — low-cost sites on which anyone can list products at fixed prices — where prices for the watch dipped as low as $300. But Yahoo also alerted me that Aqualands were being offered at its online auctions. I checked out their listings and similar listings at the other major online auctions. I immediately discovered that among all the purchasing channels available to me, the real deals in Aqualand watches lay with those auctions. EBay had 19 of them for sale; Yahoo, 3; Amazon.com, 5. A few of the listed watches were used, but most were described as brand-new, in-the-box, warrantied merchandise, and some were going for less than $250. Some of the sellers seemed to be brick-and-mortar shops, whereas others seemed to be storeless individuals, but in most cases it was hard to tell exactly who or what the sellers were. All the listings had the same basic format, so that one from the Sharper Image wouldn’t necessarily have been any more prominent or slicker than one from an enterprising retired grandmother in South Bend, Ind. Retail Holdouts — But at What Price? “I hate the online world,” says Don True, the amiable owner of Country City Store, a cluttered shop tucked away on a quiet, mostly residential street in Manhattan’s trendy East Village. “It’s impersonal. Some of my customers talk about buying antiques online, but most of them come back to me. I think the prices aren’t that good on eBay, and people are afraid of ending up with a piece that’s chipped.” Down the block is Bernd Goeckler Antiques, a more spacious store where the antique-furniture prices run into the tens of thousands of dollars. No aversion to technology here: two large thin-screen monitors hooked up to state-of-the-art Macintosh computers are perched close to the entrance, and the shop has maintained a Web site for more than two years. But sell on eBay? No way, says the prim, bespectacled Bernd Goeckler. “That sort of thing happens at a lower level of the business,” he explains. Things look more promising at Howard Kaplan Antiques, a dark, expansive shop around the corner on a busy street, where I’m greeted by a youngish, gaunt man encased in black, who looks smirkily hip enough to be CEO of one of the Silicon Alley start-ups only blocks away. But the question of online auctioning gets me brusquely turned away. A morning spent hopping around this domain of $35-a-square-foot storefronts sheltering million-dollar inventories fails to turn up a single antiques shop owner professing interest in selling on eBay or its competitors. Something else that fails to turn up in my presence: a single walk-in customer. Meanwhile, on this same morning, bids are pouring in on well over 5,000 antiques listed on eBay alone, items ranging from a piano stool (minimum bid: $5.50) to a Maxfield Parrish architectural panel (minimum bid: $35,000 — so much for the “lower-level” theory). It seems a strange disconnect, but in fact it’s par for the course, according to Dave Brennan, director of the Small Business Institute at the University of St. Thomas in St. Paul, Minn. “Most brick-and-mortar businesses just don’t get it,” he says. According to the U.S. Small Business Administration, 70% of small businesses have no Web sales capabilities whatsoever. No Inventory? No Problem Some microbusinesses operate successfully with no inventory, thanks to the fact that online-auction customers are reconciled to a lag of a week or more between placing a winning bid and receiving the item. A seller can wait until an order is in before actually purchasing the item that he or she has just sold, adding perhaps a harmless extra day or two to the lag time. Tony Surtees, general manager of the Commerce Group at Yahoo, told me about one seller who looks for low-priced items in antiques shops, puts holds on them, snaps pictures of them with a digital camera, and throws them up at auction online. If he gets his minimum price on an item, then he goes back to the store and buys it; otherwise he cancels the hold. Or here’s what one watch seller states on its Yahoo cyberboutique: “AAA Jewelers … is not an authorized representative of all the manufacturers whose watches and jewelry are offered for sale. … To keep costs down, AAA Jewelers maintains a limited inventory and often obtains an item from its dealer network once an order is placed. In the vast majority of cases the item is shipped within 3-5 business days. … Some items may not be available.” I’m sure my local jeweler would be able to keep his costs down, too, if he could get away with telling customers that their watches would be in the store a mere five business days after they were paid for.

The Thing That Would Not Die

Model Community This inventive toy maker has an on-line community like you dream about. So how come they almost killed it? A short time ago, in a galaxy about 90 miles from Chicago, there was a hot little toy company that had a mysterious competitive weapon: an on-line customer community that really smoked. Only the rulers of the company didn’t quite get what a powerful weapon they had. It took a gutsy employee (with a knack for being really aggravating) to show how the right interactive Internet presence could help the business generate ideas, solve problems, and tap into customer passion for its products. The company: Playing Mantis Inc. of South Bend, Ind., manufacturer of die-cast cars, plastic-model kits, and action figures. The employee: Lisa Greco. In the physical world she is the company’s customer-service manager, opinionated and outspoken despite a Fargo-like midwestern cheer. On-line, however, she is something more mighty to behold. As moderator of the bulletin board dedicated to the company’s model kits, this single mom is a nurturing guide for the adult men who come to her bulletin board to talk about toys. She is Mistress of Monster Models. The Queen of Styrene. Simply put, Greco represents a customer’s pipeline into the heart of the company. That’s an incredible boon to hobbyists accustomed to traditional toy makers, which guard product information as if they were Napoleon Solo protecting nuclear firing codes. Playing Mantis, on the other hand, is available 24/7 on the boards. Anyone can ask questions or find out about new products. Moreover, toy-heads can safely indulge their love of the trappings of childhood without fear of being scorned as terminal nerds. What Playing Mantis gets is even more valuable. Through the boards it can reach the burning core of its customer base with company news, promotions, and quick-and-dirty survey questions. It can vet product ideas with real consumers before committing a dime to development. Last year alone, board members promoted new products, provided remedies for Web-site problems, and helped bring Playing Mantis to a new understanding of who was actually buying its stuff. And to think the company almost threw the whole thing away. Before we tell that story, let’s consider a simple proposition: In this world, men don’t grow up. That is no expert opinion, nor is it the result of painstaking research. It’s just common sense. Ask anyone who ever married one. Once we can agree on that, the whole story falls into place: why Tom Lowe, son of one of the world’s best-known entrepreneurs, started a company dedicated to reissuing lines of toys from the 1960s; how the company became successful despite the toy industry’s reputation for a competitive viciousness usually reserved for totalitarian nations; and how both Lowe and Playing Mantis discovered the secret formula (wouldn’t be much of a tale if it didn’t have a secret formula) for building a vibrant, successful on-line customer community — the Holy Grail of all E-commerce companies. Here’s the thing: most American men never, ever lose their passion for the playthings of their past. That’s why store shelves are packed with classic hits of the ’60s — Hot Wheels cars, Etch A Sketch, and the Duncan Butterfly Yo-Yo, to name a few. Toy makers know that parents make the big buying decisions and that fathers especially never lose affection for the toys they loved as kids. Which brings us to Lowe and his company. Walk into Playing Mantis and you’ll see drab offices, just like those of any typical light-manufacturing company, but with one exception. There are toys everywhere. Glass cases in the lobby display build-ups of the company’s Polar Lights line of model kits (mostly foot-tall figures of monsters, spies, and space robots). The walls are festooned with test shots and lineups of the company’s Johnny Lightning die-cast toy race cars. Employees’ shelves are packed with Pezzes and other playthings. Lowe’s own modest office is especially crammed with goodies. His shelves are filled with Playing Mantis products, and the walls are covered with framed photos of NASCAR champions and muscle cars. But Lowe’s real treasures are stowed behind a Cyclone security fence in the shipping bay. That’s where the boss keeps his personal stash of collectibles. He has enough Johnny Lightnings and Captain Actions there to make a grown man — should there be such a thing — swoon. But for all the play factor, the corporate headquarters is still basically a cube farm in the unglamorous burg of South Bend. Playing Mantis, founded in 1994 and still tiny by toy-industry standards, has only 40 employees and revenues of $15 million to $20 million. Most of the employees are locals. Half have been hired in the past two years. It doesn’t take too many strides for Lowe to reach any corner of his empire. Lanky, sleepy-eyed, renowned for his prankster sense of humor, he ambles around the building like a big kid. Stopping in his product-development department — a couple of banquet tables pushed together — he checks out some handcrafted prototypes from a new line of toy cars tentatively called “The Dreamboats” — family sedans from the 1950s, real Bulgemobiles. Lowe picks up a bloated Chrysler and offers his highest praise: “Rock on!” (Well, it’s a toy company, not the English-lit department at Columbia.) Lowe, 40, is firmly grounded in the tail-end baby-boomer demographic his company serves. He grew up in Cassopolis, Mich., which everybody calls Cass, amid the richest cultural influences of the ’60s: Mad magazine, monster movies, and good old-fashioned network television — oh, yes, and social protest and the Vietnam War. His father was the well-known entrepreneur Edward Lowe, inventor of kitty litter (somebody had to) and, by a number of accounts, a my-way-or-the-highway kind of guy. Lowe grew up mostly in the care of his mother, who, wonderfully, did not throw away his old toys. Never straying from his midwestern roots, Lowe graduated from Miami University of Ohio, earned his master’s in marketing at DePaul University in Chicago, and married his high school sweetheart. He sold for a food broker and did marketing work for Domino’s Pizza, but the corporate life was not much fun. “I was tired of being told what to do,” he says. In 1987, in Dundee, Ill., Lowe started his first company: Safe Care Products. Financing the effort with his own savings, Lowe was the company at the beginning. From his basement he developed products he knew he could sell to mass merchandisers. He had one hit toy — a Velcro football called the WhattaCatch — but most of his 30-some products were anonymous, you-never-thought-you-needed-it-until-you-saw-it-on-a-store-shelf items, such as a bathtub cushion and a Nintendo video-game lock called HomeworkFirst. The best stuff was yet to come. By the early 1990s, Lowe’s generation was rediscovering the toys they thought they had outgrown. In those pre-eBay days, the bible of this loose society of arrested adolescents was a magazine called Toy Shop, filled with classifieds featuring goodies from the preceding 40 years or so. Reading it, Lowe noticed that a lot of the stuff he had played with when he was a kid was selling for big bucks. That demand looked like one hell of an opportunity. Take Hot Wheels, for example. Introduced by Mattel in the mid-’60s ( You can tell it’s Mattel. It’s swell!), these little die-cast cars were engineered to roll freely and fast. They were a sensation — and still are. Although new Hot Wheels are on store shelves, some versions from the ’60s command hundreds of dollars each. Down in his mother’s basement lay all the toys Lowe had discarded back when he discovered girls, including about 50 Hot Wheels and 8 cars from the Johnny Lightning line. He initiated a trademark search. Mattel had a death grip on the Hot Wheels name, but the Johnny Lightning name had been abandoned years before. “Polar Lights is very special to me. …You’ve rekindled the joy I once felt when buying these kits. …You’re the only company who I feel a part of.” –Lou H. Through an ad in Toy Shop, Lowe says, he bought a collection that included 30 original Johnny Lightning cars. He brought the swag to Wal-Mart, notorious for being tougher than the A-Team when it comes to taking on new products. “Whattaya got here? A flea market?” the buyer roared. “I’ll give ya five minutes.” Lowe explained that he was going to re-create toys from the ’60s. “I was there for an hour and 15 minutes, explaining what my plan was,” he says. Wal-Mart bought in. Toys R Us did, too. Lowe was ready to rock. He sent his original Johnny Lightnings to China with a simple directive: copy these. And in 1995, Safe Care was reborn as Playing Mantis, a name he chose to be clever and kid friendly. “I always liked playing with praying mantises when I was young,” Lowe says, illustrating the difference between a Cass native and, say, some kid from Brooklyn. Lowe has always had one measure for deciding which products Playing Mantis will pursue: “If it isn’t cool, we won’t do it,” he says. He means it, too. This is his company all the way; he owns it free and clear. There isn’t even any long-term debt (“Just a working line of credit,” says chief financial officer Randy Miller), so the company has the resources to choose and develop its own products. “Being private is an important advantage. We can do what we want,” Lowe says. What he wants to do is to diversify enough to fight off challenges from the Hasbros and Mattels of the world. (Playing Mantis has already survived trademark-infringement litigation with Mattel. The suit was settled out of court.) He now has 2 solid brands; he’d like to build up to 10. And he has two secret weapons. The first: customers such as the guys on the bulletin board, gleeful pseudo-grown-ups who share his child-of-the-’60s sensibility. The second: his company’s ability to spin on a dime and give those guys what Lowe knows they want. That’s how he decided to revive a line of monster models originated in the ’60s by a company called Aurora Plastics Corp. In those years, Aurora models were bigger than Star Trek. Aurora produced model kits of classic monsters (like the Wolf Man and the Mummy) as well as characters from television (like Batman and Superman). And did they ever sell! “Those guys were easily putting out 200,000 or 300,000 units at a run. I’m sure some of the best-sellers, like Frankenstein and Dracula, were up there with sales of 2 million or 3 million apiece,” says Thomas Graham, professor of American history at Flagler College, in St. Augustine, Fla., and author of Greenberg’s Guide to Aurora Model Kits. “At the time, plastic models of all sorts were sold everywhere — in candy shops, drugstores, bicycle stores — and I even found mention of one mortuary. They were easy to find, they were inexpensive, and pretty much all your friends were building them.” By the 1980s, Aurora was gone, a victim of bad business decisions. With it went the entire market for monster models. The models weren’t missed until their original fans grew older and started searching for the icons of childhood — a pursuit that Graham claims is healthy. “The people I know who are living long and prospering are those who still enjoy playing,” he says. “Playing with toys in particular.” Take Lowe, for example. He built Aurora models as a kid and remembered one with special fondness: the haunted house from The Addams Family TV series. “I loved it,” he says. So in 1995, under the name Polar Lights (Get it? Aurora? Polar Lights?), Lowe had the kit re-created, offering it as a $60 exclusive at the high-ticket FAO Schwarz toy-store chain. The collector’s market went nuts. Original Addams Family house kits were selling in Toy Shop for at least $500. A year later, when the remade kit went into wide release at less than $25, a new market was born. Make no mistake: the days of 300,000-unit runs of a monster model are over. Most Polar Lights kits are produced in runs of 15,000 units. Yet Polar Lights has been successful enough for the line to be expanded to include 60-odd kits. To date, the most successful is a new original done in the Aurora style: a model of the Jupiter 2 spaceship, the interstellar Winnebago featured on the TV series Lost in Space. Playing Mantis launched Polar Lights just as intelligent life was being discovered in cyberspace. In late 1995 and early 1996 — through bulletin boards on Prodigy, America Online, and other services — collectors, craftspeople, and genre fans were discovering whole communities of like-minded souls. Lowe and his managers caught on to the phenomenon — sort of. In 1995 they stuck up a quick site, just some early brochureware. But for serious marketing, Playing Mantis held fast to traditional methods — newsletters and print ads. Part of the reason for going slow on the Web was that Lowe was no fan of online customer interaction. “I would do chats and look at boards on AOL, but I found that I didn’t get a lot of new ideas from them,” he says. “Besides, there are some vicious people out there. Some of the employees who left would get on the boards and say things that just weren’t true. There were competitors who got on there just to screw around with you. I might go on to see what’s being said, but in terms of being Tom Lowe on the boards, I don’t do it anymore.” But Greco had no such reservations. She and Hank Hagquist, an outside contractor who was Playing Mantis’s original Web master, were old friends from Riley High in South Bend. Hagquist was running his own site, called Hobbytalk, for fans of radio-controlled car models. He talked to Greco about starting a section devoted to Playing Mantis products. “I thought they could be a good subject,” he says. “I thought the people who bought or collected their products were real enthusiasts, people with a passion.” In 1998, Hagquist established a board for Polar Lights, moderated by Greco. Dave Metzner, the company’s product-development manager for model kits, helped Greco answer board members’ questions. But it was she who ruled the board. Judiciously leaking product news, insisting on cordial relations and polite language, Greco — signing missives with an enthusiastic “Moi!” — gathered a loyal cadre of fans to her cyberclubhouse. Yet even after hundreds of members had signed on, she didn’t fully understand the potency of the boards until Polar Lights released that model of the Jupiter 2. The kit, enthusiastically received, had a flaw: a hatch inside the ship was upside down. That detail would escape 99.9% of normal buyers. But this was the Internet, where obsessive behavior hangs its hat. Board members were all over the error, and Metzner, with Lowe’s approval, decided to correct the flaw for the second run of the kit. The online critics felt as if they had spoken and the company had responded. True enough, says Metzner. “If it hadn’t been for people telling us about it, it wouldn’t have been fixed,” he says. It was the kind of action that converts loyal customers into devoted fans. As the online community jelled, its members got very comfortable with one another. Their exchanges strayed way beyond toys. In the course of a limerick contest initiated by Greco ( There once was a monster named Frankie, in the mood for a little hanky-panky… What say we just don’t go there?), one member posted a message revealing that his wife had left him. “Why share it out here like this?” he wrote. “I don’t know. Thanks for the support out here, you guys.” Greco responded immediately — “We’re here for you” — and the board members pitched in. It brought home for Greco just how much this community meant to its members. The board was a sanctuary that connected them to the company and to one another far more deeply than she had realized. “As I reflect back on my hobby experiences for the year, one of the most satisfying has been the relationship formed by a large number of us with Polar Lights. It is not their products that, I feel, sets them apart from other model companies. It is their devotion to the consumer.” –PCModeler.com Unfortunately, Lowe was not frequenting this board (or boards that were set up later for Johnny Lightning and Captain Action fans), so he saw little of all that. What he did see was that Greco and Metzner were spending an awful lot of time on the Internet. It didn’t seem as though their involvement with the boards was adding much to the business. “That’s what they were doing with their time?” Lowe remembers asking. “Talking to people about their problems, which have nothing to do with model kits? So we took a very hard look at that.” At the time, in 1998, Playing Mantis was already reexamining its entire customer-service function. By 1999 some customer-service staffers were being asked to do more active selling. That’s how it happened that the boards almost died. It started with Hagquist, who was still hosting the virtual community on his site. “At some point I was saying that here we have this multimillion-dollar company building its name for free,” he says. “C’mon, guys, feed a little back.” So he gave Greco a deadline: By the end of February, start paying him $50 a month for each of the three boards. Greco filed all the appropriate paperwork, never imagining there’d be a problem. But Miller wouldn’t approve the expense at first. Look at it from his point of view. For one thing, it is often his job, as with any CFO, to be the one who says no when it comes to using company resources. For another, he and Lowe were already wondering what the true cost of the boards was and whether they were worthwhile. “It wasn’t really a financial decision as much as a decision regarding use of time,” Miller says. “Intangibles like that make for the toughest decisions.” As the deadline approached, Greco grew nervous. If the boards shut down, it would be a disaster — and not just for the company, which would lose a resource that she felt hadn’t even begun to pay off. “This community, and I think most communities, are built on trust,” she says. “These boards are a refuge for the guys, a place where they can be themselves. Shut it down, even for a day, and you create an uncertainty from which the community might never recover.” She went to Metzner for advice. Of all people he best knew what was happening on the boards. Together they decided that even if they had to pay the fee themselves, they’d keep at least the model-kit board running. But first Greco wanted to reach out to Lowe directly. It wasn’t politically correct, and it would anger her managers, but it wouldn’t be the first time she had gone right to the top. (Greco was once a guard in a prison for men, and she prides herself on being pretty tough.) “I felt I owed the fight to the guys out there,” she says. On February 22, Greco posted a new topic on the Polar Lights board. Under the title “Hypothetical Question” she wrote, “Good morning, guys! Everyone have a cup of coffee? Anyone bring the donuts Time for a little sidebar discussion. SUPPOSE, just suppose, this BB would cease to exist. How would you all feel about that?” That week the boards hummed. Members figured that something was going on in South Bend. Member Steve Iversen, who under the nom-de-Web CultTVMan operates a popular site for builders of science-fiction models, E-mailed his list of 700 subscribers, urging them to register their support. In post after post, members expressed their need for the board: “Polar Lights is very special to me. … You’ve rekindled the joy I once felt when buying these kits. … You’re the ONLY company who I feel a part of.” –Lou H. “It helps us to be kids again. … It’s easier to be a kid again when you see there are a bunch of other people doing it: you feel less guilty/silly!” –David Redknap “As I reflect back on my hobby experiences for the year, one of the most satisfying has been the relationship formed by a large number of us with Polar Lights. It is not their products that, I feel, sets them apart from other model companies. It is their devotion to the consumer.” –PCModeler.com