Tag Archives: Hitwise Pty. Ltd.

Visits to Google+ Continue to Dive

Google_plus

Weekly visits to Google+ may have skyrocketed to nearly 2 million in early July, but over the last few weeks activity on the social networking site has diminished. READ MORE »

Google+ Growth Appears to Slow

google-plus-red-3601

The growth of Google+ may be slowing. Web tracking firm Experian Hitwise has reported that total visits to Google’s new social network fell about 3 percent to 1.79 million in the U.S. for the week ending July 23 compared to the week before when visits had risen 283 percent. People also spent less time at Google+ last week, with the average amount declining 10 percent to 5 minutes and 15 seconds. READ MORE »

Can Bing Catch up with Google?

Fast Company reports on whether Microsoft Bing, the simplified search engine that replaced the aging search engine a while back, can ever catch up with the wholly dominate Google search engine. From the report: “According to reports, Bing’s market share has been steadily growing. Experian Hitwise says Bing’s searches increased 5 percent last month, with Bing-powered searches now accounting for nearly 26 percent of the market (that’s counting Yahoo, which uses Bing’s tech; comScore has the two combined totals at 28 percent). Year-over-year growth rate in December was 49.4 percent, according to Barclays, compared with just 20.6 percent for Google.” Can Bing Catch Google? Microsoft Spends Millions on ESPN, Jay-Z Partnerships [Fast Company]

Can Bing Catch up with Google?

Fast Company reports on whether Microsoft Bing, the simplified search engine that replaced the aging search engine a while back, can ever catch up with the wholly dominate Google search engine. From the report: “According to reports, Bing’s market share has been steadily growing. Experian Hitwise says Bing’s searches increased 5 percent last month, with Bing-powered searches now accounting for nearly 26 percent of the market (that’s counting Yahoo, which uses Bing’s tech; comScore has the two combined totals at 28 percent). Year-over-year growth rate in December was 49.4 percent, according to Barclays, compared with just 20.6 percent for Google.” Can Bing Catch Google? Microsoft Spends Millions on ESPN, Jay-Z Partnerships [Fast Company]

Google’s Universal Search Format Impacts SEO

Google’s new universal search format may force you to change your business’ Web presence and marketing strategies. The format blends traditional Web results with news, maps, blogs, books, video, and other forms of content onto the main page, and could affect your business’ rankings. Google’s share of the search engine market was 51 percent in May, according to ComScore Networks, and many small and mid-size businesses depend on the search engine giant to drive customers to their sites. Search-engine marketing experts say Google’s changes will gradually compel businesses to diversify and freshen their online content, and to think about search-engine marketing in a slightly new light. The changes won’t be too difficult, experts say, and could help small and mid-size businesses increase their Web presence. Small and mid-size businesses “have the advantage of being potentially more nimble and open to emerging technologies and media outlets over bigger corporations,” says Web and search-engine expert Richard Walters of Mindspace, an advertising and public-relations agency in Tempe, Ariz. Reassessing how your website is found Google’s changes won’t wipe your business off the main page right away — if ever — search-engine marketing experts agree. But it may force small and mid-size businesses to become more sophisticated about search-engine optimization strategies, which can help your pages jump in the rankings but were generally a weak point for smaller businesses even before Google’s changes. “Maybe they’re getting their feet wet, but they haven’t dove completely into it,” says David Wallace, co-founder and CEO of SearchRank, a Phoenix-based search-engine marketing firm. “I would definitely say that there is probably a lot of room for growth there.” One basic search-engine optimization strategy is to include relevant, high-ranking keywords for your business in the webpage title and content. Search engines crawl and often pick up on pages with those keywords. The method will still apply to webpages, but other content such as images and video should also be identified with relevant keywords, according to experts. While most people didn’t know it, Google includes 14 separate search databases that enables individuals to search for specific content in images, books and other databases. The universal search format crawls for terms across Google’s various databases, rather than just webpages so it’s important for businesses to have several different forms of content such as blogs and video that can show up in search results. “It’s my belief that if anyone has any size of business … they should have a blog and it should be updated,” Wallace says. Developing multimedia and fresh content Businesses should begin developing multimedia and fresh content, experts advise, such as putting online videos that can pick up hits on YouTube. YouTube and Google Maps had higher traffic shortly after Google launched its new format, according to research by Bill Tancer, general manager of global research at Hitwise, a search engine intelligence and marketing firm based in New York. Brick-and-mortar stores in particular need to be listed on Google Maps through Google’s local business center, experts say. They should also consider issuing company news releases or ramp up their publicity to get news-related hits. Search Engine Guide Editor Jennifer Laycock says that many companies are highly dependent on Google, but it shouldn’t be the only search engine that businesses target. She says Google’s new universal search format gives companies the opportunities to create content for specialized searches, or “vertical searches” as they are called in the search-engine industry. Laycock says that if you upload a video, for example, you may end up having two hits within YouTube as well as one video hit on Google’s main page. In Google’s old search format, your video would not have made it to the main page. “If small businesses figure out how to play those verticals, they’re actually in a better position than they are now,” she says.

Going Up Against Google

It was almost midnight, but David Sifry was still sitting at his office computer, nervously zinging instant messages back and forth with friends and employees. Sifry knew that his fledgling business, the popular blog search engine Technorati, was about to get a gigantic new rival: Google. It was a moment Sifry had been anticipating. When he founded Technorati in 2002, he knew that if blogging became as big as he anticipated, he’d almost certainly face competition from the giants. Indeed, he had spent the previous three years trying to take maximum advantage of Technorati’s first-mover status, the better to protect his company when the big boys made their play. On September 14, 2005, that day arrived. Google Blog Search was making its debut. Similar offerings from Yahoo and Microsoft were said to be in the works. If Technorati was to survive, Sifry reasoned, it would have to do so on the basis of its technology. From the outset, he had been pushing his programmers to refine Technorati’s novel way of searching the growing number of weblogs. And despite the long and admittedly scary shadow cast by Google, Sifry’s instincts told him to ignore the new competition and stick to his plan. Google, after all, had added other new services without killing its smaller rivals. The search engine Ask Jeeves, for example, remains viable. And Shopping.com, a shopping search engine, not only survived Google’s 2002 launch of Froogle, but wound up being purchased by eBay for $620 million in June 2005, which was hardly a bad outcome. Still, it was hard to imagine sitting back and doing nothing as one of the most powerful companies in the world encroached on his turf. “I take them extraordinarily seriously,” Sifry says. “These are very smart people, smarter than me, and they’ve made tons of money.” But Sifry didn’t see many options. Launching a major brand-building campaign to reinforce Technorati’s image as the original blog search engine wasn’t viable; after all, who can outspend Google? And he didn’t particularly want to cut and run and start looking for a buyer. A computer geek at heart, Sifry had a lot of faith in the technology he’d developed. Indeed, his bet all along had been that Google’s approach to searching the Web wouldn’t be the right fit for the blogosphere. The company’s famed PageRank algorithm indexes keywords and looks at the number of people linking to websites in order to establish the best matches for a search. In essence, Google treats the Web like an enormous library, sifting through millions of pages and displaying the most relevant ones, regardless of how old they might be. Sifry believes the blogosphere is different. It’s not so much a library as a conversation, and old blog entries get stale fast. That’s why he’s made sure that the first page of Technorati search often yields items posted in the past 10 or 20 minutes. A former Wall Street analyst, Sifry developed the technology in early 2002, while working as chief technology officer at Sputnik, a wireless computer networking start-up he had co-founded. On the side, he kept a blog, mostly to expound on tech issues, and he was curious to know who was reading it. So he spent an evening writing software code that would help answer the question. At the time, most bloggers were techies like Sifry or teenagers posting their diaries. But the phenomenon took off, and Sifry’s website, which he had dubbed Technorati, was seeing rapid traffic growth and even some paying customers–including The New York Times and Reuters, both of which licensed the technology to track what bloggers were saying about their articles. When AOL called and said it wanted to collaborate with Technorati on its new blogging service AOL Journals, Sifry realized that Technorati was no fluke and could be a lot more than a hobby. He wound down his relationship with Sputnik, signed a deal with AOL, and started raising some angel capital. In September 2003 he devoted himself full-time to Technorati. Its mantra: “Be of service.” Sifry’s instincts about the blogosphere proved correct, and Technorati has been scrambling from the outset to keep up with the blogging world’s explosive growth. In 2004, the company raised $6.5 million in venture capital. By the fall of 2005, more than 15 million blogs were being read by 30 million people, and Technorati was performing millions of searches a day. The company wasn’t profitable. But it was building a real business, using a business model not unlike Google’s–selling advertising and sponsorships, and syndicating its technology to other websites. It had much better brand recognition than its competitors, most of them start-ups such as Feedster, PubSub, and Bloglines. But going head-to-head with Google would be an entirely different matter. Sifry wondered what Google had up its sleeve. It might, for instance, have more effective ways to deal with the growing number of blog spammers trying to game the search engines (spammers had generated lots of complaints about Technorati). Indeed, the company was vulnerable on a number of fronts. Keeping up with demand was a constant challenge. Searches on Technorati were taking longer and were increasingly generating error messages. Customer support was overwhelmed, with some queries taking as long as a week to answer, sparking more complaints among bloggers. What if Google’s technology simply worked better? What if the company had developed entirely new approaches that Sifry hadn’t even considered? Could he really just stand by and do nothing? The Decision The prototype of Google’s Blog Search went live at midnight on September 14, 2005. Most of Technorati’s work force of about 30 was online, waiting. Sifry spent about half an hour checking it out, then posted a welcome note to his new competitor on his blog, including some friendly trash-talking about all the things Technorati could do that Google couldn’t, such as image finding. Then Sifry went home and got some sleep. There were no big surprises. Google Blog Search, he concluded, was solid but simple. It seemed to have a hard time keeping up with the dynamism of the blogging world; many search results it displayed were more than 24 hours old, which is ages in the blogosphere. On the other hand, Google delivered those results in less than half a second, compared with at least a full second for Technorati. It sounds minor, but in the world of Web search, that’s a big difference. “We knew we had a lot of work to do,” Sifry says. Since then, the company has been scrambling to keep its edge by launching new features. First up was a tool that provides constant updates of the things that matter most to people who write and read blogs at any given moment–such as the most-discussed books, movies, and news items on the Web. Then in October, it added a feature that is able to determine who is the most authoritative blogger on any particular topic. In November, a “Mini” search window debuted that automatically refreshes users’ favorite searches while they’re doing other things online. And in December the company introduced a prototype called Technorati Explore, an experiment in creating a newspaperlike front page from blog posts. Traffic growth slipped slightly in September. But it rebounded in November and is still growing faster than Google Blog Search, according to Hitwise, a company that monitors Internet traffic. As of mid-December, Technorati was tracking some 23.4 million blogs, adding some 70,000 more to the list every day, and getting 1.53 visitors for every one visitor to Google Blog Search. Sifry, of course, knows that Google’s product will almost certainly get better. He’s also facing new competition from Yahoo, which rolled out a blog search function on its news page in October. But he remains confident that Technorati will not lose its technological edge for some time. “What we’re building is fundamentally difficult,” he says. “If it were easy, everyone would be doing it.” Another advantage: Unlike Google, Yahoo, or any other major player, Technorati needs to keep its focus on just one thing–the blogosphere. With blogging more popular than ever, Sifry says he’s currently evaluating more than 100 potential deals–primarily advertising, sponsorship, and syndication deals. And a lot of the credit, he says, goes to Google. “I no longer have to explain what a blog is,” he says. “It’s absolutely an easier business discussion now.” The Experts Weigh In Switch to services Technorati has some good technology, but I’m not sure that it has a strategy that can keep it alive. In fact, I’m not sure what its strategy is. I’d like to see Sifry build a business around services, not search. Many of Technorati’s rivals are offering private label services for Web publishers or platform services to bloggers, like hosting and tools. Technorati seems to be doing neither. It has introduced some very clever technology, but I don’t think an advertising-based revenue model is enough to sustain the business. Susan Mernit Partner, 5ive, a digital media consultancy in New York City Look for a buyer Technorati can point to different features it has that Google doesn’t, but that’s only for now. Technorati’s best bet is to try to get acquired. It needs to stop worrying about search technology and take the head start it has in creating online communities and leverage it. Bloggers come to Technorati for more than just searching. Building on that community will make Technorati more than just another search engine. Anything it can roll out that makes it harder for people to switch will make it a sweeter acquisition target. Stephan Spencer President, Netconcepts, a Madison, Wis.-based Web consultancy It’s all in the execution I use Technorati every day to see what’s being said about my blog. It’s not clear to me what Technorati thinks its market is. Is it trying to be an entry point for consumers? Or a tool for blog publishers like me? Compared with Technorati, Google is terrible, especially in terms of timeliness. On the other hand, Technorati is overwhelmed by spam. Technorati’s strategy is not unique, so its execution has to be perfect. Sooner or later, somebody’s going to get it right. I hate to say it, but it’s probably Google. Peter Rojas Co-founder, Engadget, a New York City-based blog about tech gadgets