Tag Archives: Etch A Sketch

High Concept: Miracle Tablets

High Concept Dr. Ken Beer’s dream may look something like a cross between a Nintendo Game Boy and an Etch A Sketch, but he prefers to refer to it as “the future of medicine.” Beer, an entrepreneurial dermatologist, makes software for doctors to run on tablet computers. The problem is, tablet computers are just now hitting the market, which explains why Beer had to develop his software using a toy-like Casio touch-screen device that he rejiggered to suit his needs. Despite his lack of cutting-edge hardware, Beer believes that the finished software is poised to revolutionize the business of medicine while also improving patient care. First, some background on tablet computing. For years manufacturers have tried to sell the public on slate-style computers that enable users to write rather than type text. Some, like the infamous Apple Newton, made it to market and then flopped for reasons ranging from cost to clunkiness. Beginning this month, many computer makers will begin releasing next-generation tablets that, unlike their predecessors, are as powerful as PCs and boast long-life batteries and high-resolution displays. Bill Gates — whose Microsoft Corp. has created a Windows operating system for the new tablets — predicts that slate-style computers will dominate the PC market by 2006. Analysts at Forrester Research, in Cambridge, Mass., are more cautiously optimistic, saying the tablets will catch on first in paperwork-dependent industries like, say, health care. “I want it to be as simple as a McDonald’s cash register: you just touch it and it’s done,” says Dr. Ken Beer Enter Beer, a computer hobbyist. Two years ago Beer started designing comprehensive dermatology-practice software, paying freelance developers out of his own pocket. The software they produced manages a variety of tasks, from helping doctors write prescriptions and prepare bills to storing digital photographs of patients’ lesions. Using a wireless network, doctors can carry the tablets from hospital room to hospital room, instantly up-dating patients’ records or downloading results from distant labs. Beer is seeking investors and partners to help him finish and market his first program, called Dermsoftware, which is designed for dermatologists; after that, he will expand in-to other medical specialties. At $24,000 to $32,000 per system (which covers the software license, upgrades, and a Hewlett-Packard server), Beer knows that he is asking a dear price. But he is convinced that medical practices will gladly pay it. According to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, health-care providers must meet sweeping new regulations for storing, protecting, and transmitting patients’ health information by April 2003. Complying with the law could be a huge headache for doctors. Beer believes that his software offers just the relief they will need to make the transition. Incubator High Concept: Miracle Tablets Dossier: Life of the Party 60-Second Business Plan: Talking Trash Business for Sale: Plastic Burgeons Please e-mail your comments to editors@inc.com.

Payday

Best of the Net Four sites to turn to when you want to benchmark your salary structure. To launch or expand a company in times like these is an act of defiant optimism. But even optimists need to make payroll. How much will you have to pay to attract or keep the kind of talent your new venture will need? The Web can help. Dozens of sites report salary data: sites for job hunters, for corporate managers relocating to a new city, and for compensation professionals who set pay rates in large companies. There are even salary-data sites for entrepreneurs like you. All that information would be too much of a good thing — if it were useful to growing businesses. The bad news is that even the best salary sites get most, if not all, of their data from surveys conducted at large companies. Small businesses are for the most part left out of the picture. Even small cities are often ignored. Moreover, some sites — admittedly the very worst — let Web surfers input their own data with no external checks on the accuracy of their entries. One challenge, then, is to find reliable, useful numbers that you can access quickly, preferably at no cost. With those criteria in mind, we narrowed the field of salary-data Web sites to just four: Salary.com, SalaryExpert.com, CareerJournal.com, and the online version of Occupational Outlook Handbook, posted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Then we asked a panel of compensation experts to review them: Matt Ward, CEO at WestWard Pay Strategies Inc., an executive-pay consulting firm in San Francisco; Raylana S. Anderson, owner and president of Anderson Consulting, an HR adviser in Peoria, Ill.; and Kathy B. Rogers, president and CEO of staffing company Time Services Inc., in Fort Wayne, Ind. While our judges liked much of what they saw, they also warned that salary surveys should be only one of many sources you consider when setting pay scales. Similarly, they unanimously recommended checking out multiple salary sites rather than relying on just one; reading the survey notes carefully; and taking what you find with a large grain of salt. For one, consider that most salary surveys are out-of-date as soon as they appear, the judges said. Also, try to determine when, why, and how the raw information was collected; then look at how the site reached its conclusions. Most important, remember that only you can decide whether a salary site’s findings are relevant to your company, job descriptions, and goals. Jane Salodof MacNeil is a freelance writer in Groveland, Mass. The Savvy Entrepreneur’s Guide to Salary Data on the Web Site What it’s good for Don’t waste your time if What our CEOs had to say What you should know Salary.com www.salary.com Base pay for 4,000 job titles, searchable by either keyword or job category. You want to see pay levels sorted by company size or industry. “It’s comprehensive, quick, and easy to navigate,” said Kathy Rogers, who ranked Salary.com as her favorite of the four sites. Data for national averages are purchased from compensation consultants. SalaryExpert.com www.salaryexpert.com Salary data by city, state, and job position — plus comparisons with national norms. You want pay levels sorted by company size or industry, or pay levels for executive-level jobs. SalaryExpert was Raylana Anderson’s favorite of the four sites. She praised its valid data and solid methodology. Salary data come from the Economic Research Institute, a well-respected industry source. CareerJournal.com www.careerjournal.com General career, relocation, and headhunter information. You expect the site’s salary wizard to follow a consistent standard. Matt Ward called it his least favorite of the four sites. “Not for CEOs,” he said. “Can’t find pay info that’s meaningful.” Editorial content comes from the Wall Street Journal. (Both the site and newspaper are owned by Dow Jones & Co.) Occupational Outlook Handbook http://www.bls.gov/oco/ Detailed descriptions of occupations, useful in defining job responsibilities. You want the latest pay data. Most of the salary numbers date back to 1998. Two reviewers complained that the salary numbers were both outdated and buried in text. On this government site, the key word is outlook. Job-market changes are forecast through 2008. Copyright © 2001 Jane Salodof MacNeil. The Whole New Business Catalog The Downsizer’s Dilemma Risk Factors No More ‘Etch A Sketch’ Planning The 24-Hour Recovery Plan Squeeze Plays ‘Strap on Your Helmets’ Payday Please e-mail your comments to editors@inc.com.

The Thing That Would Not Die

Model Community This inventive toy maker has an on-line community like you dream about. So how come they almost killed it? A short time ago, in a galaxy about 90 miles from Chicago, there was a hot little toy company that had a mysterious competitive weapon: an on-line customer community that really smoked. Only the rulers of the company didn’t quite get what a powerful weapon they had. It took a gutsy employee (with a knack for being really aggravating) to show how the right interactive Internet presence could help the business generate ideas, solve problems, and tap into customer passion for its products. The company: Playing Mantis Inc. of South Bend, Ind., manufacturer of die-cast cars, plastic-model kits, and action figures. The employee: Lisa Greco. In the physical world she is the company’s customer-service manager, opinionated and outspoken despite a Fargo-like midwestern cheer. On-line, however, she is something more mighty to behold. As moderator of the bulletin board dedicated to the company’s model kits, this single mom is a nurturing guide for the adult men who come to her bulletin board to talk about toys. She is Mistress of Monster Models. The Queen of Styrene. Simply put, Greco represents a customer’s pipeline into the heart of the company. That’s an incredible boon to hobbyists accustomed to traditional toy makers, which guard product information as if they were Napoleon Solo protecting nuclear firing codes. Playing Mantis, on the other hand, is available 24/7 on the boards. Anyone can ask questions or find out about new products. Moreover, toy-heads can safely indulge their love of the trappings of childhood without fear of being scorned as terminal nerds. What Playing Mantis gets is even more valuable. Through the boards it can reach the burning core of its customer base with company news, promotions, and quick-and-dirty survey questions. It can vet product ideas with real consumers before committing a dime to development. Last year alone, board members promoted new products, provided remedies for Web-site problems, and helped bring Playing Mantis to a new understanding of who was actually buying its stuff. And to think the company almost threw the whole thing away. Before we tell that story, let’s consider a simple proposition: In this world, men don’t grow up. That is no expert opinion, nor is it the result of painstaking research. It’s just common sense. Ask anyone who ever married one. Once we can agree on that, the whole story falls into place: why Tom Lowe, son of one of the world’s best-known entrepreneurs, started a company dedicated to reissuing lines of toys from the 1960s; how the company became successful despite the toy industry’s reputation for a competitive viciousness usually reserved for totalitarian nations; and how both Lowe and Playing Mantis discovered the secret formula (wouldn’t be much of a tale if it didn’t have a secret formula) for building a vibrant, successful on-line customer community — the Holy Grail of all E-commerce companies. Here’s the thing: most American men never, ever lose their passion for the playthings of their past. That’s why store shelves are packed with classic hits of the ’60s — Hot Wheels cars, Etch A Sketch, and the Duncan Butterfly Yo-Yo, to name a few. Toy makers know that parents make the big buying decisions and that fathers especially never lose affection for the toys they loved as kids. Which brings us to Lowe and his company. Walk into Playing Mantis and you’ll see drab offices, just like those of any typical light-manufacturing company, but with one exception. There are toys everywhere. Glass cases in the lobby display build-ups of the company’s Polar Lights line of model kits (mostly foot-tall figures of monsters, spies, and space robots). The walls are festooned with test shots and lineups of the company’s Johnny Lightning die-cast toy race cars. Employees’ shelves are packed with Pezzes and other playthings. Lowe’s own modest office is especially crammed with goodies. His shelves are filled with Playing Mantis products, and the walls are covered with framed photos of NASCAR champions and muscle cars. But Lowe’s real treasures are stowed behind a Cyclone security fence in the shipping bay. That’s where the boss keeps his personal stash of collectibles. He has enough Johnny Lightnings and Captain Actions there to make a grown man — should there be such a thing — swoon. But for all the play factor, the corporate headquarters is still basically a cube farm in the unglamorous burg of South Bend. Playing Mantis, founded in 1994 and still tiny by toy-industry standards, has only 40 employees and revenues of $15 million to $20 million. Most of the employees are locals. Half have been hired in the past two years. It doesn’t take too many strides for Lowe to reach any corner of his empire. Lanky, sleepy-eyed, renowned for his prankster sense of humor, he ambles around the building like a big kid. Stopping in his product-development department — a couple of banquet tables pushed together — he checks out some handcrafted prototypes from a new line of toy cars tentatively called “The Dreamboats” — family sedans from the 1950s, real Bulgemobiles. Lowe picks up a bloated Chrysler and offers his highest praise: “Rock on!” (Well, it’s a toy company, not the English-lit department at Columbia.) Lowe, 40, is firmly grounded in the tail-end baby-boomer demographic his company serves. He grew up in Cassopolis, Mich., which everybody calls Cass, amid the richest cultural influences of the ’60s: Mad magazine, monster movies, and good old-fashioned network television — oh, yes, and social protest and the Vietnam War. His father was the well-known entrepreneur Edward Lowe, inventor of kitty litter (somebody had to) and, by a number of accounts, a my-way-or-the-highway kind of guy. Lowe grew up mostly in the care of his mother, who, wonderfully, did not throw away his old toys. Never straying from his midwestern roots, Lowe graduated from Miami University of Ohio, earned his master’s in marketing at DePaul University in Chicago, and married his high school sweetheart. He sold for a food broker and did marketing work for Domino’s Pizza, but the corporate life was not much fun. “I was tired of being told what to do,” he says. In 1987, in Dundee, Ill., Lowe started his first company: Safe Care Products. Financing the effort with his own savings, Lowe was the company at the beginning. From his basement he developed products he knew he could sell to mass merchandisers. He had one hit toy — a Velcro football called the WhattaCatch — but most of his 30-some products were anonymous, you-never-thought-you-needed-it-until-you-saw-it-on-a-store-shelf items, such as a bathtub cushion and a Nintendo video-game lock called HomeworkFirst. The best stuff was yet to come. By the early 1990s, Lowe’s generation was rediscovering the toys they thought they had outgrown. In those pre-eBay days, the bible of this loose society of arrested adolescents was a magazine called Toy Shop, filled with classifieds featuring goodies from the preceding 40 years or so. Reading it, Lowe noticed that a lot of the stuff he had played with when he was a kid was selling for big bucks. That demand looked like one hell of an opportunity. Take Hot Wheels, for example. Introduced by Mattel in the mid-’60s ( You can tell it’s Mattel. It’s swell!), these little die-cast cars were engineered to roll freely and fast. They were a sensation — and still are. Although new Hot Wheels are on store shelves, some versions from the ’60s command hundreds of dollars each. Down in his mother’s basement lay all the toys Lowe had discarded back when he discovered girls, including about 50 Hot Wheels and 8 cars from the Johnny Lightning line. He initiated a trademark search. Mattel had a death grip on the Hot Wheels name, but the Johnny Lightning name had been abandoned years before. “Polar Lights is very special to me. …You’ve rekindled the joy I once felt when buying these kits. …You’re the only company who I feel a part of.” –Lou H. Through an ad in Toy Shop, Lowe says, he bought a collection that included 30 original Johnny Lightning cars. He brought the swag to Wal-Mart, notorious for being tougher than the A-Team when it comes to taking on new products. “Whattaya got here? A flea market?” the buyer roared. “I’ll give ya five minutes.” Lowe explained that he was going to re-create toys from the ’60s. “I was there for an hour and 15 minutes, explaining what my plan was,” he says. Wal-Mart bought in. Toys R Us did, too. Lowe was ready to rock. He sent his original Johnny Lightnings to China with a simple directive: copy these. And in 1995, Safe Care was reborn as Playing Mantis, a name he chose to be clever and kid friendly. “I always liked playing with praying mantises when I was young,” Lowe says, illustrating the difference between a Cass native and, say, some kid from Brooklyn. Lowe has always had one measure for deciding which products Playing Mantis will pursue: “If it isn’t cool, we won’t do it,” he says. He means it, too. This is his company all the way; he owns it free and clear. There isn’t even any long-term debt (“Just a working line of credit,” says chief financial officer Randy Miller), so the company has the resources to choose and develop its own products. “Being private is an important advantage. We can do what we want,” Lowe says. What he wants to do is to diversify enough to fight off challenges from the Hasbros and Mattels of the world. (Playing Mantis has already survived trademark-infringement litigation with Mattel. The suit was settled out of court.) He now has 2 solid brands; he’d like to build up to 10. And he has two secret weapons. The first: customers such as the guys on the bulletin board, gleeful pseudo-grown-ups who share his child-of-the-’60s sensibility. The second: his company’s ability to spin on a dime and give those guys what Lowe knows they want. That’s how he decided to revive a line of monster models originated in the ’60s by a company called Aurora Plastics Corp. In those years, Aurora models were bigger than Star Trek. Aurora produced model kits of classic monsters (like the Wolf Man and the Mummy) as well as characters from television (like Batman and Superman). And did they ever sell! “Those guys were easily putting out 200,000 or 300,000 units at a run. I’m sure some of the best-sellers, like Frankenstein and Dracula, were up there with sales of 2 million or 3 million apiece,” says Thomas Graham, professor of American history at Flagler College, in St. Augustine, Fla., and author of Greenberg’s Guide to Aurora Model Kits. “At the time, plastic models of all sorts were sold everywhere — in candy shops, drugstores, bicycle stores — and I even found mention of one mortuary. They were easy to find, they were inexpensive, and pretty much all your friends were building them.” By the 1980s, Aurora was gone, a victim of bad business decisions. With it went the entire market for monster models. The models weren’t missed until their original fans grew older and started searching for the icons of childhood — a pursuit that Graham claims is healthy. “The people I know who are living long and prospering are those who still enjoy playing,” he says. “Playing with toys in particular.” Take Lowe, for example. He built Aurora models as a kid and remembered one with special fondness: the haunted house from The Addams Family TV series. “I loved it,” he says. So in 1995, under the name Polar Lights (Get it? Aurora? Polar Lights?), Lowe had the kit re-created, offering it as a $60 exclusive at the high-ticket FAO Schwarz toy-store chain. The collector’s market went nuts. Original Addams Family house kits were selling in Toy Shop for at least $500. A year later, when the remade kit went into wide release at less than $25, a new market was born. Make no mistake: the days of 300,000-unit runs of a monster model are over. Most Polar Lights kits are produced in runs of 15,000 units. Yet Polar Lights has been successful enough for the line to be expanded to include 60-odd kits. To date, the most successful is a new original done in the Aurora style: a model of the Jupiter 2 spaceship, the interstellar Winnebago featured on the TV series Lost in Space. Playing Mantis launched Polar Lights just as intelligent life was being discovered in cyberspace. In late 1995 and early 1996 — through bulletin boards on Prodigy, America Online, and other services — collectors, craftspeople, and genre fans were discovering whole communities of like-minded souls. Lowe and his managers caught on to the phenomenon — sort of. In 1995 they stuck up a quick site, just some early brochureware. But for serious marketing, Playing Mantis held fast to traditional methods — newsletters and print ads. Part of the reason for going slow on the Web was that Lowe was no fan of online customer interaction. “I would do chats and look at boards on AOL, but I found that I didn’t get a lot of new ideas from them,” he says. “Besides, there are some vicious people out there. Some of the employees who left would get on the boards and say things that just weren’t true. There were competitors who got on there just to screw around with you. I might go on to see what’s being said, but in terms of being Tom Lowe on the boards, I don’t do it anymore.” But Greco had no such reservations. She and Hank Hagquist, an outside contractor who was Playing Mantis’s original Web master, were old friends from Riley High in South Bend. Hagquist was running his own site, called Hobbytalk, for fans of radio-controlled car models. He talked to Greco about starting a section devoted to Playing Mantis products. “I thought they could be a good subject,” he says. “I thought the people who bought or collected their products were real enthusiasts, people with a passion.” In 1998, Hagquist established a board for Polar Lights, moderated by Greco. Dave Metzner, the company’s product-development manager for model kits, helped Greco answer board members’ questions. But it was she who ruled the board. Judiciously leaking product news, insisting on cordial relations and polite language, Greco — signing missives with an enthusiastic “Moi!” — gathered a loyal cadre of fans to her cyberclubhouse. Yet even after hundreds of members had signed on, she didn’t fully understand the potency of the boards until Polar Lights released that model of the Jupiter 2. The kit, enthusiastically received, had a flaw: a hatch inside the ship was upside down. That detail would escape 99.9% of normal buyers. But this was the Internet, where obsessive behavior hangs its hat. Board members were all over the error, and Metzner, with Lowe’s approval, decided to correct the flaw for the second run of the kit. The online critics felt as if they had spoken and the company had responded. True enough, says Metzner. “If it hadn’t been for people telling us about it, it wouldn’t have been fixed,” he says. It was the kind of action that converts loyal customers into devoted fans. As the online community jelled, its members got very comfortable with one another. Their exchanges strayed way beyond toys. In the course of a limerick contest initiated by Greco ( There once was a monster named Frankie, in the mood for a little hanky-panky… What say we just don’t go there?), one member posted a message revealing that his wife had left him. “Why share it out here like this?” he wrote. “I don’t know. Thanks for the support out here, you guys.” Greco responded immediately — “We’re here for you” — and the board members pitched in. It brought home for Greco just how much this community meant to its members. The board was a sanctuary that connected them to the company and to one another far more deeply than she had realized. “As I reflect back on my hobby experiences for the year, one of the most satisfying has been the relationship formed by a large number of us with Polar Lights. It is not their products that, I feel, sets them apart from other model companies. It is their devotion to the consumer.” –PCModeler.com Unfortunately, Lowe was not frequenting this board (or boards that were set up later for Johnny Lightning and Captain Action fans), so he saw little of all that. What he did see was that Greco and Metzner were spending an awful lot of time on the Internet. It didn’t seem as though their involvement with the boards was adding much to the business. “That’s what they were doing with their time?” Lowe remembers asking. “Talking to people about their problems, which have nothing to do with model kits? So we took a very hard look at that.” At the time, in 1998, Playing Mantis was already reexamining its entire customer-service function. By 1999 some customer-service staffers were being asked to do more active selling. That’s how it happened that the boards almost died. It started with Hagquist, who was still hosting the virtual community on his site. “At some point I was saying that here we have this multimillion-dollar company building its name for free,” he says. “C’mon, guys, feed a little back.” So he gave Greco a deadline: By the end of February, start paying him $50 a month for each of the three boards. Greco filed all the appropriate paperwork, never imagining there’d be a problem. But Miller wouldn’t approve the expense at first. Look at it from his point of view. For one thing, it is often his job, as with any CFO, to be the one who says no when it comes to using company resources. For another, he and Lowe were already wondering what the true cost of the boards was and whether they were worthwhile. “It wasn’t really a financial decision as much as a decision regarding use of time,” Miller says. “Intangibles like that make for the toughest decisions.” As the deadline approached, Greco grew nervous. If the boards shut down, it would be a disaster — and not just for the company, which would lose a resource that she felt hadn’t even begun to pay off. “This community, and I think most communities, are built on trust,” she says. “These boards are a refuge for the guys, a place where they can be themselves. Shut it down, even for a day, and you create an uncertainty from which the community might never recover.” She went to Metzner for advice. Of all people he best knew what was happening on the boards. Together they decided that even if they had to pay the fee themselves, they’d keep at least the model-kit board running. But first Greco wanted to reach out to Lowe directly. It wasn’t politically correct, and it would anger her managers, but it wouldn’t be the first time she had gone right to the top. (Greco was once a guard in a prison for men, and she prides herself on being pretty tough.) “I felt I owed the fight to the guys out there,” she says. On February 22, Greco posted a new topic on the Polar Lights board. Under the title “Hypothetical Question” she wrote, “Good morning, guys! Everyone have a cup of coffee? Anyone bring the donuts Time for a little sidebar discussion. SUPPOSE, just suppose, this BB would cease to exist. How would you all feel about that?” That week the boards hummed. Members figured that something was going on in South Bend. Member Steve Iversen, who under the nom-de-Web CultTVMan operates a popular site for builders of science-fiction models, E-mailed his list of 700 subscribers, urging them to register their support. In post after post, members expressed their need for the board: “Polar Lights is very special to me. … You’ve rekindled the joy I once felt when buying these kits. … You’re the ONLY company who I feel a part of.” –Lou H. “It helps us to be kids again. … It’s easier to be a kid again when you see there are a bunch of other people doing it: you feel less guilty/silly!” –David Redknap “As I reflect back on my hobby experiences for the year, one of the most satisfying has been the relationship formed by a large number of us with Polar Lights. It is not their products that, I feel, sets them apart from other model companies. It is their devotion to the consumer.” –PCModeler.com