Tag Archives: Enviance Inc.

Web-Hosted Software: Compliance as a Service

our beautiful site

Who’s best able to make sure your company stays up to date and compliant in the face of ever changing regulations and standards? For a growing number of companies, the answer is a software-as-a-service provider. A recent Gartner study found 15 to 20 percent of responding companies, both large and small, use web-hosted software to track compliance. And more companies are using Web-hosted software to oversee compliance every year, Gartner found. What’s the attraction? As with all software-as-a-service (SaaS), it allows the company to avoid using IT staff to oversee a non-core function. “Using software to manage compliance and compliance reporting becomes too big a burden for a small organization with limited resources,” explains Dariel LeBoeuf, senior vice president of communications and education services at TraceSecurity, a SaaS provider that helps companies with governance, risk management and compliance (GRC). “They tell us they don’t have the staff to keep up with regulations,” he says. Does a Web-hosted compliance solution make sense for your company? It might, especially if any of the following apply: You need to achieve compliance fast. “That’s one of the basic benefits of SaaS,” LeBoeuf says. “The deployment efforts and infrastructure needed to support it is minimal, so you get a positive result much more quickly.” Using Web-hosted software can also help you more quickly prepare to demonstrate compliance to regulators. You fear losing institutional knowledge. “In the environmental and safety industries, a lot of people are nearing retirement,” notes Michele Hincks, vice president of marketing at Enviance, a SaaS provider that helps companies keep compliant with environmental, health and safety regulations. “Once they leave, they’re gone, and if something is in a spreadsheet or a log book, it might not be easy for their replacements to use that information without a lot of training. Putting in a system like ours can reduce that training time.” You can’t keep up with regulatory changes. Most regulations and other compliance standards frequently change in major and minor ways. Traditional software would require either an upgrade or some adjustment by your IT staff to take these changes into account. If your SaaS provider is committed to keeping up with these changes (which is something to ask before signing an agreement) then its automatic updates should eliminate this concern. You’re preparing for a different regulatory future. One good example of this may be greenhouse gas emissions: Hincks points out that both Barack Obama and John McCain have declared themselves in favor of a “cap-and-trade” system in which companies would buy and sell polluting “credits.” If such legislation is enacted, it would immediately create a large market for such credits and make demonstrating compliance much more difficult. “Companies will need to have a standardized system, and they’ll need a way to measure pollution that can be audited and certified, because now it will be a financial instrument,” she says. You need to keep down upfront costs. The Gartner report notes that the SaaS model (which usually involves an ongoing monthly fee) may not save money in the long run, compared with the purchase of a software license. But it definitely reduces initial expenses, and provides you with an operating, rather than capital, expense for tax purposes. When working with a SaaS provider, LeBoeuf adds, the service will help you get up and running once the software is in place. “Make sure they have a plan beyond just implementing the software,” he says. “Ask how employees will use the software, how they get started, and where they go with questions. A fairly large number of organizations buy software that never gets used because of lack of such expertise.”   At the same time, keep in mind that it is still your company — not the SaaS provider — which bears ultimate responsibility for compliance. “Most regulations require that the company has someone in-house in charge of compliance,” LeBoeuf says. “At most of our small-company customers, that person may also have other responsibilities. But you can’t just turn it all over to someone else.”

Software-as-a-Service and Regulatory Compliance

our beautiful site

Here’s a nightmare scenario: You run a medical practice that uses a Web-hosted customer relationship management (CRM) solution to handle its billing and other records. One day, you get a phone call from your contact at the CRM company, who has just discovered that a hacker got inside its firewall, and has had access to your data. Mortified, you write a letter to all your patients, alerting them to the breach, and apologizing that it happened. You send the letter and brace yourself for possible lawsuits. But the next call you get is from the Feds. Whether you knew it or not, your company is responsible for the breach, and is now in violation of the Health Information Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). A growing number of companies, both large and small, depend on hosted software for everything from payroll to package design. For small companies, part of the rationale is that hosted software (or “software-as-a-service”) providers usually have more robust data centers, better in-house expertise, and tighter security than their customers do. But when you hand your company’s sensitive data to an outsourcer, you’re still legally responsible for keeping it compliant with government regulations and legal agreements. How can you make sure a provider will keep your data compliant? Just as important — how can you prove to regulators you’ve done everything you can to make sure it will? Start by following these five steps: 1. Rank providers by risk.  “I’ve had people call me and say, ‘My regulator was here and said I need to get due diligence material from the people who deliver coffee!’” reports Tom DeSot, executive vice president and chief compliance officer at Digital Defense, Inc., which offers on-demand compliance and security solutions. Asking for documentation from a guy with a coffee cart may seem completely unreasonable, he adds, but you can satisfy most regulators if they see you have a plan for addressing each of your vendors in descending order of risk. “Develop a matrix of vendors, what they do for you, and what level of risk they expose you to,” he says. “If a regulator says you need due diligence for each one, then you’ll have to do each one, but they may not expect you to do them all at once.” 2. Review the vendor’s SAS 70 audit. The Statement on Auditing Standards Number 70 from the Auditing Standards Board of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants has become something of a standard for auditing software-as-a-service providers and other outsourcers. Customers routinely ask providers for copies of their SAS 70 audit reports, and this is a good idea for you to do, too. “We just received an SAS 70 Type II audit,” reports Michele Hincks, vice president of marketing at Enviance, a provider of Web-hosted compliance solutions for health and environmental regulations. “Our customers view us as an extension of their IT system, and the audit assures them protection of sensitive data. The auditors assessed our internal controls, technology, how often we upgrade our systems and our disaster recovery plans,” she says. But it’s not enough just to know a company’s had a SAS 70 audit — you should look at the report itself, and know what type it is, according to French Caldwell, vice president of research in governance, risk management, and compliance at Gartner. “Is it a Type I or a Type II report?” he asks. “In a Type I report, the vendor is attesting to its own controls, so Type II is preferable.” Even with a Type II report, you should review it carefully to see if the controls in question are the controls you need to make sure your data is safe. 3. Get info from auditors and regulators. How do you know which controls you need? The best way to find out is to ask the experts, including regulators and auditors working for your own organization. “If your auditors get coy and say that answering your questions would compromise their objectivity, fire them and get new auditors,” Caldwell advises. “Good auditors these days know they can give you this kind of assistance.” He also suggests learning as much as you can about auditing standards. “Go join the local chapter of Information Systems Audit and Control Association (ISACA),” he says. Go to some of their meetings and network with others who are facing the same issues. Better yet, have someone in your company get certification from them. That person will learn what auditors are looking for, and to understand their language.” 4. Go see for yourself. What if a vendor hasn’t had a SAS 70 audit? This shouldn’t necessarily be a deal-breaker, DeSot says. “Not every company has a business practice that qualifies it for one. And, the controls in question may not be appropriate for that company. When this is the case, an operational audit can be just as useful.” In the absence of a SAS 70 audit, DeSot and others recommend conducting a site visit at the vendor so you and your IT experts can see for yourselves how your data will be protected — something Enviance used to let customers do before it had its SAS 70 audit. If the provider in question is hosting your data at a shared data center, it may not be able to get you in to see actual servers, but a visit to the company’s offices can tell you a lot about its professionalism and longevity. Also, DeSot advises, whenever a request for documentation or a visit is turned down, make sure to get that refusal in writing. “Regulators recognize that not every vendor will give you all the info you ask for,” he says. “But they want to see that you’ve done your due diligence.” 5. Repeat next year. Don’t assume just because a vendor has good controls in place today that it will remain so forever. If a vendor is handling your company’s information, you should go back and review its controls at least once a year, Caldwell says. “And if the vendor is handling very sensitive info, you should do it more often than that.”