Tag Archives: E * TRADE Financial Corporation

We’ve Been Hacked

Not scared of losing your data to a corporate thief? You should be Bob McNeal sits down in a cubicle in his Alexandria, Va., office with his morning coffee. He turns on his computer and flips open his notebook to check out the specifics of today’s assignment. He clicks a couple of buttons on the screen and runs his usual scripted program, entering in a few numbers from those that are scribbled in his notebook. He types in some commands, following routine instructions from his database of tools. Then he patiently waits for the computer to process his programs and answer his questions — questions that could be worth thousands of dollars to his client. Two hours later, McNeal has completed his assignment. He has broken into the computer network of MBA Management Inc., located some 20 miles away in Fairfax, and verified that he can access every computer and every database in the company. And, McNeal tells his boss, he can read the user ID and password of every single employee. Is that enough, he asks, or should he continue? That’s hacking. Sorry to make it seem so banal. But it doesn’t take some wild-eyed rocket scientist with a supercomputer and nothing better to do but type ingenious code into the wee hours of the morning to perform it. Most of what hackers do is disarmingly simple. Often they use readily available vulnerability-seeking software programs, which some experts call “point, click, and attack tools.” And most of the time hackers are pretty successful — especially when they target small companies, which typically don’t spend either the time or the resources they need to protect themselves. The simplest tricks can do tremendous damage. (Witness the “I Love You” bug that was sent earlier this year in an E-mail attachment.) Most small companies that are hooked up to the Internet do what James Mugnolo, president of MBA Management, did: assume that their Internet service provider will furnish a secure connection. It took McNeal just one morning to reveal how faulty an assumption that was. Fortunately for MBA Management, a $5-million executive-search business, Bob McNeal works for the good guys: Para-Protect Services Inc., an E-commerce and network-security company. Mugnolo, who recently moved his company to Chantilly, Va., hired Para-Protect in October 1998 to find the holes in his company’s network and recommend ways to stitch them up. McNeal stopped his penetration test into the MBA Management network after those first two hours. Normally, such a job can take two days. “We stopped when we found we could get into everything,” says Chuck Downs, Para-Protect’s vice-president and director of operations. “There was no sense in beating that horse to death.” Close call: James Mugnolo’s company received a nasty virus that read, “Enclosed is my résumé.” Mugnolo had decided to test his company’s security and to spend some money upgrading it after a former employee was suspected of stealing customer data. Like most employers who have such suspicions, Mugnolo doesn’t like to discuss the details. Still, he clearly felt betrayed, and worse, the incident scared him. In its database the company keeps information on more than 50,000 workers throughout North America, as well as on an equal number of companies that are looking for employees. “Their whole business is that database,” says Downs. Though Mugnolo didn’t hire “white hat” hackers until the company had lost data, other small-business owners are rushing to secure their networks before disaster strikes. In some cases the critical or private nature of the company’s data pushes them to it; in other cases companies see security as a differentiator for their product or service. But many have just plain seen the writing on the wall — or more precisely, in the newspaper headlines, which have blared a stream of reports on security breaches. Though well-publicized stories about computer viruses have lately brought security into the public consciousness, it’s often other threats that are more dangerous to a company’s profits and reputation. Those can include attacks that shut down Web servers, for instance, or that replace Web sites with obscene or insulting graphics. Hackers can also get in and rummage through a company’s files. Sometimes data just disappear — consider the case earlier this year at the U.S. State Department, where Madeleine Albright ordered a crackdown after a classified laptop vanished, and at Los Alamos National Laboratory, where two hard drives containing classified nuclear-weapons data were missing for more than a month. Those sorts of events — from the annoying to the frightening — are often what it takes to make an entrepreneur recognize the need for computer security, says Terry Gudaitis of information-protection consultant Global Integrity Corp., based in Reston, Va. After all, you don’t want your company to be the next one in the headlines. Certainly, Mugnolo doesn’t. And he has thus far been successful. In March, Para -Protect Services ran an unscheduled penetration test of MBA Management’s systems, and this time the company passed with flying colors. Since it adopted its new security measures, “we haven’t had a single instance of systems penetration,” says David Denne, MBA Management’s vice-president of marketing. That has left the company free to concentrate on growth: this year’s second quarter was its best ever, and the business grew from 35 employees to almost 60 in the first six months of the year. In perhaps its closest call, the company escaped damage from a virus that was seemingly designed for a headhunting company: code disguised as a E-mail attachment on a résumé. That message, signed “Janet Simons,” read: “Attached is my résumé with a list of references contained within. Please feel free to call or E-mail me if you have any further questions regarding my experience. I am looking forward to hearing from you.” The attachment, however, carried a virus that could have methodically erased every single drive on MBA Management’s network. Needless to say, that particular virus could have been disastrous for the company, where résumés flow in regularly through the E-mail system. “It probably shut down several of our competitors,” says Denne. “Our system immediately scrubbed anything that came in through the firewall, flagged it, and kept it on a server outside the firewall.” Like Mugnolo, Denne believes that MBA Management has gained a competitive edge through its stepped-up security. “I find it comforting, and therefore I think my clients find it comforting,” Denne says. Hire a Hacker At Para-Protect Services, Chuck Downs was surprised but not shocked that McNeal was able to break into MBA Management’s systems in just two hours. Doing what Mugnolo did — relying on his ISP to configure his connection to the Net — meant by definition that it was an open connection, Downs says. But if Downs wasn’t appalled, Mugnolo certainly was. His business’s competitive edge — the reason companies go to him rather than to other headhunters — is his deep compilation of information on thousands of potential employees. Included in that data is sensitive information on job openings, including postings that haven’t been made public — perhaps because an employee doesn’t yet know that he or she is on the way out. Companies can unwittingly reveal a lot about their strategic plans, for example, by listing the specific skills required for various jobs. “The last thing in the world the client wants is for that information to get back to his staff or to a competitor,” says Denne. In particular, a company that’s developing a new product doesn’t want anyone to know the nature of its work. “A breach in a program could spell the end of the whole market for their idea,” Denne adds. Still, it’s not surprising that few people spend a lot of time worrying about Internet security. As the user looks out onto the superhighway of the Web, it’s easy to see it as a one-way street. But in fact, when you open a Web page or do virtually anything on the Internet, you send a request to the faraway computer on which that Web page is stored, and that computer sends you back information, which is opened by your browser or other software. That means your computer — and, in a company setting, the server — must be constantly open and able to receive data feeds from the outside. That openness is exactly where vulnerability lies. For a fee of about $10,000, Para-Protect restricted the openness of MBA Management’s systems in two ways. First, the company installed a simple firewall from Prism Servers Inc., in Allison Park, Pa., at a cost of less than $3,000. The firewall was configured according to a simple rule, Downs says: “Anything coming from the Internet that is not requested from the inside is denied.” It does that by using a Unix filter to distinguish between information — like a Web page — that is coming in at a user’s request and any unknown traffic that arrives unbidden. When someone inside the network requests something from outside the firewall, the firewall issues a tag number with the request. If incoming data packets don’t contain a matching tag, the firewall won’t let them in. There are two big exceptions. One is E-mail, which arrives unrequested. Downs put MBA Management’s E-mail system onto a separate server, which redirects incoming mail and scans it for viruses before users can access it. The other exception is the company’s own Web site, which anyone from the outside should be able to access. MBA Management disconnected the site from its corporate network and arranged to have it hosted off-site. Second, Downs made sure that each computer went on the internal network, which is invisible to outsiders. In a normal office network with Internet access, each workstation has a unique Internet Protocol (IP) address. It was those addresses that McNeal was able to identify and attack in the penetration test. Downs changed each workstation’s IP address to a nonroutable address — meaning that outsiders can only see the address of the firewall. The result: nobody from outside can discover the IP address of an internal computer and use it as a port into the network — a common hacking procedure. Downs says that the firewall’s logs reveal that hackers have frequently scanned MBA Management’s system looking for ports since Downs put the firewall in place. Although $3,000 is low-end for a commercial firewall, Downs says, it’s all that a small company needs. “The only thing you limit is the number of people you can service,” he says, since the small firewall has limited bandwidth capacity. The Prism product, he says, can easily handle 200 users. That should cover the short-term needs of MBA Management, which plans to double its number of networked users within a year. As the company has grown, it has periodically added servers behind the main firewall and is now running six of them. Now that Downs feels the company is secure from outside intruders, the next move is to provide greater internal security for the databases. Currently, MBA Management uses a proprietary database running on NT servers. It is about to split the database into several parts using software called Adapt, which will allow the company to use the operating system’s security-administration features to carefully control who can have access to different levels of data. Since installing the firewall, Para-Protect has conducted monthly tests as part of a routine security checkup. That is not to say that MBA Management’s security is 100% foolproof. But the company has put a pretty solid defense in place — solid enough to send hackers on to easier targets. And that’s a big part of what Internet security is about: making sure yours is not the easiest lock to pick. Virtual Privacy You could say that a kindergarten play cost entrepreneur Dana Dodds $120,000 a year, and you wouldn’t be that far off. One afternoon in 1996, Dodds, CEO of San Diego auto insurer Reliant General Insurance Services Inc., left work to watch his daughter perform in a school play. He was immediately struck by guilt. “I had a customer-service rep whose daughter was in that class, too, but she couldn’t be there, and it bugged me,” Dodds says. A virtual private network lets Dana Dodds’s employees work from home without sacrificing security. Soon, about 15 of Reliant General’s employees were working from home, with no time clock — just quotas for the number of applications they processed and standards for the quality of the work they did. Back then, the workers connected to the corporate network directly through a dial-in 800 number. The phone bills for those lines ran about $120,000 a year. Reliant General is a fast-growth company — it’s made the Inc. 500 twice, as #341 in 1998 and #417 in 1999. And Dodds is all for using the newest technology to keep his company growing at a rapid pace. So in 1997 he hired information-services director Cary White to help him do just that. When White, 32, joined the company, he took one look at the exorbitant phone bill and told Dodds that the company could eliminate most of it by letting the telecommuters connect over the Internet. Dodds liked the idea but knew there had to be a catch. “He’s a very sharp guy when it comes to technology,” White says with a laugh. “Almost too smart for his own good.” The catch, White responded, lay in the open nature of the Internet. Essentially, the Internet is a very large collection of routers that are wired to one another. When you send a packet of data into cyberspace, it wanders, asking at each router, “Have you seen this IP address?” If the answer is no, the packet moves on to the next router. However, nobody should trust that every router on the Internet will simply shoo data packets along. Hackers can put tools, called “sniffers,” on those routers and use them to peek inside every packet of data that comes along. If a packet’s contents or destination seems juicy enough, the sniffers can read everything inside. An extra layer of worry exists for Dodds and his colleagues working in California’s auto industry: 11 years ago actress Rebecca Schaeffer was murdered by a stalker who obtained her address from the state Department of Motor Vehicles. (Since then, California has tightened its DMV privacy laws.) Not surprisingly, Dodds is passionate about the need to protect his customers. “Information for us is a trust, and we can’t give it away, and we can’t let anybody get it,” he says. “We’re talking about where they live, what cars they drive, where they work, the children that drive in the household, their driving records, their claims history — it’s very similar to credit information. It’s very private.” For White, simply using the wide-open Internet was out. So he called in a local consultant, Paradise Technology, which built a virtual private network. At the time, VPNs were a fresh concept, and few companies of any size had tried them out. The VPN creates a tunnel of sorts between the Reliant General network and telecommuters’ computers, shielding its content from the view of the myriad routers along the way. Axent Technologies’ PowerVPN was one of the first of its kind on the market, so Paradise chose it for Reliant General. In addition, Reliant General purchased Axent’s Defender product to authenticate users on its dial-up lines. The system works this way: Telecommuters like Reliant policy underwriter Mike Lemieux connect to the Internet through a cable modem or a dial-up ISP. Lemieux, who works full-time from his home in El Cajon, Calif., clicks on an icon to start his session with Reliant General. Lemieux’s request then passes through several stages. First, the firewall lets it through only if it is a request for a VPN session on the Axent machine. Anyone — even an authorized user like Lemieux — who tries to bypass that machine and connect directly to the corporate server will be blocked by the firewall. Approved requests for VPN sessions make it to the next stage: authentication by the Defender hardware. Lemieux enters his user ID and, just as he would at an ATM machine, types in a personal identification number. But in addition, using that PIN and secret data stored on Lemieux’s hard drive, the system creates a onetime password that allows him to access it. This two-level authentication means that someone would have to know Lemieux’s password and use his computer in order to impersonate him and gain access to the corporate server. When Defender gives the go-ahead to Lemieux’s session, the PowerVPN establishes a secure tunnel that keeps all transmissions out of harm’s way. In addition, it encrypts the contents. Once the secure connection is established, Lemieux logs in to the corporate server — using yet another password — and begins working on applications just as if he were on the network in the office. So far the system has worked so well that Reliant General uses the VPN not just for its own telecommuters but also for approved outsiders, like insurance-claims reps. Installing the system for about 25 telecommuters cost Reliant General about $20,000. Given a yearly savings of $100,000 on the phone bill, “it was pretty clear-cut, pretty much a slam-dunk decision,” says chief financial officer Greg Goodrich. Instant reassurance: Joseph Rosmann guarantees that the children’s records are shielded from harm. According to Dodds, the phone-bill savings haven’t been the only gain. He says telecommuters’ productivity has increased sharply — a phenomenon supported by a new poll conducted by the International Telework Association & Council, which found that nearly half of the telecommuters surveyed felt they were more productive working at home, while less than 10% thought they were less productive. According to Dodds, underwriters who used to process about 70 applications a day in the office are now doing at least 100 a day working at home. And giving a staffer time off to attend a school play no longer costs the company a small fortune. Bedside Manner If you think that storing kids’ immunization records doesn’t sound like a business bonanza, then you haven’t been talking with Joseph Rosmann. Rosmann’s soft-spoken manner belies his passion about his Internet start-up, HealthRadius. The company — Rosmann’s obsession since he launched it in 1996 — will soon make many millions of dollars from its Web-based repository of children’s vaccination records, he explains in measured tones. Doctors, he says, have free access to the records. Public-health agencies pay a fee to access the records of children in their area. Health plans pay $1 a child for basic data and as much as $4 a child for more complete records. Individuals, through their employers or insurers, can access their own children’s records for a family subscription fee of $15 a year. Eventually, every time a doctor’s office wants to check on a new patient’s history or a parent wants to sign up a kid for summer camp, money will flow into HealthRadius. What companies like Healtheon/WebMD Corp. have become for the Web-based administrative side of health care, Rosmann’s company will be for the patient-records side of it, he says. Rosmann, 56, who formerly worked as a health-care consultant, has had to make his pitch many, many times, to venture capitalists, state health officials, doctors, and health-care administrators. Though they may expect the caricature of an Internet-start-up entrepreneur with plans as big as the sky — a young, brash, fast-talking braggadocio — what they get instead is the calm assurance of Joe Rosmann, with his mellifluous voice that never rises or rushes. Like a family doctor explaining your test results, he provides instant reassurance with his smile and bearing. Reassurance is an important element of Rosmann’s plan. To make it work, he must collect and distribute the type of information that everyone agrees should be held in utmost privacy: medical records. Without strict assurance of the data’s security, Rosmann says, his company could never meet the requirements of health-care privacy laws — newly tightened in the wake of consumer outrage over privacy violations. And just as important, without that security, Rosmann could never sell anyone on the idea. And these days it’s a Herculean task to ensure that Web-based transactions are private and secure. Still, for cost, speed, and simplicity, Rosmann wants to do it all — including data collection and access — over the Web. His approach seems to be working. HealthRadius, based in Bellevue, Wash., will expand its immunization-records service to four new states this fall and expects to have more than half a million physicians involved within two years. Although the company took in just $100,000 in revenues last year, venture capitalists value the company at about $20 million. Rosmann expects revenues of close to $5 million this year. Four years ago, when Rosmann launched HealthRadius, doctors and health-care administrators were just beginning to eye the potential of the Internet. Washington state health officials brought Rosmann in to study how to salvage a failed medical-records-exchange initiative, the Community Health Information Network. Their request, he says, was straightforward: “Get something simple started to prove that you can safely exchange medical-health records and automate the transactions between doctors, health plans, and hospitals.” Out of that effort came two companies: Rosmann’s and a payment-exchange provider called Pointshare. Rosmann’s response to the state’s request was to break into the potentially enormous health-care-records field through the single entry point of children’s immunization data. That category is a good testing ground for the broader health-records field, he believes. For one thing, parents must frequently provide immunization records to new schools, new summer camps, and new doctors. A child typically has seen three doctors and had 23 immunizations by age six, according to HealthRadius’s research. Who wouldn’t want to make managing and exchanging all that data easier? Rosmann believed it was a market waiting to be served. One of Rosmann’s key early contacts was information-law specialist John R. Christiansen of the Seattle office of law firm Stoel Rives LLP. Christiansen began consulting for HealthRadius in the fall of 1996. “There is no standard-setting organization out there” for electronic medical records, Christiansen says. “You can’t just go out there and say, ‘What are the steps I need to take?” He advised Rosmann to draft his contracts with clients in a way that holds HealthRadius to an unusually high level of liability for the privacy and security of the data it collects. Only by doing so could Rosmann hope to reassure the doctors, health insurers, and parents who were HealthRadius’s targeted customers. If you’re going to put your business on the line like that, you’d better make sure you can live up to your promises. So the first person Rosmann brought on board was not a health-care adviser, but information-security veteran Gene Shook, now vice-president of the company’s operations and development. Rosmann and Shook, working together in their quiet offices on the outskirts of Seattle, laid out a long list of steps they would take to keep medical data both secure and private. First, they needed to be able to verify the identity of any client trying to access their records over the Web. Then they had to encrypt the data sent to and from HealthRadius servers so that only people holding the keys to unscramble it could read it. In addition, since participating doctors’ offices would submit information directly to the HealthRadius database when they performed immunizations, the company had to guarantee an even greater level of security for those transactions. Different employees at doctors’ offices — even those using the same computer — would need to have varying levels of access; for instance, some workers would be able to read but not edit patient records. The first employee Rosmann brought on board was Gene Shook, who took charge of security. Shook will soon install a VPN, which will offer a high degree of security. In the meantime, he turned to the encryption built into standard versions of Netscape Navigator and Microsoft Internet Explorer (called Secure Socket Layer encryption) and other Microsoft tools. For authentication, Shook currently uses the access-control system built into the Microsoft Windows NT operating system as well as the company’s own custom-developed access-control system. To ensure that changes that are made to HealthRadius’s database are verifiable and legally valid, Shook decided to use a method that should soon become more widespread: digital signatures that use public key interchange (PKI). Those digital signatures, provided through an authorized third party, verify two parties to each another, like a secret handshake. Washington state has recently authorized a Utah company called Digital Signature Trust to act as the licensed certificate authority for supplying digital PKI signatures. Anyone in the state can sign up with Digital Signature Trust and receive the hardware or software to generate digital IDs. Two parties that are both using those digital IDs — for instance, HealthRadius and a physician’s office — can be certain that the information that was sent exactly matches what the other party receives. In Washington, such electronic documents can now legally take the place of paper. Shook is hoping that other states adopt compatible systems; if they don’t, HealthRadius may have to install a vast and confusing array of different digital-signature systems. (Without a common standard, Shook fears that HealthRadius may have to establish its own PKI service for its customers. That not only would be more costly and difficult — HealthRadius would have to license and distribute software to everyone who is authorized to access its data over the Web — but also would open HealthRadius up to liability for its digital-signature system.) So far HealthRadius has spent about $1 million on technology, including security. By the time it rolls out nationally during the next year or two, Rosmann expects he will have spent $2 million to $3 million on technology. But perhaps most important, the company has already subjected itself to an intensive security audit (in the spring of 1998) and will undergo another one early next year. It also requires periodic audits of the 50 clinics and hospitals that supply it with medical-records data, and a randomly selected 5% of clients’ sites will be audited each year. In such a review, an independent outside party rigorously examines the procedures and technology that a company is using to handle its data. In HealthRadius’s case, the auditors were interested in seeing whether the company could live up to the security standards of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. That legislation established ground rules for medical-records privacy — always a delicate subject and one made even more so in the Internet age. (DrKoop.com got into hot water recently when its advertising partner, DoubleClick, sold lists that included members’ health information. HealthRadius’s contract with its clients bars it from selling its information.) The audit, which takes about three weeks to complete, includes interviews and a systematic review of the technology itself. That may seem like a lot of effort to secure something as relatively uncontroversial as immunization records. But a market test in 1998 confirmed that the HealthRadius service had no chance of acceptance if people felt even a slight concern that someone could access its demographic information on the more than 2 million people in its system. “We needed to act as a bank — you have direct access and no one else has access,” says Shook. In addition, managing immunization records is just HealthRadius’s initial foray into the arena of electronic-medical-records exchange. In the not too distant future, Rosmann plans to start databases that will contain patients’ disease histories and other medical matters. At that point, he wants an unblemished security track record. The company’s biggest vote of confidence so far has come in black and white: a letter from the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), an independent nonprofit organization that evaluates the quality of managed-care organizations. The letter, dated January 1999, stated that NCQA considered HealthRadius’s registry of immunization records an allowable source of data for its own system, which is used almost universally by health plans. “NCQA gave its blessing because we had provided the privacy,” says Rosmann. “As soon as that letter was issued, about every health plan became a customer.” That’s not to say Rosmann is satisfied. “We still have a little sensitivity around the subject of security,” he says, still in that calm, careful voice. In fact, he has Shook shopping for three more security items. One, HackerShield from BindView Development, scans for known intrusion methods, similar to the way antivirus software checks for familiar computer viruses. A second, IPsec, is a computer-security standard that keeps unwanted data traffic from bothering a company’s servers. One benefit of that would be protection against denial-of-service attacks that can overload and disable a server. (Remember that disastrous day for Amazon.com and eBay last February?) The third product Rosmann and Shook want, WebTrends, monitors and analyzes firewall logs for unusual activity. That will help Shook manage the company’s defenses more actively and will also help the company prosecute any hackers who try to break in. Because catching a hacker would make the kind of headlines that Rosmann would like to be in. David S. Bernstein is a freelance writer in Watertown, Mass. What Are You Afraid Of? So what’s the worst that can happen? There are several types of hacker attacks, all of which have occurred in recent months. Denial of service. Much like protesters’ barring the entrance to a physical store, hackers can shut down your E-business by making sure no customers can get through to your site. Typically, they bombard the site with data traffic, rendering the Web server useless. That is the type of attack that brought down ZDNet, E*Trade, CNN.com, eBay, Buy.com, Amazon.com, and Yahoo, each for about three to five hours, all during a period of several days in February. Electronic theft. This scenario is just like a physical robbery: the hacker breaks into your system, finds something he wants, and downloads it to his own computer. In most cases you may retain your copy of the data, but now someone else has it as well. Is that so bad? Ask the folks at CD Universe, an Internet music retailer based in Wallingford, Conn. Last December someone describing himself as a 19-ye

Upstarts: Personal-Finance Niches

Money Markets A slew of start-ups are storming the personal-finance industry by targeting populations that traditionally have been underserved What do women really want? Some start-ups think the answer is customized financial advice and business services. Those companies want to be the vehicle through which women do all their money-related tasks: paying bills, buying stocks, seeking loans, selecting insurance, and so on. They insist that women’s financial needs are different from men’s, especially because women tend to earn less than their male counterparts yet live longer lives. The thinking is that those two conditions have created a distinct marketing niche — a “niche,” mind you, that comprises 51% of the U.S. population. Do women truly need specialized financial attention? Predictably, the founders of the aforementioned start-ups believe they do. They cite the needs of the aging baby-boomer market — a megapopulation of educated women now entering their peak years of earning and spending. Those women, the first female generation to wear the proverbial pants of financial planning, will begin to look for advice on the Web and elsewhere. And the information that they’ll need will not only cover the basics but also emphasize “more relationship-oriented and life-stage topics than bottom-line transactions,” says Liz Davidson, founder and CEO of Financial Finesse, a company in San Francisco that’s dedicated to serving women’s investment needs. Such target marketing — be it to women or to any other population subgroup — dovetails nicely with the audiences that already exist on the Internet. “For some time, the Internet has been aggregating people in communities,” says Chris Musto, director of financial services and an analyst at Gomez Advisors Inc., a research firm in Lincoln, Mass., that focuses on Internet commerce. “So a start-up can work with sites that have already congregated certain groups.” Indeed, the Web — already home to such affinity sites as Women.com Networks, Gay.com, and AsianAvenue.com — lends itself to businesses hoping to attract a given demographic. Still, common sense suggests that all personal-finance customers — regardless of gender, ethnicity, or sexual orientation — would want the same commodity: trustworthy advice. Yet the specialization of personal-finance businesses, both on and off the Web, is well under way. Name a target market — teens, Hispanics, newlyweds, high-tech workers — and you’ll find a financial start-up whose raison d’être is serving it. Wrapping it up Lenda Washington first had the notion of putting a female spin on traditional investment products during her days at PaineWebber. As a thirtysomething junior broker learning the art of cold calling, she was taught to ask, “Is your husband home?” if a woman answered the phone. For Washington, those days of making cold calls inspired the idea for a business targeting female investors. Sure enough, Washington’s new start-up is now calling on women to buy its first product. The company, Allison Street Advisors, based in Washington, D.C., is selling an investment vehicle called a wrap account, which gives customers with $250,000 in assets access to big-name institutional money managers. (Normally, that kind of access requires $5 million. A wrap bundles smaller amounts into an aggregate that’s still worth a manager’s time.) For years, brokerages have sold wraps as an investment option. Allison Street’s wrap has a novel twist: the managing institutions are owned by women or minorities. Washington hopes her wrap fund will appeal to women, minorities, and institutional investors such as schools and pension funds — all of whom, she thinks, will appreciate the precept of investing through female- and minority-owned firms. The obvious issue is, Wouldn’t the potential return on investment matter more to an investor than conscientiousness about social causes? Washington, who’s African American, doesn’t disagree. But she stresses that study groups show that investors have an affinity for advisers of a similar gender or ethnic background — those “who ‘get them’ and share common experiences,” she says. Her concept is no different in principle from an environmentally aware mutual fund, for which performance is “the meat,” but “the social ticket is the gravy,” she says. Getting minority-owned money managers to sign on was the easy part. The hard part has been persuading the Merrill Lynches of the world to offer Allison Street’s wrap fund among their investment products. The sales challenge, besides navigating through bureaucratic straits, is convincing brokerage firms that customers will favor Allison Street’s wrap if they are deciding between it and an equally performing but less diversely managed fund. So far, the fund hasn’t been around long enough for its popularity to be compared with that of other wrap funds. At press time, the fund retailed only at five brokerages — including W.S. Griffith, in Hartford — and had less than $500,000 in assets under management after six months of active selling. But Washington believes the wrap could be a $50-million fund five years from now. Even if the fund isn’t a smash with women or minorities, she says, it’s sure to lure investors from large institutions. Which means it just might be a hit with anyone who has $250,000 to invest. “White males would also be interested in top managers,” she says. “We’re not excluding anyone.” Pride of ownership “You want two guys buying a one-bedroom condo to be comfortable,” says Brian Farley, founder of Pride Mortgage Inc., in Provincetown, Mass. “They don’t want a starchy banker asking, ‘Where’s he going to sleep?’ “ It’s hard to doubt Farley’s credentials on the subject. His $1.4-million business brokered $67 million in loans in 1999, and gay men and lesbians constitute a sizable portion of the business’s clientele. It’s a population that he classifies as very loyal to good service — and quick to bolt from bad, even when the bad service comes from a company that’s gay-and-lesbian-friendly. “If you don’t do a good job, it doesn’t matter if you’re called Rainbow Mortgage,” he says. Though he chose the name Pride in part because it connotes the gay and lesbian community, Farley says, “we don’t market solely to them,” and his efforts to target that community are no different from any other group marketing at Pride. In fact, the company’s eight other loan officers, some of whom head regional offices, have considerable leeway in how they promote Pride’s services. The Seattle office, for example, could market to that city’s large Asian population. As Farley sees it, the commission-earning officers’ motives are simple: to close as many loans as possible. If that means targeting a niche, many niches, or no niches at all, then so be it. At the same time, Farley’s pitch to the gay community is not some affinity-marketing facade. He’s well aware of how that community’s needs differ from those of conventional mortgage applicants. Besides facing the ever-lingering issue of potential discrimination, gays and lesbians face the possibility of being outed at their workplaces when a lender, seeking employment verification, sends paperwork to employers that lists the names of both applicants. There are also complications surrounding breakups of home-owning couples: an exiting partner will often neglect to notify the lender of the change in status and is still bound to a mortgage even if his or her name has been removed from the deed. Farley founded the company in 1998, and he generated $700,000 in revenues as Pride’s only loan officer for most of that year. By year’s end, he was ready to bring on more loan officers. Rather than expanding locally, Farley simply opened offices wherever prospective employees happened to live, which is why Pride’s non-New England locations are in the random states of Washington, Nevada, Florida, and California. Coordinating their efforts hasn’t been a problem, because loan officers don’t need much day-to-day management, and all loan applications are electronically sent and processed at the company’s operations center. Farley has a wait-and-see attitude about further plans to expand. “There’s no rock-solid business plan,” he says. One thing he knows for sure: niche marketing will continue. In fact, Farley is touring nationally to speak on the topic for Mortgage Originator magazine. “We’ve found,” he says, “that niche marketing is the best way for us to get into a city and do a good job.” The young and the eager Todd Romer’s initiation into the world of personal finance began at 15, when he watched his father use a magnifying glass to scan the small numbers of the newspaper stock listings. More curious about bulls and bears than birds and bees, Romer asked for a lesson in where to invest his lawn-mowing money. Now 32, Romer has started a magazine called Young Money, based in Loveland, Ohio. He’d had the idea since college, when — despite what he’d learned from his dad — he found the personal- finance magazines of the adult world both too difficult to understand and “too targeted to the married, working adult.” And so, after six years of building his own nest egg as a salesman for Syncor International Corp., a publicly traded pharmaceuticals company, Romer launched the magazine that he’d longed for since boyhood. With nine issues on the books and a barely profitable first year based on $275,000 in sales, Romer is pleased with the project so far. In typical new-economy fashion, he isn’t just trying to sell magazine ads; he’s hoping Young Money‘s Web site can become a popular destination for preadult investors. He’s struck a deal with Stein Roe to resell that company’s mutual funds at www.youngmoney.com and is transforming his site — now just an online face for the magazine — into a transaction-oriented one that he describes as “E*Trade for kids,” where they can do online trading with very little money. So far, Young Money‘s audience has been composed, in large part, of teenage boys. Romer didn’t plan it that way, but he believes he can parlay that following into ad sales because he can tell advertisers that he has “a young male readership that can’t be seen outside of Thrasher,” a skateboarding monthly. Romer doesn’t know why his readership is mostly male, but he guesses that it’s for the same reasons that business magazines have always had larger male audiences. These days, as more teenage boys ponder forgoing college for high-tech jobs or starting their own companies, his young male audience seems larger than ever. Because Young Money‘s audience is driven to succeed, Romer thinks he can convince advertisers that his readers are more than “just boys”; they’re the boys who’ll make a difference. “We can say that our readers are savvy, they take action, they want to get ahead,” he says. It’s not lost on him that potential investors would also have an interest in a Web site that attracts teenage boys, particularly those with a high-tech or entrepreneurial bent. Romer himself is wasting no time courting angels and venture funds. “We’re doing a full-court press on the investment community,” he says. Q&A Does Niche Marketing Make Sense? Personal finance is a hot topic. These days it seems that people everywhere are more conversant about money and investing than they were just a few years ago. That’s largely because the nation’s record prosperity has brought unprecedented wealth to many different groups, including women, minorities, and other demographic subsets. Hoping to reach those prospective investors, a bevy of start-ups are specifically targeting one group or another with their finance offerings. Will target marketing work? We asked Cheryl Russell, demographer, author, and editor-in-chief of New Strategist Publications Inc., in Ithaca, N.Y., to tell us. Inc.: For personal-finance start-ups, is simply targeting a niche enough to lure customers? Russell: Only if the start-up also provides products and services that are worthy of attention. Because women live longer and are often widowed, they will have different financial situations than the general market will. But whether those differences alone will attract women to these start-ups remains to be seen. Financial advisers worth their salt will customize a plan to suit the individual customer. So does the field require a Web site just for women? I have my doubts. Inc.: But the start-ups keep coming, and they keep attracting tons of funding. Why will they have such a tough time? Russell: It’ll be difficult for them to get people’s attention. The giants have the advantage already. The start-ups will have to offer something more than the financial advice you can get anywhere, or they somehow have to be perceived as cool or hip. Otherwise, they’ll get lost in the shuffle. On the Web, the cream is already out there, and it’s hard to get people to change their Web patterns. It’s like getting people to watch new TV shows: a daunting task. You almost have to use traditional forms of advertising, like TV and radio, which can get very expensive. Inc.: So where will all those personal-finance start-ups be five years from now? Russell: That’s anybody’s guess. It’s a huge pie. In just about any business area, you end up with two or three dominant players, and business on the Internet is no different. Women might emerge as one separate area, especially if the start-ups capture a lot of the baby boomers who are now in their mid-fifties and are financially peaking. But for other targeted groups, like the superwealthy or high-tech workers, we’re dealing with more myth than reality. For most of the country, having a lot of wealth doesn’t define your twenties and thirties. That’s the type of niche that sounds like marketers’ just trying to go after the latest thing. It’s the sort of fad that’s going to change as soon as the stock market crashes. Please e-mail your comments to editors@inc.com.

Understand How Downtime Is Measured

Measuring whether your site is “up” or “down” seems like it would be pretty easy: Either it’s available or it’s not. However, effective monitoring for downtime is a bit more complicated. For example, if you can’t view your site from a particular PC, how do you know your browser is not causing the problem? Since a variety of factors can all produce the same disastrous end result – downtime – you’ll want to monitor accessibility from several different angles. Understand What Your Web Host Can Tell You If you run a typical small- to medium-size e-commerce site, chances are your site resides with a Web hosting service. Your host – an Internet service provider (ISP) – very likely provides you with statistics about your site’s performance, usually via weekly reports that detail site activity. If these reports don’t reflect accessibility data (a graph or chart showing the percent of time your site was up or down during the week), contact your ISP’s support department and request that this metric be tracked in your reports. Be prepared to negotiate on fees for this service; the ISP field is highly competitive, so you have a great deal of bargaining power. You could easily argue that such a basic measurement should be included in your hosting package, as it is with many popular ISPs. One word of caution: getting your weekly reports to reflect downtime that may have occurred is not the same as being informed of downtime as it is occurring. For real-time notification, you will need to monitor the site yourself and/or use the services of a third party. Learn about Tools You Can Use to Do It Yourself The simplest way to keep a watchful eye on your site is to make it your own browser’s home page. Chances are if you are unable to access your site, some of your customers are experiencing the same problem. In the unlikely event that you run your own (in-house) Web server, that server automatically generates log files. There are numerous products of varying technical complexity to help you interpret server data. A short review of these types of tools can be found in an excerpt from the book Web Performance Measuring Tools and Services, by Patrick Killelea. Find Out How Third-Party Services Can Help As high-profile e-commerce sites such as eBay and E*Trade increasingly experience crashes, the market has exploded for services that monitor site performance, particularly for those that detect and alert the company to downtime. One of the great advantages of using a site-monitoring service is that it keeps the same watchful eye on your site regardless of where your site lives: with a host or on your own server. And while many such services offer a multitude of features and are very expensive, others stick with the basics and are affordable for small businesses. Copyright © 1995-2000 Pinnacle WebWorkz Inc. All rights reserved. Do notduplicate or redistribute in any form.

The Metamorphosis

Editor’s introduction: Sometimes it seems as if the Web has turned the world upside down. In the hype-ridden landscape called “dot-com,” it’s easy to assume that only the young, the new, the original idea conceived by two kids in their basement will survive. Out with the old. How untrue that is. The two companies profiled here — Plural in “The Metamorphosis” and Camera World in ” When Something Clicks” — are hardly start-ups. Their leaders have been running steady, profitable companies for years. They’re taking those years of experience managing entrepreneurial brick-and-mortar companies and using every ounce of their knowledge to transform their businesses into winners in the online world. CEO Roy Wetterstrom, never a guy to fear change, is rebirthing his 11-year-old company to take great advantage of the new economy. And Camera World has built on its 22 years of experience fulfilling customers’ expectations to transform itself into an E-commerce business. BRAVE NEW COMPANIES One morning Roy Wetterstrom awoke to find that his company had been transformed into an underdog. To get the buzz back, he’s remaking his business from top to bottom Roy Wetterstrom grew up on a 60-acre farm in Ham Lake, Minn. As legend has it, he sold eggs by the side of the road at the tender age of 11. At 14 he used his egg money to buy a chain saw and switched to selling firewood. Even then, apparently, he was willing to give up a good thing to hatch something new. That long-ago gambit pales in comparison with what Wetterstrom has at stake these days. He’s spending millions of dollars on the risky proposition that he can reshape Micro Modeling Associates — his rock-solid $54-million client/server consulting business — into a company at the leading edge of the dot-com revolution. “We’re going to transform ourselves into a top-tier Internet services, strategy, and development company,” states the 35-year-old CEO. The agenda is bold, but then again so is the individual behind it — a lanky, quietly intense man with dark hair and a slight midwestern accent. Eleven years ago he left a cushy job in Minneapolis, not far from where he grew up, to start a company. He moved his wife, Emily, and their West Highland terrier to a two-bedroom apartment in Manhattan’s Battery Park City — on Christmas Day, no less. In the cramped quarters of the second bedroom, Wetterstrom launched his new business. It grew so rapidly that in 1992 he snapped up a lease on lower Broadway in what eventually would become prime Silicon Alley rental space. But all that — in Wetterstrom’s take-big-risks world — is ancient history. Today he is remaking his business into an adviser to dot-coms and corporations moving online. To underscore its new mission, the company will even junk its old name. As of March 15, 2000, Micro Modeling will be known as Plural. To get to this point, Wetterstrom has hired three image-building consultancies, is recruiting three new senior executives, and is on track to add 185 employees to his company of 375 by year’s end. He has added a creative group and a management-consulting practice, reined in his sales force from selling the same old client/server stuff (the equivalent of ditching the egg business), dismissed his public-relations firm, and even started exploring potential acquisitions. And he’s done all that while commuting weekly from Minneapolis. (He and his wife moved back in 1994, when they decided to have a family.) On Monday evenings, when he boards the flight to LaGuardia, he says good-bye not only to his wife and three-year-old son, David, but also to his baby daughter, Margaret, who was born in April 1999, in the middle of all the madness of turning Micro Modeling into something entirely new. Brawny upstarts have been grabbing Internet work from Micro Modeling’s longtime customers. Wetterstrom’s vision for transforming Micro Modeling into Plural boils down to this: First, the company is forgoing all new client/server work — the work that made it a star — in favor of all-Internet projects. Second, the company will risk being unprofitable for the first time in its history. To make matters trickier, the company will soon find itself under the microscope of the unforgiving public markets. “We’re driving ultimately to an IPO, and that is bringing a lot of issues to the fore,” Wetterstrom says. For the CEO and his peers in the high-tech consulting world, the pressure to author a shrewd Internet strategy can be particularly brutal. Investors — as well as employees and customers — often push consulting companies’ CEOs to build Web practices. Of course, although that process is stressful, the potential upside is enormous. The companies that the new Plural will compete with have been soaring in the public markets despite being relatively young and small. Old-line technology-consulting companies like Micro Modeling don’t make waves on NASDAQ. Wetterstrom would like to grab a larger share of the Internet consulting business — and he believes that a big shake-up is needed to do it. “We want to put a stake in the ground and say, ‘This is who we are,” he says. It’s also who they have to be. Brawny upstarts like USWeb/CKS, Razorfish, Proxicom, Viant, Sapient, Scient, and iXL have been grabbing Internet work all over the place, including from Micro Modeling’s longtime customers. And there are signs that steady client/server work is starting to tail off. In contrast, the sheer volume of Internet consulting is increasing more rapidly than any other kind of tech consulting, says Wetterstrom. Other key trends: companies are moving funds once earmarked for Y2K problems over to Web development; the market for Web consulting is highly fragmented; and the financial-services industry — Micro Modeling’s turf — is particularly bullish on the Web. “I saw after doing an analysis of the market and making a judgment on the market opportunity that this was a no-brainer,” Wetterstrom says. A no-brainer, indeed. “If Micro Modeling hadn’t made the transition, growth would have been a challenge,” observes Edward S. Caso Jr., a securities analyst following the IT-services industry and senior vice-president at First Union Securities, in Baltimore. “A service company has to offer what the client wants, and in IT what they want is constantly changing.” Roy Wetterstrom and a partner (who has since left the company) started Micro Modeling in 1989, with the intention of customizing Microsoft Excel for financial-services companies. Merrill Lynch was the business’s first customer, and it went on to work with 23 of the 25 largest investment banks. Revenues grew at a brisk pace, landing it on the Inc. 500 in 1997 and 1998, with an astonishing five-year growth rate of 814% in 1998. Wetterstrom claims that Micro Modeling’s annual operating profit has been about 15%. In late 1998, Wetterstrom raised $20 million in capital from TA Associates, a Boston concern that invests in late-stage private businesses, and $15 million in credit from Fleet Bank. He began staying up nights, thinking seriously about an initial public offering. He started schmoozing potential underwriters. He felt sure that he’d take Micro Modeling public within 12 to 18 months. But a funny thing was happening on Wall Street. The gap between valuations for client/server consulting companies and Internet consulting companies suddenly widened. “Clearly, we began to see that there were haves and have-nots when it came to market value,” Wetterstrom recalls. Regardless of profitability, he says, “traditional consulting companies were trading at around one times revenues, while Internet consulting companies were trading at 20 times revenues. The market was sending us a loud and clear message.” Micro Modeling already possessed some Internet expertise. One particular coup came in 1997, when the NASDAQ Stock Market engaged the company to create a password-protected extranet for listed companies. Not only has the (ongoing) project been lucrative, but Micro Modeling’s employees loved the work. Given a taste of the hype-ridden Internet world, staff programmers wanted more. Wetterstrom provided training for his technologists in anticipation of Web-related work. But it didn’t come. Wetterstrom and his team hadn’t sold their message – We can handle your Web projects – the way the upstart Internet consulting companies had. By early 1999 the CEO had come to believe that the Web was the future of his company, that client/server work was its past. The sooner the company moved wholeheartedly into the new space, the better. On August 31 of last year, Wetterstrom attended a clubby one-day analyst conference hosted by First Union Securities’ Ed Caso. The CEOs of nine public Internet consulting companies spoke, as did Wetterstrom and three private-company peers. “It was a pretty interesting and crystallizing event,” he recalls. “Clearly, the capital markets were viewing us as being well positioned in this space.” But he found his competitors’ presentations even more interesting than the offhand comments of admiring investment bankers like Caso. As the other CEOs described their companies, he slipped into a reverie about Micro Modeling’s future: “It just became so clear that (a) this was obviously the right space to be in, and (b) we were positioned to win this space. But I also realized that being positioned to win and winning were two different things.” Wetterstrom decided to beat the Scients and Viants of the world at their own game. That would mean making some brutal decisions. It would mean dumping Micro Modeling’s solid PR company, despite an amicable relationship, and replacing it with not one but three hot image-building companies from Manhattan’s chatty Internet clique. It would mean infusing the company with new talent — some of it taken from the Internet creative world, a world that the client/server programmers had had little to do with. And it might mean letting some of the new folks run roughshod over Micro Modeling’s 11-year-old culture. It might not be fun. But it might do the trick. Micro Modeling’s most obvious challenge was to lose its clunky name. “One thing that all of the public companies in this space have in common is an extremely strong brand,” the CEO says. “I wanted to see a much, much bolder approach to raising brand awareness.” He’d already tried rebranding the company once. But he’d taken a halfhearted approach by changing “Micro Modeling Associates” into “MMA” — attempting to keep old customers happy while moving toward the new. The $250,000 transformation failed. “We wanted to keep our options open,” he says. “We had very strong brand recognition within certain circles — good circles, like Wall Street and Microsoft. But I came to the conclusion that ‘MMA’ raised more questions than it answered.” The questions were as fundamental as “What is MMA?” and “What does it want to sell?” The business was suffering an adolescent identity crisis. Managers talked about providing creative and strategic consulting, but technology consulting was the company’s only real strength. Most employees were “champing at the bit” to diversify into creative and strategic work, but there were still pockets of resisters, says Wetterstrom. Customers, too, were recalcitrant. “Their natural tendency is to continue to call us for the same type of work. I’ve been trying to transition away from that for six months,” he says. Frustrated, the CEO devised a comprehensive plan to transform MMA into a full-service interactive strategy and development company. “We were only going to become a top-tier player by being much more aggressive,” he recalls. “And we could only accomplish that by sending a really, really loud message to the world that we were something new and something different.” Wetterstrom looked hard at his management team. He realized that he needed more talent — leaders who could re-create the company from the inside out. He also needed to free himself up from the demands of the day to day. He hired a search company to recruit a president (he will remain CEO) and a chief marketing officer. But perhaps the most dramatic change would be the one his younger brother, Derek, would make. Derek had been with the company almost from its inception, and, as chief financial officer, had helped Roy grow the company at its remarkably steady pace. Now he would take over the top corporate-development role, so that the company could hire a CFO with IPO and public-market experience — a new manager who could take the transformed company public. The next step was to identify a leader who could take charge of the complicated brand-building project. Wetterstrom found William Luddy, a caustic showman who plied his trade at Agency.com, a respected Web-design and marketing shop. Luddy would establish the revamped company’s new creative capability — Wetterstrom hired some 30 new employees just for that purpose — and today serves as acting chief marketing officer. Though Luddy’s brash style stands in stark contrast to Wetterstrom’s midwestern reserve, the CEO embraces Luddy’s New York sensibility. “Bill’s quite a passionate person, which I think is good. If he went off into the corner, I don’t think we’d be able to get where we need to go quickly enough,” says the CEO. What Plural needs to do is dazzle investment bankers on a visceral level. A larger-than-life character, this one man — this outsider — will have a disproportionate impact on the rise or fall of the company. First off, he’s been leading the charge to change its name. Last September he hired Lippincott & Margulies — the Park Avenue corporate-image company that handles Coca-Cola and Amtrak — to create a new identity. Over the course of the next three months, L&M vetted a series of names in foreign languages, with trademark lawyers, and in front of focus groups. Around Thanksgiving, Wetterstrom signed off on Plural. “I like it because it means working together with our customers and with our partners,” he says. “And I was thrilled that we could get a six-letter Internet address in English.” As if renaming the company isn’t enough, now Luddy has set his sights on adding a touch of dot-com chic to its entrenched techie culture, both to increase visibility and to help attract and retain the new employees the growing business needs. “Roy was primed for me to come in the door and say we needed to change things out of some prima donna prissiness that’s perceived to be part of creative services. But I think I caught him flat-footed when I said we needed to change things for the sake of recruiting and retention,” says Luddy. “Bill is not shy at all about letting us know what types of cultural issues we need to be thinking through,” Wetterstrom says. “For example, he’s told us that we have to be sensitive to physical-work-space issues. The traditional corporate office — a cube environment — doesn’t play well in the creative world, so we’re looking into different furniture layouts and a more warehouse-like environment.” The new Plural culture will feature more than just exposed brick. The company is working with clientele it has never served before. To get the new dot-com customers he wants, Wetterstrom is offering them discounted rates and making up the difference by taking equity. His goal is to build a “mutual fund” of pre-IPO dot-coms and use that equity to retain current employees and to attract new talent. His new client roster includes an online grocer SimonDelivers.com as well as Web sites AtYourBusiness.com, Easyrebates.com, and TechnologyNet.com. Of course, taking on the dot-coms means that Plural will expand its focus beyond financial-services companies — its bread and butter since Merrill Lynch first signed on. But Wetterstrom foresees using the dot-com portfolio to sell Plural’s new service offerings back to the financial-services companies whose business made him successful in the first place. Amid all of that activity, the CEO’s biggest concern is getting enough oomph out of the Plural name launch to ensure that good customers start knocking on his door. To that end, Luddy has devised a three-inch-thick project plan of marketing milestones. Nothing is being left to chance. Helping Luddy execute his plan is the company’s polished in-house publicist Connie Hughes, an elegant Manhattanite who is as meticulous in her choice of words as she is with her attire. In hopes of burnishing the Plural rebranding campaign, Hughes replaced MMA’s Minneapolis-based PR company with Neale-May & Partners, which handles several top dot-coms, including E*Trade. She is also working with another firm, Farago + Partners, the creators of Barnes & Noble’s advertising. “It helps if you have partners who are part of the momentum,” says Hughes. “They’re really psyched about this, and we feed on that.” At a mid-December holiday party, Wetterstrom unveiled the new name internally. This month, the company will hold “Plurums” — meetings with customers and partners — to explain its new positioning. Still, despite the best-laid three-inch-thick plan, the rebranding effort remains challenging. “All sorts of questions come up,” Hughes says. “There was an event in late February with a sponsoring opportunity. It would have been perfect for us, but it was too close to the name change. It’s a balancing act. We want to capture mind share, but then if we do that as MMA, we’ll have to reeducate the market later.” And what if the name doesn’t work? “I’m still chewing on whether I like the name or not,” says First Union’s Caso. “It has an Internet feel without the obnoxious dot-com after it, but I think I would have liked Wetterstrom Inc. or something like that. But that’s a personal, Ed Caso bias.” Doubts like those create anxiety, and they’ve taken a toll on the company. So has the latest financial wrinkle: though Wetterstrom publicly predicted that revenues would jump by 50% in 1999 — on CNNfn no less — they grew only by 14%. And profits dropped below 5% for the first time in years — and may stay there. “The mode that we’re in now, it’s not realistic to be at or even near historic levels of profitability,” he says. “Our goal is to remain profitable at much lower margins.” And there’s still that small matter of Plural’s IPO. Wetterstrom would like a late 2000 offering, capitalizing on the momentum of the new-name marketing campaign, which in turn would get a boost from an impending IPO. Whether all of this will play for the public markets is “the $64,000 question,” says Caso. “Micro Modeling could have gone public two years ago, but the multiples are meaningfully higher for technology-service companies today in this new format — with strategy, creative, and technology together.” Cut through the investment banker’s jargon, and what the company really needs to do is dazzle the bankers on a visceral level. It needs to project that this is the deal they need to get in on, and quick. Ironically, the company that was in Silicon Alley before the Alley was a golden name among hungry VCs now has to act as if it belongs there. It needs to recapture the buzz it had back in its heyday, when customers were beating down its door, when revenues were growing exponentially. To do that, it needs smart strategic thinking and managers who can lead split-second change. And it needs tough people who can stay one step ahead of burnout. Wetterstrom has found that level of enthusiasm in his new managers. But even they can’t sustain that frenetic pace forever — at least not without a break. Already Luddy says, “I’m going to be burned out, but that’s life. That’s part of the ride. That’s what I signed up for.” He jokes that he’s going to Hawaii, posthaste. And Hughes has booked a day at a spa. Only their CEO doesn’t seem tired or anxious. His energy seems to come from some deep reservoir of entrepreneurial ambition. The same urge that compelled him to buy that chain saw to sell firewood is pushing him forward now. “Part of me is sad to see the Micro Modeling name retired,” the CEO admits. He’s quiet for a moment. “But a much bigger part of me is excited and energized by Plural.” Mike Hofman is a staff writer at Inc. The New Math As Roy Wetterstrom’s company has evolved,Wall Street has changed the way it does its algebra: FINANCIALS 1998 MICRO MODELING 1999 MMA 2000** PLURAL Revenues $47.4 million $54 million $81 million Profits* 15% Below 5% 4%-8% Inc. 500 growth rate 814% 565% 485% *Profits refers to operating margin, not net income **2000 financials are projected Source: Plural Wall Street Valuations: Ed Caso from First Union Securities gave us a formula for the Street’s valuation of companies like Roy Wetterstrom’s. We plugged in Wetterstrom’s numbers: Micro modeling: 1998, $23.7 million to $94.8 million (0.5 to 2 times revenues) Plural: 2000, $405 million to $2.4 billion (5 to 30 times revenues) Roy’s Rules If you’re like Roy Wetterstrom and you’re transforming your company, you have a lot to think about. Here are Wetterstrom’s rules for revamping: 1. Make sure your employees are happy before you hire new ones. There’s no surer way to piss off your employees (read: lose ‘em) than to forget about them when you pass out those juicy stock options to new recruits. Wetterstrom started giving stock options to every employee two years ago. If you haven’t been doing the same, you’ll have to improvise a new plan that weds the equity needs of both new recruits and tenured employees. 2. Push responsibility down the chain of command to free up your time. To make a big strategic shift, you’ll need to take a breather from the day-to-day stuff. Wetterstrom’s solution is to make each of Plural’s regional offices responsible for individual profit-and-loss reports. That way, local managers are more likely to come up with innovative, profitable ideas on their own — leaving Wetterstrom to be the corporate visionary. 3. When you radically alter your product mix, keep a sharp eye on pricing. It’s hard to know how best to price new products — and it’s equally difficult to know which of the new offerings will be the most profitable. Wetterstrom has hired a chief knowledge officer , Jon Powell , who will study how to price and sell different Internet consulting packages and thus maximize margins. 4. Finally, think about your next iteration. Wetterstrom decided specifically not to call the company Plural.com for fear that the ubiquitous suffix would pigeonhole it in years to come, the way Micro Modeling had done in the 1990s. “We see the market changing, and I’m not sure that ‘dot-com’ will have the same resonance in 2005 that it has now,” says marketing guru Bill Luddy. “There might be a fin de siÈcle attention to dot-coms” that won’t last, he adds. Read about another Brave New Company in ” When Something Clicks“