Tag Archives: Dallas-Fort Worth

Test-Fly a Chromebook on Virgin America

20110630125901ENPRNPRN8-VIRGIN-AMERICA-CHROMEBOOK-1y-1309438741MR

Google and Virgin America–Inc. Tech’s Business Travel 50 winner for both in-flight entertainment and food and drink–have partnered to allow Virgin customers the chance to test out the new Chromebooks for free. READ MORE »

Two More Reasons Groupon Should Watch its Back

thrusocial-logo-blue-background

While it’s true Groupon copycats have been popping up all over the place, AT&T and a novel start-up called thruSocial are the newest players to throw down with the online coupon giant. According to Mashable‘s Todd Wasserman, AT&T is preregistering coupon lovers in Los Angeles, Atlanta and Dallas-Fort Worth for a service that will send daily deals to consumers via its yp.com. The telecom giant also is offering $10 off a first deal for people in those cities who sign up through May 22. READ MORE »

Tech Talk: Moving Online Helps Florist Grow

Bice’s Florist, of Dallas-Forth Worth, is a florist that has been in business since 1974. Five years ago, a new owner, Keith Riewe, bought the business and he tells IncTechnology.com that by revising his website and buying new Internet domain names, he was able to increase sales by $1.5 million a year. Elizabeth Wasserman: How has the Internet changed the florist business? Keith Riewe: It’s changed our business tremendously. When we bought the business in 2003, we had six locations throughout the Dallas-Fort Worth area. We went out and built a really robust website, an e-commerce site, and what that’s allowed us to do is close all those remote locations. We found that people were not walking into flower shops. They’re finding us on the Internet or calling us on the phone. We’ve taken six brick and mortar stores and now we have only one. And yet we have increased sales by $1.5 million. If I live in Dallas and I want to send flowers to someone in St. Louis, I’ll type in “St. Louis florist” into a search engine and that will pop up a list of florists in that area. Wasserman: So how has that changed your business model? Riewe: There’s been a huge shift in our industry because of order gatherers – people who do nothing but collect order. They don’t fulfill orders. That used to be a strong business. All they would do is get orders and send them out to the flower shops and collect 20 percent on the front end of that order. Now we have the ability to compete for those orders, along with FTD, Flowers.com and other companies. Wasserman: How did you start competing with the big guys? Riewe: We went out and bought descriptive domain names through Sedo, an online marketplace for buying and selling domain names. We’ve gotten control of over at least 20 different domain names. In addition to Bicesflorist.com, we have names like Flowernut.com, Fortworthflowers.com, Superflowerlink.com and Yourflowerplace.com. The way we use these different names is, for instance, we will have a domain name that we put in printed ad material. We will send out a  catalog and put in another a unique URL. The one we use for that is Flowernut.com. That helps us track the performance of that particular advertising campaign. We know whether we’re spending money in the right direction. We now use that in all types of things — from printed ads, online marketing, radio and TV ads – so we can see what is actually working. The biggest reason we have all these domain names is that small businesses spend so much money on marketing and they don’t know how it’s working. If we can track that information, we can better spend our advertising dollars. In the end, they all lead to the same website, Bice’s homepage. Wasserman: What have the results been? Riewe: We’ve seen a lot of positive results. We were in a Yellow Pages ad, but we pulled out of it. It was not performing at a level we needed it to. We found out because we had a unique URL in the ad and also a telephone number. We found out that when people call us or contact us it is primarily through the Internet. They get to our website but about 83 percent of people still call us versus placing an order through the Internet, although the number of people who buy from us online has risen dramatically from what it used to be. Primarily we use the domain names for tracking gross sales and advertising. We spend a tremendous amount of money on advertising and, if you spend that amount of money, any business needs to know where their customers are coming from.

Upstarts: Internet Convenience Services

Making E-commerce Easier The massive consumer rush to buy stuff online has created some real-world logistical problems — problems these start-ups hope to solve Shopping on the Web is pretty simple. You just point and click — and wait. Sure, the Web gives you endless variety, terrific deals, and 24-7 convenience. But when it comes to actually delivering the goods, E-commerce isn’t quite as fast and painless as the hype would have us believe. For some consumers, ordering on the Web just isn’t worth the hassle. 30% of Internet shoppers have cut back on their online purchasing because they don’t like having to wait for orders to be delivered, reports the Yankee Group. With such a big chunk of the E-commerce market at stake, there’s plenty of incentive to make Internet delivery radically simpler and quicker, and a new crop of Web-based start-ups is aiming to do just that. I want it, and I want it now In the brick-and-mortar world, instant gratification is something we take for granted. You walk into a store, and you walk out with the merchandise you want. So it’s no surprise that consumers want the same immediacy with E-commerce. Call it the Kozmo.com phenomenon, after the well-known Internet service that delivers snack food, videos, books, and CDs within an hour to time-starved — or maybe just lazy — urbanites. Kozmo.com isn’t the only start-up focused on shrinking delivery times. Sameday.com, based in Los Angeles, strives to give any Internet retailer a way to deliver products to customers on — you guessed it — the same day those products were ordered. In 1998 founder, president, and CEO Alex Nesbitt, with backing from Bill Gross’s Idealab, launched what was then called Shipper.com to offer next-day delivery to E-commerce companies. He changed the company’s name and focus after realizing that the demand for same-day delivery was even bigger. To deliver that quick turnaround, Nesbitt has bet on a system of large, centralized warehouses in which the company’s customers maintain inventories of their most popular products. The company launched in Los Angeles last year and now, with 36 warehouses around the country, offers ultrafast delivery in New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Memphis, and the Dallas-Fort Worth area. When retailers link their E-commerce sites to the Sameday.com site, Sameday.com becomes one of several shipping options that buyers can choose from. Sameday.com also has its own Internet mall, where Web shoppers in Los Angeles, for instance, can order baked goods, books, music, toys, gifts, and electronics from the company or its partners. Picking, packing, and shipping charges are in the $6-to-$8 range, a slight premium above traditional second-day shipping. The start-up also charges retailers additional fees for receiving and storing inventory. As Nesbitt sees it, aggregating deliveries from one central warehouse is the key to keeping delivery prices low. But rolling out the service hasn’t been cheap. So far he’s raised $25 million in three rounds of venture capital; he aims to break even sometime in 2002. To do that, he says, Sameday.com will have to gross $200 million from 20 million deliveries a year. On a recent Thursday in Los Angeles, the company made just 200 deliveries. But Nesbitt is confident that demand for his service will grow. “The question for E-commerce companies is, how do they make that instant gratification available at a cost point that consumers find attractive?” he says. “We bring the cost of speed down dramatically.” The online strip mall Whereas Sameday.com is about time, WhyRunOut.com is about convenience. Grocery shopping, dry-cleaning retrieval, film drop-offs, video pickups and returns — WhyRunOut.com aims to unburden people of the mundane tasks that so often eat up a perfectly good Saturday morning. Unlike most Internet grocers such as Webvan or Peapod, however, WhyRunOut.com offers same-day delivery: order by noon at the WhyRunOut.com Web site, and you get your groceries and other goodies in the afternoon or evening. And unlike Sameday.com, WhyRunOut.com manages speedy response without a central warehouse. Instead, the company teams up with local merchants. WhyRunOut.com’s professional “shoppers” fill orders at a number of stores, then deliver goods and services straight to the customers. WhyRunOut.com collects fees from retailers and charges consumers for each delivery. “Our target segment, busy suburban families, would rather trade money for time,” says founder Dan Frahm. What about the cost of paying people to roam the aisles and wait in checkout lines? Frahm admits that his model misses some of the efficiencies of a central warehouse. But, he points out, grocery stores are already fully stocked with merchandise and located close to consumers’ homes. “Yes, there’s some labor there, but it’s half what you have if you set up your own warehouse system,” he says. Frahm started WhyRunOut.com in 1998 with $50,000 in savings, at first doing the shopping and schlepping himself to hone the concept. Lately, the company has been operating in beta-test mode, with 30 employees and fewer than 1,000 customers in its home territory of Orange County, Calif. Currently, Frahm is seeking venture funding to underwrite a marketing campaign. One thing that’s helped, he says, is being able to ride the coattails of some better-known Internet grocers. “Customers know that home delivery is out there, and other Web grocers helped make it an acceptable way of life, which we could never have done on our own.” Look, Ma, No PC These days you don’t even have to have a computer to shop the Internet. At least that’s the aim of Vistify. Founded in Phoenix in April 1999 and now located in San Francisco, the company focuses on the household-replenishment market — or, in plain English, goods such as groceries, personal-care products, and housewares. Instead of ordering on a PC, users can choose products by touching pictures on the screen of an Internet appliance that might sit on their kitchen countertop. (Vistify has developed its own streamlined, Jetsons-esque prototype. The company also plans to offer its service on TV screens, among other media.) Vistify itself won’t sell products or deliver them, says chief marketing officer and cofounder Menekse Gencer; instead, it will offer goods through partnerships with other providers, such as Internet grocers and delivery services. At press time, the company was planning a trial rollout for the end of the year, in Colorado. For those who can’t wait for their Internet appliance, there’s Quixi, launched in New York City in October 1999 by Evan Marwell and Robert Pines. Quixi lets users shop the Web through their cell phone and a live, human intermediary who searches for information and makes purchases online using the subscriber’s stored (and privacy-protected) credit-card number and delivery information. Users pay $19.95 a month, plus some additional transaction charges. Quixi receives 5% to 10% of revenues from each online sale that it processes. Employing human helpers isn’t cheap. But Pines says that Quixi’s back-end technology is designed to minimize the time that live helpers spend on any particular transaction. The company has contracts with outside call centers, limiting its investment in infrastructure, although Quixi might eventually save money by bringing the call centers in-house, Marwell says. With around $28 million in venture capital under its belt, the company began a beta-test phase in June, offering the service free during the summer before its official September launch. In its current form, Quixi is something of an interim solution, admit Pines and Marwell. Eventually, its human-mediated Internet interface may be rendered obsolete by voice-recognition software or ubiquitous personal digital assistants. So Quixi hopes to gain a foothold in those very markets through partnerships with companies that are developing those technologies or by developing such applications itself. At the same time, says Marwell, Quixi’s intended market is people who value convenience more than the dubious prestige of being early adopters. “We almost view ourselves as being a bit of a gatekeeper for customers, not forcing the technology on them before they’re ready,” he says. –E.B. Is there any there there? Onna Iucolano, vice-chairperson of Shop.org, an Internet retailing trade organization, and former chairperson of its research committee, spoke with Emily Barker about the recent expansion in same-day delivery services. Inc.: Are there a lot of same-day delivery start-ups out there? Iucolano: There is a great deal of focus on delivery and fulfillment, and I would say that has come about as a result of activity in the last 18 months. Most Internet retail was very much focused on the front-end activities — the look and feel of the Web site, taking and processing an order — and in reality that was 50% of the battle with respect to what the customer wanted. The stumbling block was on the back end, with respect to being able to actually deliver the finished product to a consumer. Inc.: Then is the potential market the whole of Internet retail? Iucolano: I don’t think it’s that big. It’s sort of like the FedEx model of a few years back. You used to put a package in the mail, and it got there when it got there. Then FedEx in its brilliance convinced us that we had to have it overnight. So it created a market. It’s really interesting how a lot of these products and services create their market just because they exist. Inc.: How’s that? Iucolano: Given the choice of having a book in two days or having it in an hour — well, you probably never thought of having it in an hour, and all of a sudden it’s available to you. Right now the market for same-day delivery is probably relatively small, but it’s one of the fastest-growing areas of opportunity. Internet companies are all taking and processing orders, but they’re all spending a ton of money to do that. It’s too early to tell who the winners might be. Inc.: What do these companies need to succeed? Iucolano: Customer demand. The customers have to be convinced that they really need things the same day, outside of the floral business and the gift business. Video and food make a lot of sense. Anything else that’s going to work will be products that consumers latch onto and say, “I need that right now!” whether they really do or not. Getting and Sending A selection of start-ups that focus on two of the most common headaches for Internet shoppers: packages that arrive when you’re not at home and purchases that need to be returned Company: PaxZone, in Chicago Business concept: Establishes a local network of businesses to which residents can have their E-commerce purchases delivered. Also offers consumers a drop-off service for merchandise returns. Recently expanded to San Francisco. Competitive advantage: Services are free to consumers; PaxZone charges a fee to retailers since its service reduces the extra charges incurred when carriers are required to make repeat trips to residences. Major hurdle: Service may not be easy to scale up. PaxZone must sell its concept not just to consumers but also to retailers, delivery services, and the local businesses that serve as drop points. Company: Brivo Systems Inc., in Arlington, Va. Business concept: Markets software that works in tandem with a “smart box” for home deliveries. When a consumer makes an Internet purchase, the order generates a unique Brivo password that the delivery person uses to open the customer’s wireless-controlled drop-off box. Competitive advantage: Brivo’s software can be adapted to open garage doors and other receptacles too. It also handles “reverse” deliveries from the consumer’s home, such as returns or dry-cleaning pickups. Major hurdle: Since consumers are likely to balk at having to pay subscription fees to receive deliveries, Brivo is developing partnerships with online retailers that will pay for the service. Company: The Return Exchange, in Irvine, Calif. Business concept: Offers Internet retailers online software and services for handling returns. Customers register their returns on the retailer’s Web site. The merchandise goes to a Return Exchange processing center, where it is either shipped back to the retailer for resale or resold through an online auction such as eBay. Competitive advantage: Since the Return Exchange handles all phases of a return, it provides turnkey service for Internet retailers who don’t want to deal with returns themselves. Major hurdle: There’s no lack of competition in this space, from both E-start-ups and brick-and-mortar companies that specialize in handling returns. Please e-mail your comments to editors@inc.com.

Upstarts: Internet Convenience Services

Making E-commerce Easier The massive consumer rush to buy stuff online has created some real-world logistical problems — problems these start-ups hope to solve Shopping on the Web is pretty simple. You just point and click — and wait. Sure, the Web gives you endless variety, terrific deals, and 24-7 convenience. But when it comes to actually delivering the goods, E-commerce isn’t quite as fast and painless as the hype would have us believe. For some consumers, ordering on the Web just isn’t worth the hassle. 30% of Internet shoppers have cut back on their online purchasing because they don’t like having to wait for orders to be delivered, reports the Yankee Group. With such a big chunk of the E-commerce market at stake, there’s plenty of incentive to make Internet delivery radically simpler and quicker, and a new crop of Web-based start-ups is aiming to do just that. I want it, and I want it now In the brick-and-mortar world, instant gratification is something we take for granted. You walk into a store, and you walk out with the merchandise you want. So it’s no surprise that consumers want the same immediacy with E-commerce. Call it the Kozmo.com phenomenon, after the well-known Internet service that delivers snack food, videos, books, and CDs within an hour to time-starved — or maybe just lazy — urbanites. Kozmo.com isn’t the only start-up focused on shrinking delivery times. Sameday.com, based in Los Angeles, strives to give any Internet retailer a way to deliver products to customers on — you guessed it — the same day those products were ordered. In 1998 founder, president, and CEO Alex Nesbitt, with backing from Bill Gross’s Idealab, launched what was then called Shipper.com to offer next-day delivery to E-commerce companies. He changed the company’s name and focus after realizing that the demand for same-day delivery was even bigger. To deliver that quick turnaround, Nesbitt has bet on a system of large, centralized warehouses in which the company’s customers maintain inventories of their most popular products. The company launched in Los Angeles last year and now, with 36 warehouses around the country, offers ultrafast delivery in New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Memphis, and the Dallas-Fort Worth area. When retailers link their E-commerce sites to the Sameday.com site, Sameday.com becomes one of several shipping options that buyers can choose from. Sameday.com also has its own Internet mall, where Web shoppers in Los Angeles, for instance, can order baked goods, books, music, toys, gifts, and electronics from the company or its partners. Picking, packing, and shipping charges are in the $6-to-$8 range, a slight premium above traditional second-day shipping. The start-up also charges retailers additional fees for receiving and storing inventory. As Nesbitt sees it, aggregating deliveries from one central warehouse is the key to keeping delivery prices low. But rolling out the service hasn’t been cheap. So far he’s raised $25 million in three rounds of venture capital; he aims to break even sometime in 2002. To do that, he says, Sameday.com will have to gross $200 million from 20 million deliveries a year. On a recent Thursday in Los Angeles, the company made just 200 deliveries. But Nesbitt is confident that demand for his service will grow. “The question for E-commerce companies is, how do they make that instant gratification available at a cost point that consumers find attractive?” he says. “We bring the cost of speed down dramatically.” The online strip mall Whereas Sameday.com is about time, WhyRunOut.com is about convenience. Grocery shopping, dry-cleaning retrieval, film drop-offs, video pickups and returns — WhyRunOut.com aims to unburden people of the mundane tasks that so often eat up a perfectly good Saturday morning. Unlike most Internet grocers such as Webvan or Peapod, however, WhyRunOut.com offers same-day delivery: order by noon at the WhyRunOut.com Web site, and you get your groceries and other goodies in the afternoon or evening. And unlike Sameday.com, WhyRunOut.com manages speedy response without a central warehouse. Instead, the company teams up with local merchants. WhyRunOut.com’s professional “shoppers” fill orders at a number of stores, then deliver goods and services straight to the customers. WhyRunOut.com collects fees from retailers and charges consumers for each delivery. “Our target segment, busy suburban families, would rather trade money for time,” says founder Dan Frahm. What about the cost of paying people to roam the aisles and wait in checkout lines? Frahm admits that his model misses some of the efficiencies of a central warehouse. But, he points out, grocery stores are already fully stocked with merchandise and located close to consumers’ homes. “Yes, there’s some labor there, but it’s half what you have if you set up your own warehouse system,” he says. Frahm started WhyRunOut.com in 1998 with $50,000 in savings, at first doing the shopping and schlepping himself to hone the concept. Lately, the company has been operating in beta-test mode, with 30 employees and fewer than 1,000 customers in its home territory of Orange County, Calif. Currently, Frahm is seeking venture funding to underwrite a marketing campaign. One thing that’s helped, he says, is being able to ride the coattails of some better-known Internet grocers. “Customers know that home delivery is out there, and other Web grocers helped make it an acceptable way of life, which we could never have done on our own.” Look, Ma, No PC These days you don’t even have to have a computer to shop the Internet. At least that’s the aim of Vistify. Founded in Phoenix in April 1999 and now located in San Francisco, the company focuses on the household-replenishment market — or, in plain English, goods such as groceries, personal-care products, and housewares. Instead of ordering on a PC, users can choose products by touching pictures on the screen of an Internet appliance that might sit on their kitchen countertop. (Vistify has developed its own streamlined, Jetsons-esque prototype. The company also plans to offer its service on TV screens, among other media.) Vistify itself won’t sell products or deliver them, says chief marketing officer and cofounder Menekse Gencer; instead, it will offer goods through partnerships with other providers, such as Internet grocers and delivery services. At press time, the company was planning a trial rollout for the end of the year, in Colorado. For those who can’t wait for their Internet appliance, there’s Quixi, launched in New York City in October 1999 by Evan Marwell and Robert Pines. Quixi lets users shop the Web through their cell phone and a live, human intermediary who searches for information and makes purchases online using the subscriber’s stored (and privacy-protected) credit-card number and delivery information. Users pay $19.95 a month, plus some additional transaction charges. Quixi receives 5% to 10% of revenues from each online sale that it processes. Employing human helpers isn’t cheap. But Pines says that Quixi’s back-end technology is designed to minimize the time that live helpers spend on any particular transaction. The company has contracts with outside call centers, limiting its investment in infrastructure, although Quixi might eventually save money by bringing the call centers in-house, Marwell says. With around $28 million in venture capital under its belt, the company began a beta-test phase in June, offering the service free during the summer before its official September launch. In its current form, Quixi is something of an interim solution, admit Pines and Marwell. Eventually, its human-mediated Internet interface may be rendered obsolete by voice-recognition software or ubiquitous personal digital assistants. So Quixi hopes to gain a foothold in those very markets through partnerships with companies that are developing those technologies or by developing such applications itself. At the same time, says Marwell, Quixi’s intended market is people who value convenience more than the dubious prestige of being early adopters. “We almost view ourselves as being a bit of a gatekeeper for customers, not forcing the technology on them before they’re ready,” he says. –E.B. Is there any there there? Onna Iucolano, vice-chairperson of Shop.org, an Internet retailing trade organization, and former chairperson of its research committee, spoke with Emily Barker about the recent expansion in same-day delivery services. Inc.: Are there a lot of same-day delivery start-ups out there? Iucolano: There is a great deal of focus on delivery and fulfillment, and I would say that has come about as a result of activity in the last 18 months. Most Internet retail was very much focused on the front-end activities — the look and feel of the Web site, taking and processing an order — and in reality that was 50% of the battle with respect to what the customer wanted. The stumbling block was on the back end, with respect to being able to actually deliver the finished product to a consumer. Inc.: Then is the potential market the whole of Internet retail? Iucolano: I don’t think it’s that big. It’s sort of like the FedEx model of a few years back. You used to put a package in the mail, and it got there when it got there. Then FedEx in its brilliance convinced us that we had to have it overnight. So it created a market. It’s really interesting how a lot of these products and services create their market just because they exist. Inc.: How’s that? Iucolano: Given the choice of having a book in two days or having it in an hour — well, you probably never thought of having it in an hour, and all of a sudden it’s available to you. Right now the market for same-day delivery is probably relatively small, but it’s one of the fastest-growing areas of opportunity. Internet companies are all taking and processing orders, but they’re all spending a ton of money to do that. It’s too early to tell who the winners might be. Inc.: What do these companies need to succeed? Iucolano: Customer demand. The customers have to be convinced that they really need things the same day, outside of the floral business and the gift business. Video and food make a lot of sense. Anything else that’s going to work will be products that consumers latch onto and say, “I need that right now!” whether they really do or not. Getting and Sending A selection of start-ups that focus on two of the most common headaches for Internet shoppers: packages that arrive when you’re not at home and purchases that need to be returned Company: PaxZone, in Chicago Business concept: Establishes a local network of businesses to which residents can have their E-commerce purchases delivered. Also offers consumers a drop-off service for merchandise returns. Recently expanded to San Francisco. Competitive advantage: Services are free to consumers; PaxZone charges a fee to retailers since its service reduces the extra charges incurred when carriers are required to make repeat trips to residences. Major hurdle: Service may not be easy to scale up. PaxZone must sell its concept not just to consumers but also to retailers, delivery services, and the local businesses that serve as drop points. Company: Brivo Systems Inc., in Arlington, Va. Business concept: Markets software that works in tandem with a “smart box” for home deliveries. When a consumer makes an Internet purchase, the order generates a unique Brivo password that the delivery person uses to open the customer’s wireless-controlled drop-off box. Competitive advantage: Brivo’s software can be adapted to open garage doors and other receptacles too. It also handles “reverse” deliveries from the consumer’s home, such as returns or dry-cleaning pickups. Major hurdle: Since consumers are likely to balk at having to pay subscription fees to receive deliveries, Brivo is developing partnerships with online retailers that will pay for the service. Company: The Return Exchange, in Irvine, Calif. Business concept: Offers Internet retailers online software and services for handling returns. Customers register their returns on the retailer’s Web site. The merchandise goes to a Return Exchange processing center, where it is either shipped back to the retailer for resale or resold through an online auction such as eBay. Competitive advantage: Since the Return Exchange handles all phases of a return, it provides turnkey service for Internet retailers who don’t want to deal with returns themselves. Major hurdle: There’s no lack of competition in this space, from both E-start-ups and brick-and-mortar companies that specialize in handling returns. Please e-mail your comments to editors@inc.com.

The Forks in Their Roads

Start-Up Diaries The forks in their roads Our story so far… It’s been just three months since the January issue of Inc. launched the Start-up Diaries, introducing five new businesses and their founders, and promising to report on their progress — or lack of it — in future issues. But that’s three months of start-up time. Which is to say, time when anything can happen. Luis Espinoza, the electronics technician moonlighting as a Hispanic-foods entrepreneur, was offered a potential revenue windfall and turned it down for want of the $250,000 he would have needed to pursue it. He seems happy enough with his choice, but where does it leave his company? Meanwhile, edu.com’s Adam Kanner did get his money ($30 million in new capital, to be exact) but still can’t be sure it’s sufficient to make his E-commerce Web site for students work the way it needs to. Still looking for funding or strategic partners were Johann Verheem of Application Technologies as well as the three cofounders of 10 Minute Manicure — though the three have scored a major contract by changing their concept. Will that decision hurt them later? And as for the two Harvard students squeezing in their start-up chores between classes, they may have a surprising new deal, too. Levi’s has approached them about modeling their jeans. For more details, read on. In the money COMPANY: edu.com, in Boston, creator of a Web site where college students can buy stuff cheap and where the companies selling that stuff can market to and do research on the students FOUNDER: Adam Kanner, 29 AT OUR LAST LOOK: Kanner was hunting for desperately needed capital in amounts that would dwarf the $4 million he’d already raised. The site was struggling technologically. And Kanner was sorting out his working relationship with his chief operating officer — Linda Kanner, his mother. LAST DIARY ENTRY: ” Mother Is the Necessity of Invention“ Things at edu.com have ballooned. A small, discreet sign remains affixed to the start-up’s front door, but it’s dwarfed by a back-lighted, billboard-size “monstrosity” (as CEO Adam Kanner calls it) above that loudly proclaims edu.com’s presence to workers in Boston’s financial district. The company’s staff of 60 or so people, who’d previously worked two to a desk in a spartan, 3,000-square-foot office, has swelled to 75 and moved up a flight of stairs into 24,000 square feet of carpeted nirvana, complete with Foosball tables and a built-in putting green. And the start-up’s war chest has grown to the size of a small closet, thanks to several months of vigorous fund-raising in which Kanner brought home an additional $30 million. The new capital came from a variety of sources, including the two Silicon Valley venture firms that had backed him originally and, for geographic diversity’s sake, four firms in Boston, one in New York, and one in Chicago. “We were trying to raise between $20 million and $25 million,” Kanner says, “so we’re oversubscribed.” He’s especially excited about a $5.3-million investment from Student Advantage Inc., a large, well-established provider of student-discount cards and related services, which had loomed as a major competitor. A new partnership, in which edu.com acts as the commerce arm for Student Advantage’s community-oriented Web sites, drastically reduces Kanner’s customer-acquisition costs. (Student Advantage’s 1.5 million members are automatically sent to edu.com’s site whenever they want to buy something.) It also suggests that edu.com may find happiness covering the back end for other student-focused marketers. As for Linda Kanner, Adam’s mother, she’s devoting less time to operations and more to her new duties as chief marketing officer. That, together with the fact that the two no longer share an office, gives mother and son some welcome space. “The more the organization grows and her role becomes defined, the less we overlap and bump into each other,” says Adam. “And the better our working and personal relationships become.” –Leigh Buchanan Starting over COMPANY: Inca Quality Foods, in South Bend, Ind., a distributor and “micromerchandiser” of Hispanic foods in grocery stores FOUNDER: Luis J. Espinoza, 48 AT OUR LAST LOOK: Espinoza, a moonlighter struggling to balance his ambitions for Inca with his work at a satisfying full-time job, was wondering how fast Inca should — or needed to — grow. LAST DIARY ENTRY: ” Moonlight over Indiana“ Luis Espinoza’s secretary has found another job. So have his two full-time truck drivers. Espinoza says that in early December, Kroger’s supermarket chain, which had Inca’s display cases in 20 of its stores, notified him that either he should gear up to add operations in 30 more stores in 30 days (at $4,000 a pop just for the new displays) or the chain would find another Hispanic-foods vendor. “The amount of money I needed was tremendous,” Espinoza says. “A quarter of a million dollars. I can’t come up with that amount of money.” (Even the smaller sums Espinoza located required him to put up his house as collateral, which he refused to do.) And so by the end of December the Kroger business — 60% of Inca’s revenues — was gone. He may be down, but he’s not out. “It’s like we’re starting all over again,” he says, describing the small stores he’s continuing to serve in the South Bend area. “It took a lot of pressure off. It’s like regrouping.” What about just giving it all up and being satisfied with his regular job at the steel-finishing plant? “I would never let my business go,” he says. “Never. I could even get to the point when springtime comes around that I wouldn’t mind getting a little cart selling ice cream in the street.” –Nancy Lyons Dream inflation COMPANY: 10 Minute Manicure, in Miami, a would-be chain of manicure kiosks in airports FOUNDERS: Karen Janson, 33; Vivian Jimenez, 31; and Lorraine Brennan O’Neil, 35 AT OUR LAST LOOK: The founders were closing in on their first airport contract (Dallas-Fort Worth) and were negotiating with an angel for the capital ($500,000) they needed to launch their company. LAST DIARY ENTRY: ” Three Women and a Kiosk“ In the early months of winter, the elegantly simple kiosk idea got, shall we say, a little bigger. Several hundred square feet bigger, to be exact. When the Dallas-Fort Worth airport deal stalled, the 10 Minute Manicure founders turned to Pittsburgh. The good news was that the concession management at Pittsburgh International Airport liked their concept enough to send them lease terms by mid-January. The bad news was, there were some catches. The Pittsburgh people had just one space available, and they were thinking “hair.” Within 24 hours, Karen Janson and Vivian Jimenez had revised their concept. Nails and hair. Instead of just manicures, the newly conceived Style Express would also offer quick, inexpensive hair services for women and men. Not that the enlarged operation would replace the goal of building manicure kiosks in other airports, the founders say. As they see it, the Pittsburgh Style Express will be kind of a showplace, a foot in the door of the airport industry. “It’s a brand extension,” says Janson. Or it will be, provided the women can come up with the $150,000 needed to launch it. The good news was that the Pittsburgh-airport people liked their concept. The bad news was, there were some catches. They had just one space, and they were thinking not nails but hair. Within 24 hours, Janson and Jimenez had revised everything. Nails and hair. “It’s a brand extension,” says Janson. They are, they would acknowledge, increasingly desperate for financing. By mid-January, they had reached their personal investment limit (about $35,000 among all three cofounders) and had yet to seal a deal with any angel or investor. But even as they worried about raising the bare minimum of cash, something dramatic was happening to the founders of 10 Minute Manicure. As they talked to more and more prospective investors about putting up the $500,000 they thought they needed to start, they began to understand that there wasn’t some big secret about financing a start-up that everyone knew but them. There was no one right answer. “Some people say you have to give away 70% of your company; some people say 30%,” says Janson. “There’s no standard whatsoever.” And as they realized that not everyone knew more than they did, they gained confidence. “The funny thing is, I think our hopes have gone up higher,” says Jimenez. “I think that we value ourselves more. Now we’re looking for more than just a $500,000 investor. We’re looking for a partner that will invest up to $5 million — one that will stick around with us and help us expand very aggressively.” So now the founders of 10 Minute Manicure cum Style Express are talking about a rapid national launch. They’re in search of financing partners who understand the size and scope of their ambition. “If you really look at the way to do business today,” says Janson, “it’s either get brand recognition from the get-go or you’re in the wasteland.” The small kiosk concept has, again, gotten just a little bit bigger. –Karen Dillon Model attraction COMPANY: FÚxito Worldwide Inc., in Cambridge, Mass., a Web site for the international soccer community, which offers E-commerce, news, and a recruiting database FOUNDERS: Richard Powell, 20, and Daniel Hoffer, 22 AT OUR LAST LOOK: The two Harvard University students were searching for capital, employees, and ways to attract more visitors to www.fuxito.com. LAST DIARY ENTRY: ” The Player“ Not long ago the cofounders of FÚxito were struggling to refine their business model. Now they may very well redefine the whole concept of what a business model is. Since they appeared on our January 2000 cover, Powell and Hoffer have been approached by Levi’s about modeling jeans. “To be honest, this is really small and inconsequential for me,” says Powell, a Harvard junior who began developing the soccer-focused Web site in late 1998. “I don’t let it take priority over the other things we really need to do.” Such as? Recruiting seasoned talent, raising venture capital, and enhancing the Web site — the same challenges they faced three months ago. But if those challenges aren’t new, the environment in which FÚxito faces them is. Since last fall FÚxito has encountered three new direct competitors, Internetsoccer .com, LiveSoccer.com, and Goalnetwork.com. “We have to make sure we’re not working too slowly,” says Powell. To boost its working capital, in January the company raised about $1.2 million, the bulk of it from three New York City­based institutional investors. That represents FÚxito’s first funding from nonangel sources — and begins a pattern Powell hopes will continue as he sets out to raise as much as $12 million from venture capitalists. Hoffer predicts the valuation of FÚxito, which this year is on track to post revenues of more than $5 million (from selling soccer merchandise), will get a kick from the expected relaunch of www.fuxito.com, which included the long-awaited addition of an online store. Soon, thanks to a partnership with a virtual-reality vendor, FÚxito expects to add “really cool” features, Hoffer says. Even so, he adds, “we need some people with solid business experience to turn this into a $1-billion company.” The key to attracting such folks? Well, it couldn’t hurt to have the company’s name on all those jeans ads. “But,” notes Powell, taking a break from studying for an econometrics exam, “being plastered over billboards everywhere won’t do anything if we’re not building more value for our users.” –Joshua Hyatt Package deal COMPANY: Application Technologies, in San Diego, a developer of new consumer-product packaging, including the Appli-K pouch FOUNDER: Johann Verheem, 33 AT OUR LAST LOOK: The Appli-K pouch was designed, but Verheem needed capital to develop manufacturing processes, as well as customers to build the market share that would protect him against knockoffs. LAST DIARY ENTRY: ” Plan B-Minus” Verheem and company marketing manager Natasha King are no longer seeking to raise significant capital. While Verheem and his wife, Emmarance, were back in their native South Africa for an extended family visit over the Christmas and New Year’s holidays, he negotiated an agreement locking in a deal with a strategic partner that will develop the manufacturing processes and prototypes for the Appli-K pouch, the product he’s basing his business on. Verheem plans to let his strategic partners fund development of the Appli-K. He realizes the pouch alone is not enough to grow the business on; he needs a whole line of products. So while he locks in the relationships he needs for the pouch, he is also starting to look for new products to bring out. –Michael Warshaw Please e-mail your comments to editors@inc.com. Read the complete Start-Up Diaries series.