Tag Archives: Cary (North Carolina)

Texting on the Company Tech

our beautiful site

More people text than make phone calls these days and it’s easy to see why since texting is easy, fast, and discrete.  According to Nielsen Media, 77 percent of wireless subscribers use texting technology. In business, texting is valuable for collaboration, confirming deliveries, and sending quick information to customers via Twitter and text reminders. But as with any new technology, users need to be reminded of texting’s do’s and don’ts. Texting do’s Ideal For Quick Messages. Lisa Creech Bledsoe, director of Calvert Creative and brand manager of Calvert Holdings in Cary, N.C., uses texting for business and is an active member of the Twitter community, the free messaging microblog social media tool. She texts via her iPhone while on the road and contributes to her community using AIM Chat and Twitter while on her desktop. Through texting, Bledsoe receives links and quick, frequent answers to single, simple questions such as, “I need a good webinar application.” She adds that texting is great for directions or for information about a client as you’re heading out the door. Texting is also an important tool for managers who need to send urgent messages to staff, says Andy Klassman, director of project management at TeleMessage.com, in Acton, Mass., which offers messaging services and products for service providers and enterprises. It’s Polite. “Texting is so great when you’re surrounded by other people and don’t want to disrupt, but still need to communicate,” Klassman says. “Another key strength of texting is that people always have their mobile nowadays.” Geoff Doyon, information systems administrator at the Magdalena Ecke Family YMCA in Encinitas, Calif., texts via his work phone for business and tells his friends and family to contact him on his personal phone. “Texting allows me to communicate to others without the intrusion of a phone call,” Doyon says. “Also, text messages provide an ‘audit trail’ of sent and received messages.” Texting don’t’s No Inappropriate Messages. Most people in business know it’s not a good idea to send inappropriate messages via text, even if they are masked in texting jargon. Most companies have an Internet use policy which applies to text messaging and it’s a good idea that all employees feel familiar with this policy. “Don’t communicate anything you don’t want the Pope to see,” Bledsoe says. No Texting While Driving. Employees may also need to be reminded not to text and drive. Bledsoe uses Jott.com, a voice-to-text technology as well as her hands-free headset so she can text while in traffic. Businesses must also consider their state’s no-texting-while-driving laws to set up explicit written policies that will not hold the employer liable if the employee causes an accident while texting and driving. Too Long a Message. Texting is not the right medium for sending a complicated message since you’re limited to 160 characters. Being concise is taken seriously in the texting world. “One must communicate clearly to avoid sending a message that may be misinterpreted by the recipient,” Doyon says. If you can’t be concise or if the message is complex, then it may be a good idea to pick up the phone or talk to the recipient face to face. When Customers Haven’t Signed Up to Receive Texts. No one wants to receive text spam that they have to pay for. Administrators need to ensure that their customers have opted in to receive reminder emails and that they have confirmed to pay the service fee. Compliance issues As more people are texting for business and for personal use on the company time, businesses are trying to figure out how to manage texting issues, such as what can or can’t be sent via text message. The American Management Association says that 77.7 percent of major U.S. companies keep track of employees’ communication, including e-mail and Internet use. This is particularly true in the banking, healthcare, financial services, and government sector where confidentiality is key. These industries have strict Internet use policies and regularly monitor and archive employee text messages using text encryption services. Businesses outside these industries would also be wise to initiate Internet use policies so they can not only protect their corporate image and presence, but also protect their employees.

Buy Web Apps? Webware Lets You D-I-Y

our beautiful site

Do-it-yourself webware programs such as Coghead, Python and Microsoft Office Live can be a cost-effective way of building a customized application platform for a small or medium-sized business. These webware applications are run through a Web browser, rather than a desktop application, and include servers, task scheduling, session management, cascading style sheets, and databases. The goal of these applications is to create interlocking computer platforms that are easy to deploy. Popular uses of these applications include database management, customer relationship management (CRM), asset and bug tracking, project and event management. So why would a small business rely on these D-I-Y technologies rather than hiring an outside consultant or buying a pre-packaged application? Advantages: Ownership — With a D-I-Y software application, you have full ownership and control of the product, so when you need to tweak a servlet, you do not need to wait on someone else. Cost — You don’t need to pay an outside programming consultant for the initial set-up; you don’t need to worry about the cost of upgrades, and there is no management fee for your server. A program like Adobe’s ColdFusion runs $1,600 and still needs to be customized, which is costly for the small business. Time — These applications will save you the consultant’s programming time since you’re doing all of the work yourself. Disadvantages: No maintenance — Since these applications are D-I-Y, you or someone on your team needs to know how to maintain the system and fish out the bugs. No upgrades — You need to ensure that your codes remain encrypted and secure to prevent hackers and system failures. How to decide whether to try webware Aaron Hyde, the founder/owner of BrewedFresh Media.com, a Web content and publishing company in Cary, N.C., says that with these D-I-Y applications users need to know if they are tech savvy enough to manage these applications on their own. “With full ownership comes full responsibility and some small businesses don’t have the time to spend programming and managing these applications,” Hyde says. He adds that these businesses may think that they are saving money, but they still need to know how to install and customize these applications. Businesses need to also determine whether they can get some of these applications from a vendor or an on-demand software provider. Farming out development and maintenance of your applications may end up being more economical when compared to the value of the time spent in-house developing and maintaining your D-I-Y webware application. Conclusion Although the folks in the IT department may look down on those of us who use D-I-Y webware applications, RSS feeds, wikis, mashups, and blogs, they are all part of the Web 2.0 revolution, the second generation of Web applications for the Web user who connects with others and participates in the global conversation. Implementing D-I-Y Web-based applications for a small business makes sense if your company has the right people on board who know what they’re doing so that significant cost and time savings may be achieved. SIDEBAR:D-I-Y Webware Applications Coghead Coghead is a Web-based application that helps users build and host custom database applications in a much shorter timeframe than traditional software development applications. Examples of Coghead’s business applications include project management, CRM, bug tracking, and dynamic programming. Pricing starts at $49/month for five users and a multi-user account is free for 30 days. Python Python is an open-source programming language that can run on Windows, Mac, Nokia mobile phones, and Palm Pilots. Companies and individuals use Python for game development, networking, databases, and bug tracking. Microsoft Office Live Microsoft Office Live is a hosted service allowing small businesses to customize their own website and Web-based applications. With Office Live, users can store and share documents via online workspaces and can efficiently track projects and company information. Three levels are available at varying monthly subscription rates: Office Live Basics (free), Office Live Essentials ($19.95/month), and Office Live Premium ($39.95/month).

Cost Cutting: The Money Pit

Cost Cutting Last autumn, Vivek Wadhwa was scared. Really scared. Just a few months earlier his company — Relativity Technologies, in Cary, N.C., which helps businesses update computer systems — had been soaring at enviable heights. Relativity ended 2000 with $10 million in revenues. Back then, Wadhwa recalls wistfully, “we were anticipating triple-digit percentage growth and double-digit profits.” In the first quarter of 2001 he was preparing to take the four-year-old company public before year-end. But by summer, Relativity was fighting for its life. Recession-panicked customers postponed or canceled scheduled upgrades; between March and mid-July, Relativity didn’t close a single new deal. Wadhwa idled 10% of his 175-person workforce and gave everyone else, including himself, pay cuts of 12.5% to 20%. And it still wasn’t enough. So last fall he started digging through the company’s expenditures, mining for potential savings. When he examined the telecom bills, he hit a mother lode: Relativity was spending more than $160,000 annually on voice and data services. Digging further, Wadhwa discovered nugget after nugget of wasted expense. Overseas calls that were billed home at $4.65 a minute. Domestic calls that were billed to a big-name calling card at 18¢ a minute plus a 90¢ “connection fee.” And conference-call bills that approached $30,000 a year. Wadhwa characterizes those expenditures as unacceptable even in good times and personally painful in bad ones. “These costs,” he reminded employees in a December 2001 memo, “are literally coming out of your salaries as well as mine.” Relativity’s experience is far from rare. Total telecom costs — including charges for phones, cellular services, pagers, toll-free numbers, fax lines, and data communications — often rank among a company’s top five expenses. Per-employee expenditures have doubled since 1996, now averaging $3,000 to $5,000 a year, according to the Aberdeen Group, a Boston-based research and consulting firm, at a time when rates for some telecom services — such as long-distance and wireless — have actually dropped by 30% to 50%. Yet many CEOs (40%, according to one International Data Corp. survey) haven’t a clue about what their voice and data services actually cost. Why the disconnect? For some companies, such as Relativity, it was the by-product of a strong economy. “When things were going well, I didn’t have time for this,” Wadhwa says of his telecom-bill treasure hunts. During the heady dot-com days, he focused on growth rather than cost cutting; in particular, he considered telecom expenses a cost of doing business. Such ignorance isn’t cheap. Gartner Group says companies typically waste 10% of their telecom budgets on outdated services — old high-rate cellular plans, for instance — or errors, such as the wrong rates, duplicate bills, incorrect taxes, or inaccurate charges. One of the more common telecom money pits: unused phone lines. “Let’s say you’re changing locations,” says Tom Heslin, founder of Sunsar Communications, a telecom agency based in Trumbull, Conn. “You order service for the new location, and you order disconnects for the old location, but it never gets disconnected.” Or you simply assume your carrier will shut off your old service. Or you transfer employees around your site without moving their telecom services. In all those cases, the meter may keep running indefinitely. One of Heslin’s clients found that it was paying for lines in a building that it had vacated three years earlier. Companies don’t always have to eat such losses, however. TelData Control, a telecom consulting and auditing company in East Rutherford, N.J., wrangled a $71,000 refund for a client who for five years had paid for lines that were never turned on. Another sinkhole: mystery services that companies don’t realize they have. Think voice mailboxes for long-departed employees or call waiting on fax lines. Heslin recalls asking one client company about its T1 line. “We’ve never had one,” the staffers replied. “I said, ‘Look, it’s right here on the bill,” Heslin recalls. “The silence in the room was palpable.” The line, left by a former occupant, had been live but unused for years, and Heslin’s client was paying $500 to $600 a month for it. How come nobody notices? Telecom costs often spin out of control as businesses expand. “The more remote sites you have, the uglier it gets,” says Aberdeen Group senior analyst Dana Tardelli. Many small companies that lack full-time telecom managers depend on harried accountants who often pay batch after batch of complex, inch-thick bills without analyzing whether they contain duplicate or inaccurate charges. Of course, companies can control some telecom expenses by researching their options and negotiating better rates in the first place. (See ” Cheap Talk,” Inc Technology, 2000, No. 1.) But Wadhwa and other CEOs have found many other ways to cut the high cost of talk. Go generic. When Relativity employees travel overseas, they now use local prepaid phone cards, allowing them to make international calls that cost the company as little as 7¢ a minute. For domestic calls, Wadhwa has replaced those costly big-name calling cards with a discount warehouse’s cards, which charge just 3.5¢ a minute. Go flat out. Wadhwa cut Relativity’s bills by more than 90% when he switched to a teleconferencing service that charges a flat $200-a-month rate. B.Z. Halberstam, CEO of Discus Data Solutions, a New York City-based software-development company, saw his company’s monthly cell-phone bills drop 50% after he switched to a fixed-reimbursement plan for each employee. Cut the cord. Rodger Roeser, president of the Eisen Management Group, in Cleveland, wanted to slash the monthly five-figure long-distance bills at his marketing and public-relations agency. So he cut a deal with a telecom provider and got 30 free cellular phones, each equipped with 700 minutes of nationwide calling for $49.95 a month. Then he instructed his employees to use their new cell phones for all long-distance calls. That switch is saving Eisen $8,000 a month. Call in the pros. Independent consultants can audit a company’s total telecom spending, ferreting out opportunities for savings. QuantumShift, a telecom-management service based in Novato, Calif., audited one small employment agency’s telecom records and found 80 unused phone lines and dozens of unassigned voice mailboxes that together were costing the company $1,600 a month. Consider outsourcing. Some fast-growing companies may find it worthwhile to let somebody else manage the whole telecom mess. DoveBid, a 65-year-old industrial auction house, already had several offices nationwide when it recently either acquired or merged with half a dozen competitors. “We were already getting 10 to 15 bills every month in each location. Then multiply that by the companies we acquired or merged with,” says Adam Greenberg, who oversees the company’s telecom services. Now the majority of DoveBid’s telecom services are consolidated by QuantumShift. For those services (calling cards, cell phones, long-distance lines, and the like), DoveBid is able to run reports using QuantumShift’s Web-enabled software. The reports summarize and highlight patterns — for instance, the company’s top five users of cell-phone minutes. Greenberg won’t say exactly what DoveBid pays for its QuantumShift services; the company negotiates individual rate packages for each of its customers. So far, Greenberg also can’t say exactly how much DoveBid saves on telecom charges, but he can put a figure on time savings. “It can take one to three hours of three different people’s time to process a bill,” he says. Meanwhile, Relativity’s Wadhwa credits his telecom savings with helping the company return to profitability. Some of the money he saved he’s giving to employees to make up for their pay cuts. But even when things turn around, he’ll never again let telecom expenses fall off his personal radar. “I’ve learned the hard way,” he says. The cost-cutting campaign “is something we’re going to do from now on. All our profits are going in the bank” — not to the telecom companies. Anne Stuart is a senior writer at Inc. The Whole New Business Catalog IncQuery: Where Are the Customers? Redesign: I Read It in the Funny Papers Hands On: Roadside Assistance Cost Cutting: The Money Pit Hands On: Limited Power Best of the Net: In the Lap of Luxury Capital: Shell Game Please E-mail your comments to editors@inc.com. Related link: Tele-Sleuth