Tag Archives: Australia

Drive Traffic to Your Business Blog

our beautiful site

It’s one thing to start a company blog. It’s something else entirely to get people to visit. Driving traffic to your small business’ corporate blog takes equal parts old-fashioned marketing and contemporary Web tools. It’s a mix of common sense practices like printing a blog’s URL on company business cards with search engine optimization and blog software plug-ins to come up with the right formula to motivate people to visit, according to corporate bloggers and blog marketing experts. Whatever methods you use, aim for quality, not quantity, says Tac Anderson, a Web 2.0 expert and blogger at the LaserJet business unit of HP in Boise, Idaho. Using lots of Web-based bells and whistles can dramatically increase traffic. But if people don’t make return visits, or all that traffic doesn’t lead to more customers, better bonds with suppliers or other measures of success, it doesn’t mean much. Old school marketing methods No matter what your company’s blog is about or who writes it, start with the basics to spread the word that it’s there: Include the blog’s name and URL on printed materials such business cards, letterhead and brochures. Include it in employees’ email signatures, and prominently display it on the company’s website, either on the front page or another suitable location. MobileDataforce, a 45-person Boise, Idaho, maker of software for mobile devices, has a link to a blog written by CEO Kevin Benedict on the front page of the company’s website. On a recent trip to Australia, Benedict was walking down the street in Sydney and someone called his name “because she’d read my blog and recognized my picture,” he says. Encourage whoever writes the blog to network offline to promote it. At HP, Anderson is frequently invited to speak about Web 2.0 and social media at technology conferences, and uses the occasions to talk to people about his blogs. “Even if they don’t meet you personally, if they just hear you speak, they feel a little more connected, and they’ll be more likely to become regular readers,” Anderson says. Network online. too. Become a frequent visitor of blogs that cover similar topics or industries. Leave comments on those blogs and e-mail the authors. Include those blogs in the list of blogs, or blogroll, on your own blog. MobileDataforce’s software is used on rugged hand-held PCs, so Benedict links his blog to blogs at distributors and manufacturers of that gear. “You get more eyes, and Google ranks you higher if you have connections with other popular sites,” he explains. Search engine optimization and other tools Professional blog marketers suggest using a different bag of tricks to drive traffic to the websites, including: Search engine optimization (SEO) — An entire industry has developed around the science of placing frequently searched words and phrases into the text of blog posts so they’ll appear high in search-engine rankings and get more traffic as a result. Search engine optimization specialists such as Gary Pool, proprietor of White Rose Productions in Portland, Ore., swears by SEO software such as: Niche Bot, a subscription-based software tool that bloggers use to search for commonly used words or phrases. SEO Book, a regularly updated e-book with a variety of SEO tools. Word Tracker, another SEO tool that offers a free trial version. Plugins — Pool prefers to create blogs in WordPress because of the bounty of available plug-in software including: Add Meta Tags, which automatically selects keywords in blog posts that will get picked up by search engines. Share This, software that adds a button to the bottom of every blog post making it easier to subscribe it to a viewer’s RSS news reader. XML Sitemaps, software that produces a sitemap of a blog that makes it easier for Google, Yahoo, and MSN to search a blog. Blog directories — Pool also suggests that companies submit their blogs to blog directories for specific states, industries, or professions. If you use SEO keywords to drive traffic, don’t dwell on the details to the extent that you forget the big picture. If your blog is so crowded with key words people can’t find what they are looking for, you’ve defeated the purpose of bringing them to the blog in the first place, Pool says. And don’t forget to have fun with it. “If it’s personal, people will keep coming back. It doesn’t have to be heavy handed,” he says. In the end, content is still king. Present interesting information visitors want to read, and you never know where it will lead. At MobileDataforce, Benedict had given up ever getting an order from a large New Zealand company that initially expressed interest then stopped returning emails and phone calls. But they didn’t stop reading his blog. After six months of silence they called. “Their employees read my blog every week and they were ready to buy,” Benedict says. The blog “is an ongoing communication with customers that we don’t even know we have.”

Taking Your E-Business Global

our beautiful site

Consumers in the United States looking to find your company online reflexively assume that your domain name — or Web address — will consist of your company name plus “dot-com.” But that’s not necessarily true in other countries. Potential customers in some foreign locales prefer doing business with an online company that has a more localized domain name, forcing some businesses to consider whether or not maintaining multiple domain names is worth the cost of doing business globally. Residents of Canada and England prefer to do business with companies that have a dot-ca or dot-co-dot-uk domain, according to Nicky Senyard, the CEO of ShareResults.com, a Montreal-based company that works with international affiliate marketers. A local domain “gives people the feeling that it is my place,” she says. Companies that want to participate in e-commerce should strongly consider localized domains because it gives buyers the impression that they are dealing with someone close by, Senyard says. International brand vs. localized domain Companies that want to establish their name as an international brand may want to consider using a single domain, according to Michael Stalbaum, the CEO of online agency UnREAL Marketing, of Narberth, Pa. “It’s about brand awareness,” says Stalbaum. He believes that a dot-com address is just easier to remember. Small businesses that rely on a single domain must localize the content to be taken seriously, according to Senyard. For example, the home page should direct users to customized landing pages that can be represented by the flags of each nation. The localized content should include pricing information in the regional currency. Shipping information should be customized to reflect items that would be delayed by going through customs, Senyard says.   Cookies should be set on visitors’ computers to remember what region they are from so that next time they log on they are sent straight to those pages in their language and featuring prices in their currency. Even better is employing “geotargeting” technology that recognizes the region of the user’s IP address and automatically redirects them to a regional page. Different content for different domains Businesses that create multiple local domains should differentiate the content so that search engines do not consider them duplicates, Senyard says. For example, if multiple sites for a business exist in English for residents of Canada, England, and Australia, those different sites may be excluded from search engine results if they contain the same text. Businesses may have to change the wording of their domain name if it is not available in a foreign country. Google cannot use the Gmail domain in Germany because a similar service already existed using the country’s dot-de domain, so the company opted for GoogleMail.de, according to Greg Sterling, the founding principal of Sterling Marketing Intelligence, a consulting and research firm. If a corporate name is already in use in a region, a business might be better off substantially changing the name rather than using a derivation of a domain — such as adding a hyphen — to prevent potential lawsuits, he says.   Setting up multiple domains is not a matter of economics but a matter of commitment. Domain names can be set up within a few hours and cost less than $10 each to register and a few dollars per year to maintain. But small businesses should localize the content for language and hire someone from that region and not merely someone fluent in the language. Websites must speak to potential customers in familiar language and with an understanding of national business laws or businesses will risk alienating consumers.

Time to Switch Your Business to VOIP?

Voice over Internet Protocol, or VoIP, uses a company’s broadband Internet connection to place phone calls over the global computer network instead of via traditional wire-line phones. The key appeal of VoIP for small and medium-sized businesses is that the technology has the potential to save money, but you have to weigh those savings against the risks. “This is one more way to get additional value out of that Internet connection,” says Mike Wagner, director of World Wide Marketing at Linksys. “Initially users got broadband to browse the Web, but now you can use it to make unlimited calls in the U.S. and Canada for $29.95 a month, and international rates start around four cents a minute.” There are different ways to use VoIP: either download software and use your computer with a headset, contract for a monthly service and connect using your regular phone with an adapter, or use special small business VoIP hosting services. Deciding which technology is right for your business will depend on the size of your organization, the phone features that you want, and whether the firm has numerous satellite offices that run up large phone bills through internal calls alone. Free VoIP Services A home-based business or one with only a few employees could conceivably switch to VoIP by downloading free software from the Internet from such services as Skype and making calls using a computer and a headset. Skype software is free. Calls costing only the price of your Internet connection to other Skype users, or run a few pennies a minute for domestic calls to people with traditional phones. Radio Shack’s VoSKY Exchange offers Skype software for the business office for $800. The potential business risks include having your company’s phone service down in the event of an electrical outage, a computer crash, virus or worm. In addition, the free services have no provisions for connecting emergency 911 calls. Telephone Replacement Service For a small office, the best option may be a for-pay VoIP service that enables your workers to use a traditional telephone. In order to use VoIP with a dial phone, you need an analog telephone adapter, or ATA. This device converts the analog signal (your voice) to a digital one. Most VoIP service providers — such as Vonage or AT&T’s CallVantage — offer the adapter for free with their packages. If bought separately they cost between $50 and $100. The benefit of going with a service is that is easier to reach non-VoIP members, emergency 911 calls go through and packages tend to offer bulk usage for one monthly price, similar to cellular phone plans. They also provide integration with desktop computer applications, including your address book, Web browser or Microsoft Outlook, enabling such features as quick lookup and click-to-call dialing. Caution: some adapters won’t work with every VoIP, so check with the provider. VoIP Hosting Medium-sized companies with several offices spread over a geographic region have other VoIP needs that eliminate fees for calls between locations and thus reduce overall phone bills. For these firms, VoIP hosting services, such as those offered by Covad or Packet8 and other companies, may be best. Many hosted services deploy VoIP over PBX (Private Branch Exchange) systems — telephone systems owned by a private business instead of a common telephone carrier. These features allow small and mid-sized companies to use an unlimited number of extensions in geographically diverse locations. Some of the hosting services are appealing because they eliminate high telephone bills for intra-company calls between branch offices, but they can cost between $10-80 per line per month and also come with startup fees. At the same time, they provide more reliability and guaranteed levels of service. Here are some popular VoIP service plans: AT&T CallVantage – $30 unlimited calling U.S. and Canada Offers call logs, voicemail, speed dial, call waiting/forwarding, caller ID, fax support, directory assistance, three-way calling, and do not disturb. Not all CallVantage subscribers have E911 service (works like 911), so check before you leap. Vonage – $25 unlimited calling U.S. and Canada Call waiting, caller ID and conference calling. Vonage offers basic 911 service to all subscribers, but you must provide them a physical address. 500 minutes: $14.99 per month. Vonage provides the best overall reliability. BroadVoice – $20 per month for unlimited calling No 911, but unlimited calls to Europe, China, Chile, Singapore, Taiwan and Australia over broadband Internet. The $25 plan includes 14 more countries. Voice quality is average.

Adobe was Their Partner, Then Everything Changed

For 10 years, Karl De Abrew and Sam Chandler had a happy, productive relationship with Adobe, developing plug-ins to enhance Acrobat PDF software and consulting with the software giant, based in San Jose, California, on developer support. And Adobe seemed just as happy with ARTS PDF, De Abrew and Chandler’s Melbourne, Australia-based company; it even sponsored ARTS PDF’s online community of PDF users, Planet PDF. By 2003, ARTS PDF had 30 full-time employees and half of its $3 million in annual revenue came from Adobe-related projects. But the two partners were plotting a move that once would have seemed insane–severing the relationship and instead competing with Adobe with a PDF product of their own. The problem was the way Adobe had begun treating third-party developers like ARTS PDF. Since the release of Adobe Acrobat in 1993, such developers had been key to Adobe’s strategy. The company created the application with an open standard, giving any developer access to the software’s specifications and a free license to create applications to extend its capabilities. Hundreds of third-party developers had based their businesses on Acrobat. ARTS PDF, for example, scored a big hit with a plug-in that, among other things, allows users to activate Web links in PDF documents, and sells the software on its own website, PDF Store. But Adobe’s CEO, Bruce Chizen, who took over from co-founder John Warnock in 2000, had grown wary of working with outsiders. Warnock used to refer to the hundreds of third-party developers as Adobe’s “ecosystem.” Under Chizen’s leadership, however, the company began reengineering the third-party plug-ins itself, incorporating them into new and increasingly complicated versions of Acrobat. That sparked concern among developers. If consumers could buy Acrobat software loaded with the latest extras, they would no longer need plug-ins. De Abrew and Chandler were as tuned into the PDF community as anyone, and they knew what was coming: Their plug-in business was disappearing before their eyes. At the same time, they sensed that there was a market for an Acrobat alternative. People were changing the way they used PDF applications. Instead of using the software simply to create and read files, more businesses were embracing the PDF format as a collaboration tool to let workers share digital documents, inserting revisions and comments along the way. Acrobat can do all those things, but the cost can sting when a company needs to push out the software to large groups of employees. What’s more, many companies don’t need Acrobat’s whiz-bang graphics capabilities, which tend to slow down performance. De Abrew began asking customers what they thought about Adobe. Their responses backed up his hunch. He says he heard complaints from many executives who were tired of paying between $350 and $450 per user to license the software. Acrobat, they said, was sometimes overwhelming and confusing. They wanted a cheaper version that was faster and easier to use. And if ARTS PDF built it, they’d buy it. De Abrew and his colleagues had been kicking around the idea of creating an alternative to Adobe for years but had never seriously pursued it. Now it seemed like a good idea. Adobe was huge, with revenue of $700 million. But a 2003 research report found that the PDF market had the potential to reach $1 billion. De Abrew and Chandler were confident that ARTS PDF had the industry knowledge and engineering chops to pull off a cheaper, scaled-down version of Acrobat. What’s more, the open PDF standard meant anyone could develop applications to compete with Acrobat, so there was little possibility of a lawsuit. The way De Abrew and Chandler saw it, they had two options. They could stick it out and hope that Adobe reconsidered its approach toward third-party developers, the chances of which seemed pretty slim. Or they could try to get a slice of the PDF market for themselves. That would mean alienating their biggest partner. It would also mean refocusing most of their limited resources on developing the new product and all but abandoning the plug-in business that had been so profitable. The stakes couldn’t be higher: If the competing product failed, Adobe wasn’t likely to let them return to the fold. There would be no turning back. The Decision One muggy afternoon in December 2003, in the 100-plus-degree heat of the Australian summer, De Abrew and Chandler sat down with their four-member board of directors at the company’s headquarters and began sketching out a strategy for going up against Adobe. The mood was tense, but as the group looked out a conference room window at the city’s skyline, they knew there was nowhere to go but forward. “We decided we’d rather have our own Acrobat and a shot at a growing market than a slice of a declining one,” De Abrew recalls. Shortly after the meeting, the company’s engineering team, which is based in Nitra, Slovakia, started work on the new product, Nitro PDF. It would be a leaner version of Acrobat’s powerful and feature-rich software and would retail for $99, less than a third of the price of Adobe’s entry-level offering. Thanks to their contacts with Acrobat users and developers worldwide, they already had a strong sense of what the market wanted, not to mention an instant test group for prototypes. De Abrew and Chandler were up front about the move with their contacts at Adobe, which was putting most of its effort into pricier, high-end offerings, and the business relationship between the two companies remained intact. Meanwhile, ARTS PDF went through a radical restructuring, redirecting 80 percent of the company’s employees and cash flow–which formerly had been spread evenly among its plug-in business, Web store, online community, and consulting group–to developing and marketing the software. The other divisions continued to exist, staffed by a skeleton crew and receiving minimal marketing and development dollars. Thanks to this strategy, ARTS PDF was able to stay profitable throughout the entire ramp-up process–and it didn’t have to lay off any full-timers. Eighteen months after starting, ARTS PDF’s team of 60 part-time and full-time engineers completed the application. But the real work was just beginning. In the past, the business had sold its products only through its online store, telephone sales, and a global network of corporate resellers. Now, De Abrew and Chandler began courting big-box retailers. Since they had no retail contacts, they hired a publishing and distribution partner with an established network to negotiate deals for them. They also added staff to their small sales office in San Francisco to establish a bigger U.S. presence and started a word-of-mouth marketing campaign by distributing free beta versions of the software to hundreds of users through the Planet PDF website. In April 2005, De Abrew and Chandler officially unveiled Nitro PDF at a software trade show in Orlando. An Adobe executive speaking at the event mentioned the release in her keynote speech, briefly referring to new competition as she talked about the changing PDF industry. She didn’t show a hint of hostility, but the general reaction from the Adobe team was chilly. In years past, the two groups would have greeted each other like old friends. This time, the conversation was curt. Throughout the conference, the ARTS PDF booth was packed with people interested in learning more about Nitro PDF, and the company left the event with dozens of sales leads, Chandler says. It needed them. Shortly after the conference, Adobe pulled its sponsorship of Planet PDF and launched a competing site, AcrobatUsers.com. It also stopped giving ARTS PDF consulting work. Ricky Liversidge, a director of product marketing at Adobe, says the company’s decision to compete with Acrobat did not come as a surprise. “That changed the relationship to a form of ‘coopetition,’ ” Liversidge says. “In this industry, that’s nothing new. We face that with many different companies.” ARTS PDF isn’t quite the “other Adobe,” but the company is on track to sell 100,000 units this year, according to Chandler. De Abrew and Chandler expect revenue to ramp up significantly this year, fueled by sales at nine major retailers, including Amazon, Office Max, and Circuit City, and 19 corporate resellers around the world. The company’s main concern, Chandler says, continues to be its loss of revenue from the plug-in business. ARTS PDF will eventually start to feel that loss as its Acrobat plug-ins, which the company is no longer developing, become obsolete. “We’ve bet the farm on Nitro and restructured the entire company around our new direction,” Chandler says. “We are playing with the big boys now, but we remain utterly convinced that it was the right decision.” The experts weigh in Corporations won’t buy it ARTS PDF has bet the store on this strategy. There is demand for a lower-cost version of PDF software. That said, I don’t think many large corporations will jump over to Nitro, even if the lower price means they can buy more copies for their employees. Corporate users expect a high level of service from software providers–that’s one of Adobe’s strengths. Smaller companies can’t deliver the same service. Tim Bajarin President Creative Strategies Campbell, California It’s a matter of trust It’s a double-edged sword. Increasingly, I get calls from clients who are upset with Adobe’s pricing model. There are many companies that will say, “Hey, we just need these basic functions and we don’t want to spend the extra money for Acrobat.” On the other hand, Adobe is an extremely well-known company. It’s very hard to overcome that kind of brand loyalty. It’s almost like somebody coming out with an office suite to compete against Microsoft. People know Adobe. I’m not sure they would trust another brand. Rita E. Knox Research vice president Gartner Research Van Nuys, California Creative marketing is key It sounds like a smart strategy, but it won’t be easy. De Abrew and Chandler saw some chinks in Adobe’s armor, studied the marketplace, and found out what people wanted. The question is whether they have the resources to promote Nitro PDF with enough marketing and advertising. They really need to get their message out if they are going to make inroads against a big company like Adobe, which has much deeper pockets. Dave Dolak Founder Marketing by Dave Dolak Charlottesville, Virginia What do you think? Should ARTS PDF have gone head-to-head with Adobe? Sound off at casestudy@inc.com.

Five Ideas to Watch

1. Just Like Friendster, But With File Sharing A new Web service called Grouper allows people to invite up to 30 friends to share digital photos, music files, and videos with one another through a secure website. Grouper’s software lets users stream music files to each other but prevents downloading, which keeps the service clear of copyright disputes. Grouper is free for now, though CEO Josh Felser says the company will be rolling out a paid version in the next few months. The idea came to Felser last year when he was looking around for a good way to share photos and music from the Burning Man Festival with friends. 2. Vending Machines for DVDs Look for ATM-like machines dispensing DVDs to pop up across the U.S. this year. Two New York City-based companies, DVDXpress and MoviebankUSA, have installed more than 50 machines in supermarkets and drugstores in Manhattan. McDonald’s is testing 120 DVD kiosks in Denver. Moviebank machines (which feature a 3,000-disc selection) charge 99 cents for a six-hour rental, or $2.50 for 24 hours. 3. Stop and Read the Roses Speaking Roses, a company in Bountiful, Utah, is using lasers to inscribe images, messages, and corporate logos onto the petals of live roses. The company has customized flora at $70 per dozen for the Kentucky Derby, the Indy 500 victory party, the Bill Clinton library opening, and the Radio Music Awards (for which Janet Jackson’s image was etched onto a dozen white roses). CEO Blaine Harris recently opened offices in China and Australia. 4. Privatizing Organ Donation A website called MatchingDonors.com has sparked controversy because it uses the Internet to pair potential organ donors with transplant candidates — circumventing the official system that Congress set up in the 1980s. The site charges patients $295 per month (up to $582 for six months) to swap information with potential donors. Co-founder Dr. Jeremiah Lowney says these fees only cover his costs, and that he’s not interested in making a profit. The site’s first successful match occurred in late October, when a donor volunteered one of his kidneys to a Denver man. 5. The New Sunscreen Wipe California mom Kelley Moreno was looking for a good way to put sunscreen on her junior golfer son, Ian, but decided both lotions and sprays were too messy. So she invented Spwipes — a baby wipe infused with sunscreen. Initial sales of the product on the Web and at sporting goods stores (price: $8 for a 10-pack) have far exceeded Moreno’s expectations. Now she’s running a test with 10 ski resorts to sell Spwipes from vending machines. The company expects to pass $2 million in sales this year.

Larry’s Kids

Al Mcgorry is a small-business man who thinks big. So in 2002, when this CEO of a 12-person software consultancy in Sacramento heard of a new, inexpensive service called Oracle Small Business Suite, he thought that Oracle’s CEO, Larry Ellison, was finally offering a scaled-down version of the software that its big, multinational customers use — at a cost of a quarter of a million dollars and up — to run their businesses. But unlike traditional Oracle products, this one was simple to use, integrated, delivered over the Web, and at only $49 per month, surprisingly affordable. McGorry was hooked. The fact is, it wasn’t an Oracle product at all. This innovative new business software solution was the work of a small San Mateo company called NetLedger (later NetSuite) that was launched in 1998 by Ellison and a young protege, Evan Goldberg. NetLedger got to use the Oracle name at a time when upstart Internet companies needed all the branding advantages they could get. In return, Ellison got a foothold in the small to midsize business space. It was an inspired partnership. So much so that NetSuite reached No. 12 on the Inc. 500 this year, with four-year growth of 5,763%. Its 2003 revenue was $16.5 million, and 2004′s number will approach $50 million. And if you ask Goldberg and his team, they’re just getting warmed up. “This is a massive, massive market,” he says, citing the nearly seven million small to midsize businesses in the U.S. alone. It’s a fact not lost on Ellison. At the same time he was funding NetLedger, he was also helping bankroll another Web-based software company targeting small and midsize businesses: SalesForce.com. And now, years later, Oracle has launched its own product — which bears more than passing resemblance to NetSuite’s — aimed at the small and midsize market. That gives Ellison a stake in three companies that are, or soon may be, fighting a turf battle for the small to midsize business dollar (he owns more than 50% of NetSuite; Goldberg, other employees, and venture capitalists own the rest). If you’re Larry Ellison, those are pretty good odds. And if you’re Al McGorry, the competition is pretty good for you, too. For McGorry, the NetSuite product, which started as a simple competitor to QuickBooks, delivering accounting software over the Internet via subscription, has made a huge difference in his business. Instead of buying software on disks that you (or well-paid engineers) load onto your computers, the software is accessed over a Web browser, allowing you to log on from anywhere. All of your employees can access real-time data, which is backed up every night on class A servers. There are no upgrades to buy, and there’s far less maintenance. And the software is constantly growing, adding the ability to manage contacts, keep appointments, track sales, manage employees and payroll, manage customer orders and inventory, and build and maintain a website. As the service evolved, the name of the company was switched from NetLedger to NetSuite to reflect its lineup more accurately. “Everything just fits together,” says McGorry, who had been using at least four different software programs — none of which were integrated like the Oracle Small Business Suite — to do the same thing. But then in 2003, McGorry’s annual cost for the suite doubled to $1,200 a year ($99 per month). And in 2004, he had to write a check to NetSuite for $7,200 ($399 per month for one user; $99 per month for each additional user). That figure allowed him to increase the number of users from one to three, but it’s still an eightfold increase in his annual payment, which is always required up front. An avid reader of Internet technology bulletin boards, McGorry says that many in the small-business community were apoplectic each time the price jumped. “People were ripping them apart in these user-community forums,” he says. “My God, there were a lot of defections.” Still, McGorry says NetSuite makes sense for his growing business, Capital Datacorp, which has annual revenue just shy of $5 million — especially since it has engineers who work almost exclusively in the field and other employees (including himself) who occasionally work from home or at a customer site. On a recent trip to the Alps, McGorry, thanks to NetSuite, was able to duck into a tiny Internet cafe and get up-to-the-minute sales figures. To goldberg and zach nelson, NetSuite’s CEO since 2002, customers like McGorry are proof that they’re on to something. Trying to keep up, they hired nearly 100 new employees in 2004 — most of them sales staff — bringing the total to about 300. They’re already expanding into Europe, Asia, and Australia, having established sales offices in Canada and the U.K. in the past year, and they’re working on translated versions for countries from France to China. In advance of an IPO planned for late 2005 or early 2006, they’re on a tear to grab market share, and their confidence is riding high. “This is a CEO’s fantasy product,” says Nelson, a nearly evangelical promoter of NetSuite. As he demos the software, his enthusiasm is infectious. When it comes to competitors, he patently dismisses them, regardless of their size (like Microsoft and its Great Plains product) or market share (Intuit’s QuickBooks, the 800-pound gorilla of small-business software). Nelson is, rather boldly, even dismissive of Oracle’s ability to move into the smaller market space. And yes, that’s his boss’s other company he’s talking about. NetSuite is like the Chihuahua that thinks it’s a German shepherd. But it’s a fast-growing Chihuahua, and NetSuite has one big advantage. While its competitors targeted specific slices of the market (QuickBooks focusing on accounting, SalesForce.com on sales-force automation), NetSuite was first out of the gate with all-in-one business software delivered over the Web. Is there even anyone else in the race? “No, believe it or not,” says Yankee Group analyst Sheryl Kingstone. “Not the way they do it.” Ultimately, the company’s greatest challenge may be its ability to retain its small-business focus. Can a company that’s owned by one of the wealthiest men on the planet, a company that’s growing spectacularly, expanding globally, and competing against the likes of Microsoft and Intuit, stay close enough to the small-business mentality of its customers to truly understand them? Goldberg says that one of the company’s advantages is that it’s run entirely on NetSuite software, which forces it to evaluate its own product daily in a real-life setting. But will NetSuite be a candidate for its own software if it keeps up this pace? “It’s an interesting question that we think about,” says Goldberg. “Will we still be using NetSuite when we have 10,000 employees?” Early in his career, Goldberg’s own focus was on big business. He went to work for Oracle as a database architect in 1987, right after earning his degree in applied mathematics at Harvard. Then, after eight years, Goldberg — with the blessing and backing of Ellison — set off with three other Oracle employees to create his own multimedia software start-up in San Francisco. An early, ill-fated competitor to Macromedia Flash, the company was called mBed. It never connected, but as Goldberg struggled with managing his fledgling operation, he began to sense a greater opportunity. He had gone straight from software genius to CEO and was now dealing with employees, sales, and all sorts of start-up issues. And he needed help. “The main thing I learned,” says Goldberg, “is that, if you were a small or growing business, the tools that were available to you were extremely limited.” Goldberg called Ellison in 1998 to suggest that they create small-business applications. Ellison encouraged Goldberg to focus on accounting but to do it, unlike QuickBooks, over the Web. “Larry really was, even at that point — and this is in 1998 — sure that this was how all software was going to be delivered,” says Goldberg. “And he was trying to transition Oracle to do that for big companies.” Goldberg wanted to pursue sales-force automation, but Ellison pushed for accounting first, arguing that that’s the core of all small businesses. Accounting it was. “The entire vision of the company,” says Goldberg, “came together in about five minutes.” Thus, NetLedger was born in late 1998 in a small office south of San Francisco above a hair salon and an Indian restaurant. Goldberg says that while the first four employees were all ex-Oracle, the next 50 were deliberately not. “We really knew,” he says, “that because we were delivering software for small and midsize businesses, we needed a different culture at the company. We needed different blood.” The company was launched on QuickBooks and stuck with the Intuit product — for the first two months. “I remember that day when we imported the QuickBooks file [to NetLedger's nascent online software program], and our business was sitting there, right on the Web,” he says. “We could see everything that was happening. That was a great moment.” The first product, also called NetLedger, debuted in 1999 at a cost of $4.95 per month. At that price, Goldberg got NetLedger in a lot of hands, which was the goal. One of those early customers was Rene Vandockum, a small-business man running a San Diego company called Racebolts.com, which imports and sells titanium nuts and bolts for motorcycles and racecars. Vandockum dropped QuickBooks because of NetLedger’s integration, tying together the front and back offices. But the software was hardly perfect. “Back then,” he says, “it was down a lot, awfully slow, and every time a new version came out, the whole thing crashed.” But it was cheap, offered good (and free) customer service, and was constantly improving and adding features. It was during this early phase that Goldberg was stunned to learn that his friend and former colleague at Oracle, Marc Ben-ioff, had decided to target the same market. “He came in three months after we started NetLedger and sheepishly said, ‘Yeah, I’m doing a company. I’m going to do sales-force automation for small businesses delivered over the Web.’ ” It was precisely the plan Ellison had talked Goldberg out of pursuing. Benioff’s business — launched in 1999 with a $2 million investment from Ellison — became SalesForce.com, which is now the market leader in the category and has a post-IPO market cap of $1.7 billion. “He went a different route,” says Goldberg of Benioff, “with a different approach that allowed him to get to market quicker — but focused on a more narrow area.” I’ve always allied myself with somebody who lives and breathes sales and marketing so I can live and breathe technology.” -Evan Goldberg The news brought a heightened sense of urgency. By 2000, NetLedger had launched its Web-store application. By 2001, it had delivered its own sales-force-automation application. With that came the realization that it no longer made sense for Goldberg to serve as both CEO and chief technology officer. “My whole career,” he says, “I’ve allied myself with somebody who lives and breathes sales and marketing so I can live and breathe the technology and product design.” He knew he needed a professional CEO. His first choice lasted just a year and is now a VP at Intuit. After Goldberg dispatched a headhunter to try again, the executive recruiter sent an e-mail to virtually every executive at Intuit with a subject head reading: “Larry Ellison.” The message said Ellison was starting a great company that was going to be huge. “I actually know some people over there,” says Goldberg, “and Steve Bennett [the CEO] wrote me and said, ‘Interesting way to recruit.” Despite the aggressive approach, no successful candidates turned up. In early 2002, Goldberg called Nelson. They had known each other at Oracle, and once they started talking, says Goldberg, “it was immediately apparent that this was exactly who I wanted — he was the yin to my yang. And he gets into the company in a way that makes it really, really fun to work here.” Five years older than Goldberg, Nelson, 43, had already been on the scene in Silicon Valley when Goldberg arrived from the East. A graduate of Stanford, Nelson had bounced from Motorola to Sun Microsystems and eventually to Oracle, where he became VP of worldwid. It started with obtaining the naming rights for Oakland Coliseum, where the A’s and Raiders play. Network Associates Coliseum proved to be an unpopular stadium name, but it was a marketing coup. In fact, the A’s are now a NetSuite customer, and Nelson has already negotiated for ad space behind home plate. But he doesn’t want to stop there. “Someday we’ll have our own arena,” he says. “That’s my goal.” At MyCIO, Nelson pulled off another stunt, draping the company’s entire 11-story building — a la Christo — in a billboard. “It was at the peak of the dot-com craziness,” he says. “We broke every ordinance known to man. You could see it from five exits away. It was beautiful.” Just before the company was set to go public, though, the bottom fell out of the market. So, here was Nelson, a former Oracle marketing whiz with CEO experience, looking for a new gig. And he had one other important advantage. Goldberg knew that any CEO he brought in would have to pass a crucial test: the Larry test. “And that’s a relatively high bar,” says Goldberg. “But Zach obviously had had a lot of exposure to Larry [at Oracle].” While Ellison rarely sets foot in the offices at NetSuite, he is a constant presence. The background image on Nelson’s PC is a photograph of Ellison at the helm of his America’s Cup boat. “When Larry calls,” says Nelson, “everything stops.” And he calls regularly, usually toward the end of the month as sales results are coming in. He often advises Nelson on topics such as sales structure and how to get to market. He calls Goldberg about products, especially the “dashboard” — the system’s front page, which brings critical bits of data such as new sales, year-over-year figures, appointments, etc., onto one easy-to-read and customizable page (see photo on page 69). “When we launched the dashboard [in 2002],” says Goldberg, “Larry called me and said, ‘Okay, now you finally have something in your product that I want to use.’ And ever since then, he logs on basically every single day to see how we’re doing. He’s effectively the product manager.” When Nelson joined NetSuite, he asked Ellison how anyone could run a business without such a product. “Larry said that CEOs historically have been able to make decisions based on 1% of the data that they actually need to make the decision,” says Nelson. “Here, we give you almost 100%.” Larry has a wealth of knowledge, and he’s not shy about sharing it. I call him belligerently consistent.” -Zach Nelson Sitting in Nelson’s spacious San Mateo office with a yin-yang glass coffee table in the middle of it, Goldberg says to Nelson: “I remember that the first thing you said to me when you got done talking to [Ellison about joining the company] was, ‘He takes this thing very seriously.” That would surprise no one who knows Ellison — or has watched Oracle’s pursuit of PeopleSoft. “Larry has a wealth of knowledge about what works and what doesn’t, and he’s not shy about sharing it,” says Nelson. “He’s very focused. I call him belligerently consistent.” All of which makes NetSuite’s evolution toward higher prices and bigger clients and Oracle’s turf even more interesting. As NetSuite works hard to broaden its customer base, seeking larger and larger clients, is there a danger of leaving smaller customers behind? Racebolt.com’s Vandockum certainly thinks so. With only one employee and annual sales of around $100,000, he’s stayed with NetSuite through years of missteps and growing pains but says its pricing structure is shutting him out just as the product is hitting its stride. Over five years, he’s seen his annual payments go from about $80 a year to $1,800 a year and claims NetSuite wants nearly $8,000 next year ($4,800 for the main user, plus $1,800 for a second user, and $1,000 for an annual live tech support package that used to be free). Vandockum is considering letting his contract with NetSuite expire in May and returning to QuickBooks Pro. One reason: He says computer-based, as opposed to Web-based, software means faster response times to questions when customers are on hold. QuickBooks Pro will be a one-time $250 purchase, and Caldera Volution, a Linux-based website builder he’ll use for his online store, will charge $70 a month. But he’s dreading the change. “The switchover is a big drag,” he says. “It’s a lot of work.” While Nelson is adamant that NetSuite is not abandoning small businesses, he emphasizes that the company is targeting “growing” businesses. Seventy percent of its customers have fewer than 100 employees, but NetSuite is also signing up 400- to 500-user customers that are divisions of companies such as Weyerhauser and DuPont. And it just landed its first 1,000-user account. Still, Nelson acknowledges that the price bumps have been tough on smaller customers. Of the $399-a-month fee, he says, “Most small businesses, we know, can’t afford that.” That’s why NetSuite introduced NetSuite Small Business in August — priced at $99 per month for the first user and $49 per month for each user after that. The product has been positioned for businesses that have outgrown QuickBooks, and the price does make it far more attractive to smaller users — but some longtime users will undoubtedly be disappointed. NetSuite has helped even the smallest of companies grow more sophisticated, and these clients have been conditioned to expect more. The Small Business version, for example, doesn’t satisfy Vandockum’s desire to customize his website. Capital Datacorp’s McGorry can’t see himself giving up the features he loves for the cheaper, scaled-down version either. Nelson is quick to say that he hopes to retain Vandockum as a customer and may consider offering some limited higher-level functionality, such as website customization, at a reduced price. “The last thing you want to do is see a customer leave,” he says. “I bet we’ll work it out.” But there are skeptics — especially at the competition. Although NetSuite recently built an ad campaign on poaching QuickBooks customers, Bill Lucchini, director of QuickBooks Enterprise at Intuit, says he doesn’t consider NetSuite to be a small-business company anymore. “I think of NetSuite as a midmarket company,” he says. “If you want to put 10 users on its system, you’re talking over $6,000 a year, and that’s just not a small-business solution.” Like NetSuite, QuickBooks is segmented into multiple products, depending on the size and needs of the businesses. They range from the new $99 SimpleStart program to the $3,500-a-year QuickBooks Enterprise software, which targets companies with 20 to 250 employees (with live tech support built into the price). And Intuit now offers its own Web-based small-business solution, called QuickBooks Online, for $19.95 per month. Nelson dismisses Intuit’s new offering as a “neutered version of QuickBooks Enterprise.” He is equally dismissive of SalesForce.com’s move into the midsize market. “There’s only one thing you can’t do with SalesForce.com: sell anything,” he says. “SalesForce.com is about managing leads and prospects. The minute they become customers, all that data leaves SalesForce.com.” For his part, Marc Benioff professes scant respect for the suite model. Which is all the more surprising because it’s a model that Oracle has embraced, and Ellison, of course, helped fund SalesForce.com and still retains a small stake — although he did step down from SalesForce’s board in 2001 because of product conflicts. At NetSuite, Ellison relinquished the title of chairman in March 2003 but remains on the board. But the sibling and oedipal rivalries may just be getting started. Last summer, NetSuite shed the last vestiges of the name Oracle Small Business Suite, which had been slowly reduced to about 5% of the company’s sales. Nelson says this was done to allow NetSuite to establish its own identity. But it also likely had something to do with the fact that in September, after years of testing it overseas, Oracle released its Oracle E-Business Suite Special Edition. Oracle is explicitly targeting small to midsize businesses with a full suite of integrated business software delivered, of course, over the Internet. The difference is that instead of renting the software in perpetuity, as with NetSuite, customers purchase a one-time license (the minimum order is for 10 users at approximately $2,000 each) and then pay local resellers to maintain the software. Nelson denies that there’s any real competition between the two Ellison-controlled companies, saying they only cross paths a couple of times a month. But with its first 1,000-user deal in the bag and another in the pipeline, there are sure to be more and more awkward moments in front-office waiting rooms when Oracle’s salespeople walk in and NetSuite’s walk out. “We’re going to continue to march upstream,” says Nelson, “still servicing small businesses but also reaching much larger companies over time.” But, according to the Yankee Group’s Kingstone, both NetSuite and Oracle have their work cut out for them. NetSuite’s challenge is that new customers have to dump years’ worth of expensive software to use them. And the bigger the company, the more entrenched they are. As for Oracle grabbing a slice of the small-biz pie? “They have never been able to pull that off,” says Kingstone. “In the back-office, yes, in the front-office, no.” Of course, Oracle’s new E-Business Suite is only just getting started here in the States. When big businesses want to innovate, what do they do? They take a bunch of guys, throw them out, and let them create a small business.” -Zach Nelson Ellison declined to be interviewed for this article, citing the desire to avoid any perception of conflict of interest, as his three kids duke it out in corporate boardrooms across America and beyond. It’s hard to know if he’s conflicted or overjoyed. But it’s even harder to imagine that any of his progeny would have set off down this path without at least his tacit approval. The executive overseeing marketing for Oracle’s small to midsize business market, Frank Prestipino, downplays any rivalry, but his words about NetSuite’s product aren’t entirely brotherly. “If financials are all you’ll ever do,” he says, criticizing NetSuite for not being as customizable as Oracle, “and you don’t care what your general ledger is going to look like, and you’ll take whatever comes, then great, that’s the thing for you.” He also suggests that NetSuite’s rental model is ultimately more expensive than buying the software outright, and points out the lack of manufacturing-systems software in the suite. But does he expect to see NetSuite pop up more frequently as a competitor, as NetSuite moves upmarket and Oracle moves down? “Yeah,” he says, “I would say so.” But for all NetSuite’s drive to go after bigger fish, Nelson zealously espouses the small-business model and its contributions to society. “When big businesses want to innovate, what do they do?” he asks. “They take a bunch of guys, throw them out of the building, and let them create a small business.” That, of course, is pretty much what Larry Ellison did with NetSuite and SalesForce.com. But how much longer will each one be happy serving its own niche? “That’s always been true with software,” says Nelson. “Everybody wants to be where they’re not.” Rob Turner, who wrote about celebrity entrepreneurs in Inc.’s December issue, can be reached at dashboard@inc.com.

Meetings Go Virtual

Success in the global market was giving Marla Landreth headaches. Her company, InfoGenesis in Santa Barbara, Calif., was doing well. Customers as far away as Australia and Asia were buying its systems that link sales terminals together to track sales, inventory and customers across large properties such as resorts, casinos and stadiums. But each sale was an added challenge for Landreth, who heads training for the company, which has 150 employees and 17 sites. Most customers had steady employee turnover and a constant need to train new hires on InfoGenesis’ systems. Add to that the quarterly updates of new bells and whistles to the company’s software and Landreth faced big budget hits for training and travel. The dilemma grew as many clients cut their own travel following 9/11 and the economic downturn. “We use to distribute documentation and have everyone call in with questions, but that didn’t address the needs,” Landreth says. So InfoGenesis tried Web conferencing through Centra Software Inc., in Lexington, Mass. By setting up training sessions over the Internet, trainees several time zones away can click a link on their computers and enter a virtual classroom with a simulation of the InfoGenesis system and real-time instructions from a trainer. Students see what the software looks like in action. They can interrupt the lesson with questions using text chat or voice-over-Internet protocol (VoIP) technology, which lets them make long-distance telephone calls over the Internet rather than over telephone wires. The online solution, Landreth says, “has solved a huge problem of training and turnover for our customers.” Once the province of larger firms, Web conferencing and other collaboration technologies — tools that help people work with one another through their computers — have become more available and affordable. This is a boon for smaller companies whose only previous collaboration option was to gather workers in a room with coffee, donuts, and a whiteboard. Simple collaborative tools such as instant messaging (IM) can be incorporated into company systems, and even on individual employees’ home computers, courtesy of the AOLs and Yahoos of the world. Calendaring — the ability to check colleagues’ schedules or add a meeting their calendar — is now a standard feature in Microsoft Outlook. Web conferencing is being bundled into operating systems sold by companies like Microsoft Corp. and IBM Corp. Such systems will soon or already offer teamware — software that creates virtual workspaces for project groups inside or outside a company. The choices don’t end there. The marketplace teems with companies challenging larger companies like Microsoft and WebEx Communications Inc., a hosted Web-meeting provider based in San Jose. Flypaper.com, a San Carlos, Calif., firm hosts secure digital workplaces where teams can gather and share information, and Co-create Software, an Hewlett-Packard spinoff in Fort Collins, Colo., makes software that lets engineering and manufacturing teams work together. You can even buy turnkey systems, with servers and software, for $40,000. All tolled, the collaborative market is now estimated at around $3 billion a year. “The field is really growing by leaps and bounds now, in part due to the whole history of 9/11 and SARS [last year's outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome that put a chill on international travel],” says Mark Rice, a former Xerox executive who saw the potential of collaborative technologies and started his own Web-meeting business called Webinar Resources in Florissant, Mo. With the flood of collaborative products available, how do you choose? The best advice is to think hard about what you need and take it slow. “It’s hard to assess the values of these technologies,” says Erica Rugullies, a senior analyst at Forrester Research Inc. in Cambridge, Mass. “Some companies are afraid of collaboration because they see it as something that is just cool” rather than truly valuable, she says. “But there are advantages when you look at the business process, such as reduced phone bills or e-mail storage costs.” Web conferencing and teamware–software designed for groups and for communication, including e-mail, videoconferencing, chat features, and document collaboration–hold the biggest promise of savings in both money and time. Coworkers, clients, or prospective customers in different locations can look at documents and images on their computers while talking on traditional teleconference lines or directly over the Internet via VoIP. There are several ways to go. You can contract with the main players, like Microsoft’s Live Meeting, WebEX or IBM, which put together larger, more expensive Web conferences. You can also try going solo: Microsoft has bundled Net Meeting into all its new Windows products. Click the icon of the globe with the two arrows and you can try your hand at conferencing with up to 10 people. The third route is to sign up with a smaller conferencing firm such as Centra, which can take the mystery out of Web conferencing, especially for companies with small or nonexistent IT departments. For a fee of around 20 cents per participant per minute, Centra will set up your Internet meeting place, send out invitations, and register participants. All you have to do is click on the site, hook up a computer headset, and log into the meeting. (Centra also provides a Cost/Benefit Analysis, which shows the cost savings involved with online learning initiatives.) Going the third-party route may make the most sense for newcomers, the experts say. As with any new venture, due diligence is a necessary first step. Talk to the conferencing companies, check out their websites, ask for reference lists of customers, or even sit in on a conference, which many hold to demonstrate product features. But if you discover that conferencing works for you, you begin to use it frequently, and you and/or your IT department is up to the task, you might consider purchasing the technology to do it yourself. Microsoft offers Office Live Communications Server 2003, which lets companies set up their own IM networks via Office applications. OpenScape from Siemens AG combines voice, e-mail, IM, and collaboration features. Apple Computer Inc. has added video to IM with its iChat AV software and iSight digital camera. Oracle Corp. is challenging Microsoft’s e-mail dominance with its own Collaboration Suite, which builds on Oracle’s already considerable collaborative capabilities. The overriding advice is to take your time, especially with your own staff. Shifting cultures from donuts and coffee to computer screens and headphones may be jarring at first. “With options like teamware you have to change habits,” says Mike Gotta, senior vice president and principal analyst at Meta Group Inc. of Stamford, Conn., an industry advisory firm. “Getting people to change can be tough. You have to convince them that new is better.”

Entrepreneurs of the Year

Just like Bill Hewlett and David Packard, Janie and Victor Tsao had a garage. “Everybody starts with a garage,” Janie says. Hewlett and Packard’s was a tinker’s shed, a rustic hut that to this day whispers of science-fair projects and woodshop dreams. It’s the epicenter of technology’s sepia-tinged creation myth, the kind of place where you find a stone and brass monument naming it the “Birthplace of Silicon Valley.” The Tsaos’ garage, on the other hand, sits on a cul-de-sac in the Woodbridge section of Irvine, Calif.–the preplanned heart of Orange County–and dominates a khaki-colored house that faces a park dotted with bolted-down picnic tables. Framed by brick columns and a basketball-hoop crown, the garage speaks of SUVs, recycling bins, and home repair. It is an unexceptional place: mass market, suburban, retail. It is in this garage that, in 1988, Victor and Janie founded the company that would become Linksys, the computer peripheral company whose seven-year run on the Inc. 500 list culminated last spring with its purchase by Cisco Systems for $500 million. And if the Hewlett-Packard garage symbolizes the quintessence of an inventor’s jolting inspiration, the Tsaos’ garage signifies the other side of entrepreneurship, an immigrant story of hard work and calculated risks. THE ENTREPRENEURIAL CLOCK Two decades after emigrating from Taiwan, Janie and Victor Tsao have created, in Victor’s words, a high-tech version of a “mom-and-pop Chinese restaurant,” dividing the work in half and watching costs with the tight fist of someone who turns out the light on leaving a room. They are both tall and straightforward and they are steeped in the minutiae of their company, even now with 300 employees. They are frugal but not cheap (until recently they drove a 12-year-old car, but it was a Mercedes) and they are willing to let their company permeate their life to an incredible degree. “We never set up any systems or boundaries, like not talking about work at dinner,” says Victor. Most important, they work hard and fast. They don’t fancy themselves as inventors; they are popularizers of technology, which means any advantage they have in a price-slashing, commodity market that includes brutal competitors like NetGear and D-Link comes from making the right intuitive leaps, getting out new products a few weeks faster, keeping costs down, and negotiating tough. Like not a few business owners before them, the Tsaos heard the entrepreneurial clock ticking: They were determined to be independent before they reached the age of 40. Victor was 37 and Janie was 35 when they decided to put to use their familiarity with Taiwan (where they’d met at Tamkang University). They were both working in information technology–Janie at Carter Hawley Hale and Victor at Taco Bell–and with Victor a step higher on the corporate ladder they decided that he would continue to punch the clock while Janie launched the business, a consultancy they named DEW International. The new company mated American technology vendors like Northgate Computer with Taiwanese manufacturers that could make their wares cheaply. Soon, one of those manufacturers brought them an idea. At the time, the cables used to connect printers and PCs could extend only 15 feet before the data began to degrade. To solve this, the manufacturer invented a setup that used telephone wire to extend the reach to 100 feet. This company needed someone to market the thing in the U.S. “With companies like that,” says Victor, “actual English was not their strength.” The manufacturer came up with products that connected multiple PCs to multiple printers, and the Tsaos renamed their company Linksys. Victor quit his job in 1991, and within two years Linksys had moved twice, eventually to a 2,000-square-foot office, and each month was selling 8,000 Multishares, as those units were called, through tech catalogs like Black Box. In these early years, the Tsaos invested $7,000 in Linksys, the only capital the company required until it tapped a bank loan for the one and only time, in 2001. (They paid that loan off in less than six months.) Linksys slowly expanded from printer-to-PC connectors to PC-to-PC Ethernet hubs, cards, and cords, gear that let small businesses and nerdy households connect computers so that they could share data. It was a niche market, and with 1994 revenue of $6.5 million the company was far from a behemoth. But slow growth was the only way the Tsaos could expand without taking on debt or investors. While Victor managed operations and finances as CEO, Janie handled sales in her job as vice president of business development. As Mike Wagner, the company’s director of marketing, puts it, “Janie brings the money in, Victor keeps everyone from spending it.” Frugality and a focus on the future were obvious in the Tsaos early on. While taking M.B.A. classes at Pepperdine in the mid-’80s, Victor met Bob Klein, who recalls Victor telling him that someday he would move to Newport Coast, far tonier than Irvine. The Tsaos made that dream a reality in 1997. Klein and Victor’s first business lunch occurred at the Japanese fast-food chain Yoshinoya–and they meet at comparable places to this day (though, Klein says, Victor has taken to picking up the check). Indeed, on the night the Cisco purchase was announced, there was no celebration. Instead, Victor ate a $5 dinner box at his desk. “It wasn’t good at all,” he admits. With the birth of Linksys, Victor took to working 100 hours a week, with occasional naps on the office floor. He involved himself in every part of the business, dealing with U.S. operations during the day and Taiwanese manufacturers at night, and his employees still know him for his 3 a.m. e-mails. He drew no salary until the mid-’90s–he refers to the preceding years as the “Linksys Peace Corp” era–while the couple and their two boys got by on Janie’s salary of $2,000 a month. Linksys operated with comparable leanness. Calvin Liu, a designer who Victor calls “Mr. Linksys Look and Feel,” first worked for the company as a freelancer in 1991. As it still does, Linksys produced its own graphics. Liu would photograph the products, scan the photos, send them to the printer, and later glue the labels to the product boxes. Linksys caught a crucial break in 1995. Until that point, tying computers together with Linksys gear required installing software. But when Microsoft moved from Windows 3.1 to Windows 95, it built in networking functions. Suddenly it was simple for small offices and homes to operate networks. Instantly Linksys’ potential market expanded. Janie attacked sales with tenacity. She went to the opening of a Fry’s Electronics store and watched in fascination as customers with full shopping carts queued up a dozen deep at the cashiers. “That really opened my eyes to the potential of retail,” she says. By 1995, Linksys was in Fry’s and revenue almost doubled, to $10.7 million. Still, if catalogs like Black Box and regional chains like Fry’s were good, national retailers were better. They promised the big score. The problem was that they were nearly impossible for a tiny company to crack. Janie wanted to get Linksys into Best Buy, but she called for months to no avail. Then, in April 1996, she attended RetailVision, a trade show intended to introduce manufacturers to retail buyers. Janie set her sights on Best Buy, and when she wasn’t able to make contact with Best Buy’s buyer–Wayne Inouye, now CEO of eMachines–at the scheduled sessions, she and a sales associate tracked him right to his hotel room door. They presented to Inouye right in his room and, amazingly, he ordered just under $2 million of gear. Janie kept cool until she made her way from Best Buy’s offices to her rented car. Then, in a move that is difficult to imagine for this sensible, focused woman, she started to scream. NO SECRETS, NO GENIUS Revenue doubled to $21.5 million in 1996, then leapt to $32.1 million in 1997 and $65.6 million in 1998. Linksys moved its headquarters to a 20,000-square-foot office. But success did not lead to extravagance. To this day, Victor and Janie file vacation forms like anyone else and all new employees–even executives–must endure a 90-day waiting period for benefits. No one is allowed to work from home, with the exception of a small mobile sales force. “Victor and Janie are willing to let good talent walk away if they’re not the right fit,” says the company’s human resources head, Niki Lee. “We could get the best VP of marketing out there and if Victor and Janie realize that he’s not hands-on, he wants an admin [administrative assistant], and he only wants to give orders and not be in the trenches, then they just won’t deal with it.” Not surprisingly, this lean, fast, hard-working environment, coupled with a pay scale that in Lee’s words is not “top dollar,” leads to a young work force (average age: 27) and high annual revenue per employee (about $1.8 million per full-time employee, compared with about $560,000 for Cisco). More surprising is that annual turnover is only 5%, compared with an industry average of 9%, according to Mercer Human Resources Consulting. Glen McLaughlin, vice president of North American sales for Linksys, attributes this to a culture in which employees are allowed to run their own projects. “We’ll give you enough rope to either hang yourself or be successful,” he says. McLaughlin tells of Victor and Janie letting him switch from 15 regional to three national product distributors in 1996 even though they doubted his rationale. Other than e-mails from Victor demanding updates, they did not meddle. Luckily for McLaughlin, it worked. “Victor and Janie really like to see people execute,” says Mike Wagner. “They’re not afraid to weed people out.” As home broadband Internet use began to bloom in the late ’90s, at costs significantly higher than those for dial-up connections, Victor realized that people were going to want to hook all their small-office or home computers to one line. To do so they would need a router, a high-tech cord splitter allowing multiple computers to hook into one modem. These already existed–Cisco was making its living off them–but at $500 and up they were too expensive and complicated for a non-techie home. So Victor ordered up the product that proved to be the turning point for Linksys: a $199 four-port router that employed an easy browserlike program to lead people through installation. After introducing the product at a trade show in late 1999–the first sub-$300 consumer router to market by three months–Linksys exploded. The company’s share of the networking market leapt from 10.8% in 1999 to 18.6% the following year, according to NPD TechWorld, an organization that tracks trends and consumer sales in the industry, and revenue went from $107.6 million to $206.5 million. “They invented consumer home networking,” says Steve Baker, an NPD analyst. The introduction of the four-port broadband router was in perfect tune with Linksys’ personality. The decision to go with it was based on intuition and listening to manufacturers, not drawn-out market studies. Liu handled the product design in-house, the price was cheap, and the technology was off-the-shelf. It was not a futurist’s invention but an obvious technology made easy. “Everyone knew in the late ’90s of the broadband explosion,” Victor says. “It wasn’t really a secret.” “I won’t say Victor has a vision for 10 years,” says Liu. “But I think he has a vision for two, which gives you a good chance to be successful if you do the right things.” With the industry’s eyes on them, Janie and Victor had to keep running. Janie continued to sign up catalogs, distributors, and retailers (the list now runs from Amazon.com to Radio Shack). Victor kept introducing products around the four-port broadband router–products such as cards that allowed laptops to connect to routers–while he looked for the next big thing. He found it in wireless networking. The only thing better than letting people connect all their computers to one modem was to let them connect without a cord. In January 2001, several months after a wireless transmission standard called 802.11b (or, less clumsily, Wi-Fi) was finalized, Linksys launched a system of wireless routers and computer cards. Though Linksys wasn’t first out of the gate this time, the brand was embedded in consumers’ minds, and in 2001 Linksys revenue and market share jumped to $346.7 million and 34.2%, respectively. Again the Tsaos had capitalized on a known technology by introducing inexpensive products before most of their competitors. In that way, Victor makes his moves in the open, much as he plays basketball, his only hobby. According to Roger Bundy, his Taco Bell boss, Victor telegraphs his basketball shots with his eyes. “Shorter people could block him because he’d announce to the world that he was going to shoot,” Bundy says. The difference here is that Linksys gets off the shot before its competitors get off the ground. Liu describes an instance last February when a Taiwanese manufacturer was in town. Victor asked him to come to a meeting at 10:30 on a Saturday night. The two men talked about a new design for a small-business product. The basics were decided that night–square instead of rectangular, gray and silver instead of blue and black–and by Monday the design was finalized. That’s not unusual. Malachy Moynihan, the company’s vice president for engineering, says Linksys and its Taiwanese partners were recently able to move a product from idea to production in three weeks. Sometimes Linksys even jumps ahead of itself. In fall 2002, while an industry board was finalizing a faster wireless standard called 802.11g, the Tsaos decided that they wanted to have 802.11g products in stores for Christmas, final standards be damned. After a September meeting with chipmaker Broadcom convinced them that users could easily upgrade the 802.11g chips with free software if the final standard changed, they plowed ahead. On December 24, Linksys launched its 802.11g products, beating its competitors by three months. It sold 300,000 units in the first two months. Again: no secrets, no particular genius. The company was fast, frugal, and right, as it had been before. Victor seems almost proud that his success is not built on something more spectacular. “There’s not a lot of difference,” he says. “We all went to business school or read books or listened to lectures. We all know we need to work hard, make sure capital is coming in, all these things. Execution is the key.” Linksys now owns 49% of the networking market, and Glen McLaughlin says it is aiming for 70% by 2005. Because the brand is so well known, Linksys products fetch a $20 or $30 premium over competitors’ wares. “Their dominance is unbelievable,” says CompUSA buyer Doug Lane. Linksys hit revenue of $430.4 million in 2002, and Ehud Gelblum, a JP Morgan analyst, estimates the company will pull in $538 million for the fiscal year ending this June. But the Tsaos have never stopped sweating the small stuff. Victor still occasionally answers customer-support calls and Dan Sherman, the Cisco senior vice president who led Cisco’s investigation of Linksys, was shocked when he brought up complaints he’d read on an Amazon.com message board and Victor not only knew the exact problems but had read the same board and responded to several of the posters. For her part, Janie continues to supply a straightforward approach to negotiating with retailers. CompUSA’s Lane describes her sales force as “definitely not shy,” and Todd Magnuson, a buyer at Best Buy, says, “The first time I met Janie, it was a short greeting and right into business. Very focused and very adamant on protecting their market share.” She isn’t all steel, though. “Janie impressed me because every year she would call at Christmastime and leave a holiday message,” says John Herr, a former Buy.com buyer who had received plenty of holiday cards before but never a phone call from a company founder. “It was a nice personal touch.” STILL DRIVEN Riding an essentially unbroken string of successes, the Tsaos weren’t particularly eager to sell their company. But it was–of course–a practical matter. More than 90% of Linksys’ revenue came from the U.S. and Canada, and the company didn’t have the cash or the infrastructure to expand overseas. More important, Dell, HP, and Microsoft are all aiming for the market, and Victor felt certain that eventually somebody would try to crowd Linksys out. Victor met with bankers from CSFB to examine raising money with a public offering. CSFB instead suggested a sale, and Victor agreed to consider it. The attraction for Cisco Systems was obvious: With a huge share of big-business networking but no small-business and home-office products, Cisco was hungry for a retail company. Cisco contacted the Tsaos in fall 2002, and by March 2003 a deal had been announced. Cisco would pay $500 million in stock for the company, which, except for a small employee stock option plan, was owned by Janie, Victor, and their two sons. As part of the deal, the Tsaos agreed to stay on for two years and Cisco agreed to let the company remain a standalone unit, something it had never done in its 80 other acquisitions. “Going forward, their biggest risk is that they stop being Linksys and become Cisco,” says NPD’s Baker. Victor says he wants to quit if that happens, but so far little seems different. Except for six Cisco transplants, the executives are the same, and the decision-making speed remains that of a small company. Mike Wagner describes going to the company’s new vice president general manager, a Cisco exec named Tushar Kothari, with plans for a $600,000 German ad campaign. “Within four days he had made the decision,” Wagner says. “Maybe it’s not one hour, but it’s not six weeks. He’s definitely got the spirit.” Linksys has started to sell an 18-product collection of wireless networking devices, including a wireless router and a wireless adapter that lets people link televisions and stereos to a network so MP3 songs can be streamed from computer to stereo and chosen on TV. And Cisco has launched Linksys offices in China, India, Australia, Hungary, and Italy, and has made it possible, for the first time, for Linksys to advertise on national cable and broadcast television. As for Janie and Victor, they’re traveling more to open new markets and Victor is saying he plans to retire in five years and maybe teach, a claim no one believes. “If there’s a contest for the most boring couple in Orange County,” says Janie, “I think Victor and I would win.” Victor is now 52, Janie 50, and the company has been their life for 15 years. Victor says he has no significant regrets, except in one area: his children. His sons are now in college. Sometimes Victor managed to play basketball with his boys, but too often, quality time together took the form of the kids coming to the warehouse on Saturdays to help ship products. That’s what 100-hour weeks will do. “From age 13 to 15, they just shot up, taller and taller,” says Victor. “Whoa, what happened?” But the family tries. Victor started to delegate more two years ago, and he’s down to about 70 hours a week. Last February he even found time to hook up a home network at his own house. The Tsaos have even taken a vacation. Last May the family took a car tour of the Grand Canyon. “For four days,” Victor says. “The four of us just drove.” Linksys’ Irvine headquarters is a modest, two-story structure in a pedestrian-unfriendly office park where people walk in the street because there is a dearth of sidewalks. Desk-high scuffmarks circle the walls where temporary tables were erected at a time when workers had to cram two to a cubicle, before Linksys opened its new warehouse and call center in 2001. An ad hoc photography studio overlooks the old warehouse space, where overflow customer service reps were once housed in temporary heated tents. In the back, Janie sits in a windowless office unadorned save for four art prints and neat piles of manila folders. In the front, a temporary divider splits the office that Victor shares with Kothari. Wearing a monogrammed white button-down, Victor looks surprisingly lively–considering that less than 24 hours before, he and Janie had returned from a four-day trip to Taiwan. The trek had started after a sleepless night (he’d worked through until morning, with only a 20-minute break to pack) and came four days after he’d returned from another 10-day Asian excursion. Victor’s dark office is as unadorned as Janie’s, except for a burst packing box on the floor and an AARP cord taped to his monitor in a mocking gesture at age. Soon Cisco will move the headquarters to something grander. That suburban garage may become legendary yet. Sidebar: Be Patient For the Tsos, growth is central, rewards are for later. 1988 Revenue: $500,000 Employees: 3 Janie and Victor Tsao form DEW International, later to become Linksys, in their garage. The company popularizes technology like this Multishare print server. 1991 Revenue: $1.5 million Employees: 4 Victor quits his IT job at Taco Bell and begins working 100-hour weeks. Linksys outgrows the Tsaos’ garage and moves to a real office. 1992 Revenue: $2.2 million Employees: 8 Linksys grows enough in one year to need an office upgrade and moves to a new 2,000-square-foot location. 1994 Revenue: $6.5 million Employees: 55 Victor starts to take a salary from Linksys. He is not the highest- paid employee and will never get a raise. 1997 Revenue: $32.1 million Employees: 60 Linksys debuts on the Inc. 500 list at No. 304. The Tsao family moves to a new home in Newport Coast, Calif. 2000 Revenue: $206 million Employees: 180 Having signed up distributors from Amazon to Radio Shack, Janie moves from a clear plastic cubicle to a windowless office. 2002 Revenue: $430 million Employees: 305 Linksys gets out ahead on the new Wi-Fi standard (and celebrates at a holiday party). Victor cuts back to 70 hours a week. 2003 Projected revenue: $538 million Employees: 305 Cisco Systems acquires Linksys for $500 million in stock. The Tsaos take a rare family vacation: four days in a car. Ian Mount is a New York City-based writer. His story about the bar chain Coyote Ugly appeared in the November 2003 issue.

2002 Web Awards Honorable Mention Winners

The following 10 companies, ranging from a one-person marketing agency to a famous cheesecake bakery, weren’t among the ultimate winners in the 2002 Inc Web Awards competition. But because all demonstrated outstanding returns — some financial, some less tangible — on their Web investments, judges decided they special recognition. So here are this year’s honorable-mention winners, along with a snapshot of the ROI payoffs that earned our judges’ admiration: Company: Advanced Circuits, Aurora, Colo.URL: www.4pcb.comWhat it does: Manufactures custom-printed circuit boardsWhat we liked: This bare-bones Web site won’t win any design awards, but CEO Ron Huston says it’s gotten great results, generating $15 million annually in new revenues. The site provides a range of self-service functions, including customized price quotes delivered in a few seconds, automatic order entry, and ability to check order status. Company: CustomInk LLC, Fairfax, Va.URL: www.customink.comWhat it does: Promotional product vendor; provides custom-printed T-shirts and other itemsWhat we liked: CEO Mark Katz credits Web site with helping company track and target on-line advertising. For instance, in September and October of 2002, CustomInk’s $33,221 expenditure on on-line ads reaped $337,407 in sales. Web technology also helps CustomInk reduce errors from the industry average of 8-12% to less than 2%. Company: Beverly Shores Group, Beverly Shore, Ind.URL: www.beverlyshoresgroup.com What it does: Marketing communications agencyWhat we liked: Web site allows soloist Deborah S. Ramstorf to attract clients from Canada and Australia as well as the United States; she now receives 60% of her business via the Internet. She credits search engine placement and content on her Web site as two ways she drives traffic — and sales. Over 75% of her total sales come from her on-line presence. “My Web site has definitely been worth the investment,” Ramstorf adds. Company: Eli’s Cheesecake Co., ChicagoURL: www.elicheesecake.comWhat it does: Dessert bakeryWhat we liked: The famous cheesecake-maker’s Web site lets customers design their own customized “C-Cakes” on-line. Buyers choose from among 800 options for toppings (such as whipped cream or chocolate mousse), decorations (such as gummy bears, marshmallows, or sprinkles), and personal messages. On-line sales increased 65% since Eli’s introduced the $49 product in September 2000. Company: My Virtual Corp., Louisville, Ky.URL: www.myvirtualcorp.com What it does: Business service outsourcer; provides virtual work teams for client projects What we liked: CEO Merrily Orsini credits Web site with helping produce an 120% increase in new clients in 2001; monthly revenues in 2002 exceeded previous year’s by an average of 450%. Company: Recom Group Inc., San Dimas, Calif. URL: www.recomgroup.com and 12 related industry-specific sites What it does: Provides displays for merchandising of products and servicesWhat we liked: In 1999, Recom Group made $5,000 on-line. The company expects to finish 2002 with approximately $2 million in sales. Thanks to sales through spin-off sites like cardboarddisplays.com and musicdisplays.com, 55% of those sales come from the Internet. Company: ROI Teleservicing Corp., Weston, Fla. URL: www.teleplaza.com What it does: Consulting firm; specializes in call centers and customer-service operationsWhat we liked: Web site serves as a telecom industry portal, serving clients by offering well-organized collection of links to 850 relevant sites. This year, Teleplaza.com saw a 94% renewal rate on paid listings, which is up from 78% in 2001. CEO Jim Moylan credits a related site, CallCenterJobs.com, with increasing overall revenues by 35% over the past two years and attracting 18 new paid advertisers for the TelePlaza Digest e-mail newsletters. Several new products added to both CallCenterJobs.com and TelePlaza.com also have increased the company’s overall sales by 45% since September. Company: Shoebuy.com, BostonURL: www.shoebuy.comWhat it does: On-line shoe retailer What we liked: Web site helps customers overcome reluctance to buy shoes without trying them on. Revenues continue to increase by 50% per quarter. Shoebuy.com spends less than $7 per customer acquired for an average transaction of nearly $84, resulting in nearly a $30 profit per transaction. Company: The Wireless Source Inc., Bloomfield Hills, Mich. URL: www.thewirelesssource.com What it does: Distributes new, used, and remanufactured wireless phones What we liked: Web site automates sales, customer service, and returns processing. CEO Bob Sullivan credits site with expanding the company’s prospect base by 300% and its customer base by 25%. It’s also generated more than $1 million in new business and reduced costs by allowing customers to process their own returns, without employee intervention. Says Sullivan: “Our best ROI is yet to come.” Company: VirtualBank Mortgage, Palm Beach Gardens, Fla. URL: www.virtualbankmortgage.com What it does: Mortgage lender; specializes in “jumbo” and “super jumbo” mortgages of $200,000 to $4 millionWhat we liked: VirtualBank Mortgage credits its Web site with increasing its average monthly loan volume by 50% and saving nearly $8,000 per week by eliminating the company’s massive fax barrages to its partners. Because customers can now check their own loan status anytime, the site has also cut the number of incoming telephone inquiries by 90%.

Watching You Watching

High concept You know the scene: Jerry Seinfeld is in his car, executing an ambiguous gesture involving his finger and his nose. The model he’s dating catches him. She’s sure it was a pick. Jerry insists it was a scratch. The relationship is history. Now there’s a technology that could settle the argument. FaceLab, which was unveiled by its maker, Seeing Machines Inc., in March, is a camera-enabled computer system that tracks head position and facial and eye motion in three dimensions. Installed on a vehicle’s dashboard, FaceLab can trip a warning signal when the driver’s attention flags. Companies that design air-traffic control or nuclear-reactor panels can use it to determine ergonomically efficient layouts of instruments. And media consultants can track the eye movements of people who are watching TV commercials. “It’s for anyone who’s trying to understand how people interact when they’re using a particular machine,” says Alex Zelinsky, CEO of the one-year-old company. That wasn’t FaceLab’s original purpose. Zelinsky began developing the technology in 1996 to allow people with disabilities to instruct robots by using head gestures and eye movements. The robots would “act like a helping hand,” says Zelinsky, picking up items or bringing food to the user’s mouth. The project, which was funded by organizations for the disabled, eventually ran out of money. Volvo Technological Development then picked up the tab and took FaceLab in a mass-market direction. So far, Seeing Machines, which is based in Canberra, Australia, has shipped 10 of the $25,000 devices to customers like Toyota’s R&D labs and Delphi Automotive Systems. The start-up hopes for sales of $1 million this year. Incubator High Concept Watching You Watching The Multipurpose Multiplex Sight for Sore Eyes Racket Busters Dossier In the Line of Pliers Search InfoPosse Main Street The Bucks Stop Here Markets Hot Stuff Seen Burnt Offerings 60-Second Business Plan Prozac Notion Please e-mail your comments to editors@inc.com.