TechCrunch Writer Sounds Off About Ignoring 15,000 E-Mails

Popular tech writers say responding to e-mail can cause people to send more. Is not responding to messages acceptable today?
office-space-fax

About a month ago I posted a story about two tech writers who decided upon opposite ways to deal with e-mail overload. IT World’s Dan Tynan vowed to deal with every message delivered to his inbox for a week, which he said worked pretty well. TechCrunch’s MG Siegler ditched e-mail altogether, pronouncing that if you wanted to reach him you’d have to get to him a different way. Siegler’s month is up and after ignoring the roughly 15,000 messages he received during that time, it’s no wonder he says never has he missed anything less than e-mail.

While he did cheat a little and had to respond to 43 emails that involved work or travel arrangements, generally he says he was able to get his work done using other conduits such as Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn.

Here’s some of what he wrote:

“Here’s the key takeaway that became very clear in the past month: the vast majority of emails are unnecessary. Even if you think they’re important at the time you get them, they’re usually not. Our brains are just hard-wired to respond to emails because society has taught us it’s rude not to. We think of them as letters — even the icons for apps like Gmail and Mac Mail make us think of them this way. It’s rude not to respond to a letter…Such courtesy should go right out the same window that the U.S. Postal Service is heading out of…

Further, another thing I learned in not responding to emails is something I’ve long suspected: one of the biggest problems with email is that when you do respond, it often prompts another response in return. This is due to the very thing I just mentioned: people think it’s rude not to respond. This creates a vicious cycle of a potentially perpetual email chain. And it often happens fast and furious. By not responding, you cut this chain off before it begins. And again, most emails are unnecessary, so an even greater percentage of responses are unnecessary. We shouldn’t feel bad not responding.”

While tech blogger Robert Scoble mostly disagrees with Siegler’s views on the subject and sees several ways communicating with e-mail is better than using the alternate methods Siegler preferred, his sentiments are similar in one way. In a blog post the other day he wrote:

“…I don’t answer people back anymore if I don’t have a good answer. Why not? Answering them back just causes them to SEND YOU MORE EMAIL!”

What’s your view? Is it acceptable today to not answer an email?

Read more at TechCrunch.

This entry was posted in E-mail and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • Dave

    The answer is simple: it depends.

    Is it a potential client asking for information?  Darn right I’ll answer it.  Is it someone trying to sell me something I haven’t asked about?  The answer is NO, no matter what medium they use to get hold of me.  And, of course, there are numerous other variables that go into the answer.

  • http://twitter.com/TVPirates TV Pirates

    “one of the biggest problems with email is that when you do respond, it often prompts another response in return.” Most anti-social quote of the day. This “problem” already has a name; “dialog.”

  • http://twitter.com/elitesourcebook Elitesourcebook

    This is a great example of the rudeness of society today. Granted, a lot of e-mail is automated  or promotional in nature. And unsolicited e-mails can get burdensome at times not to mention the whole information overload issue. But there was a time when people would help one another. Listen to each other and respond. Even if you didn’t know them. Now, people will look at their watches and come up with an excuse even if they saw a guy drowning. We say we don’t have the time.  When in reality, we don’t have the courtesy and find ourselves way too important to be bothered.  Unless of course, its going to make us money…right now. Communication by real people (non-automated) should be treated like is is actually coming from a real human being. Try to show some respect and treat others like you would like to be treated. I’m sure if your e-mails, phone calls, etc. were being ignored, you would feel differently.

  • Anonymous

    I agree that it’s time to rethink our communication strategies. Using filters taught me that more than 90% of the email I receive is unnecessary. I have changed my tune on responding to everything that lands in my inbox, and in truth not everything needs a response. If someone emails you back acknowledging receipt and letting you know they’ll get back to you with edits/changes or when they review, you let them. They got it you both know it, one more email is pointless. We can all be a bit more judicious in what we send and less demanding of “instant” responses. 

  • ErikM

    I was quite amused by this article and the attempt to be cool with no email. However, email is actually the ultimate mashup. You get everything in one place, without having to log on to to multiple social or related sites. This is what is creating information overload, not email. I was at a conference recently where most of the audience in the deep-dive sessions was constantly tweeting, checking Facebook, and otherwise buried in their iPads…also trying to instantly respond to every possible interaction to remain in the cool and now. Honestly, if you get too much email, just delete the ones that are not relevant and respond to the ones that are. Dialog as “TV Pirates” wrote here is what is important, but with email we can actually have at least an online dialog in one place. Otherwise I recommend we all get out more for real face-to-face interaction…